Preview

Case and Law Review - Search and Seizure

Good Essays
Open Document
Open Document
1838 Words
Grammar
Grammar
Plagiarism
Plagiarism
Writing
Writing
Score
Score
Case and Law Review - Search and Seizure
Abstract
The Fourth Amendment is concerned with privacy along with search and seizure restrictions that apply in public schools, but, the Courts give school officials and police more flexibility to conduct searches in school. In this case and law review you will learn about two different cases where Courts balance a student’s privacy rights against the school’s interest in safety and student discipline. This means that students often have less protection against what they might perceive as unreasonable searches and seizures at school, than in other places. The Fifth Amendment is concerned with fundamental fairness. This means that school officials cannot hold or punish a student without stating the reason and providing an opportunity to contest the charges.

In the case of New Jersey v. T.L.O., a New Jersey high school student was accused of violating school rules by smoking in the bathroom, leading an assistant principal to search her purse for cigarettes. The vice principal found marijuana and other items that made it look like the student was dealing the drug. The student tried to have the evidence from her purse covered up. Her argument was that mere possession of cigarettes was not a violation of school rules; therefore, a desire for evidence of smoking in the restroom did not justify the search. Although the court concluded that the Fourth Amendment did apply to searches carried out by school officials, it held that "a school official may properly conduct a search of a student's person if the official has a reasonable suspicion that a crime has been or is in the process of being committed, or reasonable cause to believe that the search is necessary to maintain school discipline or enforce school policies ("New jersey v.," 1985)." Here the Court recognized two things. First, it reaffirmed the role of the school in loco parentis, but it also recognized that school officials are representatives of the State. The Supreme



References: (2005). Chapter 12. students and student services (No. 12.14). Retrieved from website: http://www.pacode.com/secure/data/022/chapter12/chap12toc.html Fourth amendment - search and seizure. (2013). Retrieved from http://constitution.findlaw.com/amendment4/amendment.html (1975). Goss v. lopez (No. 73-898). Retrieved from website: http://www.law.cornell.edu/supct/html/historics/USSC_CR_0419_0565_ZS.html Supreme Court of New Jersey, (1985). New jersey v. t. l. o. (No. 83-712). Retrieved from website: http://caselaw.lp.findlaw.com/scripts/getcase.pl?court=US&vol=469&invol=325

You May Also Find These Documents Helpful

  • Satisfactory Essays

    Student's Fourth Amendment rights shouldn't be limited in schools, but they still are. In school students' privacy is being invaded legally. There's no warrant needed to search students on school grounds. They could be unreasonable searches. School authority shouldn't be allowed to search students. Limiting rights in certain places is unconstitutional and shouldn't be…

    • 696 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Satisfactory Essays
  • Good Essays

    In Safford Arizona school on October 8th, officials strip-searched a 13-year-old girl after they received information from another student that the girl possessed "prescription strength" 400 mg ibuprofen and 200mg naproxen. While attending math, assistant principle Kerry Wilson entered the classroom and instructed Savanna Redding's to his office. Upon entering, she immediately noticed her planner placed on his desk. However, what she didn't recognize was the knife, cigarette and lighter that was contained inside it. Admitting the planner was hers, she explained to the assistant principle that she had lent the planner prior to her classmate, Marissa and had NO knowledge of what was inside it. Also brought to her attention was a large white bottle of ibuprofen that was also found in the planner. Unsatisfied, the assistant principle asked to also search the rest of her belongings in order to disprove her claim. When no evidence was found, he proceeded to send her to the school's nurses office for what can be considered a strip-search. She was told to remove a clothing and in the processes her private areas (breast) were exposed. Complete embarrassed, she remained calm and did as she was told. No pills, or any other illegal item was found on her. Naturally, when Savanna 's mom discovered this she "dropped the bomb" and filed a lawsuit saying it violated her daughter's fourth amendment right (which was the right thing to do)and that she was never contacted during the search at anytime. Proceeding to the trial, the District court found no violation and a panel agreed, but on the appeal in a "en banc decision 6-5" the court reversed the other decision saying that it DID in fact violate her fourth amendment right. School district appealed to the Supreme Court and approved there appeal and granted certiorari. It was reasoned that the strip search was not justified nor was the scope of intrusion reasonably…

    • 899 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    The Issue before the court was that two high school sophomores Lindsay Earls and Daniel James along with their families challenged their schools drug testing policy as an unlawful search that violated student’s right to privacy. They alleged that their policy requiring students to consent to random urinalysis testing for drug use violated the Fourth Amendment to the United States Constitution.…

    • 710 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    An example of a search subject to the demands of the 4th amendment is a state-compelled collection and testing of urine, including the requirements of the Student Athlete Drug Policy, which was determined by the Skinner v. Railway Labor Executives’ Association 1989 (11). By the case New Jersey v. T.L.O. 1985, the State’s power, in public schools, is tutelary and custodial over students. This allows a higher degree of supervision and control that other…

    • 1137 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    This case brings the question up of was T.LO's rights broken or not. The fourth amendment is the right of the people to be secure in their persons, houses, papers, and effects, against unreasonable searches and seizures, shall not be violated, and no warrants shall issue, but upon probable cause, supported by oath or affirmation, and particularly describing the place to be searched, and the persons or things to be seized. T.L.O is the person who sued because she felt that the contents in her bag were only found because it was searched unlawfully. In Juvenile Court it was decided that there had been no Fourth Amendment violation. T.L.O was searched without probably cause of any illegal activity. The fact that she was smoking cigarettes in school have the principle no reason to think she is dealing marijuana.…

