Preview

Boston Marathon Bombing Analysis

Best Essays
Open Document
Open Document
2395 Words
Grammar
Grammar
Plagiarism
Plagiarism
Writing
Writing
Score
Score
Boston Marathon Bombing Analysis
Boston Marathon Bombings: A Legal Interpretation

The two explosions that tore through the Boston Marathon nearly two years ago were like the second starting gun on April 15, 2013, a race against time to identify and capture the terrorists responsible. Bostonians were relived after an extensive manhunt ended in the apprehension of the Boston Marathon suspects, but which raised a host of legal issues including the potential consequence of authorities’ decision not to read Tsarnaev his Miranda rights, how might he be charged due to skewed media bias, and whether his case would be moved outside Boston to ensure a fair trial. The importance of these issues answer many controversial questions regarding the reach of the ambiguous legal system.

April 15, 2013 marked the 117th running of the Boston Marathon, the world’s oldest annual marathon. The event is held on Patriot’s Day, which commemorates the beginning of the Revolutionary War in 1775. At approximately 2:49 PM, with more than 5,600 of some 23,000 runners still in the race, two pressure-cooker bombs – packed with an assortment of “metal and ball-bearings” hidden in backpacks …show more content…
The manhunt that quickly ensued after two pressure-cooker bombs went off at the finish line to capture the Tsarnaev brothers finished with one dead and one gravely injured. The younger brother is left to face the legal consequences of the actions that killed three and injured many more. From the moment of capture, legal issues arose such as the decision to not read Dzhokhar Tsarnaev his Miranda rights immediately with the invocation of a public safety exception, how should this naturalized U.S. citizen be tried – a criminal or a terrorist, and how would the location of the trial affect the case and its jury. The families and friends of the victims may soon have peace as trials undergo in the ensuing
Continue Reading
View Writing Issues

You May Also Find These Documents Helpful

  • Satisfactory Essays

    Boston Marathon Bombing Article Summary
    • 542 Words
    • 3 Pages

    Boston Marathon Bombing Article Summary

    On April 15, 2013 I remember hearing from Mr. Ham that the Boston marathon had been bombed at the finish line. The only knowledge I had of this incident before I read about it— was that it was a terrorist attack. After reading this article explaining about the convictions of the two terrorists Dzhokhar and Tamerlan Tsarnaev, there isn’t any sort of bias that I can see going on in this topic. Although the author doesn’t have her own argument about the situation, she talks about the dispute between the terrorists and the prosecutors and the jury. The prosecutors and the jury came to the conclusion that Dzhokhar and Tamerlan Tsarnaev, were found guilty.…

    • 542 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Satisfactory Essays
    Read More
  • Powerful Essays

    Courtroom 302
    • 1715 Words
    • 7 Pages

    Courtroom 302

    A very significant case in Cook County Courts was the Bridgeport case, known as a “heater” case because of the publicity that surround it, and the racial overtones (Bogira 181). The Bridgeport case involved three white teenagers, Michael Kwidzinski, Jasas, and Caruso that were accused of brutally beating two young black boys who were riding their bikes in the predominantly white neighborhood. The entire summary of the case, in Courtroom 302, was based around the fact that one of the boys, Michael Kwidzinski, was most likely innocent. The question then turns to the boy himself, Michael Kwidzinski; if he was innocent, why did hid then accept a guilty plea bargain?…

    • 1715 Words
    • 7 Pages
    Powerful Essays
    Read More
  • Better Essays

    How Has Miranda V. Arizona Changed the Arrest and Interrogation Process.
    • 1197 Words
    • 5 Pages

    How Has Miranda V. Arizona Changed the Arrest and Interrogation Process.

    The Miranda Warning is intended to protect the guilty as well as the innocent and should be protected at all costs. Without the law, many suspects may be treated unfairly. It is a necessary safeguard. Its intentions were to give suspects an informed choice between their freedom of speech, their right not to speak, but be silent, and the prevent statements being given in a non-voluntary nature. Since the law was imposed police policies and procedures were promoted and enforced that effectively imposed safeguards throughout law enforcement agencies. However, with any law there is also discourse. In this essay I plan to give a brief summary of Miranda and discuss the advantages and disadvantages that Miranda provides for suspects and law enforcement officials.…

    • 1197 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Better Essays
    Read More
  • Good Essays

