Preview

Business Ethics - Whistle Blower

Good Essays
Open Document
Open Document
912 Words
Grammar
Grammar
Plagiarism
Plagiarism
Writing
Writing
Score
Score
Business Ethics - Whistle Blower
6. State your moral position on the matter

Whistle-blowing is the release of information by a member or former member of an organization that is evident of illegal conduct in or by the organization. Morality on the other hand can be defined as the concern with the distinction between right or wrong conduct. There are basically four categories of whistle-blowing in the organization. Whistle blowing can be internal, external, personal or impersonal. Internal whistle-blowing is where the matter is reported to an executive in the organization. An external whistle-blowing is reporting the matter to external public interests groups, the media, or enforcement agencies. Personal whistle-blowing is defined as harm reportedly done only to the whistle-blower and impersonal whistle-blowing is harm observed as done to another.

It does not matter what form the whistle-blowing is done in, a moral dilemma can occur when loyal employee observes the employer committing or assisting in an illegal or immoral act and thus would be forced to make moral decisions. In making moral decisions, employees need to consider factors that may have both positive and negative results. These factors are to make sure the situation warrants whistle-blowing. One of these factors is, if serious trade secrets or confidential company property will be exposed the employee should also know the harm and calculated risk. The other factor is that the whistle-blower needs to examine their motives and verify then document their information, while making sure that the information sustains its place in the case of a hearing and court as well as there are a lot more guidelines to consider.

Whistle-blowing carries serious consequences and often involve decisions to be made among conflicting moral, legal, economic, personal, family and career demands and choices. It does require a lot of self-sacrifice to stand firm and tells the truth regardless of personal outcome. There is nothing morally

You May Also Find These Documents Helpful

  • Satisfactory Essays

    Doing what’s right is never an easy decision one when it comes to work. However, when it comes to whistleblowing, this may be the hardest choice that someone will ever have to make in their life. Handling a whistleblower claim means dealing with the possibility that repercussions may come in the terms of unemployment, drop of income, loss of friendships, and reputation. The choice of a whistleblower can be impossible to make, in terms, of how they are going to bring to higher authorities.…

    • 84 Words
    • 1 Page
    Satisfactory Essays
  • Good Essays

    In every setting there should be a policy and procedures on whistle blowing. The whistle blowing Policy is put into place to provide protection against the person in the work place against victimisation or any form of punishment (physical or verbal) when concerns are genuine. If you suffer any victimisation or punishment due to whistleblowing you may be able to take your case to an Employment Tribunal. If you have any concerns about misconduct or malpractice that is occurring in your work setting you should report it to your manager/supervisor. All information given is confidential. The whistleblower is a person that discloses wrongdoing that threatens others, rather than a complaint about their own treatment.…

    • 881 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Powerful Essays

    According to Hutson (2014), “It is generally accepted that there are two types of whistle-blowing: internal and external. Internal whistle-blowing typically involves reporting concerns up the chain of command within the organization in the hope that whatever the problem is, it will be resolved. External whistle-blowing involves reporting concerns outside the organization and in particular, the media” (p. 251).…

    • 1385 Words
    • 6 Pages
    Powerful Essays
  • Good Essays

    Through his article "The Banality of Systemic Evil", Peter Ludlow gives an interesting perspective over the recent whistle blowing cases. His main analytic focus is over the Chelsea Manning, Aaron Swartz, and Edward Snowden cases that grabbed global attention. The author raises the issues of morality and whether the actions taken were justified. He also gives reference to a book called "Moral Mazes" which elaborates on ethical decision making within the corporate world. The article also gives light to one side emerging from this situation, being the younger generation. Ludlow provides his analysis, the supportive sources from both parties, and the reasons for why his inquiry is appropriate.…

