Top-Rated Free Essay
Preview

Capitaltial Tocontrol Violance in Society Punishmentis Essen

Good Essays
1013 Words
Grammar
Grammar
Plagiarism
Plagiarism
Writing
Writing
Score
Score
Capitaltial Tocontrol Violance in Society Punishmentis Essen
*
Without capital punishment (the death penalty) our lives are less secure and crimes of violence increases. Capital punishment is essential to control violence in society.

To what extent do you agree do you agree with this opinion?

Unfortunately, in today's environment where world is growing faster both economically and socially. More social pressure is increasing in terms of unemployment, less purchasing power, scarcity of resources and so on so forth. Here chances of crimes or violence increase and tougher laws and punishments are enforced by states and in extreme case capital punishment.

In recent years more governments and states are abolishing the law of capital punishment. They believe that it is very inhuman to kill him/her just because he/she had committed a crime. Their view is of implementing tougher laws and their proper enforcement. Prior to giving capital punishment one has to think the reasons which has led the person to commit such a crime and for which he/she has been given capital punishment. For example, if a person kills another person just for food because he and his family were hungry from past several days. Here the state should be liable, which ultimately had to take care of that person and his family's basis necessity which of course was food. There should be strict transparent process of justification prior to awarding capital punishment, because it a matter of human life.

Nevertheless, one the other hand there are several heinous crimes for which capital punishment is the right way to stop or minimize them. In China, forgery of severe nature is a crime and if proved guilty capital punishment is awarded. Similarly in Saudi Arabia, if a person is caught red handed while having or taking drugs, a death penalty is awarded. By doing this an example has been set. This will help in minimizing crime rate of the same nature. Capital punishment also gives an indication that how bad a particular crime for which death penalty is given is seen by the state and how eager it is to minimize or stop it completely.

In my opinion, capital punishment is essential to control the crime, but before that tougher laws should be enforced and implemented. * 2 Without capital punishment (the death penalty) our lives are less secure and crimes of violence increase. Capital punishment is essential to control violence in society.

Essay:
Capital punishment, a cruel and unusual punishment in the legal system, has long been an issue of controversy. While supporters hold that execution deters crime, opponents claim it is inhumane to deprive fellow men's life, whoever they are.

Admittedly, possibility exists that capital punishment may lead to miscarriage of jurisdiction by mistakenly executing innocent suspects. To make things even more complicated, political conspiracies have repeatedly pushed innocent victims to death in the name of jurisdiction. Take Socrates and Jesus Christ for example, both of them were imposed death sentence as dissents for violating the ruler's interest, but as is undeniable today, both of the two have made huge contributions to the human civilization.

However, these reasons mentioned above are inefficient to serve as evidence to abolish the capital punishment, because death penalty, despite its minor fault, plays a vital part in preserving the safe and security of the whole society. Not only can it ensure that the convicted criminal won't offend a second time, it is also regarded as the best "legalized revenge" to victims' family. The cost of life itself also poses as a threat to potential criminals, preventing them from harming the others. A society which imposes no more severe punishment than life imprisonment on murderers is one that perceives murder as a tolerable and unimportant issue, which is no doubt against human rights.

On balance, we can safely conclude that capit ment is essential to control violence in society. But to render it more unbiased, related regulations need refining to ensure a more effective and judicative legal system. al punishCapital Punishment should be applied or not?

It is a contentious issue, whether or not capital punishment should be allowed in modern society. Many countries have already withdrawn death penalties. Still some countries are trying to retain it. There are many people having their opinion against and for death penalties. They have strong feelings on it.

People against it argue that, capital punishment is something irrevocable. We can devoid a man from his life, but we cannot give his life back. So, we do not have any rights to give such penalties, in fact, it violates human rights. Moreover, there is a saying that ' To err is human'. Hence, a man can make mistakes unintentionally.

In addition to this, the decision of a judge can change with change in perspective, and innocent people may be wrongly convicted. During 1970 in Britain, a group of people condemned for a crime, and 15 years later they released as the judgment was wrong. To add, every person should give a second chance so that they can get enough time for penance and can improve their lifestyle.

On the other hand, people who support capital punishment also have some reasons. They argue that, for some offences such as rape, murder, adultery, genocide the perpetrator should be condemned to death. There must not be any mercy for someone who commits a wrongdoing again after having a punishment. We can call him recidivist and such heinous offenses are beyond our endurance. Sometimes, misdeed has a contagious pattern, and it is a big problem in a developing country. People in such countries are mostly uneducated, and they do a big crime in tiny circumstances.

