Preview

Cameras in Court

Powerful Essays
Open Document
Open Document
2506 Words
Grammar
Grammar
Plagiarism
Plagiarism
Writing
Writing
Score
Score
Cameras in Court
Running Head: MOUSSAOUI TRIAL

Televising Moussaoui Federal Trial
Gerhard A. Grove
Dr. Ferry
PSC201
Northwood University

Televising Moussaoui Federal Trial
Abstract
This paper will cover the current issue and controversy of televising the Zacarias Moussaoui federal trial. The trial is the first trial of a suspected terrorist involved with the September 11, 2001 World Trade Center attacks. I intend to show that the decision of U.S. District Judge Leonie Brinkema to ban photographers and Court TV from the proceedings was wrong, based on the constitutional rights of the public and previous statutes. This paper will cover various cases involving televised court proceedings and public opinion concerning the media coverage of criminal trials.

Table of Contents
Background 4
Cameras in the Court 5
Supreme Court 6
Cameras Introduced to the Courts 8
Justification for Televising Moussaoui 9
Summary 10
References 11

Background
On September 11, 2001, perhaps the most vicious assault on the United States was committed in the form of a terrorist attack on the World Trade Center in New York. This attack claimed the lives of more than three thousand souls made up of innocent civilians, firefighters, and police officers. The incident involved the highjacking of two civilian airliners and using them as missiles to bring down the Trade Center. At the time the attacks were taking place in New York, an identical attack was being carried out against the Pentagon. This attack also involved the highjacking of two airliners and using them as missiles. Civilians aboard one airliner intervened, sacrificing their lives and preventing the terrorist from completing their unthinkable attack. The second group of terrorist was successful in their mission and took the lives of over three hundred inside the Pentagon.
Muslim extremist belonging to the Al Qaeda terrorist group carried out these attacks. Usama Bin Laden , the most notorious terrorist and the



References: Associated Press (2002, January 18). Judge denies Court TV 's request to televise Moussaoui 's trial. . Wall Street Journal. Retrieved February 4, 2002 from the World Wide Web: http://interactive.wsj.com/archive/retrieve.cgi?id=sb1011394319936007480.djm Cohn, M. & Dow, D. (1998). Cameras in the courtroom. Jefferson, N.C.: McFarland & Company, Inc. Cummings, M. C., JR., & Wise, D. (2001). Democracy under pressure (9th ed.). New York: Harcourt College Publishers. Estes vs. Texas (1965). 381 U.S. 532.

You May Also Find These Documents Helpful

  • Powerful Essays

    Ray Rice Domestic Violence

    • 1680 Words
    • 5 Pages

    Mass media critical frameworks are methodologies or tools used to analyze media messages. I will be taking an in-depth look at the media’s portrayal of the “Ray Rice case” and discussing various concepts, theories, and terms to reach a critical understanding of the case as a media consumer and critic. Following my analysis I will then conclude with interpreting what was the media’s purpose throughout the coverage, and whether it was to inform, entertain, or persuade us as media consumers.…

    • 1680 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Powerful Essays
  • Better Essays

    1. Attorney Benjamin Walton is arguing there is no evidence of “Actual Knowledge of Visible Intoxicfication” and that the court should grant this motion. The bartender (Mr. John Daniels) of O’Malley’s though charged 13 drinks to Mr. Hard’s account and yes did see Mr. Hard drink 11 of the beverages in a short period of time but, at no time' during the service did the bartender have “Actual Knowledge of Visible Intoxification” of Mr. Hard's under the Indiana’s Dram Shop Act, Indiana Code 7.1-5-10-15.5. Even though he tried to hit Mr. White on their leaving the establishment, lost his balance and fell. Mr. Hard was able to get up by himself with no…

    • 1776 Words
    • 8 Pages
    Better Essays
  • Satisfactory Essays

    Branzburg v. Hayes was the only ever supreme court case to deal with reporter’s privilege. The ruling of this case was that reporter’s had no right to hide their sources in a court case. The chief justice at the time,Warren Burger, made a point that reporters, “like other citizens, [must] respond to relevant questions put to them in the course of a valid grand jury investigation or criminal trial (Fargo,2010).” With a decision that was five for and four against, this case was not an open and shut many thought it to be. Calling into play a look at the first amendment and what it really means when it says the freedom of speech. Interpreting a document that is more than two hundred years old is not an easy task to accomplish, having to combine…

    • 165 Words
    • 1 Page
    Satisfactory Essays
  • Good Essays

    WECT Staff. (2012). Guilty: Plea deal reached for men involved in riot before hankins’ death. Retrieved from http://www.wect.com/story/18780887/plea-deal-reached-for-man-involved-in-riot-before-marcus-hankins-death…

    • 880 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    September 11, 2001, a day no American can forget. On this day 19 members of a terrorist group called al-Qaeda hijacked 4 U.S. airplanes and used them to strike various targets on the East Coast. Two of the hijacked planes hit twin towers in New York City and the third plane was flown into the Pentagon in Arlington, where the U.S. military is headquartered. The fourth plane was heading for the capitol in Washington, however crashed in Pennsylvania after the onboard passengers fought the hijackers. As a result of this catastrophe nearly 3,000 people were killed. Since the September 11 attacks, many things have changed in New York City and in the United States. The government has greatly increased security around the country, especially…

