Preview

Body Worn Camera (BWC)

Good Essays
Open Document
Open Document
534 Words
Grammar
Grammar
Plagiarism
Plagiarism
Writing
Writing
Score
Score
Body Worn Camera (BWC)
I. Issue –

Body worn camera (BWC) can violate individuals’ privacy laws protected under HIPAA because officers will be recording incident which will involve individuals receiving medical attention and privileged information will recorded

II. What is HIPAA?
HIPAA is Health Insurance Portability and Accountability Act. The act addresses the use and disclosure of individuals’ health information by health care providers. Health information protected under HIPAA includes images or other types of recordings of patients. The health care providers cannot disclose records without the patient’s contest. BWC will.
III. How other states handle BWC and privacy rules (HIPAA)?
Many police departments that use BWC allow officers to use discretion whether to record in investigating sensitive crimes or situations.
A. Florida –
In Florida, there is a proposed bill for mandating body camera to be use by the state’s law enforcement officer. The proposed bill creates a public records exemption for body camera recordings made by a law enforcement officer if the recording is taken :
1. On the property of a facility that offers health care, mental health care or social services,
2.
…show more content…
There are certain situations, such as …non-law enforcement interactions with members of the community, that call affording officers some measure of discretion in determining whether to activate their cameras. There are situations in which not recording is a reasonable decision. An agency’s body-worn camera policy should expressly describe these situations and provide solid guidance for officers when they exercise discretion not to records.” When officers does not activate the camera, most department polices require officers to state in writing the reason for not activating the

You May Also Find These Documents Helpful

  • Good Essays

    The Advocate, the Louisiana based news organization, recently released an article in response to state legislature proposing regulation of body cameras worn on on-duty police officers. The uniform cameras were first implemented in reaction to spreading concern with unclear, high-profile incidents involving officer misconduct and use of deadly force. While the concept of body cameras is an attractive solution for a record of accountability within the law enforcement community, The Advocate questions when and to whom the video data would be made available. Problems of privacy for both the officer and those in interaction with the officer rise from potential footage that could be captured by the cameras. If these videos were to be made publicly…

    • 210 Words
    • 1 Page
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    Since the 1960’s, police brutality has been a major concern and the only solution to reduce it is body cameras. In fact, in a statement given by the University of Cambridge officials declared that police officers have, “Knowledge that events…

    • 977 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Satisfactory Essays

    I think that police officers should wear body camera’s when on duty so that if something goes wrong they could have it on film.body camera’s could be used as evidence against some police officers like for example if a police officer shows no respect or hits someone it could be filmed and that officer would lose his or her job. back in 2014 when the incident happened with the cop and the unarmed teen the video camera would have came in handy to see what really went down between them…

    • 158 Words
    • 1 Page
    Satisfactory Essays
  • Satisfactory Essays

    An invasion of privacy is a concern of the police officers wearing the cameras, because they have state-owned footage. When…

    • 371 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Satisfactory Essays
  • Good Essays

    If police wear body cameras the public’s trust could be restored and the communities would not so much feel unsafe when interacting with police. The cameras would “fundamentally change” the way the police and community interact (Mayor Mr. de Blasio). Eric Garners death is the perfect example of the public’s trust being lost. Garner was placed in a chokehold for being…

    • 197 Words
    • 1 Page
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    Police body cameras are quickly becoming a hot topic both in Congress and in articles. There are several opinions on them, but one thing for certain is that they have their benefits and limitations. Three authors use various rhetorical strategies to convince their audience that body cameras should or should not be used. "Cameras in the Station House" is a peer reviewed article written by no ordinary authors. The contributors and reviewers of this article consist of a state chair man, a criminologist, and two university professors.…

    • 1401 Words
    • 6 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    However, before body cameras are liberally assigned to every officer, there needs to be more specific regulations and policies concerning when, where, and how the camera and its data should be used and what to do if rising opposition or concerns should appear. However, there are still many issues concerning the daily use of body-worn cameras that the people and governing organizations are slow to address. The distribution of body cameras has simply been too quick and needs further testing, clear policy limitations and proposals, and extended contemplation on all the possible effects or consequences before they become standard use. A police officer that is out on patrol sees a woman being beaten and robbed but when the officer pulls over to the scene the suspect had already gotten away while the officer checked on the woman. Even though the suspect had gotten away, the camera that was attached to the officers uniform and on the dash of his squad car caught the face of the robber and they eventually caught…

    • 590 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Satisfactory Essays

    “ Police Body Cameras ( dash cams ) have been in use by soe law enforcement agencies since the mid-1990s”. Many people debate whether or whether not police officers should be wearing body cameras. Police officers should be wearing body cameras . Police officers should wear body cameras because for one they are able to see exactly what happened,the videos provides lessons, and the video can help protect the victim. To begin with, they are able to see exactly what happened .…

    • 451 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Satisfactory Essays
  • Good Essays

