Preview

Breast Implants Ethical Issue

Good Essays
Open Document
Open Document
425 Words
Grammar
Grammar
Plagiarism
Plagiarism
Writing
Writing
Score
Score
Breast Implants Ethical Issue
For this first assignment, I chose to read and answer the questions concerning the CNN news item on the PIP breast implant scandal.
What is the ethical dilemma in the case you have chosen?

The ethical dilemma here is between the principle of profitability and the respect of patients’ health and human life. Indeed, the company PIP used industrial silicone and numerous other unknown chemicals in order to cut the costs of their product and thus get a higher margin of profit. They probably had a really lower price compared to their competition that remained in legality.
On the other hand, by acting this way, they seriously endangered the life and health of thousands of women in Europe and South America. Unfortunately, the company having gone bankrupt, the financial compensations will most probably depend on the governments and compassionate private medical institutions.
What would you do in this situation? Why?

If I was responsible for this situation, I would try and pay what is expected of me, knowing that I was well aware of the dangers of the products that I was selling. Even though, the company went bankrupt, PIP was one of the three largest companies in the breast implant sector so there must be huge amounts of money resulting from the firm. With this money, I could maybe pay for the removal of the implants but I guess that the sums we are talking about are just too high. Nonetheless I could pay a part of the government expenses.
Moreover, with personal money acquired through the PIP Company, I could try to set up a medical institution made for the removal of these breast implants. But then again, because of these events, I don’t think that the women who have PIP breast implants would trust the same company for their removal.
It should also be noted that the PIP Company is not alone in this scare. The firms who sold the industrial chemicals to them might take a part of the responsibility because they knew that they were selling industrial silicone to a

You May Also Find These Documents Helpful

  • Powerful Essays

    The complaints about defective hip implants made by DePuy Orthopaedics, Inc., a part of Johnson and Johnson’s Medical Devices & Diagnostics group, had been sending to the U.S. Food and Drug Administration over the past two years. On August 24, 2010, after a warning letter from the F.D.A. and the new medical information of these faulty hip implants from the UK National Joint Registry, DePuy finally recalled about 93,000 of these artificial joints. What are the ethical risks and consequences associated with DePuy’s products? What should DePuy do to correct these failures?…

    • 1556 Words
    • 7 Pages
    Powerful Essays
  • Powerful Essays

    The Medicines Company

    • 868 Words
    • 5 Pages

    The Medicines Company Case Write-Up: Terence Cho, Felipe Duarte, Aleks Loiko, Robert Shaw, and James Wang…

    • 868 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Powerful Essays
  • Better Essays

    Problems with Dow Corning’s silicone breast implants began as early as 1984 when they lost a lawsuit claiming the implant caused medical illness such as autoimmune disease. During the investigation for this lawsuit, lawyers found evidence showing Dow Corning executives were aware of complaints from doctors, concerns about the lack of long-term testing, and cases of the implant bursting during surgery. In addition, the study that supposedly proved the effectiveness and safety of the product revealed detrimental long-term effects on the animals under experimentation (Book review, 1996). However, throughout all the breast implant concerns, Down Corning continued to advocate the safety of their product going as far as to hire high profile and extremely expensive teams of legal and public relations specialists. In addition, allegations were present of executives attempting to destroy damning internal documents suggesting upper management was trying to cover up its liability in the claims. The 1984 lawsuit found Dow Corning guilty of fraud and deceit stating the company provided inferior and incomplete information by understating the risks to make an informed decision (Book review, 1996). More important, it revealed the unethical behavior of the executives and company as a…

    • 1112 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Better Essays
  • Better Essays

