Preview

Business Law 110 Arbitration Case Studies

Satisfactory Essays
Open Document
Open Document
314 Words
Grammar
Grammar
Plagiarism
Plagiarism
Writing
Writing
Score
Score
Business Law 110 Arbitration Case Studies
Business Law 110
Mr. Blackmun
Case Study Problem #1
September 16, 2009
Case Study: Arbitration The issue pertaining to this case is whether a court can set aside an arbitration award on the basis that it violates public policy, subsequent to Mr. Edson being released from his job after being found intoxicated while on duty and being awarded reinstatement by the arbitrators. Exxon Mobile, the employer, filed a suit claiming that the award contravenes with public policy, which opposes intoxicated individuals from operating seagoing vessels.
Rules and Laws that apply to this case: • arbitration process • setting aside an arbitration award • appeals to the courts • violating public policy The courts have the right

You May Also Find These Documents Helpful

  • Good Essays

    (Facts) The State of Georgia has enacted a law requiring contoured rear-fender mud flaps on all trucks and trailers operating within Georgia. Thirty-five other states allow straight mud flaps and Florida requires straight mud flaps.…

    • 429 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Satisfactory Essays

    Business Law Case 3-3

    • 282 Words
    • 2 Pages

    Should a party to a lawsuit have to hand over its confidential business secrets as part of a discovery request? Why or why not? What limitations might a court consider imposing before requiring ATC to produce this material?…

    • 282 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Satisfactory Essays
  • Good Essays

    If Mary damages a client’s hair she would be held liable. According to our textbook, Mary would cause injury to the plaintiff. Mary was to provide a duty of care to the customer. She breached this duty of care “failure to exercise care or to act as reasonable person would act (Cheeseman, 2010, p. 81).” The reason I state, that is because the customer trusted Mary with their hair and she damaged the client’s hair. As long as Celia and Mary register their boutique name with the United States PTO in Washington, DC, and the PTO approved it, there should not be any legal problems. If Celia and Mary decide to offer…

    • 571 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    FACTS: Kevin Gardner (plaintiff) is a driver for Loomis Armored, Inc.(defendant), which supplies armored truck delivery services to numerous businesses that require secure transport of valuables. Loomis has adopted a policy for all drivers that their truck annot be left un attended. This policy is in the employee handbook and specifically states: Violations of this rule will be grounds for termination. During a scheduled stop, Mr. Gardner witnessed a woman being threatened with a knife by an obviously agitated man. Mr. Gardner left his truck unattended as we went to help the woman. The woman was saved and her assailant was apprehended. Mr. Gardner was fired by Loomis for violating the company policy of not leaving the truck unattended. Mr. Gardener sued for wrongful termination in violation of public policy. Judicial Opinion: The narrow public policy encouraging citizens to rescue persons from life threatening situations clearly evinces a fundamental societal interest….The value attached to such acts of heroism is plainly demonstrated by the fact that society has waived most criminal and tort penalties stemming from conduct necessarily committed in the course of saving a life. The court finds that Gardner’s discharge for leaving the truck and saving a woman from an imminent life threatening situation violates the public policy encouraging such heroic conduct. This holding does not create an affirmative legal duty requiring citizens to intervene in dangerous life threating situations. The adherence to public policy does nothing to invalidate Loomis’ work rule regarding drivers’ leaving the trucks. The holding to public policy merely forbids Loomis from firing Gardner when he broke the rule because he reasonably believed his intervention was necessary to save her life. By focusing on this narrow public policy of saving a human life, we continue to protect employers from…

    • 459 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    Ttc Case Study Essay

    • 817 Words
    • 4 Pages

    In this article it talked about how the Ontario Superior Court of Justice permitted the Toronto Transit Commission to continue with actualizing arbitrary medication and liquor testing of wellbeing delicate representatives, pending the result of a continuous intervention. The choice, finding for the business, is an uncommon and essential case on the issue of arbitrary working environment medication and liquor testing, which had been seen as displaying a high obstacle for bosses. Chief Justice F.N. Marrocco held that the candidate union would not endure unsalvageable mischief if testing proceeds, pending the result of a discretion over the issue, and in this manner expelled the union's application for an order.…

    • 817 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Better Essays

    Business Law Case Summary

    • 2465 Words
    • 10 Pages

    Section 126 stated that a firm could exercise the power to make, ratify and discharge a…

    • 2465 Words
    • 10 Pages
    Better Essays
  • Satisfactory Essays

    In the Team Charter the following will be outlined: all members will provide a reasonable way to be in contact; the member’s expectations of the team; how conflict resolution will be addressed; and an alternative dispute resolution agreement when mutual agreement is not achieved. In the case where an agreement is not reached, the instructor reserves the right to direct the group to the team charter. This decision made by the instructor is final and cannot be disputed, unless it breaches the contract between the University of Phoenix and the student’s…

    • 390 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Satisfactory Essays
  • Satisfactory Essays

    Summary: Marie-Claude operated a bowling alley in a commercial area that was adjacent to a residential area. Many small children used the parking lot near the bowling alley as a playground, and Marie-Claude was constantly tell these children leave the parking area maybe they will get injured. However, one six years old boy climb onto the flat roof of the bowling alley and while he is running, tripped and fell to the ground. But Marie-Claude continued to order the child off the roof by several times when he was on the roof.…

