Preview

Case 6 the Financial Detective, 2005

Satisfactory Essays
Open Document
Open Document
596 Words
Grammar
Grammar
Plagiarism
Plagiarism
Writing
Writing
Score
Score
Case 6 the Financial Detective, 2005
Adam Dylik

Case 6 The Financial Detective, 2005

Health Products
Company A has a much higher ratio of Cash & Short Term Investments, Receivables, and Inventories (24.2%, 12.8%, 7.0%) as compared to Company B (16.1%, 8.1%, 5.4%) which is lower in every asset category ratio besides Intangibles and Investments & Advances, 46.1% to 22.2% and 3.1% to .1%. This proves that Company A has cash on hand from the sale of side divisions and that they have a large production facility. Company B is a more diverse company in terms of production, which has a larger ratio of their assets in Intangibles such as patents and proprietary rights from the mass amount of products they sell.
On the liability side, both Company A and Company B are nearly identical with only slight differences in their ratios. Company B has Debt in Current Liabilities that is 18.2x than Company A. Additionally, Company B decided to defer amount of taxes, 10.2% compared to .8%. This shows that Company B defers taxes to take advantage of extra capital for production and as a float, showing that the cash ratio and short term investments are actually smaller than shown because much of that money is earmarked for deferred taxes.
It is easy to say that Company A has a higher ratio of cost of goods sold because of their substantial budget for research and development which is normal in a pharmaceutical company who creates their own products from research as opposed to Company B whose cost of goods sold is significantly lower, 11.1% to 23.9% because their over the counter and common products have no needed research.
Beer

Company D has higher current ratio and quick ratio which is higher 2.43x and 2.3x respectively. This was because Company D had higher cash and short term investment which was 55.6% while Company C only has 1.4%. It proves that Company D is financially conservative and it matches with the second described company.

Besides that, Company D issued more stock which is 11.9%

You May Also Find These Documents Helpful

  • Satisfactory Essays

    96 Balance Sheet 2004 2003 Edwards, Inc. has prepared the following comparative balance sheets Cash $198,000 $102,000 for 2003 and 2004: Receivables $106,000 $78,000 2004 2003 Inventory $100,000 $120,000 Prepaid expenses $12,000 $18,000 Cash $ 198,000 $102,000 Plant assets $840,000 $700,000 Receivables 106,000 78,000 Accumulated depreciation $(300,000) $(250,000) Inventory 100,000 120,000 Patent $102,000 $116,000 Prepaid expenses 12,000 18,000 $1,058,000 $884,000 Plant assets 840,000 700,000 Accounts payable $102,000 $112,000 Accumulated depreciation (300,000) (250,000) Accrued liabilities $40,000 $28,000 Patent 102,000 116,000 Mortgage payable $- $300,000 Preferred…

    • 522 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Satisfactory Essays
  • Satisfactory Essays

    patton fuller

    • 1040 Words
    • 4 Pages

    The unaudited financial statement current ratio shows that the hospital is able at 24 to 1 ratio to pay their obligations. Since the ratio is higher than one, it tells us that the company is in good financial health. If we compare this unaudited ratio to the audited ratio we can see a change of ratio. The audited current assets are at $127,867 and the current liabilities are at $23,807. The ratio is represented by a 5 to 1. The ratio in both situations shows an efficiency of the hospital operating cycle and its ability to turn its products into cash. There is a significant change in the ratio when comparing the financial statements. It is important to understand that a high current ratio does not always mean a good thing because it depends on how fast the company can convert into cash their current…

    • 1040 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Satisfactory Essays
  • Good Essays

    EGT1 Task 3

    • 1171 Words
    • 5 Pages

    The first ratio calculated was current ratio. This is done by dividing current liabilities by current assets. Current ratio is important because it shows the business’s ability to pay back the current liabilities with the current assets that they have available to them. At the end of 2011, the current ratio was at 1.86. In 2012, this ratio dropped to 1.80. The industry ranges from 3.1 (showing a strong ability to pay back liabilities) to 1.4 (showing a weak ability to pay back liabilities) with a median of 2.1. Company G is below the median showing a weakness in this category.…

    • 1171 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Satisfactory Essays

    fin 341

    • 363 Words
    • 2 Pages

    Liquidity ratios show the relationship between the current assets and current liabilities. These ratios provide us with a view of the company’s ability to pay its current liabilities. KR has a current ratio of 0.72 and a quick ratio of 0.25. WFM has a current ratio of 2.15 and a quick ratio of 1.77. Both companies’ consists largely of inventory. If both KR and WFM sold their entire inventory, they would be in the same comparable position. These ratios show that WFM is more liquid than KR.…

    • 363 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Satisfactory Essays
  • Best Essays

    Interpretation and Comparison between the two companies' ratios (Reading the Appendix of Chapter 13 will help you prepare the commentary) Oracle Corporation Microsoft Corporation…