    According to the scenario PharmaCARE promises to provide their workers with a better quality of life by providing discounted and sometimes free drugs to low-income consumers, and other benefits like healthcare programs and scholarships. From a deontology perspective PharmaCARE has a moral commitment that they continue to stand by. Another ethical theory that people often mix up with Deontology is Virtue ethics. Virtue Ethics can be identified as the one that emphasizes the virtues, or moral character. Based on the virtue ethics theory PharmaCARE can be considered to be either ethical or unethical. An ethical act of PharmaCARE is that they are looking to enhance the lives of millions with their high-quality products. According to Character based ethics, “virtue ethics is concerned with the whole of a person’s life, rather than particular episodes or actions” (bbc.co.uk). Virtue ethics teaches an action is only right if it is an action that a person would carry out in the same circumstances. In other words according to virtue ethics theory PharmaCARE must be willing to provide the same low-cost drugs even if the manufacture process was more expensive. “Ethics of Care is a theory that is centered around the interdependence of all individuals. It takes into account the fact that certain communities and people are more vulnerable than others, and that you (as the non-vulnerable population) should afford extra consideration to the vulnerable community depending on how they are affected by your choices” (Theoretical Frameworks). It is obviously the workers of PharmaCARE are not created equally. According to the scenario PharmaCARE executives live in luxury compounds, which is high above the average Colberian. Based on the ethics of care theory PharmaCARE actions are…

    • 1463 Words
    • 6 Pages
    Better Essays
  • Better Essays

    Harvesting Risks

    • 1307 Words
    • 6 Pages

    From my point of view, I do not think that any company pursues its strategy in an ethical manner anymore. Furthermore, companies now days only care about making profits regardless of whether their methods are right or wrong. Let me use the same quote from the paragraph above but I will add three more sentences to justify my comment. “A few months after Chavez’s hunger strike, DuPont ended mevinphos production.’ ‘Amvac, however, was willing to embrace it.’ ‘So DuPont sold its exclusive rights to Amvac.’ ‘Amvac continued to sell….’” (Harvesting Risks p 467-468).…

    • 1307 Words
    • 6 Pages
    Better Essays
  • Good Essays

    Breast uplift surgery is a procedure that is designed to benefit women, offering them the opportunity to increase their body confidence and counter the effects that factors such as age have had on their physique. It can also be a huge confidence booster to women that have gone through significant weight changes or had treatment for illness such as cancer that can affect their breasts. So when a surgery that has such important consequences goes wrong it can be a monumental blow to the patient and their family. When you go into hospital to have any procedure, you put your body and your trust in the hands of the medical professionals who are providing your treatment, when this trust is abused and…

    • 482 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    PRIZM/Guidant Case Study

    • 845 Words
    • 4 Pages

    In 2005, a young man named Joshua Oukrop died as a result of a malfunction in his Prizm 2 DR heart defibrillator. The Prizm 2 DR was manufactured by the Guidant Corporation. The Guidant Corporation had been manufacturing the Prizm 2 DR for several years and in 2002 had taken several steps within the manufacturing process to fix the problem with the devices. Following Joshua Oukrop’s death, Guidant officials met with his doctors and explained that they had known about the malfunction and not recalled the product because of the risk associated with replacing the product. Guidant’s position was that it was just as dangerous to patients to replace the product as it was to keep the product with the risk of malfunction. Statistically, cases of malfunction were very low and if Guidant publicized the issue, they feared a mass-exodus of patients would opt for the dangerous surgery to replace a product that was not guaranteed to fail. Guidant was faced with the dilemma of whether to publicize the information they had on the malfunctioning device and make the consumers of their product aware of the risk or to maintain the company status quo and, within their legal right, not publicize the information. Guidant chose to keep the information private, claiming to have acted in the interest of the consumer. Guidant’s decision, although entirely legal, was unethical. Their inaction led to the loss of a human life. The ethical decision, though it could have been financially difficult in the short-run, would have been to publicize the information on the malfunction and recall the product. Had Guidant acted ethically immediately after they became aware of the malfunction by informing doctors and the public of the risk, Joshua Oukrop’s life may not have been lost and Guidant may not have been entangled the ensuing negative publicity and decreasing purchasing offer from Johnson and Johnson.…

    • 845 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    This ethical issue can be fixed by creating a marketing campaign that should be combined with limitations during the sale to ensure that that the device is used appropriately. Professional and applied ethics that determines if GE Healthcare breached concepts in the introduction of its low-cost alternatives for the diagnostic medical…

