Captain Nolan Was To Blame Essay
How far do the sources suggest that Capitan Nolan was to blame for the disastrous charge by the Light Brigade and Balaclava?
All three sources agree on several points; however they also differentiate a lot. All sources agree on the character of Nolan. According to the sources Nolan was ‘enthusiastic’, ‘an eager spirit’ and ‘head strong and brave’ even though they never directly blame Nolan or like source 1 strive to defend his reputation. This could be good and bad as being enthusiastic about war could have caused Nolan to act rashly or make decisions based on the coveted glory of bloodshed. Similarly being head strong and brave can often also suggest that he was stubborn but also that he jumped into situations without thinking them through therefore the sources could be interpreted entirely differently, laying more blame on Nolan than we initially read.
Sources 3 blames Nolan more than the other two as it says ‘he was ill suited to deliver Raglans orders for the charge’. This shows us that despite critising the cavalry, he was still intent on delivering the order. On the other hand source 2 seems to focus more on Lucan, saying that he should not have been so easily influenced by Nolan, we can infer that this could mean Nolan was a distraction on the battle field, thereby being partially to blame.
Both sources 1 and 2 agree that …show more content…
From this piece of information, we can gather that the reliability of the source is probably low as it is listing Captain Nolan’s attributes. This source is biased as it is painting a certain picture of Captain Nolan that could be exaggerated in order to show him in a better light. The informants of the source also haven’t been listed, making it unclear whether it was first hand evidence or word of mouth. Despite source 1 being possibly ill informed and unreliable it was published very soon after the battle. This source doesn’t blame Nolan at all for the events at the
All three sources agree on several points; however they also differentiate a lot. All sources agree on the character of Nolan. According to the sources Nolan was ‘enthusiastic’, ‘an eager spirit’ and ‘head strong and brave’ even though they never directly blame Nolan or like source 1 strive to defend his reputation. This could be good and bad as being enthusiastic about war could have caused Nolan to act rashly or make decisions based on the coveted glory of bloodshed. Similarly being head strong and brave can often also suggest that he was stubborn but also that he jumped into situations without thinking them through therefore the sources could be interpreted entirely differently, laying more blame on Nolan than we initially read.
Sources 3 blames Nolan more than the other two as it says ‘he was ill suited to deliver Raglans orders for the charge’. This shows us that despite critising the cavalry, he was still intent on delivering the order. On the other hand source 2 seems to focus more on Lucan, saying that he should not have been so easily influenced by Nolan, we can infer that this could mean Nolan was a distraction on the battle field, thereby being partially to blame.
Both sources 1 and 2 agree that …show more content…
From this piece of information, we can gather that the reliability of the source is probably low as it is listing Captain Nolan’s attributes. This source is biased as it is painting a certain picture of Captain Nolan that could be exaggerated in order to show him in a better light. The informants of the source also haven’t been listed, making it unclear whether it was first hand evidence or word of mouth. Despite source 1 being possibly ill informed and unreliable it was published very soon after the battle. This source doesn’t blame Nolan at all for the events at the