Preview

case profile

Satisfactory Essays
Open Document
Open Document
266 Words
Grammar
Grammar
Plagiarism
Plagiarism
Writing
Writing
Score
Score
case profile
Case Profile/Summary
J.D Williams is an investment advisory firm that manages more than $120 million in fund for its clients. The firm uses an asset allocation model for investment recommendations of three funds: growth fund, income fund, and money market fund. General guidelines that must be followed in growth fund are between 20% and 40% of total portfolio value. The other two funds are between 20% and 50%. At least 30% of total portfolio value must be in money market fund. Williams just contracted with a new client who has $800,000 to invest. Williams assigned a maximum risk index of 0.05 for the client. The firm’s risk indicators show the risk of the growth fund at 0.10, the income fund at 0.07, and the money market fund at 0.01. Furthermore, Williams is forecasting annual yields of 18% for the growth fund, 12.5% for the income fund, and 7.5% for money market fund. Williams wants to find the optimal investment amount from $800,000 to invest among the three funds.

4. Looking at the risk of 0.10 and 0.07 of growth fund and income fund, the client may choose a less aggressive strategy approach by limiting the growth fund’s investment amount to equal, but not exceed the amount invested in the income fund. This change in investment strategy would induce a lower annual yield of $85,067, than the projected annual return of $94,133 by the original risky recommendation.
Due to annual yield of 18% growth fund and 12.5% income fund, the growth fund will give higher return in comparison to income fund. But the growth fund contains higher risk (0.10). In conclusion, more amount should be invested in growth fund if the goal is more annual yield.

You May Also Find These Documents Helpful

  • Good Essays

    Case Brief

    • 797 Words
    • 4 Pages

    Title of Case: Stoneridge Investment Partners, LLC, Petitioner v. Scientific-Atlanta, Inc., et al. 128 S. Ct. 761 (2008)…

    • 797 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Satisfactory Essays

    Case Brief

    • 352 Words
    • 2 Pages

    Facts: In 1998, investigative reporting team, Jane Akre and her husband Steve Wilson, brought suit against their employer WVTV, a subsidiary of Fox TV, under violation of Florida’s whistle-blower statutes. They argued that the station had terminated their employment under grounds of retaliation because the team refused to suppress and distort the contents of a story regarding the controversial Bovine Growth Hormone in Florida’s cattle. Additional claims also brought forth included declaratory relief and breach of contract. After a four-week trial, a jury found against Wilson on all of his claims. Akre decided to drop allegations concerning declaratory relief and the court allowed for continuance based on her whistle-blower claims. The jury granted a monetary award of $425,000 in damages to Akre based on retaliation claims established by whistle-blower statute.…

    • 352 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Satisfactory Essays
  • Satisfactory Essays

    Case Brief

    • 421 Words
    • 2 Pages

    Michael Huck was discriminated because he was on a wheelchair and didn’t get the same benefit as other humans who are in the back rows. He didn’t have the choice of seats which was available to others so basically for him to watch a movie; he would have to sit in the front row of the theatre. They also said if he wanted to sit at the back rows, he would have to get up but he’s a disability person. He didn’t have the opportunity like others.…

    • 421 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Satisfactory Essays
  • Good Essays

    Case Brief

    • 455 Words
    • 2 Pages

    FACTS Rumarson Technologies, Inc. (RTI) sued Robert and Percy Helmer to collect from them personally $24,965 owed to it by Event Marketing, Inc. (EMI) when EMI's check to pay RTI bounced. Robert and Percy Helmer were authorized signatories on EMI's corporate account, and they signed the check. RTI argued that as signatories they could be held personally liable. The lower court agreed and ruled in favor of RTI holding the Helmers liable. The Helmers appealed. Also of note, is that check was dated 1998 although there is some non-material dispute as to whether it was August 14, 1998, or on or around July 13, 1998.…

    • 455 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    Case Brief

    • 259 Words
    • 2 Pages

    The discovery of facts that demonstrate that a valid warrant was unnecessarily broad does not retroactively invalidate the warrant.…

    • 259 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Satisfactory Essays

    Case Brief

    • 329 Words
    • 2 Pages

    ANALYSIS: In general, the state’s judicial viewpoint as to how firmly the testator must comply with pertinent statutes varies. Common law required total compliance with procedures. Some states require total compliance but current trends seem to require only substantial…

    • 329 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Satisfactory Essays
  • Better Essays

    2. Calculate the expected rate of return on each of the five investment alternatives listed in Exhibit 13.1. Based solely on expected returns, which of the potential investments appear best?…

