After reading the scenario, we know that the Woodson Foundation is a large nonprofit social service agency, which is teaming up with the public school system is Washington, D.C., to improve student outcomes. According to the textbook, I identify the stage of Woodson Foundation is in the norming stage, which is having close relationship develop and the group demonstrates cohesiveness. Team cohesion refers to the mutual attraction attractiveness of the team members, members of the team cohesion, and team members, team cohesion is not only a necessary condition for the existence of maintaining the team, but the team has the potential to play a very important role. If a team loses cohesion, it is impossible to complete the task entrusted to the organization itself will lose the conditions exist. A social psychologist has said that what the cohesion do is to enable members of the group to stay together in groups, which is a kind of interpersonal attraction, attraction it had some similarities mechanics, such as a personal in the play "meteor ball", the meteor ball turn around with center.
The primary question that the Woodson Foundation is facing is to figure out the conflict in the development team. Because each group has its own interests, and in some cases these are directly opposed to one another. The second problem is that how to distribute the job for different candidates. In the scenario, the development team is consisted of three individuals- HR representatives from the Woodson Foundation, the schools, and the NCPIE. However, they have some different opinions for controlling, I mean that parents want to know more about their kids in school, the school thinks that they should have the most power. In my point of view, I agree with what Victoria Adams said. She mentioned that the schools and the foundation need to have larger roles then the parents and communities, like Duane said, the class sizes get bigger, and scores and graduation rates go down,