Business Process Reengineering

Topics: Business process reengineering, Business process, Management Pages: 13 (4595 words) Published: January 7, 2011
Business Process Reengineering Analysis and Recommendations
By Maureen Weicher William W. Chu Wan Ching Lin Van Le Dominic Yu Thanks to Dr. Samuel Ryan of Baruch College, City University of New York © Copyright December, 1995. This paper is was written by a group of MBA and MS students at Baruch College. May be freely quoted as long as credit is given. Please send any questions or comments to Maureen Weicher (maureenw@netlib.com). Originally posted on www.netlib.com. 1. 2. 3. 4. 5. 6. 7. 8. 9. 10. 11. 12. Introduction Old Wine in New Bottles? Is BPR a Quick Fix? The Price of Experience The Role of the Leader and Manager Reengineering the Human Resource Human Reengineering Case Study: The Conquering Power of the Small BPR Places the Customer at the Center by Breaking Down Organizational Barriers Is Information Technology an Enabler or a Bottleneck? Alternatives to Reengineering Reengineering Recommendations Bibliography

Introduction The "jumping off" point for this paper is Reengineering the Corporation , by Michael Hammer and James Champy. The paper goes on to review the literature on BPR. It explores the principles and assumptions behind reengineering, looks for common factors behind its successes or failures, examines case studies, and presents alternatives to "classical" reengineering theory. The paper pays particular attention to the role of information technology in BPR. In conclusion, the paper offers some specific recommendations regarding reengineering.

Old Wine in New Bottles

The concept of reengineering traces its origins back to management theories developed as early as the nineteenth century. The purpose of reengineering is to "make all your processes the best-in-class." Frederick Taylor suggested in the 1880's that managers use process reengineering methods to discover the best processes for performing work, and that these processes be reengineered to optimize productivity. BPR echoes the classical belief that there is one best way to conduct tasks. In Taylor's time, technology did not allow large companies to design processes in a cross- functional or cross-departmental manner. Specialization was the state-of-theart method to improve efficiency given the technology of the time. [17] In the early 1900's, Henri Fayol originated the concept of reengineering: To conduct the undertaking toward its objectives by seeking to derive optimum advantage from all available resources. [17] Although the technological resources of our era have changed, the concept still holds. About the same time, another business engineer, Lyndall Urwick stated "It is not enough to hold people accountable for certain activities, it is also essential to delegate to them the necessary authority to discharge that responsibility." [17] This admonition foreshadows the idea of worker empowerment which is central to reengineering. Although Hammer and Champy are eager to declare that classical organization theory is obsolete, classical ideas such as division of labor have had an enduring power and applicability that reengineering has so far failed to demonstrate. BPR does not appear to qualify as a scientific theory, because, among other things, it is not duplicate and it has limited scope. The applicability of classical management theories, such as division of labor, were widely duplicable and portable. These ideas stimulated increases in productivity, output, and income that led to the creation of the middle class. If BPR is not a theory, but a technique, Hammer and Champy are surprisingly vague about the details. This paper attempts to fill in the blanks. Despite their vagueness, Hammer and Champy are clear about who to blame when reengineering attempts fail; it is the fault of the individual company. To the steering committee, this sounds like a variation of blaming the victim. Cyert and March, among others, point out that conflict is often a driving force in organizational behavior. BPR claims to stress teamwork, yet paradoxically,...

Bibliography: 1. 2. 3. 4. 5. 6. Berman, Saul, Strategic Direction: Don 't Reengineer Without It; Scanning the Horizon for Turbulence, Planning Review, November 1994; Pg. 18. Brown, Tom, De-engineering the Corporation, Industry Week, April 18, 1994; Pg. 18. Cafasso, Rosemary, Rethinking Reengineering, Computerworld, March 15, 1993; Pg. 102. Caldwell, Bruce, Missteps, Miscues -- Business Reengineering Failures, InformationWeek, June 20, 1994; Pg. 50. Chew, Angie, How Insurance Firms Can Reengineer for Success, Business Times, June 20, 1994; Pg. 11. Cone, Edward, Technology Chief of the Year; All the Right Moves -- Tom Trainer of Reebok International Successfully Teamed Business Reengineering with Information Technology, InformationWeek, December 26, 1994; Pg. 35. Davenport, Thomas H., Will Participative Makeovers of Business Processes Succeed Where Reengineering Failed? Planning Review, January 1995; Pg. 24. Economist Newspaper Group, Reengineering Reviewed, The Economist, June 1994, Pg 24. Ettorre, Barbara, Reengineering Tales from the Front, Management Review, January 1995; Pg. 13. Furey, Tim R. and Garlitz, Jennifer L. and Kelleher, Michael L., Applying Information Technology to Reengineering, Planning Review, November 1993; Pg. 22. Hamel, Gary and Prahalad, C.K., Competing for the Future, Harvard Business Review, July-August 1994; Pg. 122. Hyatt, Joshua, Real-World Reengineering, Inc., April 1995; Pg. 42. Janson, Robert, How Reengineering Transforms Organizations to Satisfy Customers, National Productivity Review, December 22, 1992; Pg. 45. Kavanagh, John, Challenge for Company Culture - Business Reengineering: The Need for Totally New Thinking, The Financial Times, March 23, 1993, Survey of Information and Communications Technology (19); Pg. IX. Kehoe, Louise, Down in the Dirt to Clean Up IBM/ Louise Kehoe Offers a Contrasting View of Business Process Re- engineering, Financial Times, December 5, 1994; Pg. 8. Leth, Steven A., Critical Success Factors for Reengineering Business Processes, National Productivity Review, September 22, 1994; Pg. 557.
7.
8. 9. 10.
11. 12. 13. 14.
15.
16.
17.
Lloyd, Tom, Giant with Feet of Clay/ Tom Lloyd Offers a Contrasting View of Business Process Reengineering, Financial Times, December 5, 1994; Pg. 8. Lorenz, Christopher, Reengineering in Small Doses Only, The Financial Times, July 1, 1994; Pg. 14. May, Thornton, Not-So-Successful Reengineering, Byte, December 1994; Pg. 45. Moad, Jeff, After Reengineering: Taking Care of Business, Datamation, October 15, 1994; Pg. 40. Moad, Jeff, Does Reengineering Really Work? Datamation, August 1, 1993; Pg. 22. Schnitt, David L., Reengineering the Corporation Using Information Technology, Journal of Systems Management, January 1993; Pg. 14. Strassman, Paul A., The Rap on Reengineering, Computerworld, September 26, 1994; Pg. 119. Taylor, Billy E., Keeping BPR from Being TQMed, Enterprise Reengineering, Jan 1995; Pg. 5. Whiting, John T., Reengineering the Corporation (book review), Industrial Management, November 1994; Pg. 14.
18. 19. 20. 21. 22. 23. 24. 25.
Continue Reading

Please join StudyMode to read the full document

You May Also Find These Documents Helpful

  • Fundamental IT Strategies for Competitive Advantage Essay
  • Reengineering Taco Bell Essay
  • Reengineering the Corporation Essay
  • Management Accounting and the Modern Business Environment Essay
  • Essay about Impact of E Business on an Organization
  • Business Process Reengineering Essay
  • A Critique on Business Process Reengineering Essay
  • Business Process Reengineering Essay

Become a StudyMode Member

Sign Up - It's Free