Preview

BUGusa

Satisfactory Essays
Open Document
Open Document
285 Words
Grammar
Grammar
Plagiarism
Plagiarism
Writing
Writing
Score
Score
BUGusa
Case Scenarios: BUGusa, Inc.
LAW/421 Business Law
Jose D. Gomez, Joe Mulero, and John Paez
November 5, 2014
Donnie McGilbra

University of Phoenix Material

BUGusa, Inc., Worksheet

Use the scenarios in the Bugusa, Inc., link located on the student website to answer the following questions.

Scenario: WIRETIME, Inc., Advertisement
Has WIRETIME, Inc., committed any torts? If so, explain.

No tort was committed for the advertisement. Although Wiretime, Inc. attempted to gain customers by speaking low of BUGusa, Inc., freedom of speech was practiced by the post of the advertisement. Freedom of speech is allowed just as long as no physical change or physical play is displayed. Politician commercials are a prime example of this sort of advertisement.

Scenario: WIRETIME, Inc. (Janet)
Has WIRETIME, Inc. committed any torts? If so, explain.

Because Janet resigned and accepted the offer of WIRETIME, Inc. she committed a tort. A non-compete clause is a serious contract that can lead to severe punishment and fines. No matter if Janet was fired or if she quit, if she works for a competitor within the 2-year non-compete clause contract, illegal action has been committed and she will be punished one way or the other. If she would of resigned, and then waited 2 years to employee with WIRETIME, Inc. then no tort would have been committed.

Scenario: WIRETIME, Inc. (Steve and Walter)
Discuss any liability BUGusa, Inc., may have for Walter’s actions.

Scenario: BUGusa, Inc., Plant Parking Lot
What defenses may be available to BUGusa, Inc.? Explain your answer.

Scenario: BUGusa, Inc. (Randy and Brian)
What defenses may be available to BUGusa, Inc.? Explain your answer.

Scenario: BUGusa, Inc. (Sally)
Sally may have a successful case against BUGusa, Inc., for what torts? Explain your answer.

You May Also Find These Documents Helpful

  • Satisfactory Essays

    It210 Inchworm Code

    • 256 Words
    • 3 Pages

    * Design a program that models the worm’s behavior in the following scenario. Be sure to include the completed analysis section:…

    • 256 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Satisfactory Essays
  • Good Essays

    Bugusa Case Summary

    • 521 Words
    • 3 Pages

    The tort of negligence applies in this scenario. Negligence is described as a party who fails to act reasonably, even when the act is not intentionally, or it does not intend for harm to occur (Melvin, 2011).…

    • 521 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Satisfactory Essays

    Bugusa, Inc., Worksheet

    • 1035 Words
    • 5 Pages

    Use the scenarios in the Bugusa, Inc., link located on the student website to answer the following questions.…

    • 1035 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Satisfactory Essays
  • Good Essays

    Another circumstance that would render the noncompetition clause void would be location or the distance that is covered in the contract. If the Fabulous told the employee that they were not allowed to work for any hotel within the United States for two years, that distance is far too great to be covered by the contract. One thing to keep in mind with contractual law is that there is not a clear line by what is reasonable and what is not. That decision is left up to judicial discretion, and each case is reviewed individually for legality (Secrist,…

    • 1564 Words
    • 7 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Better Essays

    for strict liability torts. BUGusa, Inc. failed to provide an insulator in their original design for their wire tappers due to the production cost. BUGusa, Inc. has since realized its mistake, yet did not recall the older versions of the equipment, leaving Sally at risk of injury, which is exactly what happened. Strict Liability can be defined, as; “the legal responsibility for damages or injury, even if the person found strictly liable is not at fault.” (USLegal.com, 2014). Under this definition, Sally does not have to prove that BUGusa, Inc. was negligent in their actions producing their product, just that the product in question was defective, and it caused her…

    • 877 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Better Essays
  • Good Essays

    Use the scenarios in the Bugusa, Inc., link located on the student website to answer the following questions.…

