Preview

Breakdown Of The 8th Amendment

Good Essays
Open Document
Open Document
1331 Words
Grammar
Grammar
Plagiarism
Plagiarism
Writing
Writing
Score
Score
Breakdown Of The 8th Amendment
The 8th amendment to the constitution prohibits the government from inflicting cruel and unusual punishments because they exhibited an inhumane way of executing "inmates", tortured their guilty victims to death and were considered to many as unjust. It also prohibits high bail or excessive fines against the defendant. However, it has also been deemed Unconstitutional by the Supreme Court of the United States (according to the Eighth Amendment) to inflict physical damage on students in a school environment for the purpose of discipline in most circumstances. Also, The 14th Amendment acts as a binder that holds the clauses of the 8th amendment and what the government can and cannot do to the citizens of the United States.
Breakdown of the Excessive Bail/ Fine Clause in the 8th Amendment
The 8th Amendment specifies that bail shall not be excessive. This is unclear as to whether or not there is a constitutional right to bail, or only
…show more content…
Georgia, 1976
Tony Gregg was sentenced to death after he was found guilty for armed robbery and murder. Gregg believed that the sentence was unconstitutional. However, the Supreme Court argued against his claim. He already underwent two separate trials, which carefully considered several mitigating and aggravating factors.

Furman v. Georgia, 1972
William Furman was sentenced to death after he was found guilty of murder while he was attempting to burglarize a house. Furman appealed before the court. According to Justice Potter Stewart, the death penalty was clearly handed out to Furman mainly because he was a black man. Thus, it violated the Eighth Amendment.

Wilkerson v. Utah, 1878
Walker Wilkerson was found guilty of first-degree murder in 1878. The court decided that Wilkerson would be executed publicly. The defendant made an appeal on the ground that hanging was the approved form of execution at the time and not firing squad. However, the Supreme Court favored the decision.
The 14th Amendment balances out the 8th

You May Also Find These Documents Helpful

  • Good Essays

    In the People v. Caballero case, the 8th amendment was being denied when 16 year old Graham was served with “…a minimum of 110 years before becoming parole eligible” (People v. Caballero). Terrance Graham’s VIII amendment was violated, he was given a cruel and unusual punishment of a 110 year sentence, and only after that would he be eligible for parole. Graham was a 16 year old boy who was committed for armed burglary and attempted armed robbery, and was sentenced to probation. However, his probation was revoked and was sentenced to life in prison for burglary: “…leaving Graham with no possibility of release unless he was granted executive clemency” (PJDC). The number of given years is cruel because it falls out of a human’s natural life…

    • 155 Words
    • 1 Page
    Good Essays
  • Satisfactory Essays

    Believing that no one was home, an intruder broke into a house in Savannah, Georgia, on the night of August 11, 1967. The house was occupied, however and the house owner confusion, the intruder fired his gun, killing the home owner. The police apprehended a suspect, William Henry Furman, whom they had pursued as he fled the crime scene. A jury subsequently found Furman guilty of murder and sentenced him to death.…

    • 72 Words
    • 1 Page
    Satisfactory Essays
  • Good Essays

    The Supreme Court case of Gregg V. Georgia dealt with administrative law, which is the legal field that regulates the due process clause in the Constitution. The clause is about the Government having the obligations to respect and uphold the legal rights of American people during and after they are arrested. Troy Leon Gregg and other inmates on death row believed that the death sentence was in direct violation of the 8th and 14th Amendments, which dealt with cruel and unusual punishment and that states must require due process. Gregg was found guilty for armed robbery, and the murders of two men in 1973. From that the Supreme Court had accepted his death sentence for the charges of murder and not of armed robbery thus being the first man in…

    • 1330 Words
    • 6 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Satisfactory Essays

    Georgia “On the night of August 11, 1967, 29-year-old William Joseph Micke, Jr., came home from work to his wife and five children in Savannah,Georgia. He went to bedaround midnight. Two hours later, the Mickes were awakened by strange noises in thekitchen. Thinking that one of his children was sleepwalking, William Micke went to thekitchen to investigate. Micke found 26-year-old William Henry Furman in the kitchen.Furman was a poor, uneducated, mentally ill African American who had broken into the house and was carrying a gun. When he saw Micke, Furman fled the house, shooting Micke as he left. The bullet hit Micke in the chest, killing him instantly. Micke's family immediately called the police. Within minutes, the police searched the neighborhood and found Furman still carrying his gun. Furman was charged with murder.” (Source C). http://www.enotes.com/supreme-court-drama/furman-v-georgia. N.p., n.d. Web. 19 Apr…

    • 362 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Satisfactory Essays
  • Good Essays

