Preview

BUGusa Inc. Worksheet

Better Essays
Open Document
Open Document
1160 Words
Grammar
Grammar
Plagiarism
Plagiarism
Writing
Writing
Score
Score
BUGusa Inc. Worksheet
October 21, 2013
LAW/421

University of Phoenix Material
BUGusa, Inc., Worksheet
Use the scenarios in the Bugusa, Inc., link located on the student website to answer the following questions.

Scenario: WIRETIME, Inc., Advertisement
Has WIRETIME, Inc., committed any torts? If so, explain.

WIRETIME has committed Defamation in the form of trade libel against BUGusa, Inc. by taking out a print ad in an industry magazine (University of Phoenix, 2013). According to Melvin (2011) there are three elements that must be present to claim libel. 1) The defamatory statement must be “clear and specific” to the company or product. WIRETIME clearly stated in the ad that the equipment used by BUGusa, Inc. was “low quality and did not work reliably for more than 1 month,” (University of Phoenix, 2013). The statement was made against a specific company and their specific product. 2) The statement was made knowing it was not true. BUGusa, Inc. has exclusive contracts with law enforcement (University of Phoenix, 2013) so their products are well known in the industry. 3) The statement was made to a third party by taking out the ad in print (Melvin, 2011). An ad like this could cause customers to rethink their contracts with BUGusa, Inc. or could deter new customers from using their products. This could damage their reputation in the industry.

Scenario: WIRETIME, Inc. (Janet)
Has WIRETIME, Inc. committed any torts? If so, explain.

In this scenario Janet breaches her contract and leaves BUGusa, Inc. for WIRETIME Inc. and that is not a tort (University of Phoenix, 2013). However, WIRETIME Inc. went after Janet by offering her a 10% pay increase and a $5,000 signing bonus. Because WIRETIME Inc.’s Human Resource manager knew that Janet was under contract and could not work for WIRETIME the act to employ Janet was an interference with contractual relations and that is a tort (Findlaw Inc., 1999). The defendant, WIRETIME, intentionally



References: FindLaw Inc. (November 1, 1999). Business Torts: Misrepresentation, Interference and Unfair Competition. Retrieved from http://www.inc.com/articles/1999/11/15387.html Melvin, S. P. (2011). The legal environment of business: A managerial approach: Theory to practice. New York, NY: McGraw-Hill/Irwin. University of Phoenix. (2013). Case Scenario: BUGusa, Inc. [Multimedia]. Retrieved from University of Phoenix, LAW241 - CONTEMPORARY BUSINESS LAW website.

You May Also Find These Documents Helpful

  • Good Essays

    LAW 421 Week 3 BugUSA

    • 434 Words
    • 2 Pages

    1. Scenario: WIRETIME, Inc., Advertisement Has WIRETIME, Inc., committed any torts? If so, explain. 2. Scenario: WIRETIME, Inc. (Janet)…

    • 434 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    LAW 421 week 2 reflection

    • 788 Words
    • 3 Pages

    Learning Team Weekly Reflection Law/421 University of Phoenix In Week one of Contemporary Business Law, Team A learned about substantive, procedural, criminal, civil, common, and statutory law. In the reading assignments for week one, we discerned the differences that separate the laws and how the courts enforce the laws. Corporations and businesses are awarded protections under the Amendments to the Constitution of the United States that protect them from fraudulence. The following essay covers Team A interpretation of the different laws and how the laws pertain to corporations, businesses, and our current places of employment.…

    • 788 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Better Essays

    References: Melvin, S. P. (2011). The legal environment of business: A managerial approach: Theory to practice. New York, NY: McGraw-Hill/Irwin.…

    • 969 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Better Essays
  • Good Essays

    BTT’s e-mail to Chou caused further investigation in the analysis of the first two questions. First, the case scenario states the e-mail was sent by “a BTT manager,” not the chief executive officer or the like. The e-mail on its own is not sufficient to constitute “signed writings” within the meaning of Statute of Frauds. Last, the e-mail lacked the typed name of the person at BTT authorized to make the deal.…

