Preview

CAFO Environmental Effects

Good Essays
Open Document
Open Document
725 Words
Grammar
Grammar
Plagiarism
Plagiarism
Writing
Writing
Score
Score
CAFO Environmental Effects
Alongside the growing failures of manure lagoons, the manure carries bacteria and viruses that are harmful to humans if they come into contact through consumption of contaminated water. Also, according to Columbia University, "run offs from CAFOs are believed to have contributed to the dead zones in the Gulf of Mexico, Chesapeake Bay and other East Coast estuaries" (Cho). Some of the many reasons that CAFOs are causing dead zones in large bodies of water is that they can affect the life of both the humans and life in the water that is contaminated. When the water is contaminated by CAFOs there is not only a contamination of viruses and bacteria, but also of chemicals, antibiotics and hormones used in the production of meat. According to Columbia …show more content…
Increasing growth of industrialized meat production has contributed to the increase of farm land for both the use of animals, and feed for the animals used to meat. In order to have the amount of meat to be produced for the human population to consume meat industries require larger areas of farming land. According to the U.N. Convention to Combat Desertification, "It takes up to 10 pounds of grain to produce just 1 pound of meat, and in the United States alone, 56 million acres of land are used to grow feed for animals" …show more content…
People might ask why grow that much grain just for the animals to eat, when it could be grown for the human population to consume? Majority of the crops grown for the animals such as cattle, poultry, pigs and sheep are fed soybeans. This crop is widely used to feed the animals of meat production industries because soybeans are a cheap and easy source of protein. However, the growing rate of land needed for animals to be kept the industries also need land to grow the feed for the animals. According to the U.N. Convention, "Only 4 million acres of land are producing plants for humans to eat" (Meat). Why is it that the number of acres for crops grown for animals to consume is significantly higher than the number of acres grown for humans to consume? The reason for that question is that in order for the industries to keep up with the high demand for meat, there must be an increase in crops grown specifically for the animals to consume. However, once the animal is butchered the output of meat per pound is much less than the output of crops such as wheat and

You May Also Find These Documents Helpful

  • Good Essays

    Ap Euro Essay Outline

    • 358 Words
    • 2 Pages

    1.More animals mean more meat, better diets, and more manure for fertilizer (which means more grain).…

    • 358 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    Apes- Water Study Guide

    • 1340 Words
    • 6 Pages

    E. coli can get in the water from human and animal waste and if not treated it can end up in bigger bodies of water.…

    • 1340 Words
    • 6 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Satisfactory Essays

    The CAFO is the concentrated animal feeding operation in the United States and all over the world. The CAFO is charge of the animals such as pigs, cows, and chicken. They are the corporation that is in charge of the killing and packaging the food. This companies has done, so much to make human happy with the package food they are purchasing in the store. They want to make everyone’s money worth spreading, but they don’t care if what they are doing is corrupting not only the environment but the animals and humans. I personally do not agree with this system because what they are doing is cruel, but it has also gotten out of hands. They are ruining the environment in which we live in, they are overfeeding their animals, and people are dying from…

    • 138 Words
    • 1 Page
    Satisfactory Essays
  • Good Essays

    Hypoxic zones can occur naturally, but scientists are concerned about the areas created or enhanced by human activity. There are many physical, chemical, and biological factors that combine to create dead zones, but nutrient pollution is the primary cause of those zones created by humans. Excess nutrients that run off land or are piped as wastewater into rivers and coasts can stimulate an overgrowth of algae, which then sinks and decomposes in the water. The decomposition process consumes oxygen and depletes the supply available to healthy marine life (What is a dead zone?). Since these dead zones are becoming more popular, the animal life is becoming less suitable for more areas. When a dead zone occurs the fish that swim into the arewa get stuck and eventually die from lack of oxygen. Overall, the Bay has lost 98 percent of its oysters, about 80 percent of grasses. Looking at the pictures of dead zones there is a clear view of how terrible this disease is to the ecosystem. The whole bottom of the bay is clear of any living organism. In the Chesapeake Bay and many other areas the dead zones are formed by nutrients from agriculture and urban development within the Bay’s watershed, or the area of land that drains into a body of water, are washed into the Bay in excess quantities. These excess nutrients…

    • 1044 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    it takes 4500 acres to produce 80,000 pounds of meat the average american eats 209 pounds of meat per year. if that was all grass fed beef only 382 people could eat that meat. 11.7 acres per person times 314 mil acres in usa which adds up to 3.7 billion acres to raise enough grass for that year and this is only grass fed beef. we would need 3.9 billion acres unfortunately there are only 1.9 billion acres in the us it would take 3 times the amount. so grass fed beef is not sustainable. there is no way to we could use grass feed all the time. We just don't have enough land to use. even if we did we would still be using it all…

    • 775 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Better Essays

    Another thing we are all scared about is money. “The 7 billion livestock animals in the United States consume five times as much grain as is consumed directly by the American population. (Vegetarian Times) This could lead us into famine. Also the more land we buy for over populated animals the more money that is spent towards agriculture.…

    • 889 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Better Essays
  • Satisfactory Essays

    Suprising at it may seem, more people suffer from malnutrion now than they used to. Farmers tend to only plant and harvest high-carbohydrate crops such as rice and potatoes due to their ability to grow in large quanties. They can make a greater profit off of products like these. Since we all now depend upon these farmers to provide our societies with food, we do not have as varied a diet as previous hunter-gatherer societies. To qoute the article directly, "when they swtiched to farming, they traded quantity for quailtity." This is an evident fact. Crops which produce larger quantities of food are more likely to be planted than those which may be healthier options.…