    • 1244 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Satisfactory Essays
  • Satisfactory Essays

    Business Law Case Study

    • 1437 Words
    • 5 Pages

    Those familiar with skiing know that there are risks involved when one chooses to participate in the sport. Those risks, however, should be associated with self-inflicted harm caused by mistakes that a skier may make and not unforeseen obstacles and dangerous situations. The injuries sustained by Alex Johnson on the slopes at Bethlehem Ice Solutions (BIS) were not self-inflicted; far from it. They were the result of negligence on the part of BIS who failed to mark boundaries that separates the slopes and caused Craig to crossover onto another slope, walking directly into Alex’s path and colliding into him, causing severe bodily harm.…

    • 1437 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Satisfactory Essays
  • Powerful Essays

    Business Law, Tort Law

    • 2260 Words
    • 10 Pages

    Giaschi, C. J. (2010). “Margaret Elizabeth No.1” et al., (June 10, 1997). Retrieved July 2, 2010 from http://www.admiraltylaw.com/personalinjury.html…

    • 2260 Words
    • 10 Pages
    Powerful Essays
  • Satisfactory Essays

    After I carefully viewed the website on Florida Court Alternative Dispute Resolution (ADR), I was so amazed by the information I comprehended and gathered. With that being said, wow, I feel kind of novice because I was not at all aware of the federal and state laws that exist in Florida. The California website is easy to read and interpret: it explains arbitration nicely and succinctly (courts, 2016).…

    • 681 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Satisfactory Essays
  • Good Essays

    1.Evaluate the views of the Critical Legal Studies School of jurisprudence. What are the benefits and drawbacks of using broad notions of fairness in deciding cases?…

    • 913 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Better Essays

    Legal Writing

    • 5304 Words
    • 22 Pages

    555 P.2d 696 Supreme Court of New Mexico. Zelma M. MITCHELL, Plaintiff-Appellee, v. LOVINGTON GOOD SAMARITAN CENTER, INC., Defendant-Appellant. No. 10847.Oct. 27, 1976. Appeal was taken from an order of the District Court, Bernalillo County, Richard B. Traub, D.J., reversing a decision of the Unemployment Security Commission and awarding benefits to discharged employee. The Supreme Court, Sosa, J., held that employee’s insubordination, improper attire, name calling and other conduct evidencing wilful disregard of employer’s interests constituted ‘misconduct’ disqualifying her from receiving certain unemployment benefits. Reversed.…

    • 5304 Words
    • 22 Pages
    Better Essays
  • Powerful Essays

    In the Final Paper (Case Study) it speaks to the following case and circumstances. Knarles and Barkley are father and son respectively. Barkley is seventeen years old. They operate a facilities maintenance company that regularly does business in the District of Columbia, Maryland and Virginia. The company is based in Maryland. They have a number of contracts with building owners where they have agreed to provide building maintenance to both residential and commercial buildings within the three jurisdictions already mentioned. They receive a monthly payment of $2,000 to $4,000 depending upon the size of the building. They bill the owners for any equipment of a substantial nature that has to be replaced. Because of Knarles long-term relationships with building owners, these contracts that were once in writing are generally renewed without a new written agreement. Often Knarles and Barkley will replace outdated and broken equipment such as water heaters and boilers that are part of a building's heating system. Further, as part of maintenance they regularly wash windows, remove snow and do touch-up painting as required.…

    • 2072 Words
    • 9 Pages
    Powerful Essays
  • Powerful Essays

    Law Business Court

    • 3464 Words
    • 14 Pages

    The Federal Court is the highest judicial authority in the country. It was established pursuant to Article 121(2) of the Federal Constitution. Its decision binds all the courts below. The Federal Court hears appeals from the Court of Appeal. Leave to appeal must always be obtained prior to proceeding with the appeal. The Federal Court is headed by the Chief Justice. According to Article 122(1) of the Federal Constitution, the Federal Court shall consist of the Chief Justice, the President of the Court of Appeal, the two Chief Judges of the two High Courts and seven other judges. All its members are appointed by the Yang di-Pertuan Agong, acting on the advice of the Prime Minister, after consulting the Conference of Rulers. Before tendering his advice, the Prime Minister shall, except for the appointment of the Chief Justice, consult the Chief Justice. Article 122(1A) of the Federal Constitution, allows the Yang di-Pertuan Agong, acting on the advice of the Chief Justice, to appoint any person who has held high judicial office in Malaysia to be an additional judge of the Federal Court. Every proceeding in the Federal Court is according to section 74 of the Courts of Judicature Act 1964, heard and disposed off by three judges or such greater uneven number of judges as the Chief Justice may in any particular case determine. In the absence of the Chief Justice the most senior member of the Court shall preside. Article 122(2) of the Federal Constitution provides that the Chief Justice, if he considers that the interests of justice so require, may nominate a judge of the Court of Appeal other than the President of the Court of Appeal to sit as a judge in the Federal Court. The Court sits on such dates and at such places as the Chief Justice may from time to time direct. Normally the Federal Court sits at the Palace of Justice in Putrajaya. However the Federal Court also goes on circuit to the major towns of Penang, Ipoh, Kota Bharu, Johor Bahru, Alor…

    • 3464 Words
    • 14 Pages
    Powerful Essays