Preview

Carter Oil Crisis

Powerful Essays
Open Document
Open Document
2323 Words
Grammar
Grammar
Plagiarism
Plagiarism
Writing
Writing
Score
Score
Carter Oil Crisis
For thirty years Americans have watched as our Presidents have debated over the foreign oil dilemma. Throughout those thirty years little has been accomplished. Research has been done and we have finally gotten the hybrid car on the market, but the use of foreign oil is still a drastic measure and keeps rising each year. There are many options America could use to end this war on oil. Some of them include the use of ethanol, hybrid cars, and nuclear power plants. We do use some of these, but perhaps we need to expand their use instead of looking to the Middle East to continue to supply our needs. However, we have not taken the time, nor initiative to research some of these ideas further. For instance, ethanol as a fuel is available in some …show more content…
The Carter/Reagan Doctrine, named after the Presidents who endorsed it, led to a build up of United States forces in the Persian Gulf to protect our interest in oil. It has cost tax payers fifty billion dollars per year to maintain readiness to intervene; in addition to the sacrifice of American blood shed by soldiers who fought to protect that interest. The Carter/Reagan Doctrine was a good temporary plan, but not a long term one. It should have been a temporary protective measure put in place while research and technology for an alternative plan was being produced. As this tactic may have protected our interest in the Gulf, it is not perceived by critics to be a solution. Tom Collina Executive Director of 20/20 Vision explains that our goal should be to reduce the use of oil enough so that our national and economical security is no longer tied to the survival of the Saudi royal family or any other non-democratic oil producer. He further argues that then, and only then can our foreign policy be truly independent from our need for oil. Barry Serafin, journalist of The Journal Editorial Report, explains that we have squandered decades of opportunity to amend this problem. The chairman of the Energy Program also complains that we have lost the will to do anything about it. In the seventies America began researching …show more content…
He goes on to explain that two thirds of the world's oil is in the Middle East, primarily Saudi Arabia, Iran and Iraq. With their high volume of oil, the Middle East supplies large quantities of oil to other countries, as well as, America. For instance, China is second to the United States in their dependency on foreign oil, who imports half of their petroleum from the Middle East. As both countries continue to need more and more oil, America could eventually become a threat to China and possibly other countries who will also need more imported oil. The potential for future world crises could come from the need for oil. That is why there is an urgency to create other alternatives before the issue ripples into a massive world war. China has already taken steps to gear their country toward alternative means by setting fuel economy standards. America needs to follow suit and do the same and focus on the research needed to determine the best possible alternatives to foreign

You May Also Find These Documents Helpful

  • Good Essays

    In late 1979, the US was shaken by Iran’s seizure of American hostages and the Soviet invasion of Afghanistan. The latter event in particular was seen as a direct threat to Persian Gulf oil. President Carter, after a period of vacillation, used his 1980 State of the Union speech to lay out an explicit pledge to defend the Gulf by arms. His words: “An attempt by any outside force to gain control of the Persian Gulf region will be regarded as an assault on the vital interests of the United States of America, and such an assault will be repelled by any means necessary,…

    • 708 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    Gov Blog 18

    • 418 Words
    • 1 Page

    On this week’s episode of “GPS”, Fareed Zakaria interviewed a variety of guests to contribute on the issues of Saudi Arabia and the oil economy. He first spoke to Tony Blair, the former prime minister of the United Kingdom about the death of King Abdullah of Saudi Arabia. I found Blair to be the most interesting guest because of his personal opinion and experience with King Abdullah, and he described the king’s attitude in describing a country that in some ways is a very conservative country. Blair stated that Abdullah said that they were doing the change, but wanted to let the Saudis do it at their own pace. He also mentioned how he always have a debate as to whether Saudi Arabia should accelerate or and go faster and so on. In the end, Blair said that he believed that what Abdullah was really trying to do, was to create these vehicles of change in the country. Blair’s statement on using Saudi Aramco, the oil company, was that it is not run like many oil companies around the world but still actually is a really top well-run company. The university he established, the King Abdullah University of Science and Technology, featured men and women being treated equally and educated equally. Blair believes that the term science and technology was chosen for a reason, and claims that Abdullah’s view would be that he was moving as fast as he could. This rather favorable opinion of Saudi Arabia, a controversial country and oil power was very informative and helped create an interesting conversation. Another one of Fareed’s featured guests was Martin Wolf, who spoke about the oil economy. As an economist, Wolf believes that in the current oil situation, the Saudis have another possible choice, which is for them is to start cutting production. Wolf claims that this might raise oil prices, but he believes that they would then bear a disproportional part of the losses. It would depend on how they think that would affect other country's output and what they think the…

