Preview

Capital Punishment-the Cases of Johnny D. Mcmillan and Ron Williamson 1

Better Essays
Open Document
Open Document
1054 Words
Grammar
Grammar
Plagiarism
Plagiarism
Writing
Writing
Score
Score
Capital Punishment-the Cases of Johnny D. Mcmillan and Ron Williamson 1
Capital punishment is, undeniably, one of the most highly debated topics in the United States. Many Americans support capital punishment, but they are wrong to do so. Many people use the argument that capital punishment deters crime and recent studies have shown that it does deter crime. Over the years, several studies have demonstrated a link between executions and decreases in murder rates (Haugen). While this is true, people do not realize there are several reasons why the death penalty should be abolished. The three main reasons capital punishment should be abolished is too many innocent inmates are either executed or put on death on row, capital punishment is morally wrong, and it would save the government millions of dollars if capital punishment was not in place. The Federal Government and state governments do not consider the lives of innocent men who were and currently are convicted of murder and sentenced to death. They think the court systems are flawless and if a jury finds one guilty, then the defendant is guilty no questions asked. The cases of Johnny D. McMillan and Ron Williamson prove the judicial system to be dead wrong. Pete Earley tells the story of Johnny D. McMillan in his nonfiction book, Circumstantial Evidence. The story of Johnny D. took place here in Monroeville, Alabama (Earley). He was falsely accused of the murder of Ronda Rene Morrison. He spent six years on death row and was finally released when it was proven that false testimony had put him in prison (Earley). No one from the prosecution or the state ever apologized to McMillan for his wrongful imprisonment (Earley). John Grisham tells Ron Williamson’s story in his nonfiction book, The Innocent Man. Ron Williamson, a former New York Yankee, was also falsely accused of murder (Grisham). Williamson was falsely accused of the murder of Debbie Carter in Ado, Oklahoma (Grisham). He spent eleven years on death row before he was finally proven innocent (Grisham). U.S. District court


Cited: Earley, Pete. Circumstantial Evidence. New York: Bantman Books, 1995. Print. Grisham, John. The Innocent Man. New York: Doubleday, 2006. Print. Haugen, David. The Death Penalty Should Not Be Abolished.. David B. Muhlhausen Opposing Viewpoints: Criminal Justice. Detroit: Greenhaven Press, 2009. 24 Nov. 2009. Mears, Bill. "Study: States Cant Afford Death Penalty." CNN.com. 20 Oct. 2009. Web. 24 Nov. 2009. . Tucker, William. Capital Punishment Should Not Be Abolished. Opposing Viewpoints: Criminal Justice. Ed. Tamara L. Roleff. San Diego: Greenhaven Press, 2004. Williams, Marry. Capital Punishment Undermines the Sacredness of Life. Current Controversies: Capital Punishment. San Diego: Greenhaven Press, 2000. 24 Nov. 2009.

You May Also Find These Documents Helpful

  • Good Essays

    The Innocent Man is non-fiction examining several particularly unjust criminal convictions in the Oklahoma justice system. But as non-fiction, you will not believe how innocent people can be railroaded onto death row on almost no evidence whatsoever, coerced confessions and unscrupulous prosecutors who want someone's head on a stick without truly looking for the killer.…

    • 416 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Powerful Essays

    Crime is a major problem in our world today. Some people in our country live in fear that they will be the next victim of a crime; they could be robbed, raped, or even murdered. There are so many theories on how to stop crime. One of the theories is the use of the death penalty as a deterrent. There are a lot of issues that surround that idea that make the use of the death penalty just as bad as the accused committing murder. It is very contradictive, inconsistent, and unethical. Although some people believe that the death penalty deters crime, there are many arguments against it. For example, the costs are extremely high, racism is involved, and there are innocent people on death row to list a few.…

    • 2253 Words
    • 10 Pages
    Powerful Essays
  • Good Essays

    Capital Punishment is regarded as one of the United States' hottest topics. Those for and against it constantly debate over the various issues that capital punishment brings forth. This essay explains just a few of these topics and my view on the death penalty.…

    • 1062 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    The death penalty is a major topic for debate Shannon Rafferty defends in her portfolio published by Penn State entitled “Death Penalty Persuasive Essay.” She believes the penalty should be allowed because it functions as a deterrent, it provides society retribution and it is morally just. Olivia H. disagrees with use of the death penalty in her essay “Capital Punishment Is Dead wrong.” She tells about the risk of punishing the innocent, and how the states are doing irreversible acts of crime. As the authors disagree about whether the death penalty should be allowed, they have some common ground when it comes to admitting the potential for human error and in both disagreeing to the use of barbaric punishments by the government.…

    • 413 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Powerful Essays

    When understanding criminal law it is important to consider the positive and negative effects that different punishment alternatives can have. Over the last century the use of capital punishment, the legal process for which an individual is sentence to death when found guilty of committing a crime, has been a subject debated back and forth between government parties on its effectiveness. Many people believe that the issues of fairness, constitutionality, morality of an individual’s life, and potential of convicting the innocent are too important to allow the use of the…

    • 2611 Words
    • 11 Pages
    Powerful Essays
  • Better Essays

    1. " The High Cost of the Death Penalty." The Feminism and Nonviolence Studies Association Journal Home Page. N.p., n.d. Web. 2 Aug. 2013. <http://www.fnsa.org/v1n1/dieter.html>.…

    • 1143 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Better Essays
  • Good Essays