    Timothy Mcveigh's Oklahoma City Bombing
    • 963 Words
    • 4 Pages

    Timothy Mcveigh's Oklahoma City Bombing

    Tragedies seem unreal for people who are directly affected by them. There something that can either unite or destroy people. Just like making life decisions can take away a life or give life. A similar decision was made to take away Timothy McVeigh’s life as a sentence due to his action to bomb 168 individuals in the Murrah Building on April 19, 1995. This horrific circumstance is remembered as the Oklahoma City Bombing. One man’s decision to inflict pain, due to his strong faith, caused another to return the favor on a more intense level.Who is America to decide that she will be the bearer of life or, in McVeigh’s case, a barrier of death? “While the horrific scale of McVeigh’s crime seem to demand the ultimate penalty, there’s something…

    • 963 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Good Essays
    Read More
  • Good Essays

    Wolf v Colorado
    • 542 Words
    • 3 Pages

    Wolf v Colorado

    Brief Fact Summary. Police officers sought a bombing suspect and evidence of the bombing at the petitioner, Miss Mapp’s (the “petitioner”) house. After failing to gain entry on an initial visit, the officers returned with what purported to be a search warrant, forcibly entered the residence, and conducted a search in which obscene materials were discovered. The petitioner was tried and convicted for these materials.…

    • 542 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays
    Read More
  • Better Essays

    Miranda v. Arizona case: How it changed law enforcement
    • 1557 Words
    • 5 Pages

    Miranda v. Arizona case: How it changed law enforcement

    On March 13, 1963, eight dollars in cash was stolen from a Phoenix, Arizona bank worker, Police suspected and arrested Ernesto Miranda for committing the theft. Eleven days earlier, an 18- year old woman was kidnapped and raped in Phoenix, Arizona. The police investigated the case but didn't have any leads as to a suspect. During two hours of questioning Ernesto Miranda on the theft charge, without never being offered a lawyer, he confessed not only to the eight dollars theft, but also to kidnapping and raping an eighteen year old woman eleven days earlier. The police arrested the poor, and mentally disturbed man. This case would become well known in American constitutional studies. Miranda was 23 years old when he was arrested. By confessing to the crime, Miranda was convicted for kidnapping and rape and sentenced to twenty years in prison.…

    • 1557 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Better Essays
    Read More
  • Powerful Essays

    Final
    • 2890 Words
    • 12 Pages

    Final

    Around 2:30 p.m. on the afternoon of September 18, the victim, a prominent citizen in the community, was assaulted and robbed of his wallet by the defendant while walking home from work. He was assaulted, pushed up against a car, and threatened with a knife. Because of the victim's prominence in the community, this crime generated a great deal of media attention, calling for a quick arrest and conviction of the person or persons who committed the crime, which resulted in heavy pressure being placed on the police to make an arrest. The defendant was apprehended several days later while carrying the victim’s wallet and a knife. The victim subsequently identified the defendant in a lineup.…

    • 2890 Words
    • 12 Pages
    Powerful Essays
    Read More
  • Satisfactory Essays

    the zimmerman trial
    • 658 Words
    • 3 Pages

    the zimmerman trial

    After the ‘not guilty’ verdict was announced even more uproar was initiated by the people who were monitoring the development of the case. Outrage erupted online and twitter was filled with people’s tweets voicing their disappointment and anger about the outcome of the trial. Other people opted to voice out their disappointments in the streets of New York, Florida, Oakland, Miami, and Los Angeles, where several peaceful protests, rallies, vigils, and demonstrations took place. But there were also a number of riots that occured, where protesters burned US and…

    • 658 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Satisfactory Essays
    Read More
  • Better Essays

    Miranda V. Arizona
    • 2657 Words
    • 11 Pages

    Miranda V. Arizona

    This case is one that changed the way the United States Police forces will work forever. Every human in the world has natural born rights. Even people who have been arrested have rights, ‘The rights of the accused’. These rights are the main point of this court case.…

    • 2657 Words
    • 11 Pages
    Better Essays
    Read More
  • Good Essays

    Trayvon Martin
    • 680 Words
    • 3 Pages

    Trayvon Martin

    On Saturday July 13th, 2013th, all of America waited on what would be the verdict of George Zimmerman, who killed 17-year old boy Trayvon Martin in Sanford, Florida. In the end a six, mainly white, women jury decided to claim Zimmerman as non-guilty for second degree murder. This caused a huge shock for many Americans. They were left with this shock and pain through thoughts of how could this happen. There were protests because people felt that this verdict does not reflect the true justice that this country claims we fulfill. Due to this verdict and the overall trial, it displays how the United States justice system is not blind to race, because of the way the trial was set up and the ultimate outcome.…

    • 680 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays
    Read More
  • Powerful Essays

