Brandon Jorritsm Source Analysis

It follows that; the use of sources provides readers with the most reliable information. The use of sources is evident in the paper written by Brandon Jorritsma in comparison to the paper written by an unknown writer. For example, in the paper written by the unknown writer, the writer states, “But the most serious problem with cell phones is without a doubt driving while talking or texting”. As a result of not providing a source, this creates the impression of a personal opinion. On the contrary, sources in Brandon Jorritsma’s essay are linked to a work-cited page. Overall, Brandon Jorritsma’s essay presents a strong use of source compared to the writing of the unknown author.
Naturally, how sources are applied can be seen in both writings
The power of sources in Brandon Jorritsma’s writing makes it more persuasive and does not rely mainly on personal opinion. Such as, “… they felt anxiety if they forgot to take their phone out of the house with them (Jarvenpaa 12). Even when the phone was not anywhere near them, they couldn’t escape its demands on their attention”. This proves Brandon Jorritsma developed strong and persuasive perspectives with the acknowledgment of sources. As for the writing by the unknown author, his or her input is less valued due to the missing identification of a source. To sum up, source material adds evidence and support to writing.
In summary, the paper by the unknown author and by Brandon Jorritsma seems similar. But, the use of sources throughout the writing and their effects is what makes the two writings different. The use of sources adds evidence and support to writing while not using sources concludes that the information present is not reliable. Reliable sources are applied by quoting and paraphrasing. Furthermore, sources have the power to enhance writing by making it more persuasive in contrast to sources not enhancing writing by making it less