    • 1578 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Better Essays
  • Good Essays

    Case Brief

    • 551 Words
    • 2 Pages

    Facts: Maryland police arrested a man named Alonzo Jay King, in 2009 for first and second degree assault charges and booked into the Wicomico County, Maryland, facility, where booking personnel took a cheek swab (“buccal swab”) to take a DNA sample pursuant to the Maryland DNA collection Act. The swab was matched up to an unsolved 2003 rape case. The police had collected the 2003 DNA sample from the rape victim who underwent a sexual assault forensic exam. A police detective presented the matching 2009 and 2003 DNA to a grand jury, the grand jury indicted King for first-degree rape. Later in 2009, the detective obtained a search warrant and collected a second DNA sample from King that also matched the 2003 sample.…

    • 551 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    Case Brief

    • 1484 Words
    • 6 Pages

    This case in Fenton, Missouri involves 17 yrs. old Christopher Simmons born in 1993. Charles Benjamin and John Tessmer were Christopher Simmons friends and accomplices. Christopher Simmons planned and committed a capital murder along with Charles Benjamin. The plan was to commit burglary and murder by breaking and entering, tying up Shirley Crook, and tossing her off a bridge. The three boys met at 2am in the morning however, Tessmer then dropped out of the plan. Simmons and Benjamin broke into Mrs. Crook's home, bound her hands and covered her eyes. They put Mrs. Crook in a minivan drove her to a state park and threw her off a bridge. Once the case was brought to trial court, the evidence was solid and overwhelming. Simmons had confessed to the murder, performed a videotaped reenactment at the crime scene, and there was testimony from John Tessmer against him that showed premeditation. After the crime Christopher discussed the plot in advance and later bragged about the crime. After 2 hours of investigation Christopher broke down and confessed. At trial the State introduced Simmons confession and the videotaped reenactment of the crime, along with testimony that Simmons discussed the crime in advance and him bragging to fellow classmates about it later. The defense called no witnesses due to the evidence and confession. The jury having returned a verdict of murder, the trial proceeded to the penalty phase. The jury returned a guilty verdict. The jury recommended a death sentence in which the trial court imposed despite Christopher not having a criminal background. The State charged Simmons with burglary, kidnaping, stealing, and murder in the first degree. Simmons was 17 at the time of the crime. He was outside the criminal jurisdiction of Missouri’s juvenile court system. Charles Benjamin and was…

    • 1484 Words
    • 6 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    Case Brief

    • 664 Words
    • 3 Pages

    The court decided that the removal of the cameras that were placed in the park to collect footage of the deer culling was not in violation of the First Amendment. The reason that it did not violate the First Amendment is because although the park is a public area for all to see and visit, the recordings took place during times that the park was closed to the public. This means that S.H.A.R.K. has not right to the access of the video footage of the deer culling. The court also came to the…

    • 664 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Satisfactory Essays

    The author states the dangers of investing aggressively when a person is young. The rationale behind this is because some that is young is able to risk a loss more so than an older individual. The author indicates this is often misleading and younger individuals should save their money, invest conservatively, and watch the returns increase over time. By using this method a person can actually see more of a return than some who gets a return right away but may lose it all after one hasty bad investment.…

    • 444 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Satisfactory Essays
  • Good Essays

    Case Brief

    • 741 Words
    • 3 Pages

    1. Applications for asylum may not be made against the wishes of a parent of a child that lacks the mental capacity to request asylum and a third party cannot speak on behalf of a minor because it is the right of a…

    • 741 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Satisfactory Essays

    positioning report

    • 749 Words
    • 3 Pages

    2. Simulate 1000 iterations of the two strategies over the six-year period. Create a histogram of the final fund values. Based on your simulation results, which of the two strategies would you recommend? Why?…

    • 749 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Satisfactory Essays
  • Good Essays

    The client’s investment policy is less of a passive strategy and therefore has a higher level of risk tolerance. The client’s needs allow him to use a longer time horizon, meaning he does not need to use him funds right now. His main objective is to invest in multiple sectors and spreading out his investments. He is not concerned about maintaining a stable market and the liquidity of his assets, and more on outpacing inflation and his capital appreciation. Based on the Client’s results from the Investment Guideline Survey, we have concluded the best allocation of cash, stocks, and bonds would be a balanced Growth and Income.…

    • 1266 Words
    • 6 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    A moderate-risk mutual fund. Based on the information Brian provided her, Preeti estimates that with…

    • 835 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Good Essays

Related Topics