Capital Punishment is characterized as the judicature, where a person is sentenced when he or she has committed a grievous offense and is followed by the execution of the individual. Although, most states that concede capital punishment have an age requirement, it is legal to dictate death sentence on a minor, in certain cases. In every society a form of punishment is imposed on those who break the law to discourage future wrongdoers. Indeed capital punishment is a practice that has been applied since the ancient times, and has become a very controversial issue in the United States and worldwide; and it has passed through many legal disputes that even came to a halt while the Supreme Court was discussing the case to reach a decision which later upheld the punishment with certain conditions. But is not killing a violent act? Killing is prohibited in every primary religion and is acknowledged as a crime in every civilized society, regardless of how it is carried out. The reality is that murder has never been absolute. Indeed, some religions accept the use of war and killing in self-defense, whereas governments not only allow soldiers to kill but they are also required to do so for their nation. As Sir James Stephen (1864) said “No other punishment deters men so effectually from committing crimes as the punishment of death.” (p. 6). This gives right to one of the most debatable questions on the topic, which is the deterrence interrogate. Deterrence as explained in the first paragraph, is the use of a punishment to prevent people from reoffending. Death attains benefits for a society, assuring it from wrongdoers. If the death penalty does not stop criminals, what would stop it? During the times when there was no judicial system, people who had carried out murder and rape, were punished by the victim’s families, which led to future vendettas that multiplied within generations. Death penalty was a well-accepted law as a result of many criminal offenses, enforced...
References: Kronenwetter, M. (2001). Capital Punishment in Context. Capital Punishment Second Edition, (pp. 1-33). Santa Barbara, CA: Contemporary World Issues.
Haines, H. H. (1996). Against Capital Punishment. The Anti-Death Penalty Movement in America, 1972-1994 (pp. 1-40). New York, NY: Oxford.
Baik, E. (2012). Gender, Religion and National Origin: Latinos attitude toward Capital Punishment. Journal of Social Sciences (15493652), 8(1), 79-84
Stetker, C. S., & Stetker, J. M. (2010). Capital Punishment: A century of discontinuous debate. Journal of Criminal Law & Criminology, 100(3), 643-689.
Phillips, S. (2009). Criminology: Legal disparities in the capital of Capital Punishment. Journal Of Criminal Law & Criminology, 99(3), 717-755.
Homans, L. (2008). Swinging Sixties: The Abolition of Capital Punishment. History Today, 58(12), 43-49.
Yost, B. S. (2011). The Irrevocability of Capital Punishment. Journal of Social Philosophy, 42(3), 321-340. doi:10.1111/j.1467-9833.2011.01537.x
Langhamer, C. (2012). The Live Dynamic Whole of Feeling and Behavior: Capital Punishment and the Politics of Emotion, 1945-1957. Journal of British Studies, 51(2), 416-441.
Garland, D. (2011). The Problem of the Body in Modern State Punishment. Social Research, 78(3), 767-798
White Paper on Ethical Issues Concerning Capital Punishment. (2012). World Medical Journal, 58(3), 82-87.
Please join StudyMode to read the full document