Case Study Ethics Frazier Chemical Incorporated Company

Topics: Ethics, Social responsibility, Deontological ethics Pages: 5 (848 words) Published: May 8, 2015
Crisis at Komfy
Topic: Ethics
Purpose Statement: To determine possible cause of action at Komfy Introduction
Ethics considers the best possible way in which people cohabit and live. It also determines which actions are right or wrong depending on the situation at hand. In corporate practice, ethics defines the moral practice of the owners, employees, as well as the society at large (Bloomfield, 54). Chris Kross in his capacity as the chief engineer at Frazier Chemical Incorporated Company is duty bound by the ethics code to do what is ethically correct for the well-being of the company. However, he must keep in mind the good of the society in which Frazier Chemical Incorporated company operates. Frazier Chemical Incorporated Company poses a threat to the society through its disposal of PRTZ chemical to Komfy Lake. This action also violates the rules stipulated by US Environmental Protection Agency. Ethical codes are not considered by the officials of the company since they are aware of the problem but disregard the long-term effects caused by the effluent flowing into the lake. In the conspiracy, is the EPA official Chuck Chance, who does regular inspections at the company but due to his relationship with the President of the company, overlooks the issue. By so doing, the individuals involved break the rules of morality and ethics hence presenting Chris Kross with a dilemma on the best way to handle the misgivings of his boss and the EPA official. Evaluation solution theories

Basing on the evaluation solution theories, Kris is presented with a number of solutions to curtail the threat posed to the community by Frazier Chemical Incorporated Company. Stockholder theory in collaboration with utilitarianism presents him with the first possible cause of action. Interests of the company come first in his priorities. He should also apply normative ethics. This implies that his moral action should maximize the economic well-being of the company. Moreover, Kris should consider the nature of his freedom and the degree of his individual rights. Consideration of his rights and freedom gives him social and legal framework to operate on in his undertaking of the duties and responsibilities bestowed upon him by Frazier Chemical Incorporated Company. Justice theory, on the other hand, prescribes that whatever cause of action undertaken should consider the best interest of those involved. The society, the government, employees of Frazier Chemical Incorporated Company, as well as the EPA official's interest, should be looked into before Kris decides on which is the best solution to the problem at hand. The categorical imperative theory presents pure practical reason. Kris should consider which means best delivers the desired results since the end justifies the means. Basing on this theory, however, does not stipulate which is the best means to be undertaken hence a conscious decision is left on his hands. A moral decision should be taken without reference to the participants of the problem at hand. This aspect makes morality valid universally (Sims, 328). According to the front page test, Kris should consider his feelings in the event that the actions of the company ever go to press. The test will help him analyze his actions and the perceptions it will pass across to the members of the public. It is an honorable thing to be reasonable since it will enable Kris to make a conscious decision on what cause of action is most appropriate to undertake given his position and the situation at hand. Suppose the truth about the long-term effect of the effluent being discharged into Komfy Lake is exposed, would he be guilty and uncomfortable? Consideration of this question will make him determine his stand. If he is uncomfortable, the best alternative measure is to stop the activities of the company as far as his capacity is concerned. Consequences

Each and every consideration available to Kris has dire...

Cited: Bloomfield, Paul. Morality and Self-Interest. Oxford University Press, 2008. Print
Sims, R. Ronald. Ethics and Corporate Social Responsibility: Why Giants Fall. Praeger, 2003. Print
Continue Reading

Please join StudyMode to read the full document

You May Also Find These Documents Helpful

  • Business Ethics Case Study Essay
  • Ethic Case Study Essay
  • Media Ethic Case Study Essay
  • Ethics Case Study Eth501 Essay
  • Ethics Case Study Essay
  • ESR case study Essay
  • Ethics Case Study Research Paper
  • Business Ethics Case Study Research Paper

Become a StudyMode Member

Sign Up - It's Free