In the end I think, death penalties must be applied for certain offences. We cannot forgive a person who sets fire in a hospital containing a number of innocent patients. We surely cannot excuse a serial killer when he gets caught. Moreover, how can we forgive those people who tried to sell their motherland for money and still living among us? They are hardened people to rehabilitate. They are incorrigible. Death should be their ultimate destiny.

You May Also Find These Documents Helpful

  • Powerful Essays

    Definitions For Ethics GCSE

    • 2503 Words
    • 11 Pages

    Some suggest that Capital Punishment is not the way to go as sooner or later people will get killed because of mistakes or flaws in the justice system, for example witnesses, prosecutors and jurors them being human can all make mistakes (Alexander Pope) “To err is human”. When these human mistakes are coupled with flaws in the system it is inevitable that innocent people will be convicted of crimes. Where capital punishment is used mistakes cannot be put right.…

    • 2503 Words
    • 11 Pages
    Powerful Essays
  • Good Essays

    It is an established fact, that capital punishment is still conducted in many countries of the earth. People are being sentenced to death every day and in my essay I am going to respond to the ethic question whether death penalty serves as a justified and valid form of punishment.…

    • 605 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Powerful Essays

    The gains associated with capital punishment are the affect it can have on effectively deterring criminals from not only murderer, but any serious crime (Cameron 1989). It is used as an intimidation factor for which people weigh the cost and benefits of their actions, and in a case where the cost is their life, the probability of them committing a crime will decrease (Shepherd 2004). The significant relationship it shares with the homicide rate has been found that 150 fewer homicides take place in reaction to one execution happening to a convicted murderer (Cooter and Ulen 2012). Looking at this relationship directly from an economic perspective, capital punishment can be seen as a commodity; an increase in it leads to an increase in consumer welfare as it decreases the chance of another victim being murdered (Cameron 1993). The effect that deterrence has on society is seen as a public good as well because of the positive, widespread affect it has on a larger number of consumers by increases their safety and security. By increasing the amount of resources the government puts towards conviction and punishment for criminal activities, it will allow for a reduction in harm (Cooter and Ulen 2012) and allow the demand for protection and a safer environment to be met. Capital punishment is the strongest alternative of punishment to create the largest deterrent…

    • 2611 Words
    • 11 Pages
    Powerful Essays
  • Powerful Essays

    Recent years, capital punishment has been a focused problem and heated discussion among countries in the world. In the legislation system, capital punishment is the highest and cruelest punishment to criminal offenders. Nowadays, more than 100 countries have abolished death penalty, but some of the other countries still keep and implement capital punishment, such as America, which it is rare that using death punishment in developed countries. Actually, American government restored capital punishment in 1976 and executed more than one thousand people until now. In the United States, only thirty six states have capital punishment, while the others do not have death penalty. Some people think America should not have capital punishment because capital punishment does not conform to civilization. However, America should continue to use the death penalty because capital punishment…

    • 1408 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Powerful Essays
  • Good Essays

    Capital punishment will deter people from committing a crime. In 1973, Ehrlich employed a new kind of analysis which produced results showing that for every inmate who was executed, 7 lives were spared because others were deterred from committing a murder. For each execution, the crime rate dropped by over 18%. By having the death penalty in our law system, it will teach kids to stay in school, so they don't get into…

    • 715 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    Bern Death Penalty

    • 620 Words
    • 2 Pages

    Capital punishment is a punitive measure in which an offender is found guilty through the traditional judicial process and the punishment delivered is execution. Depending on the state the offender was processed in, execution may be delivered in many ways ranging from lethal injection to death by electrocution. Crimes for which capital punishment is applicable for are known as capital crimes. Since capital punishment is essentially about the use of the death penalty, it must be asked whether it is a rational and effective way to react to and address capital the crimes. This writing will explore both the moral and practical implications of capital punishment and also look at it from an ethical viewpoint.…

    • 620 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    Capital punishment has not been proven to deter crime and it opens the possibility of executing innocent people. That is why the United States of America should abolish the death penalty.…

