Preview

Bossuet And Thomas Hobbes

Good Essays
Open Document
Open Document
683 Words
Grammar
Grammar
Plagiarism
Plagiarism
Writing
Writing
Score
Score
Bossuet And Thomas Hobbes
An absolute monarchy is when a single ruler has complete authority. There may still be a system of government in place but the absolute monarch would have complete dominance over the whole of it. To gain complete control monarchs had to reduce the power of all other institutions, especially the nobility. Absolutism is not virtuous but suited the needs of the people and territories at the time.
Thomas Hobbes, author of Leviathan, believes that men naturally want war with everyone who is not themselves. He believes that the only way to have peace in a world with such men is to have a single ruling entity. Hobbes’ states that men need to, “confer all their strength and power upon one man, or upon one Assembly of men, that may reduce all their
…show more content…
It is in an extract of this that Bossuet expresses that, like Thomas Hobbes, he believes that an absolute ruler is a necessity in governing. Unlike Hobbes, Bossuet believes that the need for the absolute monarch is because the throne is established from God therefore the one who sits the throne, or the Prince, should be complete in their rule in a way similar to God’s rule over man. Bossuet justifies absolute rule by reminding the reader that, “ governs all peoples and gives them their kings” (Bossuet). To take power from the prince would be to take power from God. Bossuet claims that the Prince should have so much power that the only thing that would protect a person from his reach would be their innocence. The ruler does need to have control to make people fear the consequences of their actions. Since most people at the time believed that the absolute monarch was given the power through divine right, meaning that to go against the Prince was to go against God, allowed the ruler this type of …show more content…
Like most absolute monarchs Louis claimed that his power was given to him by God and that he was to be representative of God here on Earth. He made himself head of the French church and revoked the Edict of Nantes, which had previously allowed tolerance towards French Protestants. He also worked, “to centralize and tighten control of France and its overseas colonies” (History.com staff). Louis gained control of France’s economic system and implemented mercantilism. He gained control over the powerful nobles through invitations to his court at his lavish palace, Versailles. His strong hold over the rebellious nobles allowed him to maintain his position as absolute monarch. Although King Louis XIV’s reign was full of successes he also had failures. Louis reached too far into foreign affairs and fought many expensive wars, leading to impoverished

You May Also Find These Documents Helpful

  • Satisfactory Essays

    An absolute monarch has both positive and negative affects as a system or government. One positive attribute is organization. In document eight, Louis the 14th describes the necessity of organization when ruling a country. Without organization, a kingdom is vulnerable and its fall is imamate. With one absolute ruler, nothing is discussed nor fought over. As Louis 14th described, “The interest of the state…

    • 402 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Satisfactory Essays
  • Good Essays

    To make a long story short, Louis XIV tried to have power over everything and everyone possible, including the clergy. Absolutism became a well-known term during this period and basically was a political theory that sought to ? encourage rulers to claim complete sovereignty within their territories.? As an absolute monarch you could ?make laws,…

    • 455 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Powerful Essays

    Why Is Louis Xiv Effective

    • 1100 Words
    • 5 Pages

    He lost four wages, on four wars. Because of that, France went into bankruptcy. France was at war for 30 years under the rule of Louis XIV. Louis XIV toughest war was the Spanish succession. His grandson inherited Spain, along with all of its possessions. He wanted to unite with him, which would give him other countries, islands and colonies to own. One of the main reasons why Louis XIV lost the wars he did was because of the balance of power. He was much more powerful than the countries he was about to go to war with, smartly, the European countries allied up with each other; balancing out the power between them and France. With the European powers allying to prevent Louis from uniting Spain and France together, they overpowered France. Louis agreed to the Peace of Utrecht; Spain and France crowns could never unite, giving the allied Europeans what they wanted. If Louis had won, he would have control of Spain’s Territories; of other small countries and American colonies. Putting in a great amount of money and losing the wars was not something Louis had intended, because of this, France was greatly in…

    • 1100 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Powerful Essays
  • Good Essays