    • 314 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Satisfactory Essays

    The case study “The Twenty Dollar Bill” involves students and their Fourth Amendment rights. The Fourth Amendment to the U.S. Constitution states that citizens are free from unreasonable search and seizure from the government. However, school administration (an extension of government) does have the power to implement searches and seizures that may be outside of the constitutional scope in order to maintain good order and discipline in the school. This is evidenced by the Supreme Court case New Jersey vs. T.L.O where the Supreme Court ruled that requiring schools to obtain warrants for searches would interfere with the swift and informal disciplinary procedures needed in schools. However, the Supreme Court also stated that there must be reasonable grounds to conduct a search and it is limited to individualized suspicion and not group searches. Students do not shed their constitutional rights when they enter school grounds.…

    • 364 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Satisfactory Essays
  • Good Essays

    Constitutional Policing

    • 986 Words
    • 4 Pages

    Weeks v. United States. 232 United States. 383. (1914). Retrieved from http://scholar.google.com/scholar_case?case=8676110639881267815&hl=en&as_sdt=2&as_vis=1&oi=scholarr (This case outlines the case law around constitutional policing in the United States.)…

    • 986 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    Firstly, the students see the searches of their lockers is an invasion of property given by the school itself "The biggest drawback to a school locker search is the lack of trust students may feel as a result of actions they see as an invasion of privacy. Because students may keep personal items in their lockers, such as photographs and personal letters, even a search with the best intentions can appear to be a major breach of trust by teachers and administrators, causing a rift between the student body and the faculty" (classroom-synonym) the evidence states that the searches would be negative in many ways. First being a violation of the 4th amendment, and second, searches decrease the trust between teacher and students in an environment where the teachers require the students to trust them. In addition, the students feel that it is a violation of their privacy. Students question why they are being targeted. Some schools say that the lockers are their property, however backpacks are the students’ private property, but schools state that whatever comes to school, the teachers are obliged to search if reasonable (classroom-synonym). In the case of New Jersey v T.L.O, although the bag was owned by…

    • 713 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    Amendment 4 “Search and Seizure” talks about, and legalizes “The rights of the people to be secure in their persons, houses, papers, and effects, against unreasonable searches and seizures, shall not be violated, and no Warrants shall issue, but upon probable cause, supported by Oath or affirmation, and particularly describing the place to be searched, and the persons or things to be seized.” The fourth amendment protects the rights of an individual so they are not wrongfully or illegally searched.…

    • 340 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    Essay On Security Checks

    • 955 Words
    • 4 Pages

    Some of these include doing more drug searches, locker checks, and bag checks. The fourth amendment in the United States Constitution states that search and seizure is prohibited unless there is a probable cause and requires a warrant for actions to be taken. (US Constitution) This keeps schools from searching the students personal property unless there is a legal reason to do so. Many schools provide drug searches where an authority figure, such as a police officer, will come into the school with drug dogs. These dogs are trained to recognize the scent of many illegal drugs such as marijuana, cocaine, and heroin. If one of these substances is scented by the dogs, an authority figure may search the area. In bigger cities where violence incidents are more common, schools have placed metal detectors at the main entrance of the building. (School Security) This helps to keep dangerous, metallic, items such as guns or knives out of the…

    • 955 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    Best V. New Jersey Case

    • 897 Words
    • 4 Pages

    School administrators and law enforcement officers have different regulations when a search or seizure is being conducted, especially concerning that of a minor. School administrators only need reasonable suspicion to search a student while law enforcement officers must have probable cause. In the cases of Best V. New Jersey and Safford V. Redding, the issues of search and seizure of a student in school are laid out in different scenarios that clearly portray the difference between a constitutional search and an unconstitutional search. The concept of reasonable suspicion is sufficient for the extended search in the Best V. New Jersey case because the student was in clear violation of school policy and the search was necessary to maintain safety and order in the school;…

    • 897 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Satisfactory Essays

    A teacher found two girls smoking in the bathroom in a school located in New Jersey. Upon arrival to the principal’s office for disciplinary actions, one of the girls admitted to smoking, while the other (whose initials are T.L.O.) denied any wrongdoing. The principal ended up searching the girl’s purse which contained evidence to prove she was smoking in the bathroom along with marijuana paraphernalia. She eventually admitted to using this paraphernalia for selling marijuana in school. Using the evidence found within the purse and the confession, she was charged and taken into juvenile court where she was eventually sentenced to a year’s probation. T.L.O argued that her 4th amendment rights had been violated…

    • 263 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Satisfactory Essays
  • Good Essays

    This case established limitations on our 4th amendment right under school property. The majority opinion should be right one because in order to…

    • 310 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    The Four-Part Action Plan

    • 799 Words
    • 4 Pages

    The four-part action plan to rectify the situation was done with the intent to promote the success of all students. Step 1 of the action plan involved contacting the school district’s legal department because I am aware that Essex factually stated that “the Fourth Amendment of the U.S. Constitution provides protection of all citizens against unreasonable search and seizure” (2011). I am also aware that “the major challenge facing school personnel involves the task of delicately balancing the student’s individual right to Fourth Amendment protection against the school’s duty to provide a safe and secure environment for all students” (2011). Because Mrs. Cole left her classroom unattended to do the search, it could be argued that she was not…

    • 799 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    Attempts to define Reasonable Suspicion have been provided by both state and federal courts, yet the term is considered unclear but important to define because schools use it in order to conduct searches of students. Reasonable Suspicion in schools is defined as “a warrantless search of a student when officials have reasonable grounds to believe that a student possesses evidence of illegal activity or activity that interferes with school discipline and order”. The New Jersey State Supreme Court rendered its current definition due to the most recent court case of New Jersey vs. TLO. Theoretically, everyone should agree this standard is acceptable to uphold in any school, however reasonable suspicion allows for racial profiling to slip in, and it ineffectively protects the constitutional rights of students.…

    • 614 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays