Preview

Campaign Spending Limits

Good Essays
Open Document
Open Document
364 Words
Grammar
Grammar
Plagiarism
Plagiarism
Writing
Writing
Score
Score
Campaign Spending Limits
Campaign spending should be limited

The 2008 presidential election has shown the citizens of the United States of America how much freedom campaign spending has. Months before the election; spending has exceeded the last 2000 election of six hundred million dollars. It's almost ridiculous how much money can be spent on campaign spending.
One question that comes up when thinking of unlimited campaign spending is the existence of a democracy where only the wealthy can become leaders and decision makers. "The absence of campaign spending limits severely restricts access of minority and low income communities to the political process". With current averages on spending it almost impossible for this group to be heard. "Limits on campaign spending

You May Also Find These Documents Helpful

  • Good Essays

    Fahrenheit 451 Unit 5

    • 1607 Words
    • 7 Pages

    According to the United States Supreme Court, the First Amendment prevents limits from being placed on independent political expenditures by corporations. True…

    • 1607 Words
    • 7 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Satisfactory Essays

    As one can see, campaign finance reform has been around for a while, not that many people were really aware of it until the Citizens United v. FEC case of 2010. Citizens United was founded in 1988 by a Washington political consultant, Floyd Brown who received major funding from the Koch brothers, industrialist who own the secondly largest privately owned company in the US (Mayer, 2010). They gained fame by suing the Federal Election Commission (FEC), leading to a notorious Supreme Court case which eliminated some restrictions on how corporations can spend money in elections. Back in 1971, the Federal Election Campaign Act (FECA) was the main United States federal law that regulates political fundraising and spending. Its original focus was…

    • 280 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Satisfactory Essays
  • Good Essays

    Today, most American politicians are “fundraisers first and legislators second,” which has numerous consequences (Sarbanes). Congressman John Sarbanes estimated that congressmen devote 30 to 70 percent of their time to fundraising -time that could be spent creating legislation and learning about policy issues (Lieu). Additionally, the unrestricted private campaign donations are undermining democracy, in a sense “buying the government,” while the people’s interests shift to the back seat. To reduce gridlock, we need our congress members time and energy devoted to legislation, and their votes dedicated to the people, not solely the Big Money minority. In accordance with the views of many grassroots leaders, I believe that we need a comprehensive overhaul of the election system. The first step is the reversal of Citizens United, a court case that led to the creation of super PAC’s when the Supreme Court ruled that the federal government cannot limit corporations (or unions, associations or individuals) from spending money to influence the outcome of elections (Liptak). The second step involves transferring power back to the people. As Lawrence Lessig, academic scholar and political activist, points out, “So long as elections cost money, we won’t end Congress’s dependence on its funders (Lessig).” Therefore, our second step must be to adopt a system of…

    • 972 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    The significance of money cannot be underestimated when looking at party decline in the US. To run for Congress requires large amounts of money, but to run for President requires even…

    • 623 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    Before the Citizens United decision funding came from individuals and PACs, or Political Action Committees. PACs are groups that receive or donate a minimum of $1000 but a maximum of $5000 to any individual to influence federal and/or state elections. This limit made fundraising one of the most time consuming activities for politicians. Even though individuals had the right to donate as much as they wanted the social judgment of openly paying for your political ideals kept many rich silent (and many were simply uninterested). This began to change with Citizens United v. Federal Election Commission ruling which overturned the ban on the use of corporate or union funds in politics.…

    • 1050 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    Over the past three decades, elections have ceased to give people the choice they are intended to have when voting for their senators and representatives. From 1975 to the present, incumbents have won their reelection bids over 90% of the time. Opponents to term limits point out that elections are designed to hold officials accountable to the people they are representing. Yet, congressmen use their large monetary funds, benefits, name recognition, and experience to end rival campaigns before they…

    • 460 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Satisfactory Essays

    Government in America

    • 258 Words
    • 2 Pages

    9. What are the main features of the Federal Election Campaign Act of 1974? a. b. c. d. e. 10. Present an argument that political action committees are essential to a successful campaign. 11. What are the three effects campaigns can have on voters? a. b. c. 12. What three factors tend to weaken campaigns impact on voters? a. b. c. 13. What is meant by the “permanent campaign”? 14. How might campaigns affect the scope of government?…

    • 258 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Satisfactory Essays
  • Good Essays

    This banned soft money contributions to campaigns, especially from interest groups. Because soft money was limitless, this act prevented interest groups from sending huge sums of money to specific candidates.…

    • 612 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Powerful Essays

    Political advertising in the use of television has become so significantly renown that it is the "major form of communication among candidates and the voters they seek to reach out to" according to Richard Brody, Stanford University Press. In realization of Eisenhower's success, every presidential campaign since 1952 has relied extremely on political ads. 40 years later, the political parties of George Bush, Bill Clinton, and Ross Perot spent over $110…

    • 1537 Words
    • 7 Pages
    Powerful Essays
  • Good Essays

    Campaign related spending has increased dramatically over time. Even though the Supreme Court has ruled that campaign spending (not donations) by candidates and private individuals / groups is a form of free speech, some feel that there is just too much money in our election system. What do you think? Is campaign spending problematic? In what way(s) is it, or is it not, problematic exactly? Please explain your answer and provide evidence…

    • 1063 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    The arguments between the Anti-Federalists and Federalists led to the creation of a document that has stood the test of time and new governments have repeatedly modeled their governmental structure off of the Constitution. Despite the overwhelming majority of the Anti-Federalists’ concerns over many of the Constitution’s provisions being unfounded, their apprehensions regarding disproportionate amount of influence men of property could have on government officials have since become a scary reality, ironically due to their own insistence on implementing a Bill of Rights. Since the Supreme Court deemed that the United States government had no right to limit money spent on elections in Citizens United vs. Federal Election Commission, wealthy donors, including corporations, have contributed millions upon millions of dollars into elections at all different levels of…

    • 1803 Words
    • 8 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    Term Limits

    • 433 Words
    • 2 Pages

    In my opinion I agree without a doubt that there should be a term limit. I feel that there are plenty of other choices out there that can do much better for our country that having a…

    • 433 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    Do you think democracy is endangered by the need to raise huge amounts of money to run for public office? Is the need for big money leading to less democracy—that is, government by special interests? Would you support public financing of campaigns?…

    • 812 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    Point Shaving

    • 506 Words
    • 3 Pages

    Unfortunately there is the big issue of the politicians and their campaigning for funds and it's going to be hard to control…

    • 506 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    The Citizenship Agenda

    • 896 Words
    • 4 Pages

    Voting with Dollars suggests that American voters should be given a special credit card account containing $50 that they can only spend on federal election campaigns. Voters would go to ATMs and transfer their patriot dollars to their candidate and/or political party of interest. Candidates will be eager and determined to gain voters’ patriot dollars. Not only will it change the excitement of the candidates, but it will allow conversation and debating throughout the community regarding who the money should be given to. I disagree with Ackerman’s idea in that politicians will not only be trying to persuade people for a vote, but now for their money. Advertisements and debates will become more of what people want to hear in hopes that the politician will gain people’s money. Understanding the amount of money used in campaigns, it should be our job individually to provide the amount of money we want for our politicians. We should not have to distribute credit cards to make campaigns…

    • 896 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Good Essays