Preview

Caputo: Fundamentalism Is The Passion For God

Satisfactory Essays
Open Document
Open Document
226 Words
Grammar
Grammar
Plagiarism
Plagiarism
Writing
Writing
Score
Score
Caputo: Fundamentalism Is The Passion For God
Caputo make it a point to say that Fundamentalism is the passion for God gone mad, a way to turn the name of God into the name of terror…an attempt to shrink the love of God down to a determinate self of beliefs and practices…Fundamentalism attempts to close down the open-ended question ‘what do I do when I love my God’” (Caputo, 107-108).
I understand showing people what they are doing wrong and how they can improve their lives. I understand having your own opinions and beliefs about certain, controversial subjects. However, condemning them and terrorizing them for using the free will that God gave to them should be absolutely unacceptable.
I believe that the main thing that influences the decisions that fundamentalists make is the pride
Continue Reading
View Writing Issues

You May Also Find These Documents Helpful

  • Good Essays

    The New Cold War Jiergensmeyer Summary
    • 1426 Words
    • 6 Pages

    The New Cold War Jiergensmeyer Summary

    By calling someone a fundamentalist, one would suggest that that person only is motivated by religious beliefs rather than the society and the world in general. This seems like an odd statement, considering that he just two paragraphs later quote Sheikh Ahmed Yassin as stating that there is no clear distinction between religion and politics, the distinction being a Western way of thinking (ibid, locations 138-139). When he recognizes that that is the case, why does he insist that calling a person fundamentalist is denying his ability to think both religiously and politically? A non-Western fundamentalist would necessarily insist on religion and politics being the same or so closely connected that there are no crucial distinction. That is at least the case for both traditional Judaism and…

    • 1426 Words
    • 6 Pages
    Good Essays
    Read More
  • Better Essays

    Mccullen V. Coakley Case Analysis
    • 1429 Words
    • 6 Pages

    Mccullen V. Coakley Case Analysis

    Everyone has a freedom of speech, but others should not try to stop others from exercising their rights. A person can’t say the other is wrong or fight a person to join their side or that their side is right. A person can try to use facts and try to educate a person of their viewpoint. People are not entitled to have their viewpoints be received by people. A person does not have to agree with you on your viewpoint. You can’t change a viewpoint of another. People have their own ways of…

    • 1429 Words
    • 6 Pages
    Better Essays
    Read More
  • Good Essays

    Blade Runner And Frankenstein Comparison Essay
    • 659 Words
    • 3 Pages

    Blade Runner And Frankenstein Comparison Essay

    • The rise of atheism and deism – a shift away from traditional religion and oppressed thinking of the…

    • 659 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays
    Read More
  • Good Essays

    Ruth Stein Fundamentalism
    • 394 Words
    • 2 Pages

    Ruth Stein Fundamentalism

    Ruth Stein believes that fundamentalism is one’s personal “quest” to “violently transcend experiences” of one’s fear of eternal slumber (death) and how the existence of another human being serves as an “obstacle” that distances an individual further from their personal desires. She feels as though fundamentalism is being encapsulated in one’s own personal “comforting straight jacket.” Which I felt is a view that is rarely seen or heard of (at least it is nothing I have seen or heard of). As I was reading Stein’s article, one (when I say one I mean myself) could compare Stein’s unusual and thought provoking ideas as well as concepts to Sigmund Freud- in the sense that they both took a unique and stylistic approach to a very controversial yet…

    • 394 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Good Essays
    Read More
  • Better Essays

    Fundamentalism and Inerrancy of Scripture
    • 5412 Words
    • 22 Pages

    Fundamentalism and Inerrancy of Scripture

    Fundamentalism is a type of religious reaction to all forms of modernity. Within Christianity this phenomenon is mostly characteristic of Protestantism but is also found in Catholicism. In fact, the term fundamentalism was coined in the United States at the beginning of the 20th century, but it was only toward the end of that century that the term began to be applied to some Catholic movements.…

    • 5412 Words
    • 22 Pages
    Better Essays
    Read More
  • Better Essays

    Fundamentalism In The 1920's
    • 1355 Words
    • 6 Pages

    Fundamentalism In The 1920's

    These people cling to their religion because they had nothing else to hold onto. Fundamentalism was "a caricature of culturally unenlightened individuals bent on preserving tradition at the expense of progress." (religiousmovements.lib.virginia.edu) Yet, surprisingly, Fundamentalism was one of the most successful religious movements in the twentieth century. They were behind the temperance movement and the anti-communist movement. However, it was not until Tennessee vs. John Scopes that the fundamentalists had to defend themselves against the Darwinists, and vice-versa.…

    • 1355 Words
    • 6 Pages
    Better Essays
    Read More
  • Good Essays

    Most Hated Family In America Summary
    • 747 Words
    • 3 Pages

    Most Hated Family In America Summary

    To see people purposely hurting others and thinking that is acceptable is not kosher. I think they have taken the word of god to an extreme and over interpreted almost everything. I have heard that the bible says being a homosexual is a sin, but this is America, and people who feel the need to do such things have that right. If it is a sin, so be it, those people have the freedom to do whatever they feel with their lives. I would never join a group like this because of the damage they are doing not only to those people who are gay, or to the families of fallen soldiers, but to their own family. In the video it showed the CHILDREN picketing, they had no idea what it meant or why they were doing it. It also had footage of the 7 year old boy being hit with soda by onlookers. They are brainwashing their children and forcing them into this lifestyle before they can think for themselves. They are isolating them from being accepted into society, these poor children have no friends, and they have put their children in physical danger by making them do this, people hate them for doing so and will act on that hatred as they did in the video or…

    • 747 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays
    Read More
  • Satisfactory Essays

    Censorship: Dr. Martin Luther King Jr.
    • 264 Words
    • 2 Pages

    Censorship: Dr. Martin Luther King Jr.

