Brand Metamorphosis: Mutation of Brand Dna in the Process of Glocalization – a Case of Coca Cola in India.

Topics: Coca-Cola, Brand, Marketing Pages: 33 (9505 words) Published: September 6, 2010
Brand Metamorphosis: Mutation of Brand DNA in the process of glocalization – A case of Coca Cola in India.

Arup Kumar Baksi

Abstract
Post globalization branding strategies focus on hybridization of cultures and incorporating the same to mutate the brand DNA. Globalization has given birth to a jargon namely ‘glocalization’ which is a measure of local adaptability of a global brand. The basic concept of branding has undergone a paradigm shift while taking into consideration the cultural and ethnic aspects while spreading across global markets. Once in a global market, a brand undergoes a metamorphosis, often a triggered one, depending on the degree of change sought to fit local conditions. Academic researches on Brand DNA analysis and Brand Metamorphosis are still at the neonatal stage and enough literature support is still not available. This article (in a Case Study format) tries to analyse the metamorphosis undergone by the number one global brand – Coca Cola, in Indian market. Key words

Brand, Brand DNA, glocalization, metamorphosis, hybridization, adaptability, culture.

Introduction

Globalization has had a huge impact on the branding strategies of international companies. Since the early 1990s many multinational companies, such as Unilever, have moved from a multidomestic to a global marketing approach including global branding strategies (Schuiling and Kapferer 2004). Cost-cutting due to economies of scale and benefiting from a strong worldwide image have been suggested as the most important reasons in favour for a global brand strategy (Schuiling and Lambin 2003). Moreover, the alleged convergence of consumption patterns across borders (Levitt 1983) challenge the concept of brands adapted to local needs and conditions. However, from a consumer perspective, reactions to the prevalence of global brands seem to be quite heterogeneous. On the one hand, consumers seem to value and admire global brands as illustrated by their sometimes even iconic status. On the other hand, global brands are often criticized for threatening local differences and for imposing an objectionable consumer culture on societies (Holt 2002). This criticism culminates in the antibranding movement represented by renowned spokespersons like Naomi Klein or George Ritzer. This paper aims to examine how consumers perceive and evaluate global brands. We define global brands as brands “that consumers can find under the same name in multiple countries with generally similar and centrally coordinated marketing strategies” (Steenkamp, Batra and Alden 2003, p. 53).

Literature Review
So far, consumer research has focused on positive effects of a global brand image, i.e. of the perceived brand globalness. Research indicates that consumers value global brands especially for their assumed high quality and prestigious image (e.g., Nguyen, Barrett and Miller 2005; Steenkamp, Batra and Alden 2003). An internationally well-established brand name can act as a "halo" construct that effects quality beliefs (Han 1989). If a brand is perceived as globally available, consumers are likely to attribute a superior quality to the brand, since such quality is thought of as a prerequisite for international acceptance. Furthermore, prestige and status benefits have been shown to constitute one of the primary motivations of consumers to choose global brands. Especially in Non-Western countries, international brands are more expensive and scarcer than local brands and, therefore, have an exclusive appeal (Batra et al. 2000; Steenkamp, Batra and Alden 2003). In addition, the consumption of internationally recognized brands demonstrates a cosmopolitan and modern lifestyle – an association highly desirable for some consumer segments (Alden, Steenkamp and Batra 1999). So far, the disadvantages of global brands from a consumer perspective have not attracted as much interest in the marketing community. One exception is provided by Schuiling and Kapferer (2004) who...

References: 2. Boyd, D. (2006). "Glocalization: When Global Information and Local Interaction Collide." O 'Reilly Emerging Technology Conference, San Diego, CA. March 6.
3. Campbell, M. (2002). “Asterix Promoting McBurgers in France: McDonald in the 'glocalization ' of fast food marketing”, Toronto Globe & Mail, January 24.
4. Hye-won, J. (2006). “Is globalization succumbing to glocalization?”, The Korean Times, July 18.
5. Kappan, R. (2004). ‘Web’ man in a new weave, The Hindu. Available at: http://www.gothamcomics.com/html/spiy_desi_2.htm. Accessed on: September 26, 2006
6
7.Raimi, S. (2003). “Glocalization”. Available at: http://searchcio.techtarget.com/sDefination/0,,sid19_gci826478,00.html. Accessed on: September 25, 2006.
8. Stollberg, G. (2005). Ayurvedic medicine in Germany. Available at: http://www.uni- bielefeld.de/soz/pdf/PaperStollberg.pdf. Accessed on: September 25, 2006
9
10. Towers, D. (2004). “Wal-Mart: A glocalized company”. Managing Global Business- Self-Program, Universite Jean Mouline, Lyon 3.
11. World Bank Institute & The Glocal Forum (2003). “Glocalization: Research study and policy recommendations.”
Aaker, D., Joachimsthaler, E., 1999
Alden, D., Steenkamp, J. –B., Batra, R., 1999. Brand Positioning Through Advertising in Asia, North America, and Europe: The Role of Global Consumer Culture. Journal of Market- ing, 63(1), 75-87.
Baalbaki, Imad B., Naresh K. Malhotra, 1993. Marketing Management Bases for International Market Segmentation: An Alternate Look at the Standardization/Customization Debate. Inter- national Marketing Review, 10(1), 19-44.
Batra, R., Ramaswamy, V., Alden, D.L., Steenkamp, J.-B., Ramachander, S., 2000. Effects of Brand Local and Nonlocal Origin on Consumer Attitudes in Developing Countries. Journal of Consumer Psychology, 9(2), 83-95.
Belk, R., 1995. Collecting in a Consumer Society, London, Routledge.
Belk, R., 1996. Hyperreality and Globalization: Culture in the Age of Ronald McDonald. Journal of International Consumer Marketing, 8(3&4), 23-38.
Crockett, D., Wallendorf, M., 2004. The Role of Normative Political Ideology in Consumer
Behavior
Druckmann, D., 1994. Nationalism, Patriotism, and Group Loyalty: A Social Psychological
Perspective
Friedman, J., 1990. Being in the World: Globalization and Localization. In: Featherstone, M. (Ed.), Global Culture: Nationalism, Globalization and Modernity, Sage, London, 311-328.
Ger, G., Belk, R., Lascu, D.-N., 1993. The development of consumer desire in marketing and developing economies: The cases of Romania and Turkey. Advances in Consumer Research,
20(1), 102-107.
Han, C. M., 1989. Country Image: Country Image: Halo or Summary Construct? Journal of
Marketing Research, 26(May), 222-229.
Hofstede, G. ter, 2001. Culture’s Consequences – Comparing Values, Behaviors, Intstitutions and Organizations Across Nations, 2nd ed., Sage, Thousand Oaks.
Holt, D.B., 2002. Why Do Brands Cause Trouble? A Dialectic Theory of Consumer Culture and Branding. Journal of Consumer Research, 29(1), 70-90.
----- (2004b), “Leveraging the Corporate Brand” California Management Review, 46 (3), 6-18. AAKER, DAVID A. AND ERICH JOACHIMSTHALER (2000), Brand Leadership, London, Free Press.
AAKER, JENNIFER L. (1997), “Dimensions of Brand Personality”, Journal of Marketing Research, 34
(August), 347-356.
BALDAUF, ARTUR, KAREN S. CRAVENS, AND GUDRUN BINDER (2003), “Performance Consequences of Brand Equity Management: Evidence from Organizations in the Value Chain”, Journal of Product and Brand Management, 12 (4), 220-236.
BALMER, JOHN M.T. AND EDMUND R. GRAY (2003), “Corporate Brands: What Are They? What of
Them?”, European Journal of Marketing, 37 (7/8), 972-997.
BALMER, JOHN M.T. AND STEPHEN A. GREYSER (Eds.) (2003), Revealing the Corporation: Perspectives of Identity, Image, Reputation, Corporate Branding and Corporate-Level Marketing, Routledge, London.
BENDIXEN , MIKE, KALALA A. BUKASA, AND RUSSELL ABRATT (2003), “Brand Equity in the Business -to- Business Market”, Industrial Marketing Management, 33, 371-380.
CHEN, ARTHUR C.H. (2001), “Using Free Association to Examine the Relationship Between Characteristics of Brand Associations and Brand Equity”, Journal of Product and Brand Management, 10 (7), 439 -451.
DAVIS, SCOTT M. (2002), Brand Asset Management: Driving Profitable Growth through Your Brands, San Francisco, Josey Bass.
DAVIS, SCOTT M. AND MICHAEL DUNN (2002), Building the Brand-Driven Business: Operationalize Your
Brand to Drive Profitable Growth, San Francisco, Josey Bass.
DE CHERNATONY , LESLIE (1999), “Brand Management Through Narrowing the Gap Between Brand
Identity and Brand Reputation”, Journal of Marketing Management, 15, 157-179.
DE CHERNATONY, LESLIE AND SUSAN SEGAL-HORN (2001), “Building on Services’ Characteristics to
Develop Successful Services Brands”, Journal of Marketing Management, 17, 645-669.
DOYLE, PETER (2001a), “Building Value-Based Branding Strategies”, Journal of Strategic Marketing, 9,
255-268.
----- (2001b), “Shareholder-Valu e-Based Brand Strategies”, Brand Management, 9 (1), 20 -30.
DYSON, PAUL, ANDY FARR, AND NIGEL S. HOLLIS (1996), “Understanding, Measuring, and Using Brand
Equity”, Journal of Advertising Research, 36 (6), 9 -21.
FARQUHAR, PETER H. (1989), “Managing Brand Equity”, Marketing Research, 1 (September), 24 -33. FARQUHAR, PETER H., J. Y. HAN, AND Y. IRIJI (1991), Recognizing and Measuring Brand Assets, Report
91-119, Marketing Science Institute, Cambridge, MA.
Continue Reading

Please join StudyMode to read the full document

You May Also Find These Documents Helpful

  • Essay about Coca Cola Brand Audit
  • Brand Preference of Coca Cola Products Research Paper
  • Coca Cola Brand Audit Essay
  • Brand Coca-Cola Essay
  • Brand Audit on Coca Cola Essay
  • Essay on Brand Audit of Coca Cola
  • Coca-Cola India Case Essay
  • Coca-Cola in India Case Essay

Become a StudyMode Member

Sign Up - It's Free