Preview

Campaign Finance Reform

Powerful Essays
Open Document
Open Document
1400 Words
Grammar
Grammar
Plagiarism
Plagiarism
Writing
Writing
Score
Score
Campaign Finance Reform
Any campaign finance reform must be structured within the framework of the Constitution.

When examining the role of the government in situations of participation in political processes, the role as the protector of rights and privileges as identified in the Constitution must be weighed against its role as a regulator of the political process. A primary principle of the First Amendment is to protect and encourage the rights of individuals and organizations to participate in our civic process (Federal Campaign Finance Law). This right to be involved in the political system is an important privilege and should not be taken lightly. Any campaign finance reform must be structured within the framework of the Constitution. Disclosure requirements are observed as means to deter corruption by requiring that contributions made to elected officials and candidates are made public in federal elections. Disclosure allows voters to make up their own minds based on the information that is placed before them. Supreme Court Justice Louis Dembitz Brandeis believes, “Publicity is justly commended as a remedy for social and industrial diseases. Sunlight is said to be the best of disinfectants, electric light the most efficient policeman” (Brandeis, 97). Brandeis’ statement laid the groundwork of the Sunlight Foundation, which was founded on the idea that utilizing new technology to facilitate citizens with information concerning Congress, will lead to the reduction of corruption, ensure greater government accountability, and establish public trust. The Sunlight Foundation claims that by, “providing timely online access to information about the Congress and its members will enable citizens and the press to better understand the activities of their lawmakers and the institution, to monitor the interplay between lawmakers and lobbyists, and enable Congress to better police itself” (Sunlight). Although I agree with the Sunlight Foundation up to a point, I cannot



Cited: "About The Sunlight Foundation." 19 April 2007. The Sunlight Foundation. 19 Apr 2007 . Brandeis, Louis. Other People’s Money. New York: F.A. Stokes, 1914. "Federal Campaign Finance Law." Federal Election Commission. U.S. Government. 29 Mar 2007 . "Government and Politics." Polling Reports Online. 30 April 2006. Polling Reports Inc. 19 Apr 2007 . McAuliff, Michael. “Hillary: The $10m woman-Political fundraisers turn to gold for Democrat First Lady." Daily Telegraph. 27 March 2007: 15-. Lexus Nexus. University of Tennessee at Chattanooga Lib. 20 Mar. 2007 Thompson, Nicolas. "The Internet and Political Campaigns." 16 June 2003. Globalist. 26 March 2007

You May Also Find These Documents Helpful

  • Powerful Essays

    This summer, I was fortunate enough to get an internship on a local U.S. Congress campaign. I live in the Pennsylvania 8th district and worked on the campaign of Kathy Boockvar, Democratic challenger to Republican incumbent Mike Fitzpatrick. I was able to meet many interesting people and clarify my own political ideals, but most importantly I got to learn about campaigns and the election process.…

    • 3864 Words
    • 16 Pages
    Powerful Essays
  • Good Essays

    There have been many attempts to reform the campaign finance since the 19th Century and before the reform was introduced, there were concerns over the amount of money being spent by individual candidates in the run up to an election and the actual presidential elections. In 1974, under President Ford, the Congress passed significant amendments to the Federal Election Campaign Act creating a way to regulate campaign contributions and spending.…

    • 436 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    In his book, Big Money: 2.5 Billion Dollars, One Suspicious Vehicle, and a Pimp- on the Trail of the Ultra-Rich Hijacking American Politics, author Kenneth P. Vogel writes on the newly less regulated, and arguably more corrupt relationship between the American political system and big money donors. In this response paper I will address the main questions in relation to the text. One, which Supreme Court decision allowed for the rise in “Big Money’s” influence over the American political system? Two, how did the Supreme Court decision addressed in question one change both the American political landscape and the fundraising techniques used by those involved in political fundraising? And third, how did the Republicans and Democrats each respond in 2012 to “Big Money” in the American political system. I will follow the answers to these questions with a later section in my paper devoted to a personal response to Vogel’s text, as well as connections between his text and broader topic discussed in our Interest Groups class lectures.…

    • 1195 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Better Essays

    References: Barone, M. & McCutchen, C. (2011). Almanac of American Politics 2012. Chicago, IL: University of Chicago Press.…