    • 847 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    Quiz One

    • 977 Words
    • 4 Pages

    1) Patty owned Patty’s Cakes in Jacksonville, Florida. She sold her business to Fruity’s, Inc. a national pastry company. There was a non-compete agreement in the contract for the sale of her business. In the non-compete, Patty agreed not to work in any capacity in the food industry for 10 years on the entire east coast. A court would likely determine that the non-compete agreement…

    • 977 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    Bodyworks Case

    • 336 Words
    • 2 Pages

    Bodyworks’ non-compete clause satisfies the first four elements of enforceability but fails the fifth element because it is against “public policy.” In the early 1900’s, non-competition clauses were usually not upheld because these provisions were seen as a restraint of trade which was against public policy. See Mar-Hof Co. v. Rosenbacker, 97 S.E. 169 (N.C. 1918). North Carolina law says that “no contract or agreement hereafter made, limiting the rights of any person to do business anywhere in the State of North Carolina shall be enforceable unless such agreement is in writing duly signed by the party who agrees not to enter into any such business within such territory.” N.C. Gen. Stat. § 75-4. Over time though, North Carolina courts became more open to non-compete provision, but the covenant had to satisfy a five-part test to determine if it was enforceable. United Labs., Inc. v. Kuykendall, 370 S.E.2d 375, 380 (N.C. 1988). It is enforceable if it is (1) in writing; (2) made part of a contract of employment; (3) based on valuable consideration; (4) reasonable both as to time and territory; and (5) not against public policy. Id. The fifth element, not against public policy, is met when it is intended to protect a “legitimate interest” of the covenantee and is not so broad as to be “oppressive to the covenantor or the public health”. Iredell Digestive Disease Clinic, P.A. v. Petrozza, 373 S.E.2d 449, 453 (N.C. Ct. App. 1988). If honoring the contract would create a substantial harm to the public health, “the public interests outweigh the contract interests of the covenantee, and the court…

    • 336 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Better Essays

    Why isn’t advertising falling underneath the same scrutiny as when a company or person is…

    • 1347 Words
    • 6 Pages
    Better Essays
  • Satisfactory Essays

    3. During the year ended October 31, 2011 Asher Farms processed 343.6 million chickens, or approximately 2.0 billion dressed pounds and is the 4th largest processor of dressed chickens in the United States.…

    • 272 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Satisfactory Essays
  • Satisfactory Essays

    The article “Freedom of Speech and My Right to Silence at Bath Time” by Patti Waldmeir is about how telemarketers should not be calling family householders. Telemarketers get angry at the negative response the people give them when they call, but after all, they are disturbing people in the comfort of their own. However, these telemarketers also have freedom of speech. As it says in the article “… advertisers have a right to broadcast their wares, but consumers have a right to refuse to listen.”…

    • 568 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Satisfactory Essays
  • Powerful Essays

    Business Torts Wk 2

    • 2107 Words
    • 9 Pages

    An integral aspect of a business liability practice is to take ongoing proactive measures through direct collaboration to avoid lawsuits before they are ever filed. Not all companies understand how to completely guard themselves of outside entities that have ill will and malice intent therefore it is important to completely understand how to handle these circumstances. Such risks have an impact on a company’s existing…

    • 2107 Words
    • 9 Pages
    Powerful Essays
  • Good Essays

    Question: There are no accountants on the board of the Oriole Corporation, a privately held corporation. The board routinely relies on a Certified Public Accountant (CPA) to explain the financial situation of the corporation. The board does not do an independent analysis of the CPA¿s report. In these circumstances, the board is…

    • 1002 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Powerful Essays

    Torts study notes

    • 17104 Words
    • 69 Pages

    In Part III, I propose we take seriously a mixed theory of tort law, which can attend to both deterrence and corrective justice. In suggesting this, I review a limited number of tort doctrines and show how the combination of deterrence and justice can provide a better or fuller explanation for these doctrines than can either theory standing on its own. In this…

    • 17104 Words
    • 69 Pages
    Powerful Essays
  • Better Essays

    <Lawpublish.com/firstamend>. “First Amendment in Advertising.” Cuyohoga Falls Law Industry, Harvard Law University, Web. 28 November 2012.…

    • 1973 Words
    • 8 Pages
    Better Essays