    • 1023 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    According to DeGeorge, for whistle-blowing to be considered ethical there first must be a serious harm that the whistle-blowing aims to prevent, which is greater than the harm it causes the firm and stakeholders. In this case, the corrupt activities are very serious and would have posed a greater harm going undetected than the negative media attention and charges brought against the firm. DeGeorge’s second condition states that the whistle-blower is required to first attempt to prevent…

    • 1698 Words
    • 7 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Satisfactory Essays

    Acct 573 Week 1 Homework

    • 417 Words
    • 2 Pages

    Whistleblowers are the main ones that expose white-collar crimes in contemporary society. Whistleblowers are the ones that let the authorities and the public that another person is being involved in illegal activities occurring in the work place. Illegal activities can include fraud, violations of rules, laws, and or procedures. A whistleblower may tell someone within his or her organization or someone in law enforcement. In order to be a whistleblower according to federal authorities, the…

    • 417 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Satisfactory Essays
  • Powerful Essays

    on whistle blowing: The moderating impact of the moral intensity of the issue. (2011). Journal of Business Ethics, 103(3), 485-496. doi:10.1007/s10551-011-0876-z.…

    • 1262 Words
    • 6 Pages
    Powerful Essays
  • Powerful Essays

    WHISTLE-BLOWERS have been big news lately — from Chelsea Manning, formerly known as Pfc. Bradley Manning, to Edward J. Snowden. Yet, for most people, the question of whether to expose unethical or illegal activities at work doesn’t make headlines or involve state secrets.…

    • 1811 Words
    • 7 Pages
    Powerful Essays
  • Good Essays

    Review “Just pucker and blow: An analysis of corporate whistleblowers” in Chapter 2. Please respond to the following:…

    • 784 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    According to Halbert, Ingulli, & Frey (2015), whistleblowers are people who decide to report unethical or illegal activities, usually activities under the control of their employers. They may be working for private companies, nonprofit organizations, or for the government. A whistleblower is an individual working in an organization who decides to expose the misconduct, misbehavior, or illegal actions occurring in that organization. Making the decision to expose these actions can be very difficult to disclose with the fear of repercussion. The information being disclosed to supervisors or the media can either be inside or outside their organization. There are a number of organization or groups out there that are concerned with issues in organization and when a whistleblower is exposing corruption, those groups make themselves available for the whistleblower to make their allegations.…

    • 951 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    This incident Challenger present us a case study in organizational communication, ethics and culture as it promotes or discourages necessary communication and the ethics of whistle blowing.…

    • 427 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    When faced with a difficult situation of morals, choice, and possible destruction of a person’s protection and survival, individuals find themselves in a formidable situation. This is a common occurrence for people who become known as a whistleblower. There is a problem in the United States with protection of individuals for whistleblowing in the workplace, and not enough is being done for these individuals. Whistleblowing is increasing and has become more common, more frequent, and sometimes dangerous. Individuals could potentially face the inability of obtaining another job because they are stigmatized as a whistleblower. This paper will focus on two questions: How does the society’s view support whether someone will blow the…

    • 1797 Words
    • 8 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Better Essays

    This document will describe the key characteristics of a whistleblower and briefly summarize one researched instance of whistleblowing in one publicly traded company within the last 12 months. It will…

    • 1292 Words
    • 6 Pages
    Better Essays
  • Satisfactory Essays

    Whistle blowing does not violate company’s loyalty because they comapny is lying to themselves, employees, and consumers. Bok argues that whistle blowing does violates company loyalty while Larmer argues that whistle blowing does not violate company’s loyalty. This paper support Larmer’s argument with examples, research, and laws.…

    • 47 Words
    • 1 Page
    Satisfactory Essays
  • Satisfactory Essays

    You brought up a very good point about if the whistle blowers identity always stays confidential. I would hope that it does, however I am sure that there are some cases when it does not stay confidential. I am sure that there may be some who are afraid to report unethical behavior in the workplace in fear that their identity would not be kept confidential.…

    • 65 Words
    • 1 Page
    Satisfactory Essays

Related Topics