With the tighter bond between business and scientific research, debates regarding the substantial commercial influences on scientific research are heated recently. Although it looks like that research would struggle without financial support from business (David Weatherall 2001), and Pisano（2006）even pointed out that promoting new forms of entrepreneurial activities might have positive impact on basic scientific medical research, the majority still believe that business becomes increasingly harmful to scientific research. This essay try to argue that commerce could be detrimental to scientific research to some extent.
One manifestation of the destructive influence on scientific research is that few academics could run independently without sponsor from business. Parkinson and Langley (2009) have drawn attention to the fact that chemical engineering are strongly impacted by Oil Company, and engineering departments have to depend on funds from the arms industry. Ho&Saunders (2001) also expressed a similar view that scientists could not make up their own mind on selecting the research fields without considering other factors. To illustrate this, scientists might be constrained to do “practical research” and give up “theoretical research” because the former one would receive more capital from funders, even though the latter one is more attractive to scientists. What’s more, some unpopular research could be neglected. Monbiat (2001,July 10) mentioned that the biotechnology and the medicine area are funded well but the genetic engineering is completely overlooked. In other words, the scope of scientific research could be easily constrained by commercial influences. Thus the freedom and independence of scientists are being eroded and scientists feel hard to insist on their interested areas.
Research might be a little short-term interest oriented. Parkinson and Langley (2009) indicated that government policy also create the profitable surroundings for...
Please join StudyMode to read the full document