Preview

Captain Thomas Preston’s Account of the Boston Massacre

Good Essays
Open Document
Open Document
668 Words
Grammar
Grammar
Plagiarism
Plagiarism
Writing
Writing
Score
Score
Captain Thomas Preston’s Account of the Boston Massacre
Captain Thomas Preston’s Account of the Boston Massacre

The excerpt from Captain Thomas Preston’s account of the Boston Massacre explains the events that occurred on March 13, 1770 were out his control, while leading to the deaths and injuries of many. He states, “I am, though perfectly innocent” in which he did not instruct his army to fire at the riot. “IT IS [A] MATTER OF TOO GREAT NOTORIETY TO NEED ANY PROOFS THAT THE arrival of his Majesty’s troops in Boston was extremely obnoxious to its inhabitants.” One can clearly see that the colonists were upset at Britain and furious at the fact that they were sending more soldiers to Boston. One of the justices who was familiar with the people stated, “the soldiers must now take care of themselves, nor trust too much to their arms, for they were but a handful; that the inhabitants carried weapons concealed under their clothes and would destroy them in a moment, if they pleased.” This meant that the colonists were now arming themselves and the British soldiers must be cautious in what they do. Preston hearing these things was knowledgeable and knew that any little spark within the colonist would cause a massive explosion. There was a mob of about a hundred people outside of the Custom House, where the king’s money is stored. Preston took all measures to make sure that the riot was cleared up as quickly and peacefully as possible. “So far was I from intending the death of any person that I suffered the troops to go to the spot where the unhappy affair took place without any loading in their pieces; not did I ever give orders for loading them.” In this statement Preston’s intentions are not to harm anyone, but rather to take the high road. The mod kept on increasing in numbers and calling out, “Come on you rascals, you bloody backs, you lobster scoundrels, fire if you dare, G-d damn you, fire and be damned, we know you dare not.” This goes to show that the colonist are very angry and are looking to start a fight

You May Also Find These Documents Helpful

  • Good Essays

    The colonists were political activists waiting to happen. Politics had been relatively quite in the New World since its boom. In the Puritan societies, citizens took turns serving political offices; it was part of their duty to the community. As cities grew, they elected their own councils or other forms of government. Not until the grumbling began did Britain feel the need to place its own officials over the colonies. The colonists, especially those in Boston, were only waiting for the spark they needed to ignite a political, and later a military, war. For some, this spark may have been the tarring and feathering of John Malcolm, a hated customs informer. According to Alfred Young in his book The Shoemaker and the Tea Party, this particular event "was part of the upsurge of spontaneous action in the wake of the Tea Party that prompted the Whig leaders to promote a "Committee for Tarring and Feathering" as an instrument of crowd control"(50). The crowds seemed to zealous even for the rich opposition leaders who believed they needed to inhibit many mob uprisings. Hewes' political life started years earlier than this last event. For Hewes, "the Massacre had stirred [him] to political action"(Young 39). Notice that he was "stirred" to action, not reluctantly pushed or forced.…

    • 839 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    On March 5, 1770, British soldiers were badgered to the point of outrage by a small group of boys (Wheeler and Becker, 75). The soldiers eventually retaliated at the group and the church bells started ringing alarming the town that a fire had broken out only leading the numbers in the crowd to increase (Wheeler and Becker, 75). Captain Thomas Preston and his sentry were called to the scene to assist. However, their attempts to redirect the crowd were unsuccessful. It is at this point that a musket was fired and the situation continued to escalate leaving some dead and others wounded (Wheeler and Becker, 75). Was Captain Thomas Preston guilty of murder by ordering his soldiers to fire? Or was he innocent and the soldiers fired out of provocation and their own volition?…

    • 719 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Better Essays

    The very next day we were told to leave the Boston by the Gov.Hutchinson .All the people of the Boston came on the street to insult and curse us .On march 13, the colony attorney general issued 13 indictments for murder. We were accused that the murder was all planned and all of us had revenge in hearts. In March 6 a warrant was issued for the arrest of Captain Thomas Preston and the officer in charge of the troops who did the shooting .Me and other seven soldiers under Preston’s command were clapped into prison later the same day. In a particular witness testified that one or two weeks before shooting , Pvt Killroy had said that “ he would never miss an opportunity ,if he had one to fire on the Boston people .…

    • 650 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Better Essays
  • Good Essays

    On March 5, 1770, a group of brave colonists gathered around a British Soldier at a local tax office. They hurled insults at the soldier, and with the confusion that ranged gunshots were heard; Five men were found wounded on the ground. Although the Boston Massacre seemed to be the colonists' fault since they started off by hurling insults, we must remember how the British Soldiers treated the colonists before. For example, the Quartering Act forced families to have open their homes to British Soldiers in order to shelter and feed them. Nevertheless, the news about the Boston Massacre spread quickly throughout the colonies.…

    • 310 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    Another area which must be discussed is the metropole responses to acts of resistance in the peripheries. W.A. Speck mentions some British politicians believed duty on Tea was ‘a symbol of parliamentary sovereignty over the colonies’ (Speck, 2015, p.32). It could be argued the reprisal policies following The Boston Massacre demonstrate the metropole believed they had a right to exercise they perceived superiority, as they considered the peoples in the peripheries as children. Measures such as the The Quartering Act could be seen as the metropole exercising to its parliamentary sovereign. As mentioned above, the colonists saw these polices by the metropole is unfair. From a British point of view the acts of resistance were not only caused disruption to profits, it is highly likely some politicians they saw the acts of resistance as…