    • 1124 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    On September 11, 2001, It was just an ordinary day for everyone living in New York City and Washington D.C, doing their usual routine, but those were about to change in a single beat. Two big towers were completely destroyed, 4 huge commercial airplanes were crashed, one hit the field of Pennsylvania, and the pentagon were almost demolished in a flashed of an eye, a horrible experienced that caused a dramatic reaction not only to the people who saw it but to the people who were in contact of 9/11. After all the attacked, this is something that the Americans will never forget. “This wasn't al Qaeda's first terrorist attack, but it was the deadliest”.(Ojalvo,1)…

    • 564 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Better Essays

    Janda, Kenneth. Berry, Jeffrey. Goldman, Jerry (2008). The Challenge of Democracy (9th ed.). Boston; New York: Houghton Mifflin Company.…

    • 1942 Words
    • 8 Pages
    Better Essays
  • Satisfactory Essays

    Media in Court Cases

    • 333 Words
    • 2 Pages

    Media in court cases has many effects. One of which is the possibility that the Medias opinion may result in tainting the jury with unproven facts. As humans we make decisions based on how we perceive the world and the information we have on decision we are going to make.…

    • 333 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Satisfactory Essays
  • Good Essays

    Do terrorists have rights? Should Terrorists have legal protection? This is not an easy question to answer. This question poses an interesting dilemma, reason being these people are on the Federal Government’s list of most dangerous criminals. Also, most if not all are not legal U.S. naturalized citizens. The US Constitution clears states that in Article one section nine halts Congress from stopping the “honor” of habeas corpus in all cases excluding cases of revolt or assault. However, all humans have so- called “natural rights” and that’s what the Constitution and Deceleration of Independence are all about. According to (businessdictionary.com) natural rights are defined as political theory that maintains that an individual enters into society with certain basic rights and that no government can deny these rights. The modern idea of natural rights grew out of the ancient and medieval doctrines of natural law, i.e., the belief that people, as creatures of nature and God, should live their lives and organize their society on the basis of rules and precepts laid down by nature or God. With the growth of the idea of individualism, especially in the 17th cent., natural law doctrines were modified to stress the fact that individuals, because they are natural beings, have rights that cannot be violated by anyone or by any society. The Bill Of Rights observes some of the natural rights’ and the Fifth Amendment specifies that, in criminal cases, “No person shall be deprived of life, liberty, or property without due process”. Equally, without the 5th amendment, all people have the so-called “natural right” to due process. As always you need your chance to prove you’re innocence before they prove your guilt.…

    • 723 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Better Essays

    Neubauer, D.W. (2004). America 's Courts and the Criminal Justice System. Thomson Wadsworth Criminal courts/ United States.…

    • 1241 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Better Essays
  • Good Essays

    Court History and Purpose

    • 873 Words
    • 4 Pages

    Siegel, L. J., Schmalleger, F., & Worrall, J. L. (2011). Courts and Criminal Justice in…

    • 873 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Best Essays

    The Oklahoma City Bombing

    • 2384 Words
    • 7 Pages

    Nye, Chad F. Law and Society : Journalism and Justice in the Oklahoma City Bombing Trials. El Paso, TX, USA: LFB Scholarly Publishing LLC, 2013. ProQuest ebrary. Web. 3 April 2015.…

    • 2384 Words
    • 7 Pages
    Best Essays
  • Good Essays

    Zen Buddhism

    • 1798 Words
    • 8 Pages

    Clark, C. (1994, Sept 23). Courts and the Media. Retrieved June 21, 2005 from the WIU Online Library in the CQ Researcher.…

    • 1798 Words
    • 8 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Satisfactory Essays

    Pistorius Trial

    • 358 Words
    • 1 Page

    On February 25, 2014, Judge President Dunstan Mlambo ruled in the High Court in Pretoria that the entire trial may be broadcast live via audio and that parts of the trial may be broadcast live via television, namely the opening and closing arguments, the testimony of consenting state witnesses, the judgment, and the sentencing if applicable. The media such as ESPN, TIME, ABC, CNN and likes of a few other big name media got ahold to the case due to the fame…

    • 358 Words
    • 1 Page
    Satisfactory Essays
  • Good Essays

    Although we discussed surveillance and media in a more obvious form, reality television, I believe this example is just as applicable. In terms of the physical surveillance, the court case in 1999 brought out all sorts of forms of evidence that spoke to the movements of Syed on the day of the crime and, most notably, cell phone records and what towers were pinged during phone calls. It is worth noting that it is one of the first instances this was used in a Maryland court. Secondly, this was a capital crime trial in which a massive community was aware of and bore witness to. Lastly, and this is obvious, but as a convicted and incarcerated felon he is under constant surveillance and the actions and proceedings which put him there are open for anyone to…

    • 1065 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays