Bowling For Columbine Analysis
Bowling for Columbine
Introduction
When I first heard the name of the film; ‘Bowling for Columbine’, I thought this was a movie only about the Columbine High School Massacre in year 1999. I was wrong about it. This movie is much more than that; he dug for the truth – how come the massacre happened. I will be focusing on how the movie is build up, how he gets the attention, because I have never seen anything a exciting documentary before.
Main Ideas
In this documentary it is the real view of America’s gun problem. We are going to hear the blames, but there is not really any too blame. The Americans thinks it is easy to blame others, I agree too, but they are the problem, or at least the gun law. It’s irresponsible of the government, …show more content…
I think he is the only one who has done something about gun arms, there has to be done more about it. I really think it is a great movie; it is the best documentary I have seen in my life. It is humorous and disturbing, and I believe Michael Moore planned this out – to amuse and scare the viewers at the same time, while watching this movie. I gives him thumbs up for choosing such a hard subject, but still making space for a little bit of fun. That is extremely good. Michael Moore speaks from his own point of view in “Bowling for Columbine”, but he remains a balance between subjective and objective, and that gives a space for our own opinion, it also gives us a reason to think twice.
This documentary really has my attention, and I have seen it three times. It has still not gotten old and boring, because Michael Moore has the viewer’s attention. I think it has a stance between a film and a documentary, but it is irrelevant because we know it is real. Before I saw “Bowling for Columbine”, I knew it was easy to get access to guns, but my mind almost got blown up, when he went to the bank and got a free gun, because he opened a bank account, although there were some security checks etc.
Introduction
When I first heard the name of the film; ‘Bowling for Columbine’, I thought this was a movie only about the Columbine High School Massacre in year 1999. I was wrong about it. This movie is much more than that; he dug for the truth – how come the massacre happened. I will be focusing on how the movie is build up, how he gets the attention, because I have never seen anything a exciting documentary before.
Main Ideas
In this documentary it is the real view of America’s gun problem. We are going to hear the blames, but there is not really any too blame. The Americans thinks it is easy to blame others, I agree too, but they are the problem, or at least the gun law. It’s irresponsible of the government, …show more content…
I think he is the only one who has done something about gun arms, there has to be done more about it. I really think it is a great movie; it is the best documentary I have seen in my life. It is humorous and disturbing, and I believe Michael Moore planned this out – to amuse and scare the viewers at the same time, while watching this movie. I gives him thumbs up for choosing such a hard subject, but still making space for a little bit of fun. That is extremely good. Michael Moore speaks from his own point of view in “Bowling for Columbine”, but he remains a balance between subjective and objective, and that gives a space for our own opinion, it also gives us a reason to think twice.
This documentary really has my attention, and I have seen it three times. It has still not gotten old and boring, because Michael Moore has the viewer’s attention. I think it has a stance between a film and a documentary, but it is irrelevant because we know it is real. Before I saw “Bowling for Columbine”, I knew it was easy to get access to guns, but my mind almost got blown up, when he went to the bank and got a free gun, because he opened a bank account, although there were some security checks etc.