Briony S Being For Metafictional Narrative Ethics

Topics: Ian McEwan, Ethics, Atonement / Pages: 42 (14349 words) / Published: Apr 28th, 2015
Critique, 52:74–100, 2011
Copyright © Taylor & Francis Group, LLC
ISSN: 0011-1619 print/1939-9138 online
DOI: 10.1080/00111610903380154

Briony’s Being-For:
Metafictional Narrative Ethics in Ian McEwan’s Atonement

DAVID K. O’H ARA
ABSTRACT: This essay attempts to identify an unusual brand of self-conscious narrative by focusing on Ian McEwan’s novel, Atonement (1992). What makes this minority metafictional style especially unique is not only its presence in the work of one of the late twentieth century’s preeminent British novelists, but also its ethical character. For this reason, the kind of metafiction being discussed should not be conflated with more traditionally ideological forms that attest to their own fictionality in the name of undermining “realist” illusions.
Rather, it will be argued that self-conscious narrative, in the case of McEwan, is oftentimes utilized in order to reassert an ethical complex that lies between author and reader, text and world. The fundamental differentiation being made, then, is that between a properly postmodernist metafiction and what might be considered a restorative metafiction that works, in a self-justifying manner, toward an affirmation of narrative ethics. For this latter style of metafiction, storytelling does not mark the beginning of a free-play of signifiers or a dispersal of constituting fictions, but rather the beginning of a dialogical and ethical relationship between texts and readers; of stories not just being told from one to another, but by one for another.
Ultimately, this essay examines the way the Ian McEwan of Atonement explores the same self–Other dynamics that underpin the work of Levinas, MerleauPonty, and Zygmunt Bauman while metafictionally making claims about narrative not unlike those found in the hermeneutic philosophies of Richard Kearney
74

CRITIQUE

and Paul Ricoeur. For it is precisely this same ethical propensity of narrative as understood by Kearney and Ricoeur that Atonement not only



Cited: Beckett, Samuel. Interview by Tom Driver. “Beckett at the Madeleine.” The Columbia University Forum 4.3 (1961): 23. Bauman, Zygmunt. Life in Fragments: Essays in Postmodern Morality. Oxford: Blackwell, 1995. Belsey, Catherine. Critical Practice London: Methuen, 1980. Bergonzi, Bernard. The Situation of the Novel. Pittsburgh: U of Pittsburgh P, 1970. Bradbury, Malcolm. The Modern British Novel 1878(2001. London: Penguin, 2001. Drabble, Margaret. The Seven Sisters. London: Viking, 2002. Eagleton, Terry. “A Beautiful and Elusive Tale.” The Lancet 358.9299 (2001): 2177. Finney, Brian. “Briony’s Stand Against Oblivion: The Making of Fiction in Ian McEwan’s Atonement.” Journal of Modern Literature 27.3 (2004): 68–82. Head, Dominic. Ian McEwan. Contemporary British Novelists. Manchester: Manchester UP, 2007. Kearney, Richard. On Paul Ricoeur: The Owl of Minerva. Hampshire, UK: Ashgate, 2004. . On Stories. London: Routledge, 2002. . Poetics of Modernity: Toward a Hermeneutic Imagination. Amherst, MA: Prometheus, 1999. . The Wake of Imagination. London: Routledge, 1998. Lévinas, Emmanuel. Entre Nous: On Thinking-of-the-Other. New York: Columbia UP, 1998. . Humanism of the Other. Chicago: U of Illinois P, 2003. . Totality and Infinity: An Essay on Exteriority. Pittsburgh: Duquesne UP, 1967. Lawrence, D. H. Selected Critical Writings. Ed. Michael Herbert. Oxford: Oxford UP, 1998. McEwan, Ian. Atonement. Toronto: Vintage, 2001. . Interview by Adam Begley. “Ian McEwan: The Art of Fiction CLXXIII.” The Paris Review 44.162 (2002): 30–60. . “Only Love and Then Oblivion.” The Guardian 15 Sept. 2001. 15 Sept. 2001. <http://www. Merleau-Ponty, Maurice. Phenomenology and Perception. London: Routledge, 1967. Ozick, Cynthia. Art and Ardour. New York: Dutton, 1984. . Time and Narrative III. Chicago: U of Chicago P, 1988. Lang, 2002. Schwartz, Lynne Sharon. “Quests for Redemption.” Rev. of Atonement, by Ian McEwan. New Leader 85.2 (2007): 23–25. Shapiro, Anna. Rev. of Atonement, by Ian McEwan. The Observer 1 Sept. 2002: 17. Smith, Dennis. Zygmunt Bauman: Prophet of Postmodernity. Cambridge, UK: Polity, 1999. Sontag, Susan. Under the Sign of Saturn. New York: Farrar, 1980. Tallis, Raymond. Interview by Andrew Brown. “The Ardent Atheist.” The Guardian 29 Apr. 2006. 29 Apr. 2006. <http://www.guardian.co.uk/books/2006/apr/29/philosophy1>. Walter, Natasha. Rev. of Atonement, by Ian McEwan. The Guardian 7 Sept. 2002: 15.

You May Also Find These Documents Helpful

  • The Metafictional Paradox
  • Metafictional Elements in Ian Mcewan's Atonement
  • The Ethics Of Being A Paralegal
  • Being A Pediatrician Narrative
  • Being A Housewife In The 1950's
  • To what extent is Briony a reliable narrator in Atonement
  • The Ethics, the Do's and Don'ts of Being a Professional
  • S Jones Leadership Ethics
  • Being A Twin: Personal Narrative
  • Personal Narrative Being Unchained