    Torturing Prisons
    • 1727 Words
    • 7 Pages

    Torturing Prisons

    • Alan M. Dershowitz. America on Trial: Inside the Legal Battles That Transformed Our Nation—from the Salem Witches to the Guantanamo Detainees. New York: Warner Books, 2004.…

    • 1727 Words
    • 7 Pages
    Powerful Essays
    Read More
  • Good Essays

    Stephanie Crowe Murder Case
    • 496 Words
    • 2 Pages

    Stephanie Crowe Murder Case

    January 21, 1998 was the beginning of one of the most appalling police coercion cases, involving the murder of 12-year-old Stephanie Crowe, and the main suspect: her 14-year old brother, Michael. In the morning when Stephanie’s body was found and police called, they interviewed each and every family member, but focused on Michael and two of his closest friends. According to a 2003 New York Times Upfront article, Michael “was questioned for 27 hours over a three day period” (Bell, n.d.). Due to the police believing that Michael and his friends were the ones who committed this crime against his own sister, he wasn’t able to go to her funeral; instead he was being interrogated by authorities and preparing for trial.…

    • 496 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Good Essays
    Read More
  • Satisfactory Essays

    Due Process Research Paper
    • 280 Words
    • 2 Pages

    Due Process Research Paper

    We live in a democracy. Men before us and even now have fought and died to secure that we remain in a democracy. The Constitution was written to ensure that our rights as a nation was protected against the government of the Kings rule as well as individuals of our nation to be protected against our own government. The Bill of Rights gave each citizen certain legal rights. Included in those rights are the right to a speedy trial and the right to due process. The Supreme Court later ruled that the accused also has rights, and everyday those rights are protected. This paper will describe the concept of Due Process. This paper will define the adversarial system, identify the rights of the accused, and describe the process after a crime has been…

    • 280 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Satisfactory Essays
    Read More
  • Better Essays

    The Right to Remain Silent
    • 1164 Words
    • 5 Pages

    The Right to Remain Silent

    “You have the right to remain silent. Anything you say can and will be held against you in a court of law. You have the right to an attorney. If you cannot afford an attorney, one will be provided for you” (US Constitution Online. Steve Mount. May 10 2008). Do you recognize this as your Miranda Rights? These rights are based on the US Supreme Court’s historic Miranda vs. Arizona case and are your Constitutional rights as an accused person prior to any law enforcement questioning. On May 7, 2000 Brenton Butler, a 15 year old black male from Jacksonville, Florida, was accused of robbery and murder (Murder on a Sunday Morning. Dir. Jean-Xavier de Lestrade. Denis Poncet. 2000. DVD). This became known as the documentary, “Murder on a Sunday Morning”. Upon his arrest, and as part of legal procedure, he was read his Miranda Rights. “We could make arrangements for that” according to Detective James H. Williams. However, neither Williams nor the other arresting officers followed through with the correct course of action to get him a lawyer. It was the officers’ duty to get Butler in touch with his lawyer or a public defender, however; he was not given an attorney until the next day. He was properly told of his rights and still chose to speak with the detectives without proper representation. Should the court restrict a suspect’s right to be told that he can remain silent? In this essay I will argue both for and against being told that “you have the right to remain silent.”…

    • 1164 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Better Essays
    Read More
  • Good Essays

    Should The Government Need Capital Punishment?
    • 1692 Words
    • 7 Pages

    Should The Government Need Capital Punishment?

    The judicial system and the courts do important work in serving justice. But at times they deny justice to the innocent and allow the wrongdoers to enjoy justice at the cost of the innocent citizens. The investigative arms of government are qualified to do their work. However, they depend on links that lead to substantial evidence enough to take an alleged criminal to court and prove that they are guilty. However, the law is blind. People never choose what will happen where they are and when. As the crime has increased in some of the cities around the world, a person may just decide to shoot another on a busy street. And when people hear gunshots, they run away. Due to the confusion, people may brand one of those near the victim as the perpetrator. Once one individual claims to have seen the alleged perpetrator commit the crime, others will join in claiming they also witnessed the person commit the crime. As Stevenson (2014) covers some of the cases he has handled, it is evident that some of the people serving a death sentence are innocent. They are suffering because of legal brinkmanship. Such incidents will divert investigators attention from seeking the real perpetrators, and they will focus on gaining many witnesses to testify in their case against the alleged perpetrator. Such cases happen when the investigating officers are lazy, and all they want is to deliver results without caring about justice. Some…

    • 1692 Words
    • 7 Pages
    Good Essays
    Read More