    • 418 Words
    • 1 Page
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    Parts of where oil is imported from Islamic extremists are abundant = terriorist, petrodollar into terrorists pocket. Americans have the idea that foreign oil or energy is bad. Danger to economy, security, not patriotic. Assumptions . Political platforms, campaigning candidates all raised this issue in some fashion. Claims the idea of achieving energy independence to national security. Contradictory to economic, military, political, environmental – makes no sense. Interdependent, accept the reality of energy interdependence. He points out that the biggest oil producer also imports fossil fuels by not acknowledging the reality and trying to detour, it’s really adopting inefficient, counterproductive policies. Need to actively engage…

    • 595 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Better Essays

    Sci 207 Final

    • 1748 Words
    • 4 Pages

    There are many alternative energy sources that we can see and put our hands on but they all have pros and cons. Some are either too expensive or not viable as a long term source of energy in comparison to oil. Our infrastructure is built around coal and oil dating back to the industrial revolution. From our cars to the power that runs the microwave in the kitchen fossil fuels are a part of our lives but they are running out, killing…

    • 1748 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Better Essays
  • Better Essays

    In order to reduce the overall demands for gasoline in America, I would propose for an alternative form of energy to be developed, which in turn could be used as a type of substitute for gasoline. This would eventually force the…

    • 699 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Better Essays
  • Satisfactory Essays

    There has been debating among people in the United States on how the best energy supply. Some people suggests that the United States should in fact decrease its dependency on oil and begin to invest in an alternative energy source like renewable energy, such as wind and solar power – Go green. Others have contended saying that converting over to a new power source would not only be expensive but it is unnecessary because the United Sates already has a sustainable energy source, we just have to search for the resources in unexplored areas within the country and Alaska and the Gulf Coast. Personally, I side with the individuals that agree that the United States invest in an alternative energy source. Renewable energy is already being practiced in some areas of the United States and it has been proven to be more cost effective and healthier for the environment.…

    • 578 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Satisfactory Essays
  • Good Essays

    It is obvious that the demand for energy and fuel sources is increasing drastically as time goes by. The United States also anticipates an oil demand increase as the population grows over the next few decades (Haug, 2011). Therefore, the big dilemma is whether or not the search for oil on our land should continue. The recent development and expansion of clean energy resources, although expensive, can end the battle over oil deposits and lead the country into a cleaner future.…

    • 476 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Better Essays

    Rodman D. Griffin’s article entitled “Alternative Energy: Can Renewable Energy Sources Replaces Fossil Fuels?” is about alternative methods of getting energy. The article goes into great detail of how America has gone into such an increase in using oil and other non-renewable resources. America spends billions of dollars a year on oil and gas to fuel the countries working class. This was incorporated in my paper along with other facts that Griffin uses throughout his article. His article gave me insight to the crisis that we face everyday and a new wave of thinking when it comes to alternative energy.…

    • 2056 Words
    • 9 Pages
    Better Essays
  • Satisfactory Essays

    It is not easy question regarding whether America should attempt to drill its way out of dependency on foreign oil or to push hard for alternative energies. Many considerations need to be examined; environmental concerns including global warming, employment, big business, and monetary issues including the trade balance, foreign policy, and special interest groups.…

    • 587 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Satisfactory Essays
  • Good Essays

    Fracking

    • 850 Words
    • 4 Pages

    I personally think we need to go the long way to become energy independent. For the U.S., oil dependence represents a serious national security threat. While the United States is drilling more oil than it has before, consumers are not seeing the lower prices at the pump. Still, the idea of “energy independence” has continued in American political discourse, leading some to believe that the U.S. can solve its energy problems by producing more oil, which is not the…