    • 971 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    “ For hundreds of years people have considered capital punishment a deterrence of crime. Seven hundred and five individuals have died since 1976, by means of capital punishment; twenty-two of these executions have already occurred this year at Death Penalty Information Center”, exclaims Tara Volpe in her article, Capital Punishment: Does Death Equal Justice? In another article written by Coretta King, the author states that, “In recent years, an increase of violence in America, both individual and political, has prompted a backlash of public opinion on capital punishment”. Capital punishment is a tremendous issue that faces the criminal justice system. Some people think that capital punishment is a good idea for those who commit capital or very serious crimes; on the other hand, some people believe that capital punishment is wrong. In reality, capital punishment is wrong for several reasons.…

    • 682 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Powerful Essays

    Is capital punishment and the death penalty cruel and usual punishment? Should the death penalty be abolished completely? Is capital punishment a real deterrent to crime and homicide incidents? How many innocent people are victims of the death penalty, and how many may actually be innocent? These questions are still in debate not only in the United States (U.S.) but around the world.…

    • 1432 Words
    • 6 Pages
    Powerful Essays
  • Better Essays

    Crime is an incontestable part of the society which is a result of social, political and economic imbalance and differences amongst different sects of society. It is obvious that states have to take actions in order to repress and deter crime but the manner in which this is done has always been up for discussion. Death penalty and life imprisonment are the commonly used tools used by the state to reduce homicide rates and other execrable crimes. Although there is a school of thought which considers death penalty as an appropriate and acceptable consequence to horrific crimes however majority still see it as inhumane and objectionable as it not only violates the basic human rights of the people but also sometimes claims innocent lives, does not act as a crime deterrent, is racially biased, costs more than alternative punishments and targets the poor mainly.…

    • 2797 Words
    • 12 Pages
    Better Essays
  • Better Essays

    Can life imprisonment be a good alternative to death penalty? The issue remains unresolved. Even the US Supreme Court that had abolished ‘Death Penalty’ reversed its decision when new and less cruel methods of execution were introduced. Why does a society punish its members for certain acts that are offensive and unacceptable to its laws and codes? This can be a starting point of exploring our dilemma about death penalty vs. life imprisonment. It is argued that fear of death deters people from committing crimes, and the penalty of death exerts a positive moral influence. The American death penalty laws have invited ire and ridicule of human rights activists everywhere, including in the USA, and Courts in most democratic countries, including India, have been very sparing in pronouncing death sentences in the ‘rarest of rare cases”. Yet, crimes of murder and rape and the cruel manner in which they were carried out, at times, make ordinary citizens support and commend death penalty and believe that fear and intimidation of capital punishment shall keep other citizens from violating the social and normative codes of their State and society. But there are contrary views and arguments, according to which capital punishment does not deter crime and death penalty is not necessary. Countries that no longer have death penalty have not experienced an increase in the number of murders. Sweden, Netherlands, Denmark, Switzerland and Belgium have not carried out executions since the early part of the century, yet these countries have not experienced a rise in crime rates. But the retributive value of capital punishment dismisses the question of deterrence. Deterrence works only if forbidden acts are illegal as well as immoral. So the easily frightened will not break the law, but “the fearless will break the law, the irrational will break the law, and all others will break the law”, it has been argued.…

    • 1393 Words
    • 6 Pages
    Better Essays
  • Good Essays

    Crime is a part of everyday life and everyone is aware of the threat it possesses, but the question lies in the methods in which it should be dealt with. A major issue in today’s society is whether or not the death penalty is a proper form of punishment. Many people have different opinions on the issue because of its many pros and cons. The arguments against the death penalty show that executions are more expensive than life in prison, the innocent may be wrongly accused, and it is not a deterrent to crime.…

    • 817 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    Capital punishment is necessary in order for justice to prevail. However, there are always controversies and opposite views against this punishment. The anti-capital punishment people feel that it is immoral for the government to carry out this because it is subjected to killing. They believe that everyone makes mistakes and everyone should have their right or chance to correct their mistakes. It is true that capital punishment will deprive the criminal’s life and his chances, but it is sure to gain social stability and will be an effective way of deterrent of crimes.…

    • 950 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Satisfactory Essays

    Capital punishment should be banned under international low. To what extent do you agree or disagree with this statement.…

    • 293 Words
    • 1 Page
    Satisfactory Essays
  • Better Essays

    Should Capital Punishment?

    • 1359 Words
    • 6 Pages

    Capital punishment should be abolished. To what extend do you agree or disagree with this statement?…

    • 1359 Words
    • 6 Pages
    Better Essays