    People should have freedom to say what they want to say, for what they believe in.…

    • 264 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Satisfactory Essays
    Read More
  • Good Essays

    Ap Government Civil Rights Notes
    • 437 Words
    • 2 Pages

    Ap Government Civil Rights Notes

    Everyone has the right to publicly express their thoughts verbally or in print as long as it does not pose a threat to other people…

    • 437 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Good Essays
    Read More
  • Satisfactory Essays

    Westboro Baptist Church has the right to protest military funeral are protected by the First Amendment.
    • 298 Words
    • 2 Pages

    Westboro Baptist Church has the right to protest military funeral are protected by the First Amendment.

    The U.S. guarantees free speech to its citizens. The protests of the Westboro "church" are, in my opinion, morally reprehensible and cruel. But, once we start denying free speech to somebody, simply because we don't like their opinions, we undermine the rights on which our country is built, and we open the door to censorship.…

    • 298 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Satisfactory Essays
    Read More
  • Satisfactory Essays

    Nicholas Barber Freedom Of Speech
    • 107 Words
    • 1 Page

    Nicholas Barber Freedom Of Speech

    People are entitled to one of the rights listed in the first amendment, the freedom of speech. It’s true that some people are hateful but even if we don’t like, agree, or even joke about it we don’t have the right to control them. People are unable to express their thoughts and feelings because they do not want to offend others.…

    • 107 Words
    • 1 Page
    Satisfactory Essays
    Read More
  • Good Essays

    The Role Of Religiosity In Religion
    • 475 Words
    • 2 Pages

    The Role Of Religiosity In Religion

    The term “religiosity” was used by social scientists in order to indicate the extent, commitment, devotion and faithfulness of a person’s participation and practice of his or her religion (Gay and Lynxwiler, 2013). According to Ayenibiowo and Ayeni (2013), religiosity, in its narrowest sense, deals more with how religious an individual is and less with how religious an individual in terms of ritual, symbols and doctrines. On the other hand, religiosity, in its broadest sense, is a multifaceted construct pertaining to various religious activities, devotions and beliefs.…

    • 475 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Good Essays
    Read More
  • Good Essays

    1st Amendment Research Paper
    • 721 Words
    • 3 Pages

    1st Amendment Research Paper

    They could say things to incite harmful actions against others like screaming “FIRE” in a crowded theatre or allowing a student to make an obscene speech at a school-sponsored event. They would not get in trouble because they would legally be permitted to express themselves. In the case Whitney vs. California the court found that freedom of speech guaranteed by the 1st amendment is not an absolute right. In the case tinker vs.Des moines Yes, we should be allowed to say our mind, but at what cost? Some things you would prefer to keep to yourself, then share aloud. Though some things are cruel, we cannot limit opinions that are contrary to popular belief or unorthodox…

    • 721 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays
    Read More
  • Good Essays

    Mircea Eliade on Religion
    • 1830 Words
    • 8 Pages

    Mircea Eliade on Religion

    Several people find Mircea Eliade’s view on religion similar to Emile Durkheim’s, but in truth, it is similar to Tylor and Frazer’s. One of Eliade’s major works was The Sacred and the Profane. In his writings he explains that his understanding of religion are two concepts: the sacred and the profane. The profane consists of things that are ordinary, random, and unimportant, while the sacred is the opposite. The sacred “is the sphere of supernatural, of things extraordinary, memorable, and momentous” (Pals 199). When Durkheim mentioned the sacred and the profane, he was concerned about society and its needs. In Eliade’s view, the concern of religion is with the supernatural. To Eliade, the profane doesn’t hold as much meaning as the sacred. He describes profane as vanishing and fragile, while the sacred as eternal and full of substance. He does not try to explain away religion and reject all reductionist efforts. Eliade only focuses on “timeless forms.” He says they reoccur in religions all over the world, but he ignores their specific context and dismisses them as irrelevant. He also ties religion to archaic people whom he defines as, “those who have lived in the world of nature,” (Pals 198) or those who have hunted, fished, and farmed routinely. Archaic people want to live life in the model of the divine because they have a deep longing for paradise, and to be close to God. Also, Eliade is an admirer of how myths tell the stories of not only gods but also on the struggles of life. He says that humanity is forming a new belief system in which the belief is of whether or not there really is a God. Eliade states that because of this theory, we must learn to live without the sacred. Eliade certainly has an interesting approach on religion.…

    • 1830 Words
    • 8 Pages
    Good Essays
    Read More
  • Good Essays

    Police Brutality
    • 797 Words
    • 4 Pages

    Police Brutality

    There is a time where you need to stand up to say your side of the story. A time where ethics, religion, and liberty all factor to make your opposition many but worth the battle. Problems arise everyday that go against one’s beliefs. I believe it is our right to not let others trample on a view just because they feel that they are right. A flight or fight response is the only choice for one to make and silence is unacceptable. I made a choice one day at burger store.…

    • 797 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Good Essays
    Read More

Related Topics