    He collected taxes without the consent of the estates general in order establish many things, fund a series of wars, build a bigger and stronger military and to build his palace, the Palace of Versailles, when it was built he insisted that the nobles spend more time there (Doc 2). This eventually led the nobles into debt because they spent most of their time and money at the Palace of Versailles. The nobles being in debt meant that they lost status and power, which ultimately fed the basis for the French Revolution. Document 3 states; “The aftermath of the revocation was disastrous for France. Many of those who abjured [gave up] their Protestant religion repented of their weakness.”(Doc 3) This demonstrates that the removal of the Edict of Nantes drove people insane because it granted the people France substantial rights, however when the rights were removed by Louis XIV people became infuriated, which is another reason to why the French Revolution occurred. Fundamentally, the actions that Louis XIV took had a great impact towards his people. His actions ultimately led the people of France initiate the French Revolution, which left France and its people at a vulnerable…

    • 920 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    King Louis XIV was a man of strength and courage with many ambitions that he was fully determined to achieve. He dedicated most of his rule taking steps to accomplish the goal of “one king, one law, one faith” for the country of France. By one king he aimed for the ruler to have supreme power over armies, government bureaucracy, and culture. This would eventually lead to the overall influence of the French upon other countries and their kings. By way of one law he aspired for the nobles to no longer rule over separate states but for one government with supreme power. King Louis had a desire for an absolute monarchy. As a result he would not be legally bound by any institutions or other persons in the country. This inclination was not easily met or as successful as he had hoped. Louis XIV sought religious unity between the French people, one faith. To do this he revoked the Edict of Nantes. King Louis XIV did not achieve his entire goal to the extent which he had anticipated but overall he was victorious, leaving a huge impact and influence on the French society and Europe as a whole.…

    • 747 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    Although he developed the strongest standing army in Europe, France antagonized all other strong forces in Europe during more than fifty years of his ruling, and eventually bankrupted the French Government. “It produced poverty, misery, and depopulation….Recurring famines and tax increases provoked peasant uprisings” (Palmer 189). From the War of Devolution until the Treaty of Utrecht, Louis gained a slight portion of land in Europe, but he drained the wealth of France and aggravated the burden on French peasants. Endless wars eliminated the chances of creating a prosperous economy system in France and weakened his absolutism with huge debt.…

    • 552 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    Louis XIV was the epitome of an absolute monarch. Through his endless wars, extreme extravagance, and absolute control over taxes and the economy, he set the example for other European powers. His absolute rule brought about both positives and negatives. By building a large army to defend and expand his borders, he alienated other empires and created enemies. Placing political power and faith in the nobility helped him rule a vast kingdom but displaced him from the common man. His obsession with being a great conqueror expanded France to its largest in history, but nearly bankrupted the country and resulted in losing more territory than he gained. Although Louis XIV brought many improvements to France, as well as western society, his insatiable lust for war and extravagance caused more harm than good to the French Empire.…

    • 750 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Satisfactory Essays

    Absolutism created a time of prosperity throughout the 1500s and the 1600s. At this point of history, absolutism was an efficient way of running a government. Absolutist leaders were vigorous, assertive and a potent symbol of authority. The amount of industrial growth in countries such as Russia was both efficient and effective because the power of authority was concentrated into one person’s hands. Absolutism enabled Peter the Great to modernize and adapt Russia for war, commerce and industrial growth. Additionally, absolutism gave people a powerful leader they needed to trust in and depend on for their country's sake. This type of regnant is most evident King James I of England and King Louis XIV of France. For example, King James…

    • 257 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Satisfactory Essays
  • Good Essays

    However I cannot deny that some absolute monarchs did create a sense of tyranny at their time as the absolute monarch in Western Europe . Like I said each king or queen has the choice on how they wanted to rule and not all of them choice the positive ways I have talked about . For example King James I . In document 2 or the ideas expressed by the king himself , he says “monarchy is the supreme thing upon earth ; for kings are not only God’s lieutenants on earth , and sit upon God’s throne , but even by God himself are called God’s.” he uses this statement to put himself and other monarchs equal to God ,so he doesn't have to follow the church , and has more power than the church .I am not saying he was bad leader of his country i just see him as more of a tyrant than a positive absolute monarch…