    • 780 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    The advent of modern biotechnology and genetic engineering brought about the prospect of human enhancement – that is, of such a use of medicine or technology that would improve human physical and mental traits beyond what is currently regarded as their ‘normal’ scope. In consequence, as the promise of enhancement is moving steadily from science fiction to daily news, a whole new debate emerged on the ethical and legal implications of such ---.…

    • 204 Words
    • 1 Page
    Good Essays
  • Powerful Essays

    Dow Corning Corporation began operating with Dow Chemical in 1943 when Dow Corning agreed to supply the silicone technology, while Dow Chemical supplied the manufacturing processes (Wilkicki and Craig). In the 1960s, Dow Corning began manufacturing silicone breast implants to use for reconstructive surgery of cancer patients and for breast augmentations. However, Dow Corning knew as early as the 1950s that silicone and silica used to produce breast implants was “bioreactive, immunogenic, toxic, and inflammatory” when exposed to the human body (Rumptz, Leland, McFaul, Solinski, and Pratt). Research has also found that implants can rupture occasionally and leak silicone fluid into the rest of the body possibly causing autoimmune disease, cancer, as well as numerous other symptoms (Hermes).…

    • 2342 Words
    • 10 Pages
    Powerful Essays
  • Good Essays

    GlaxoKlineSmith

    • 686 Words
    • 3 Pages

    GlaxoSmithKline’s charges are a hope to many of the different health departments that large companies will take note on what has happened to GlaxoSmithKline and will only practice safe and ethical practices. GlaxoSmithKline’s example will prove too big health care business’s that the government will not tolerate unethical research and give opportunities to repair any damage they have done so the American public can live safely.…

    • 686 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    Smith Case

    • 626 Words
    • 3 Pages

    The Smith & Nephew S.A. (S&N) was the Spanish subsidiary of the Smith and Nephew group that is based mainly in the United Kingdom and United States. The company was founded in Spain around 1963. S&N sold in Spain healthcare products manufactured by the Smith & Nephew group in various countries. The company had two divisions medical and surgical. Between these two divisions they sold all of the group product ranges and families. The subsidiary in was trying to expanded their sales in the country to more hospitals and private care centers in the country. The company enters into a trial contract with Innovex in Spain to try to help the company expand its sales from just hospitals. Innovex is a company that contract teams of medical sales representatives to promote the products of the company. S&N under this contract would have 10 sales representatives and an area manger to serve Galicia, Asturias, Andalusia and Valencia. The sales team was try to promote the company moist wound healing product to primary care centers in the area they were assigned. The company went through with the trial contract with Innovex and the results of trial contract had some good things and some bad things. They saw increases in market share of their products in the regions of the contract. Some of the regions had more increase then others so there was concern of why in didn’t increase as much in the other regions.…

    • 626 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Better Essays

    "Between You and Me." New York Times 19 July 2011: D4(L). Gale Opposing Viewpoints In Context. Web. 15 Nov. 2012.…

    • 1420 Words
    • 6 Pages
    Better Essays
  • Good Essays

    Grad Student

    • 306 Words
    • 2 Pages

    According to the literature, within approximately 24 months, Ann Fyfe and the hospital CEO were fired by physicians because their marketing strategies unintentionally sabotaged the unannounced competition between the physician and hospital. Apparently the “physicians” were not viewed as internal customers and their urgent care practices began to decline. Thomas (2009) noted the physicians were not in agreement with the way their industry was being marketed. A lot of them viewed this avenue as “sleazy, commercial, and inappropriate, and the culture of medicine was simply not ready for it.” Although this unfortunate mishap occurred, hospitals across the country were still interested in Ms. Fyfe’s style and she continued to meet their demands. She went on to receive prestigious awards as “ the first Modern Healthcare ‘Up and…

    • 306 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Best Essays

    Scheeres, J. (2000). Vulva Goldmine: How Cosmetic Surgeons Snatch Your Money. Bitch: Feminist Response to Pop Culture, 11, 70.…

    • 2689 Words
    • 11 Pages
    Best Essays