Paper One Assignment
Playing by the Rules
“Morality is not the doctrine of how we may make ourselves happy, but how we may make ourselves worthy of happiness”- Immanuel Kant. According to Kant, his three ethical propositions promote actions based on duties that portray moral worth. The motive in which directs you to a decision must be made from your duty as a human being, not conformity. Just because an action is deemed “popular,” to Kant, simply does not mean that you go about performing that action anyways. You do what is right because you are supposed to, not because it is a means to some end in which you seek.
The situation at hand involving Beth and her colleague Susan’s management promotion competition is a challenging one. Their boss, Tina, has her hands tied between which woman she is going to choose for the position. Beth appears to be the more qualified, capable candidate, yet Tina is best friends with Susan, creating an obvious advantage in her favor. Since rumors started to spread about Susan and the disappearance of her business expense receipts, the ball was now in Beth’s court. She knew that Susan was telling the truth about the missing receipts when she admitted that she merely misplaced them, since Beth had actually found them behind the copier unbeknownst to anyone. This was Beth’s best, and only, chance at the management promotion, and she could eliminate Susan out of the equation completely. So, the question is, what moral recommendations would I give to Beth given Immanuel Kant’s view on morality and decency?
Given that there are only two options in which Beth has to act upon this dilemma, the decision is to both save Susan’s reputation, and possibly lose her job opportunity, or to keep Susan on bad terms with Tina, and accept the promotion she has been ultimately offered. Confirming Kant’s beliefs involving duty-based ethics, it is Beth’s absolute responsibility to report the findings of...
Please join StudyMode to read the full document