    • 975 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    Absolutism Dbq Analysis

    • 447 Words
    • 2 Pages

    One of the more common forms of government was absolutism. Rulers believed they should have complete control over the country. An excerpt in document 1 states that Prince Machiavelli believed the best way to rule was to be aggressive and feared and thought that the only way the citizen would follow his rule was if he emulated his power and social status. He thought that if he showed kindness and generosity that he would be overthrown. Most of the monarchs believed in divine right, this meant that they thought that they were chosen by God to rule. One of rulers that believed in divine right was King James 1st, his ideas were expressed in document 2 one of his quotes: “….God has the power…

    • 447 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Better Essays

    Absolutism is the political doctrine and practice of unlimited, centralized authority and absolute sovereignty, as vested especially in a monarch or dictator. The essence of an absolutist system is that the ruling powers is not subject to regularized challenge or check by any other agency, be it judicial, legislative, religious, economic, or electoral. When Louis XIV was king he proclaimed, “I am the state” (Encyclopedia Britannica). This statement alone made by Louis XIV showed familiar assertion of absolutism. It has existed in various forms in all parts of the world, including in Nazi Germany under Adolf Hitler and in the Soviet Union under Joseph Stalin. The most studied form of absolutism would be absolute monarchy. Absolute monarchy originated in early modern Europe and was based on the strong individual leaders of the new nation-states that were created at the breakup of medieval order. The most common defense of monarchical absolutism is known as The Divine Right of…

    • 1631 Words
    • 7 Pages
    Better Essays
  • Good Essays

    Dbq Absolute Government

    • 695 Words
    • 3 Pages

    God establishes kings; so therefore, a monarch's authority to govern should be absolute. In Document 3, Bishop Jacques Bénigne Bossuet writes that God establishes kings as his ministers and reigns through them over the people. The right to rule is derived directly from God, not from the consent of the people. Bossuet believes that the royal throne is not the throne of man, but in…

    • 695 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Powerful Essays

    Absolute monarchy or absolutism means that the sovereign power or ultimate authority in the state rested in the hands of a king who claimed to rule by divine right. Kangxi and Louis XIV were both shining examples for absolutist rule. Age of Absolutism was between 1610 and 1789. Absolutism is a term used to depict a type of monarchical power that was not at all restrained by institutions, for example, legislatures, social elites, or churches.…

    • 952 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Powerful Essays
  • Good Essays

    magnesuim

    • 528 Words
    • 3 Pages

    Absolutism was considered the most effective government during the time by giving the rulers unlimited power. Machiavelli, who wrote The Prince, felt that the best way to rule was to be feared by the people. He stated, “Men have less hesitation in offending a man who is loved than one who is feared, for love is held by a bond of obligation which, as men are wicked, is broken whenever personal advantage suggests it” (Document 1). In this quote, it explains how if you were a ruler that was feared, you would receive more respect from the people then if you were loved. King James I also believed that absolutism was the most effective way to rule. In his opinion, kings were Gods and he strongly supported the Divine Right. Divine Right is the belief that kings get their authority from God. "The state of monarchy is the most supreme thing upon earth; for kings are not only God's lieutenants upon earth, and sit upon God's throne, but even by God himself they are called gods" (Document 2). This quote explains how King James I believed he gained his authority from God and if you were chosen to rule, then you must be treated as if you were a god.…

    • 528 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    Dbq on Absolutism

    • 841 Words
    • 4 Pages

    In a rule using suppression, backed up by the claim to divine authority, an absolute monarchy embodies the omnipotent government reign. Such power was given solely to the head of the state without any constituted restraints. During the Reformation up to the seventeenth century, Europe’s social system started to have conflict as to whether absolute power should be appointed to the king. The king’s subjects, mostly nobles, supported their kings right to absolute power because they got the benefit of political leadership roles and were also given royal protection. The common-folk and the servants were against it because absolutism abused the power in ruling over the peasants as the king, which tended to be restricting.…

    • 841 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Good Essays