    • 315 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Satisfactory Essays

    The colonists were throwing snowballs, sticks, and even stones at the soldiers. Furious the soldiers fired into the group of people, at that piont 3 people were killed and 8 people were badly injured. So, Captain Thomas Preston was taken on a trail there, John Adams and Josiah Quincey defend Captain Preston…

    • 450 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Satisfactory Essays
  • Good Essays

    The Boston Massacre was a crucial event that occurred on March 5th, 1770. At this point in history, tension was high between the British forces and angry colonists. People of the 13 colonies began to become outraged at Britain for passing unfair laws, such as taxes on goods like tea and paper. A group of men whom had lost their jobs and blamed the British gathered around the Customs House in a riot. Eight British soldiers stood their ground in front of the protesters, both sides becoming more and more outraged at each other. The event quickly escalated after young Edward Garrick is hit with the back of a soldier’s firearm. Private Hugh Montgomery is hit with a club and is the first to fire at the colonists, despite Captain Thomas Preston’s command not to shoot. More men are killed as people began to back away from the scene. The Boston Massacre ends with 5 patriots dead and 6 wounded. As the Independence Hall Association says, “The Boston Massacre was a signal event leading to the Revolutionary War.” The colonists were fed up with Britain and acted on their anger without thinking about what could’ve and did happen. The soldiers ignored their orders not to shoot and turned a riot into a massacre that led to the Revolutionary War. Had both sides controlled their rage and not acted without considering the consequences, the death of 5 people would have been…

    • 1090 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    Lexington Concord

    • 642 Words
    • 3 Pages

    According to John Parker, what were his orders to his colonial troops if they were approached by British troops? ordered our Militia to meet on the Common in said Lexington to consult what to do, and concluded not to be discovered, nor meddle or make with said Regular Troops . What were his orders once the troops approached? he told them not to fire any of there weapons.Explain in your own words.…

    • 642 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    The Boston Massacre happened on March 5, 1770. The Boston Massacre happened because the colonist were angry. The men were all riled up. They were just let of work. The colonist were physically and mentally messing with the English soldiers. "A general attack was made on the men by a great number of heavy clubs and snowballs being…

    • 295 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    The people of Boston wished to be free of British reign, a goal that was not possible until all ties with Britain were cut. To achieve this goal, the Bostonians purposefully escalated the situation in Boston, causing more discourse between the colonies and Britain. This is exemplified in the testimony of William Tant, a Boston citizen, who claims that the Bostonian rioters were taunting the soldiers to “Fire, fire, and be damned,” essentially asking the soldiers to fire at the rioters (Document 2). Moreover, in Captain Preston’s, the captain of the British soldiers, account of the…

    • 712 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Satisfactory Essays

    Later after the Massacre still on March 5, 1770 a mob of American colonists gathers at the Customs House in Boston and begins taunting the British soldiers guarding the building. Well I know that the colonist probably shouldn’t have rebelled like that afterwards, but you would have to think if someone you knew and loved got killed you would be pretty mad and would probably do something like that in that time. It would not help if you did not…

    • 277 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Satisfactory Essays
  • Satisfactory Essays

    In 1767, British soldiers were sent to Boston to keep order. There was high tension between the British soldiers and the colonists. At 9'o clock at night, a fight broke out and 5 colonists were killed. The Boston Sons of Liberty called the event the Boston Massacre. Historians wondered if the Boston Massacre was an act of self defense by the soldiers or if the soldiers murdered the colonists. After further investigation on this topic, I propose that the British soldiers murdered the colonists.…

    • 227 Words
    • 1 Page
    Satisfactory Essays
  • Good Essays

    On March 5, 1770 a specific event took place that had impacted many lives. This event is known as the Boston Massacre. The Boston Massacre was considered to be a street fight that took place when a mob started to throw snowballs, stones and sticks at a squad of British soldiers. In the end, five colonists resulted in death. This was caused by the developing tensions in the American colonies that had been growing ever since the Royal troops had first appeared. I believe that the Boston Massacre was an act of self-defense. I say this because, the British soldiers’ lives were under threat and had to use equal force. In addition, a massacre is when many are killed and it consists of an innocent/defenseless side. In the Boston Massacre, both sides were not defenseless. This was not murder either because, this event was not planned or was meant to happen. The British soldiers weren’t intending to kill these colonists. Lastly, manslaughter wouldn’t be reasonable because, the British soldiers killed these colonists in act of defense/protection.…

    • 626 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Satisfactory Essays

    On March 5, many innocent Bostonians were killed by British soldiers. It was an unprovoked murder where the soldiers fired and killed five colonists! The citizens were just attending to their daily duties on the streets when a soldier started a fight with them. The struggle soon turned into a full fledged confrontation. When other redcoats attempted to calm the group with threats of firing on them, Bostonians were rightfully outraged and began to fight back a little. Some citizens even picked up pebbles and twigs and threw them at the soldiers in defense.…

    • 324 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Satisfactory Essays
  • Satisfactory Essays

    The Boston Massacre was when a group of colonists came in a mob and taunted British soldiers. One of them panicked and shot at the people. The rest of the people panicked too so they all shot at the colonists. There were 5 people dead including a man who was half African American and half Native American. His name was Crispus Attucks. Paul Revere heard of it and made a picture making the British look really bad to everyone. The cause, the effects, and the people involved were all important to the American Revolution.…

    • 94 Words
    • 1 Page
    Satisfactory Essays