    • 753 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Better Essays

    Law 421 Contracts

    • 1070 Words
    • 5 Pages

    Melvin, S.P. (2011). The legal environment of business: A managerial approach: Theory to practice. New York, NY: McGraw-Hill/Irwin.…

    • 1070 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Better Essays
  • Good Essays

    Bugusa Case Study

    • 914 Words
    • 4 Pages

    Scenario: WIRETIME, Inc., Advertisement Has WIRETIME, Inc., committed any torts? If so, explain. A Tort was committed by WIRETIME, Inc. which means “a civil wrong where on party has acted, or in some cases failed to act, and that action or inaction causes a loss to be suffered by another party” (Melvin, S.P., 2011) The statement made by WIRETIME, Inc. will potentially harm Bugusa, Inc. reputation. A statement made by WIRETIME, Inc. accusing Bugusa, Inc. products were low quality and did not work past a months’ time. This type of statement is a defamatory “A false and defamatory…

    • 914 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Better Essays

    Melvin, S. P. (2011). The legal environment of business: A managerial approach: Theory to practice. New York, NY: McGraw-Hill/Irwin.…

    • 1488 Words
    • 6 Pages
    Better Essays
  • Satisfactory Essays

    Law 421

    • 822 Words
    • 4 Pages

    Scenario: WIRETIME, Inc., Advertisement Has WIRETIME, Inc., committed any torts? If so, explain. Wiretime, Inc.’s ad in the well-known industry magazine stated that BUGusa, Inc. electronic recording devices are low quality and not reliable for more than a month (University of Phoenix, 2013). This tort is defamation since it can harm the company’s reputation. This written defamation, or libel, falls under the element of specificity because the statement is about a specific party, business and product. In order to receive damages, BUGusa, Inc. will have to prove they suffered financial harm from this statement (Melvin, 2011).…

    • 822 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Satisfactory Essays
  • Powerful Essays

    BugUSA, Inc. - Case ScenarioThis scenario presents the case of BugUSA, Inc.; as a team, we endeavor to address the legal ramifications of each company's activities. BugUSA, Inc. has legal rights to intellectual property protection, and this paper explores the options available within that realm. WIRETAP, Inc. will face civil liability claims if caught in its underhanded measures, and possibly a civil RICO suit; BugUSA's security guard Walter, however, has also created a case against its own interests. When another company owns the rights to a web domain that suits BugUSA's needs, it faces the challenge of how to acquire the domain with as little hassle and as much protection as possible. A robbed vendor may present new tort liabilities for BugUSA, and we explore potential defenses. Finally, an injured police officer may have further claims against BugUSA in light of the company's manufacturing decisions.…

    • 2109 Words
    • 6 Pages
    Powerful Essays
  • Better Essays

    Bugusa, Inc.

    • 1676 Words
    • 7 Pages

    Scenario: WIRETIME, Inc., Advertisement WIRETIME, Inc. committed a defamatory tort which is “a civil wrong where one party has acted, or in some cases failed to act, and that action or inaction causes a loss to be suffered by another party” (Melvin, 2011, p. 208). A tort was committed because WIRETIME, Inc. made a statement that will hurt the reputation of BUGusa, Inc. The statement made is “a false and defamatory statement concerning a party’s reputation, honesty, or a statement that subjected a party to hate, contempt, or ridicule. In order to qualify as defamatory, the statement must have a tendency to harm the reputation of the plaintiff” (Melvin, 2011, p. 209). Next WIRETIME, Inc. placed a defamatory advertisement in a well-known industry magazine that contained a statement that is accusing BUGusa, Inc. for having a bad product. By doing this, the dissemination of the advertisement to a third party is an element that requires the statement must somehow reach the ears or eyes of someone other than the tortfeasor and the victim, (Melvin, 2011, p. 209). Finally, the advertisement has the third element, specificity. Specificity means the WIRETIME, Inc. advertisement specified a particular party, BUGusa, Inc. and their product and services, (Melvin 2011). Because of this defamatory advertisement, BUGusa, Inc. will probably suffer damages or loss of clients because of the negative implications stated in the WIRETIME, Inc. advertisement.…