    • 1504 Words
    • 7 Pages
    Best Essays
  • Powerful Essays

    This is a brief analysis and comparison of select financial ratios of four companies: two in the manufacturing and two in the retail food industries. The financial ratios analyzed are the current ratio, debt ratio, profit margin, return on assets. I should point out that I used the most recent financial reports provided for each company, although in some cases they may not represent the same years. All dollar figures are in thousands.…

    • 2439 Words
    • 10 Pages
    Powerful Essays
  • Better Essays

    Xacc280 Financial Analysis

    • 1828 Words
    • 8 Pages

    Investors and potential investors in these companies will look at and consider a multitude of information before deciding which of these two companies would be a better investment. For instance, most investors will look at each company’s current assets and liabilities amounts. In 2004, Coca-Cola had more than 12 million dollars in current assets, while PepsiCo showed only 8.6 million dollars in their current assets. In 2005, Coca-Cola faced a decrease while PepsiCo had an increase in current assets. PepsiCo recorded 10.4 million dollars in current assets, while Coca-Cola dropped to 10.2 million dollars. Their current liabilities faced similar comparisons. In 2004, Coca-Cola had 11.1 million dollars in current liabilities, and then dropped that number to 9.8 million dollars in 2005. This…

    • 1828 Words
    • 8 Pages
    Better Essays
  • Good Essays

    The strength of Mark X as a company is its fixed assets turnover ratio, which rose from 1990 to 1992. This tells us Mark X 's ability to generate net sales from each addition of a fixed asset. Sales generated from the fixed assets are greater than the costs of the fixed assets, which imply that the fixed assets that were purchased are good investments for the company. This is really the only positive ratio they have at the moment. Weaknesses we found in Mark X were its debt ratio, which increased from 40.47% in 1990 to 46.33% in 1991 and from 46.33% to 59.80% in 1992. This shows us Mark X 's amount of debt relative to its assets is increasing and that its debt is equal to more than half of its assets by 1992. The current ratio and quick ratio has also indicated negative change, both decreasing between 1990 and 1992. The current ratio is a liquidity ratio that measures a company 's ability to pay short term obligations, while the quick ratio shows a company 's ability to pay its short-term obligations with its most liquid assets. Both ratios are steadily decreasing, indicating to us the position of the company has become less and less favorable.…

    • 1418 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Powerful Essays

    Staples Inc. and Office Depot Inc., are two companies that deal with offices supplies and compete with each another. The two organizations sell similar products and try to price match items to encourage more customer revenue. Like other organizations, they both encourage customers to buy the product as well as offering deals that would make customers walk inside their stores. They also have similar accounting and financial statements that make the organization a more reliable one.…

    • 8288 Words
    • 34 Pages
    Powerful Essays
  • Good Essays

    DQ 2

    • 353 Words
    • 1 Page

    From the e-Activity, determine why it is sometimes misleading to compare a company’s financial ratios with those of other firms that operate within the same industry. Support your response with one (1) example from your research.…

    • 353 Words
    • 1 Page
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    Bp Accounting Ratios

    • 347 Words
    • 2 Pages

    The current ratio has increased by 0.0534 from 0.9900 to 1.434. As the current ratio is a measure of liquidity and ability to meet short-term debt requirements, BP was more able to meet their short term debt obligations in 2005 than 2004. From 2001 to 2003 the current ratios were 1.0767, 0.9733, and 0.9600 respectively. In 2001, 2002, and 2004, BP?s current liabilities were greater than current assets, indicating that BP may have faced some difficulty in meeting short-term debt obligations during these years. In 2003 and 2005 the current ratios were greater than 1, representing that BP?s current assets were greater then its current liabilities for the year. BP?s current ratios are less than the industry average, which simply means that there are other companies that are more successful at meeting short term debt obligations than BP for the industry. The industry median for the current ratio is 1.26.…

    • 347 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Powerful Essays

    The Hershey Company and the Tootsie Roll Company both are companies in confection industry; they specialize in a wide variety of chocolate candy products. I compared both companies for the years 2002, 2003, and 2004 against each other and against the industry averages in order to make a decision about which company investors would choose to invest in. The comparisons I used to make this decision were ratios for liquidity, solvency, and profitability. As a…

    • 3780 Words
    • 16 Pages
    Powerful Essays
  • Good Essays

    The Investment Detective

    • 439 Words
    • 2 Pages

    This case presents the cash flows of eight unidentified investments, all of equal initial investment size. The student’s task is to rank the projects. The first objective of the case is to examine critically the principal capital-budgeting criteria. A second objective is to consider the problem that arises when net present value (NPV) and internal rate of return (IRR) disagree as to the ranking of two mutually exclusive projects. Finally, the case is a vehicle for introducing the problem created by attempting to rank projects of unequal life and the solution to that difficulty criterion.…

    • 439 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Satisfactory Essays

    It is also possible to compare ratios of one organisation against those of another in a similar…

    • 426 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Satisfactory Essays
  • Better Essays

    Acct-504 Final Project

    • 1253 Words
    • 4 Pages

    This is a comparison of the debt-to-total asset ratio; also known as the leverage ratio, of both companies. This ratio is a good measure of solvency as it shows the…

    • 1253 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Better Essays