    • 2051 Words
    • 6 Pages
    Better Essays
  • Best Essays

    Democracy is deified as a government ruled by its people, a society represented by its own members forming a self deciding and self governed community. This very essential ideal established the founders of the United States has become harder to uphold, and there are restraints that do not allow for true democracy to be fully expressed. Extra-governmental actions by special interests and the intricate costs of campaigns has married the economic and political arenas and it has resulted the creation of heavily influenced representatives that no longer serve their original function- to represent the interest of their constituents. The functionality of today’s political system would be unrecognizable to that of the original Constitution and that of the founders. The absence of term limits of House and Senate representatives have causes two elements that infringes on the democratic value of the government of the United States; now members of the congress and senate are career politicians and hold office for many ulterior reasons other than the honor of public service, and secondly this notion has now created a political class an exclusive society that dictates the legislative process. An Amendment to the Constitution is necessary to overturn the previous institutional establishment of limitless terms for senators and house representatives, because amendments are the only way to modify the articles of the constitution. [1]…

    • 2378 Words
    • 10 Pages
    Best Essays
  • Good Essays

    Setting a regulation to funnel the wealthy elite’s money into super PACs takes away power from the everyday individual and their right to have a government by the people for the people. Also, it perpetuates corruption due to the super PACs not being legally obligated to disclose their spending, which is known as “dark money”. This continues the cycle of corruption by decreasing transparency of a candidate, making the candidate and their interests less known to the public. Due to this, he public is unable to make informed decisions to better not only their own lives, but the entire country through their vote (Levy 1).…

    • 510 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    Fahrenheit 451 Unit 5

    • 1607 Words
    • 7 Pages

    According to the United States Supreme Court, the First Amendment prevents limits from being placed on independent political expenditures by corporations. True…

    • 1607 Words
    • 7 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    The Constitution’s Structural Limits on Power Should Be the Focus of the Bill of Rights” contains many valuable insights. In particular, it re-affirms the proposition – lost for many years but perhaps gaining some new currency – that the so-called “structural” provisions of the Constitution are, and were intended to be, not merely matters of mundane and perhaps outdated institutional design but core protections of individual liberty. Further, it rightly emphasizes that the antifederalist-inspired Bill of Rights amendments work together with the Constitution’s structural provisions to limit government and promote individual liberty by reducing the federal government’s power even in areas in which it is granted authority.…

    • 250 Words
    • 1 Page
    Good Essays
  • Satisfactory Essays

    As one can see, campaign finance reform has been around for a while, not that many people were really aware of it until the Citizens United v. FEC case of 2010. Citizens United was founded in 1988 by a Washington political consultant, Floyd Brown who received major funding from the Koch brothers, industrialist who own the secondly largest privately owned company in the US (Mayer, 2010). They gained fame by suing the Federal Election Commission (FEC), leading to a notorious Supreme Court case which eliminated some restrictions on how corporations can spend money in elections. Back in 1971, the Federal Election Campaign Act (FECA) was the main United States federal law that regulates political fundraising and spending. Its original focus was…

    • 280 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Satisfactory Essays
  • Good Essays

    Today, most American politicians are “fundraisers first and legislators second,” which has numerous consequences (Sarbanes). Congressman John Sarbanes estimated that congressmen devote 30 to 70 percent of their time to fundraising -time that could be spent creating legislation and learning about policy issues (Lieu). Additionally, the unrestricted private campaign donations are undermining democracy, in a sense “buying the government,” while the people’s interests shift to the back seat. To reduce gridlock, we need our congress members time and energy devoted to legislation, and their votes dedicated to the people, not solely the Big Money minority. In accordance with the views of many grassroots leaders, I believe that we need a comprehensive overhaul of the election system. The first step is the reversal of Citizens United, a court case that led to the creation of super PAC’s when the Supreme Court ruled that the federal government cannot limit corporations (or unions, associations or individuals) from spending money to influence the outcome of elections (Liptak). The second step involves transferring power back to the people. As Lawrence Lessig, academic scholar and political activist, points out, “So long as elections cost money, we won’t end Congress’s dependence on its funders (Lessig).” Therefore, our second step must be to adopt a system of…