    Times outlines the major concerns surrounding the use of police body cameras. The article stresses two of the major scrutinies, privacy and the lack of official policy. With regard to issues over privacy, especially in cases involving domestic violence or rape victims, many worry the body cameras will not be used for their intended purpose; to capture events from an officers point of view. One Police Chief from Grand Junction, Colorado, John Cramper, remains torn. He wants citizens to feel free to talk to his officers as a trusted confidant and fears people will not be as open while being recorded on camera. Cramper, among other experts on the issue, strongly suggests that victims and witnesses should only be filmed with their explicit consent. Another notable skeptic, Missouri state Rep. Jeff Roorda, with regard to dashboard cameras states, “Instead of the cameras being there to protect officers, they get disciplined for petty stuff constantly…” Another legitimate concern expressed in the article is the issue concerning the lack of policy. “Faced with the challenge of striking a balance between transparency and privacy for citizens U.S. law enforcement agencies have not adopted a uniform policy for body cameras…” The article cites a recent federal survey of 63 law enforcement agencies across the country implemented the use of body cameras in the police force. The report states that nearly a third of these agencies have no…

    • 819 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    The camera is really not for the victims safety it's for the policer officer safety, so that the victims knows what every they do it is recorded and will be used against them. The police camera’s are a very easy way to tell if the victim is very aggressive or if they’re total opposite. The question really is if the officer are trying to use the camera’s to overpower the victim and make the officer have more power just because the camera can only see the person. Do you think the police officers be able to be used there body cameras in private areas recording…

    • 709 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    What if an instance does involve harm by the officer? Then if that officer is not required to wear the body camera there will be no official proof of the incident. Hear say is a big problem throughout the world. Oklahomans should not have to have their laws justified by such a matter. The law offices should provide clear and visual data had a problem arise with an officer. There have been many recent shootings throughout the United States…

    • 537 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    There have been many complaints about if body cameras on police officers will work or not. There are two people that have different opinions that other people that think body cameras will stop police brutality against police officers. William N. Grigg, and Joshua Krause these people think body cameras on police officers will not work, and will not stop or decrease the violence from police officers. Grigg’s argument is Their arguments are that the officers from the SDPD forgot to turn on their body cameras while on duty. A crime that happened in April, Officer Neal Browder fatally shot a 31-year-old man named Fridoon Zalbeg Rawshannehad, who had been suspected of carrying a knife. After the shooting, no weapon was found, although Rawshannehad was carrying what has been described as “a shiny looking object.”(San Diego Cops…

    • 839 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Better Essays

    “Earlier this year, a 12-month study by Cambridge University researchers revealed that when the city of Rialto, California, required its cops to wear cameras, the number of complaints filed against officers fell by 88 percent and the use of force by officers dropped by almost 60 percent” (Bailey). It seems that the camera acts as an impartial witness and it cools the tension between the officer and the citizen. And when the police is acting kind because there is a camera, the civilian will act kind and they will be happy with the officer and will not file any complaints. Dr. Wesley G. Jennings, principal investigator for the study and associate chair in USF’s Department of Criminology, said officers in Orlando were initially skeptical about the equipment, with some claiming that body cameras wouldn’t change their willingness to use force during an arrest. The statistics appear to tell a different story, even though only one in four officers in the study agreed that wearing the devices had any impact on their behavior in the field (Wing). Some people were not convinced that body cameras would change a thing but studies from the Department of Criminology show that the officers themselves say that officers change their behavior in their department. A study at Florida Atlantic University showed “citizens who had a more positive view of police and thought they were treating people fairly…

    • 1257 Words
    • 6 Pages
    Better Essays
  • Satisfactory Essays

    Police should have body cameras because it is important, they are many polices officers that do a bad work, in that case body cameras can help to know who had the reason on an accident, police officers are bound to remember events in ways that protect their sense of self and justify their actions. In general watching body cameras footage should reduce dishonesty in incidents.…

    • 286 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Satisfactory Essays
  • Good Essays

    Body cameras are seen as an invasion of privacy, as they provide state-owned footage. When police cameras are on, they will capture everyday civilian and police behavior that does not necessarily need to be recorded. Do all defendants want their arrests recorded? Do all bystanders want to be in those videos when shown in court(5 pro)? Civilians might not want to be video tape, or have there face on camera. Or the public doesn't want to be on camera. It is not practical to have cameras play constantly, there must be guidelines for when police should turn their cameras on and off(5 Pro). There has to be a limit on how long they can have their camera on. They most likely need to turn it on when there around the public or they get a compliant. Cameras also threaten to degrade civic values by turning police officers into walking surveillance tools. This could erode trust between citizens and law enforcement, as well as formalize casual public reconnaissance in a way that the NSA never dreamed of(hilliary). Civilians should trust the police and trust that they will keep the people safe. The camera give us another excuse to not want to trust the police. The police should be truthful and the civilians and they might have more trust in them.…

    • 818 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Good Essays