    • 850 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Powerful Essays

    Today, the United States is the largest consumer of oil in the world. On average, the United States consumes 20.7 million barrels of oil a day (EIA, 2008) but we are the world’s third largest producer of oil (EIA, 2008). The United States produces 5.1 million barrels of oil a day and 3.6 million barrels from various other sources but there is a 13.5 million barrel shortfall (EIA, 2008). This information allows us to conclude that the United States produces 10% of the world’s oil but consumes 24% (EIA, 2008).…

    • 2258 Words
    • 10 Pages
    Powerful Essays
  • Good Essays

    At the turn of the twentieth century, the United States used coal, oil, and wood as a natural resource to produce energy. Around the beginning of the twenty-first century, those same energy resources are routine today as they were a hundred years ago. The U.S. has refined our ability to use new sources of energy that we have discovered over the last hundred years. However, “Annual consumption of petroleum and natural gas exceeded that of coal in 1947 and then quadrupled in a single generation. Neither before nor since has any source of energy become so dominant so quickly” (“Peacock”). With time the population’s need for more energy was in high demand.…

    • 698 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Better Essays

    The Cold War and U

    • 1426 Words
    • 41 Pages

    In the political history of the United States, the Presidential Doctrines hold an important position. Presidential Doctrine can be defined as a set of principles or practices applied by a President to a particular situation, region, or government, and a President may formulate a doctrine alone or with the help of advisers within the entire administration (Jones, 2013). According to the Monroe Doctrine to the Reagan Doctrine, in the realm of the U.S. politics and foreign affairs, presidential doctrines have played a pivotal role, and if studied from the perspective of the Cold War, the importance of the Reagan Doctrine can be ascertained. The presidential doctrine of Reagan which is popularly known as the Reagan Doctrine played a significant role in decreasing the global influence of the Soviet Union. In the course of the Cold War but it also played a crucial role in shaping the long term foreign policies of the United States in a tumultuous manner primarily because of its role in supporting the anti-Sandinista rebels (called “Contras”) and for eventually instigating the U.S. – Iran conflict, and it is due to such a roles that even today the Reagan Doctrine is considered strategically an important political approach. The Soviet regime provided a chance for Reagan to formulate a doctrine which will be able to strengthen the motivation of these rebels and eventually bring an end to the Soviet According to historians and political strategists they have often identified the Reagan Doctrine as a “strategy orchestrated and implemented by the United States under the Reagan Administration to oppose the global influence of the Soviet Union during the final years of the Cold War” (“Reagan Doctrine”, n.d.). And it is due to its importance in respect of U.S. foreign policy that despite of the doctrine’s duration being less than a decade, it remained as “the centerpiece of United States foreign policy from the…

    • 1426 Words
    • 41 Pages
    Better Essays
  • Good Essays

    Carter’s administration was seen as the route of all of the problems in the Middle East, and Reagan’s administration was seen as the savior of the problems in the Middle East. Reagan’s presidency had a peace proposal for the Middle East called the Reagan plan; this was U.S. policy for peace in the Middle East. It brought peace to Lebanon, Beirut, and most Middle Eastern capitals. He believed that the Middle Eastern problems “ran back to the dawn of history. In our modern day, conflict has taken its brutal toll there. In the age of nuclear challenge and economic interdependence, such conflicts are a threat to all the people of the world—to call a halt to conflict, hatred, and prejudice”. (2) Reagan asked for the support of the American people. Peace did not last long. Shortly after Reagan left office and his vice president George H. Bush assumed the presidency, in August of 1990, the U.S. increased actions in the Persian Gulf, which became known as the Persian Gulf War. (3) This began the long conflict of intervention in the Middle East that would lead to our current involvement with ISIS.…

    • 906 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Satisfactory Essays

    Energy is very important, especially for the people of the United States. It has become an integral part of our lives and we have grown dependent on it. Therein lies the problem, however, because the more we use it, the less there is. We have to find alternative forms of energy before it is gone and we are left high and dry. Not only is our sources decreasing, it is also polluting our beautiful world. Reducing the use of energy and finding alternatives is our only choice when considering the future of America. Cheap gas may sound great right now but once it is gone, it is gone for good. We cannot be selfish and only think of the now, we must look to the future and preserve our resources so that our grandkids will have a good life. We have made…

    • 258 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Satisfactory Essays