Capital Structure

Topics: Net present value, Internal rate of return, Discounted cash flow Pages: 6 (1969 words) Published: February 12, 2006
Financial decision-makers must find answers to important questions, including; •What long-term investments should the firm undertake (capital budgeting) and how will investment and finance decisions affect the firm's value (valuation)? •How can cash be raised for the required investments? This is known as the ‘financing decision' (cost of capital, capital structure and leasing). •How will the firm manage its day-to-day cash and financial affairs (short-term financing and net working capital)?

The Capital Budgeting Mini Case presents a financial decision of acquiring another corporation. Two choices are available; Corporation A and Corporation B, the cost of each choice is $250,000, and acquiring both corporations is not an option. The primary goal of any company is to create value for its shareholders and as such, the most important job of the financial manager is to create value from the company's capital budgeting,

Financial managers must be particularly aware of the timing of cash flows (the ‘time value of money') and associated risks. This financial decision-maker will use projected cash flows to determine whether acquiring Corporation A or Corporation B (i.e. NPV and IRR) is the best choice. If acquisition does not generate positive cash flow, the company is effectively providing finance for the acquired corporation.

Capital Budgeting Decisions
Many business opportunities involve sacrificing current earnings for future profits (opportunity cost). For the acquisition to be worth pursuing, it must generate a higher rate of return than what could be earned in the capital markets (Jaffe et al., 2002:200). When assessing capital budgeting projects, financial decision makers typically use discounted cash flow methods such as Net Present Value (NPV) or Internal Rate of Return (IRR).

Net Present Value (NPV)
The most commonly used technique for financial decision making is Net Present Value (NPV) analysis. NPV is the present value of future cash returns, discounted at the appropriate market interest rate, minus the present value of the cost of investment. NPV includes the current cost of the investment in determining its value and not simply what it will return. The NPV rule that should be used by decision-makers is that an investment is worth making if it has a positive NPV and should be rejected if it has a negative NPV. An investment with a positive NPV is worth undertaking because doing so is essentially the same as receiving cash payments equal to the NPV (Jaffe et al., 2002:59,926). Using the discount rate as the required rate of return, the net present value of an investment is the present value of the cash inflows minus the present value of the cash outflows. A more common way of expressing this is to say that the net present value (NPV) is the present value of the benefits (PVB) minus the present value of the costs (PVC) NPV = PVB - PVC

To calculate the NPV (Net Present Value), I discounted the cash flow at discount rate of 10% for Corporation A and a discount rate of 11% for Corporation B. By using the discount rate I conducted a test to see if the project is expected to earn our minimum desired rate of return. Here are my decision rules: If the NPV is:Benefits vs. CostsShould we expect to earn at least our minimum rate of return?Accept the

PositiveBenefits > CostsYes, more thanAccept
ZeroBenefits = CostsExactly equal toIndifferent
NegativeBenefits < CostsNo, less thanReject

In the Capital Budgeting Mini Case, Corporation A's NPV is equal to 20,979 and Corporation B's NPV is equal to 40,252. Corporation B is the better selection because: (1)The benefits are greater than the costs

(2)Expect to earn at least the minimum rate of return and more

Whilst, Jaffe et al. (2002:140,157) argue that "the NPV approach is the best one for evaluating capital budgeting projects" alternative methods exist, of which the Internal Rate of Return (IRR) method has...

References: Cooper, C. & Argyris, C., eds. (1998) Encyclopedia of Management. Blackwell business: Oxford.
Jaffe, Jeffrey; Ross, Stephen A.; and Westerfield, Randolph (2001). Corporate Finance: Fifth edition, Custom Electronic Text for the University of Phoenix, McGraw- Hill. Unknown (2002).
Smith, C. (1986). The theory of corporate finance: A historical overview. In, The modern theory corporate finance, eds Jensen & Smith. McGraw Hill: Sydney.
Continue Reading

Please join StudyMode to read the full document

You May Also Find These Documents Helpful

  • Du Pont Case Study
  • Capital Structure Essay
  • Capital Structure Essay
  • Capital Structure Essay
  • Optimal Capital Structure Essay
  • Factors determining Capital Structure Essay
  • Articles Relating to Capital Structure-Essay
  • Essay about relationship between factors of capital structure

Become a StudyMode Member

Sign Up - It's Free