    • 1676 Words
    • 7 Pages
    Better Essays
  • Satisfactory Essays

    University of Phoenix Business Law 531 Alternative Dispute Resolution Assignment Professor Jack Tandy December 19, 2010…

    • 610 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Satisfactory Essays
  • Satisfactory Essays

    Case Scenarios BUGusa Inc

    • 601 Words
    • 3 Pages

    Scenario: WIRETIME, Inc. (Janet) Has WIRETIME, Inc. committed any torts? If so, explain. WIRETIME interfered with a current contractual relationship in this case. WIRETIME knew of the agreement Janet had with BUGusa and convinced Janet to break the contractual agreement she has existing with her employer. Janet breached her contract with BUGusa by accepting a job working for WIRETIME. The contract stated Janet is not to work for BUGusa’s competitor for another two years, thus violating a non-compete clause.…

    • 601 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Satisfactory Essays
  • Good Essays

    What is a Tort? Within the business law terminology, a tort is also alias to the term “wrong”. According to Chapter Five of Business Law, “under tort law, an injured party can bring a civil lawsuit to seek compensation for wrong done to the party or to the party’s property” (Cheeseman, 2010). Within an everyday life, everyone is suing everyone, which is a prime example of tort and negligence being put to use on a daily basis. In the business regulation simulation, Alumina Inc. encountered many different risks and torts due to erroneous issues. For example, the horrific dismays and disagreement that the top level executives had with the suburban housewife led to issues in the media and the business aspect of Alumnia, Inc.…

    • 748 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    Our group research that few relevant cases and try to find the answer on this problem. The first one is Gilford Motor Company Limited v Horne [1933] CH935. This case is very similar to the case of Computer and Chu. In the case of Gilford Motor Company and Horne, Horne was a managing director of the Gilford Motor Co Ltd. His employment contract stipulated (clause 9) not to solicit customers of the company if he were to leave employment of Gilford Motor Co. Mr. Horne was fired, thereafter he set up his own business and undercut Gilford Motor Co's prices. He received legal advice saying that he was probably acting in breach of contract. So he set up a company, JM Horne & Co Ltd, in which his wife and a friend called Mr Howard were the sole shareholders and directors. The High Court held that Mr Horne would not break the covenant with Gilford Motor Company. Therefore, in the case of Gilford Motor Company Limited v Horne [1933] CH935, the defendants company was…

    • 774 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Satisfactory Essays

    bugusa worksheet

    • 491 Words
    • 3 Pages

    BUGusa, Inc., Worksheet Use the scenarios in the Bugusa, Inc., link located on the student website to answer the following questions. Scenario WIRETIME, Inc., Advertisement Has WIRETIME, Inc., committed any torts If so, explain. Scenario WIRETIME, Inc. (Janet) Has WIRETIME, Inc. committed any torts If so, explain. In this case Janet is working for BUGusa, the contract she signed will be valid for 2 more years. In the contract it states that Janet is not to work for any competitors wither it is if she breaks the contract by leaving the company or if she is fired. Both Janet and WIretime are guilty of breaking the contract. The Tort that has been committed is known as Current Contractual Relationship Tort. The more money and the incentive of the sign on bonus of five thousand dollars is an infringement of the contract Janet is affiliated with. Wiretime has committed a tort by enticing Janet to break her current contract. Scenario WIRETIME, Inc. (Steve and Walter) Discuss any liability BUGusa, Inc., may have for Walters actions. Scenario BUGusa, Inc., Plant Parking Lot What defenses may be available to BUGusa, Inc. Explain your answer. Scenario BUGusa, Inc. (Randy and Brian) What defenses may be available to BUGusa, Inc. Explain your answer. Scenario BUGusa, Inc. (Sally) Sally may have a successful case against BUGusa, Inc., for what torts Explain your answer. Bugusa, Inc. Worksheet LAW/421 Version 2 PAGE MERGEFORMAT 1 Y, dXiJ(x( I_TS 1EZBmU/xYy5g/GMGeD3Vqq8K)fw9…

    • 491 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Satisfactory Essays