    Some may say that the death penalty is helpful to society because it intimidates criminals into committing less crimes, particularly murders, when in reality, studies like one done by Benjamin S. Tyree of the University of Richmond show that there is no correlation between the use of the death penalty and lower murder rates, and if anything, states that do not use the death penalty, have lower murder rates than those that do (Deter, Tyree). If that is the case, then it is obvious that the death penalty does not benefit our country.…

    • 863 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Better Essays

    Be it resolved that capital punishment be legalised in Canada. The death penalty was officially abolished in Canada in 1976 when the Canadian government held a free vote in Parliament to eradicate it from the Criminal Code and over sixty countries around the world have done the same. According to a poll conducted by Angus Reid, a Canadian sociologist, 21 percent of Canadians feel that murderers can be rehabilitated and 54 percent feel that although the convicted murderer has taken a life, it still is not justifiable to take the murderer’s life as the punishment. Capital punishment should not be legalised because it does not provide a useful purpose to society, it does not promote the rehabilitation of criminals and it is more retributive than restorative.…

    • 1850 Words
    • 8 Pages
    Better Essays
  • Better Essays

    Death Penalty

    • 4048 Words
    • 17 Pages

    Thesis: Capital punishment is useless as a deterrent, morally indefensible, discriminatory in practice, and prone to errors that may have led to the execution of wrongfully convicted people. Its continuing legality in the United States is critically undermining American moral stature around the world. The Supreme Court should bring the United States in line with the rest of the civilized world and hold that death is a cruel and unusual punishment prohibited by the Eighth Amendment. Summary: The death penalty process consumes tremendous amounts of money and resources and fails to deter criminal activity. It is not uniformly applied geographically, and where it is allowed, it is used in an often arbitrary and racist manner. As a result, states have been curtailing the use of the death penalty, the Supreme Court has limited its application, and both death sentences and executions are down sharply. This is at odds with the recent efforts of some states to expand the range of capital crimes, and with national polls which still reflect a clear majority of Americans favor capital punishment. Meanwhile, momentum has been accelerating in the international community to abolish the death penalty, and the United States is increasingly criticized for failing to keep in step with other civilized nations in this area. Capital Punishment in the United States Since the 1977 resumption of capital punishment in the United States, nearly 1,100 convicted prisoners have been put to death in the thirty-eight US states where the practice remains legal. As of the beginning of 2007, approximately 3,350 people remain on death row in American prisons. In recent years, the evidence has shown that the death penalty process consumes tremendous amounts of money and resources and fails to deter criminals. FBI Uniform Crime…

    • 4048 Words
    • 17 Pages
    Better Essays
  • Good Essays

    Recently, there has been talk amongst many Americans about whether or not the “death penalty” should be outlawed in the United States. Although the crime may be unforgivable, no one should have the right to decide whether or not a person’s life should be stripped away, because nothing is more important than a person’s life. There are many reasons why the death penalty should be outlawed, one reason is that many criminals put on trial may face discrimination, and receive a bias punishment. Another reason is that the death penalty is very costly and that the alternative, life without parole, is a much cheaper and easier solution. The death penalty also reflects the moral standing of today's society. Nobody can justify taking another person’s…

    • 1055 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    Death Penalty In Prisons

    • 1012 Words
    • 5 Pages

    The death penalty now viewed as so barbaric that the views around the world have shifted so much that the U.S continuous to be the only country in Western Democracy to carry it out (Manning & Rhoden-Trader, 2000). The U.S has now begun to recognize so many problems that the death penalty system has such as it being unequally applied to minorities time and time again. Furthermore, the cost of carrying out an execution is staggering compared to life in prison without the possibility of parole. Inmates that were sitting on death row have been and continue to be exonerated which means innocent people can be put to death. One other major problems with the death penalty and statistics have shown that it simple does not deter crime. For these reasons and more I believe we should abolish the death penalty and never look…

    • 1012 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Powerful Essays

    A Summary on Death Penalty

    • 1607 Words
    • 7 Pages

    IV. Today I would like to share with you the benefits of death penalty by explaining some of the basics, providing you with some statistics, sharing stories with you of some people who have been executed, argue the biggest conflicts affecting this debate, explain how executions are punishment and a safety precaution, and tell you what you can do to make a difference.…

    • 1607 Words
    • 7 Pages
    Powerful Essays
  • Better Essays

    Messerli, Joe. “Should the death penalty be banned as a form of punishment?”. Balanced Politics. 7 January 2012. Web. 26 February 2014. .…

    • 1450 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Better Essays
  • Powerful Essays

    Thesis Statement: Research suggests that capital punishment should be abolished to obviate mishandled executions, prevent wrongfully convicted citizens from being put to death and to lower taxpayer dollars for incurred expenses for inmates on death row.…

    • 2185 Words
    • 9 Pages
    Powerful Essays
  • Best Essays

    Criminal Justice , 2009 David B. Muhlhausen, "The Death Penalty Deters Crime and Saves Lives," Heritage Foundation, August 28, 2007. www.heritage.org. Reproduced by permission of the author. "Capital punishment produces a strong deterrent effect that saves lives." In the following viewpoint, David B. Muhlhausen argues that capital punishment should not be abandoned because it deters crimes, saves lives, and the majority of American citizens support its use. Additionally, he maintains that evidence does not support claims that racial discrimination results in a disproportionate number of African Americans incarcerated on death row. David B. Muhlhausen is a senior policy analyst in the area of criminal justice for the Heritage Foundation, a conservative public policy research organization.…

    • 2506 Words
    • 11 Pages
    Best Essays