Business Law Case Paper

Topics: Supreme Court of the United States, Flight attendant, United States Pages: 2 (492 words) Published: September 18, 2007
Citation: Olympic Airways v. Rubina Husain
Supreme Court of the United States, 2004
470 U. S., at 406
470 U. S., at 404

Summarize: In December 1997, Dr. Abid Hanson and his wife, Rubina Husain (hereinafter respondent), traveled with their children and another family from San Francisco to Athens and Cairo for a family vacation. During a stopover in New York, Dr. Hanson learned for the first time that petitioner allowed its passengers to smoke on international flights. Because Dr. Hanson had suffered from asthma and was sensitive to secondhand smoke, respondent requested and obtained seats away from the smoking section. After boarding, they discovered that their seats were only three rows in front of the smoking section. A flight attendant refused respondent's three requests to move Dr. Hanson. As the smoking noticeably increased, Dr. Hanson walked toward the front of the plane to get fresher air. He then received medical assistance but died. Respondents filed a wrongful-death suit in state court, which was removed to federal court. The District Court found petitioner liable for Dr. Hanson's death, and the Ninth Circuit affirmed, concluding that, under Saks' definition of "accident," the flight attendant's refusal to reseat Dr. Hanson was clearly external to him, and unexpected and unusual in light of industry standards, Olympic policy, and the simple nature of the requested accommodation.

Issue: Whether the "accident" condition precedent to air carrier liability under Article 17 is satisfied when the carrier's unusual and unexpected refusal to assist a passenger is a link in a chain of causation resulting in a passenger's pre-existing medical condition being aggravated by exposure to a normal condition in the aircraft cabin?

Decision: Yes. The Court explained that the term "accident" in the Convention refers to an "unexpected or unusual event or happening that is external to the passenger," and not to "the passenger's own internal...
Continue Reading

Please join StudyMode to read the full document

You May Also Find These Documents Helpful

  • business law case study Essay
  • Business Law Case Essay
  • Business Law Case Study Essay
  • Essay on Business Law Jordan vs Sasha Case Study
  • Business Entities, Laws, and Regulations Paper
  • Business Law Case Study Essay
  • business law Essay
  • Business Law and Society Paper

Become a StudyMode Member

Sign Up - It's Free