    The establishment of the death penalty dates back to around the Eighteenth Century B.C. in the code of King Hammurabi of Babylon. Over the years, the death penalty and its purpose has varied and changed. Furman versus Georgia is what sparked the modern day death penalty era. The Supreme Court Case dealt with an African-American man, William Henry Furman, in which he was convicted of murder. The decision that resulted from Furman versus Georgia enforced many states along with the national legislature to reevaluate their level of capital offense in order to guarantee that the death penalty would not be conducted in an unjust manner. The outcome of the decision from Furman versus Georgia triggered confusion concerning the death penalty. It led…

    • 370 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    The Trial by Franz Kafka is a book that clearly demonstrates the effects of dictatorship upon freedoms permitted in most democracies today. Throughout the novel Josef K. undergoes a number of violations of basic principles of law. The 4th and 6th Amendments are the first to be violated when he is arrested and the guards have no reason for doing so. In the conclusion of the novel Josef’s 8th Amendment is also violated when he is executed.…

    • 940 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    The “Cruel and Unusual Punishment” Clause of the Eighth Amendment came from the English Bill of Rights that were adopted in 1689. This provision was written into the English Bill of Rights after Titus Otis, who lied causing many innocent people to be executed, was punished in a cruel and unusual way at the time. George Manson first used the cruel and unusual punishment clause in 1776 when he drafted the Declaration of Rights for the Commonwealth of Virginia. In 1791, the clause was added to the Eighth Amendment to the United States Constitution. People feared that if this clause was not added that Congress would abuse its power and use cruel and unusual punishments as a tool to oppress them.…

    • 174 Words
    • 1 Page
    Good Essays
  • Satisfactory Essays

    Judicial History: Harvey Lee Windsor was convicted of capital murder under § 13-A-5-40 (a)(2), Code of Alabama 1975. The jury unanimously recommended the death penalty and the trial court accepted the jury’s recommendation and sentenced the appellant to death by electrocution. Windsor then appealed the conviction and sentence to the Court of Criminal Appeals.…

    • 505 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Satisfactory Essays
  • Good Essays

    William Henry Furman was in the middle of robbing a home when the owner caught him. Furman attempted to flee from the home, but he accidently killed the owner with a gun (Furman V. Georgia, 2015). Furman was declared guilty of a felony and was to be executed (Furman V. Georgia, 2015). The Constitutional question that is regarded in this court case deals with cruel and unusual punishment.…

    • 610 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    In this case, William Furman committed a robbery of a private home. The resident of the home awoke to find Furman in his house. Furman tried to escape and while doing so, he tripped and fired his gun accidently, which killed the victim. He was taken to trial and found guilty of murder. Because the shooting occurred during the commission of a felony, Furman was eligible for the death penalty according to the felony murder rule. The rule of felony murder states that if an offender kills, with or without intention, during a dangerous crime, they are guilty of murder. Furman was sentenced to death but the case was taken to the Supreme Court before his punishment was carried out. The issue of the case was whether the death penalty should be considered cruel and unusual punishment. If it was considered cruel and unusual punishment, then it would also be in violation of the 8th and 14th Amendments.…

    • 447 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Better Essays

    Gregg v. Georgia (1976) – A crucial ruling which upheld the use of the death penalty. Troy Leon Gregg was found guilty of murdering two people, during his trial he was sentence to death. However, Gregg would not have his sentence, he argued that the court decision was unconstitutional violating his eighth and fourteen amendments right. The case was sent to the supreme court, the problem that the supreme court face was whether or not what Gregg has done was worth sentence to death and if his sentence violated his rights.…

    • 1367 Words
    • 6 Pages
    Better Essays
  • Good Essays

    If I had to choose to give up one of my rights under the Bill of Rights, I would choose to abolish the Eight Amendment. This amendment defines the right to a reasonably priced bail and/or fine, and no cruel nor immense punishment be given. With this being said, I do not believe that someone being charged with littering, jaywalking, or any other minor crime where no harm or injury was inflicted, should be charged with an elongated prison sentence or immense fee. I merely believe that allowing someone with a very serious crime charge should not be able to simply pay a fee and be allowed back into the community temporarily until their trial. By doing this, we could reduce crime rate on the streets generated by people being released before their…

    • 172 Words
    • 1 Page
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    In Cold Blood Essay

    • 326 Words
    • 2 Pages

    Richard Eugene Hickock and Perry Smith were found guilty of murder in the first degree and their punishment is death. "Can there be a single doubt in your minds regarding the guilt in your defendants? No! Regardless of who pulled the trigger on Richard Eugene Hickock's shotgun, both men are equally guilty... penalty-death." (303)…

    • 326 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    grown as has the number of judicial controls used by each state. Of the 3,122…

    • 1134 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    The authors describe the history of the death penalty statues in the United States and how…

    • 883 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Good Essays