The first reason I agree with Michael Levin’s theory that torture is sometimes vindicated is because morals demand it. Torture may help to save lives. If the use of an unpleasant method will save more lives, it is foolish to not save those lives. Levin offers the example of a situation involving a bomb going off in a certain amount of time that would risk the lives of millions. If authorities refuse to take extreme measures such as torture to gain information necessary to save lives, they are failing to deliver the moral duty of protecting …show more content…
Torture aids in discouraging an individual from committing evil acts. The techniques involved in torture may dissuade an individual from harming others, therefore, upholding order in society. Order is also maintained through the terrorist facing repercussions to try to combat his evil act. The terrorist makes the decision to harm innocent people, but the victims did not want to be a part of this. Therefore, order is upheld because a clear message is sent through torture that these evil acts will not be tolerated. Torture also maintains order by showing that when people choose to harm others, they are taking inherent risks. Since people who commit these acts know that risks are built in, methods such as torture may be used by authorities to help maintain control over society. Besides, the need for torture to maintain order, it is also necessary for another