    • 555 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Satisfactory Essays
  • Good Essays

    While I already knew that I eat a lot of food, what I did not realize was how much of the food I eat is packaged. In the tables 1 and 2, I put everything that was a local food into a bold font. It was only one item for each week, four brats the first week and three the second. They are from a local meet market, but even they are not very sustainable. Meat is very resource intensive to produce. Many more pounds of grain are fed to the animals to fatten them up than we get in return as meat. According to Lester Brown (2011), 35% of the world’s grain harvest each year goes towards making animal protein. Brown (2011, pg. 173) also states, “With cattle in feedlots, it takes roughly 7 pounds of grain to produce a 1-pound gain in live weight. For…

    • 451 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Better Essays

    Pollution of the Kosciusko Lakes Pollution is one of the many ways that harm is inflicted upon the earth. It comes in two different forms, natural and artificial. Each one is equally damaging to the environment and hard to eradicate once introduced into the ecosystem. Natural pollution comes in forms of invasive species (plants and animals), but also can come in forms of run-off. Artificial pollution comes in the form of litter and adds to the harmful effects of the natural pollution.…

    • 1012 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Better Essays
  • Good Essays

    Naked Economics Chapter 4

    • 1284 Words
    • 6 Pages

    Cattle is land intensive in other countries too if the ratio of land to labor in cattle production exceeds the ratio in wheat production in that country. A comparison between another country and the United States is not relevant.…

    • 1284 Words
    • 6 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    Rainwater also carries contaminants like trash, car oil, and animal fecal waste from the streets and roads into the storm drains (“Stormwater Runoff”). All of these pollutants also eventually lead into the Bay. Many of the aquatic organisms may be intoxicated or trapped by the oil and trash. This will lead to the depletion of their populations and consequently affect the other organisms in their food chain, and the humans that rely on them as a source of food (“Stormwater Runoff”). The chemical contaminants affect the population of all sorts of aquatic life in the Chesapeake Bay. For example, the “small bottom dwelling organisms take in the contaminants through skin contact while feeding” (“Chemical Contaminants”). Larger fish then consume the chemically contaminated fish, and accumulate the toxins in their body tissue (“Chemical Contaminants”). Mammals and other wildlife then consume these contaminated fish as the chemicals keep harming the predators of contaminated prey in the food chain (“Chemical Contaminants”). Many Marylanders rely on aquatic organisms, like crab, that they fish from the Chesapeake Bay as a source of income. If the pollution of the Bay is not stopped, the disappearance and contamination of these organisms will bankrupt many entrepreneurs in the state. These aquatic organisms will not be able to survive from the continuous exponential growth of toxins in their ecosystem.…

    • 1010 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    Worst Mistake in History

    • 551 Words
    • 3 Pages

    The issue about nutrition that Jared Diamond brings up is debatable because it might really depend on what region he studied to find the numbers. Even though humans started to domesticate crops, it doesn’t mean they didn’t hunt for animals. During the…

    • 551 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Better Essays

    Even though one of the main reasons for having pollution in our atmosphere is carbon dioxide emissions, studies have shown that there are many other culprits. One of these many culprits is the production of meats as well as maintaining the livestock itself. Scientists found out recently that “raising animals for food generates more greenhouse gases than all the cars and trucks in the world combined” (Top 10 Reasons Why It's Green to Go Veggie). Livestock also contributes to global climate change due to the fact that they cause the destruction of the land and the pollution of water…

    • 1079 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Better Essays
  • Satisfactory Essays

    Food Sustainability

    • 689 Words
    • 3 Pages

    Some scientists argue that there is enough food to support the world population, but critics dispute this, particularly if sustainability is taken into account. Many others say that “global population growth will cause a food, water, and energy crisis by 2030”. (Chapman, Heald) Population growth is the main driving force of agricultural demand. “As world population doubled from 3 billion to 6 billion, daily Calorie consumption in poor countries increased from 1,932 to 2,650, and the percentage of people in those countries who were malnourished fell from 45% to 18%.” (Chapman, Heald) The more people there are the greater amount of food that is needed.…

    • 689 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Satisfactory Essays
  • Satisfactory Essays

    The article, “Vegetarian is the New Prius”, written by Kathy Freston, discusses the amount of contribution that livestock actively plays in the most crucial and serious environmental problem, from a local scale to global scale. Freston writes that the amount of livestock raised in United States soil is the main cause of air pollution, land degradation, water shortage, water pollution, biodiversity, and especially aids to global warming. This article attempts to convince readers to cut meat out of their diet and to become vegetarians, so that less livestock would be raised to feed the people and environmental issues would be cut down. Although it is true that Freston provides the audience with solid, legitimate factual arguments concerning the brutal slaughtering and consumption of livestock by humans, she fails to address the opposing argument. Although I am a personal fan of vegetarian foods, I disagree with Freston, primarily because my family has raised me on chicken and other meats. I believe that there will be livestock whether a lot of people change their diets and become vegetarians or not. At the University of Chicago, researches concluded that feeding animals for the production of meat, eggs, and dairy products requires growing upwards of ten times as many crops needed than if we just went without livestock. According to a report done by the United Nations animal agriculture takes up 70% of all agricultural land, and 30% of the total land surface of the planet. Upon seeing these disturbing facts, I do not believe that society will never 100% convert to a vegetarian lifestyle. Even if they do, there will still be millions of wild animals producing all of the same gases that are so harmful to our environment.…

    • 314 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Satisfactory Essays

Related Topics