    • 972 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    Protection of Corporate Political Speech 1. How would you frame the issue and conclusion of this essay? The essay in our textbook argues that when The First amendment and the fourteenth amendment’s equal protection clause are combined, corporations are provided the rights and protection of political speech. Currently, corporations are regulated on supporting political candidates through indirect corporate funding.…

    • 687 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Best Essays

    Topic: "Campaign finance reform and the Citizens United Case." The paper will discuss what campaign finance reform looked like prior to and following this case, as well as the reasons for unlimited spending on political activities being damaging to democracy. It will also discuss the ideas for reversing the Citizens United case, the steps taken towards this so far, and the likely outcome based on current evidence and events.…

    • 1402 Words
    • 6 Pages
    Best Essays
  • Good Essays

    Fec vs. Citizens United

    • 1289 Words
    • 6 Pages

    The First Amendment has been one of the most controversial issues surrounding the Constitutions since its ratification in 1787. The First Amendment states, “Congress shall make no law respecting an establishment of religion, or prohibiting the free exercise thereof; or abridging the freedom of speech, or of the press; or the right of the people peaceably to assemble, and to petition the Government for a redress of grievances.” Many people disagree on the extent of power the First Amendment actually has on the right to free speech. One of the most controversial issues surrounding the First Amendment is how much influence a company can have over elections and campaigns. Huge corporations are known to pay billions of dollars to endorse certain politicians, and in turn the politicians pass legislation benefitting the corporation. Is this fair, or even legal? The Supreme Court case Citizens United v. Federal Election Commission dove right into the issue. Citizens United v. Federal Election Commission was an important United States Supreme Court case in which it was decided that the First Amendment prohibited the government from restricting political expenditures by corporations and unions. Citizens United, a nonprofit organization, produced a political controversial video on Senator Hillary Clinton prior to the 2008 primary elections, known as Hillary: The Movie. The documentary covered Hillary Clinton's life while in the Senate, the White House as First Lady and during her bid for presidential Democratic nominee. However, the documentary falls within the definition of "electioneering communications" under the Bipartisan Campaign Reform Act of 2002 ("BCRA")-a federal enactment designed to prevent "big money" from unfairly influencing federal elections. In a 5–4 decision, the Court held that BCRA violated the First Amendment.…

    • 1289 Words
    • 6 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    The changing landscape in the country has contributed to the uptick in gridlock in Washington D.C. The Supreme Court case has given rise to Super Political Action Committees (Super PACs) which have contributed billions of dollars to negative media advertisement of rival candidates. An area to explore in regards to this case are the loopholes created and their consequences. For instance, nonprofits who are not legally required to disclose the names of their donors can function similar to Super PACs. In addition, American subsidiary corporations owned by a foreign parent company are allowed to contribute unlimited amounts of money to political committees. As a result, it is possible that foreign entities are influencing U.S. elections. We are sure no one wants that to occur given the 2016 U.S. Presidential election controversy. Our goal is to explore the origins of the Supreme Court case, noting that longstanding reforms to campaign contributions were overturned, and it’s devastating aftermath. If the money of a few wealthy individuals and organizations outweighs the power of ordinary citizens, everyone does have an equal voice. These circumstances deteriorate the voice of that latter group, as they do not have the power to donate as much to the political campaigns. In the meanwhile, citizen’s faith in their government has fallen as more money entered politics through these shady…

    • 442 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Powerful Essays

    Legislation regarding the role of money in American politics is as old as the nation itself. In 1699 the Virginia House of Burgesses established a law banning the bribery of voters in elections. This law made insured that wealthy candidates would not attempt to pay off voters in an attempt to win elections (Mutch 2001). Today, the general consensus is the interested money is what corrupts politics, not bribes by self-financed candidates. It was not until the early nineteenth century that contributions to candidates began. In 1983, Congress restricted federal workers from contributing to federal campaigns after passing the Pendleton Civil Service Act. This was due to the rise in party loyalist who were given government jobs and expected to contribute to the parties’ campaigns in return (Mutch 2001). While this legislation succeeded in eliminating contributions from federal employees, it subsequently led politicians to begin finding money in other places. Primarily these sources were “industrial giants in oil, railroads, steel, and finance, which held major stakes in the direction of government…

    • 570 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Powerful Essays