Preview

Bjornson Manipulation

Satisfactory Essays
Open Document
Open Document
253 Words
Grammar
Grammar
Plagiarism
Plagiarism
Writing
Writing
Score
Score
Bjornson Manipulation
Björnsson’s research interests fall into moral psychology and moral responsibility. He works on the unification and accounts of moral correctness as well as the psychological effectiveness of manipulation and how the ignorance of others can justify the rightness of possible evil. There are many attributes that conceal the faithfulness of why manipulation is necessary to survive and why it is despicably wicked. The guiding inspiration has been to start with an empirically adequate account of why attributions of responsibility display the patterns they do. Based on such interpretations, we are able to understand and identify why people are prone to manipulation and what it can cause in the future. With this information, we are able to better

You May Also Find These Documents Helpful

  • Good Essays

    In society, authority and its rules are respected by people in the community through acts of obedience. Authority is not only the government laws, but can also be people with a higher status, such as parents, teachers, or employment managers. As long as people obey those with authoritative power, they will receive rewards, or at least avoid punishment, even when the command requires unjust actions towards another person. For example, Hitler’s propaganda that made the Germans believe that the Jews were the source of their economic problems and scapegoated them in world war two. And years after the Holocaust, some Germans deny their part in the abuse towards the genocide of six million Jews. In other words, people who deny their part in an unjust action place the blame on…

    • 816 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Powerful Essays

    In many studies done by social scientists and psychologists, the idea and strength of social interactions upon the individual leading to ordinary people behaving extraordinarily evil has been dissected thoroughly (Post, 2011). Will power, or the ability and strength to make and act on one’s own decisions, exists in all men, of course, but the power of those that hold authority and a person’s peers seems to have equal—if not sometimes more—manifested exertion and control over an individual’s actions and thoughts. This, thereby, leads people that would normally act in a morally responsible way to behave in the contrary and perform acts out of character with a humanistic ideology. In the American culture, individualism is celebrated, but the social belonging that each individual values and craves also causes a need to conform, at times, to very strong societal influences that may develop into actions that are evil and cruel, such as with the My Lai Massacre in Vietnam.…

    • 1479 Words
    • 6 Pages
    Powerful Essays
  • Powerful Essays

    Nahmias, E., Stephen, M., Nadelhoffer, T., & Turner, J. (2005, October). Surverying Freedom: Folk Intuitions about Free Will and Moral Responsibility. Philosophical Psychology, 18(5), 561 - 584.…

    • 1592 Words
    • 7 Pages
    Powerful Essays
  • Good Essays

    Moral Luck, Nagel

    • 341 Words
    • 2 Pages

    Through Moral Luck, Nagel discusses the problem of moral luck and the conflict that arises between the common practice and intuition that most of society believes in regarding morality. Throughout his essay, Nagel defines intuition and the phenomenon of moral luck and claims that, despite having this intuition, people often make moral judgments about people based on factors that are beyond their control (for example, a drunk driver who kills a child). Nagel claims that the problem of moral luck is due to the tension between a person’s intuitions and their moral standing. He also believes that one’s moral standing cannot be impacted by luck and the possibility that luck plays an important role in determining one’s moral standing. Nagel also suggests that the intuition is correct and resides at the very center of morality, but he also supports the argument that luck will inevitably effect a person’s moral standing. This conclusion leads him to believe that morality is a paradox and enigma.…

    • 341 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Powerful Essays

    Psychological Egoism

    • 913 Words
    • 4 Pages

    Ethics is a requirement for human life. It is our means of deciding a course of action. Without it, our actions would be random and aimless. There would be no way to work towards a goal because there would be no way to pick between a limitless numbers of goals. Even with an ethical standard, we may be unable to pursue our goals with the possibility of success. To the degree which a rational ethical standard is taken, we are able to correctly organize our goals and actions to accomplish our most important values. Any flaw in our ethics will reduce our ability to be successful in our endeavors. Since psychology and morality are related, moral theories must be psychologically realistic which consequently includes behaviorally/motivationally realistic. This correlation between our cognitive processes and our resulting behavior are two variables of ethics that must be considered and thereby examined closely. While psychological egoism isn’t an ethical theory and rather discusses our motivation for certain behaviors, we still find the connection to this example and examples from previous chapters.…

    • 913 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Powerful Essays
  • Good Essays

    Attribution theory is concerned with how individuals interpret events and how this relates to their thinking and behaviour. Heider (1958) was the first to propose a psychological theory of attribution, but Weiner and colleagues (e.g., Jones et al, 1972; Weiner, 1974, 1986) developed a theoretical framework that has become a major research paradigm of social psychology…

    • 279 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Satisfactory Essays

    Hasty Moral Judgments

    • 298 Words
    • 1 Page

    Human beings make hasty moral judgments constantly, sometimes involuntarily. Our predispositions, whether they are based off opinion or upbringing, often lead us to superficial judgments, with little to no prior knowledge of the individual whom we are judging. Issues like pornography, capital punishment, and abortion strike people at their core. Some are even willing to protest in support of their opposition. These are indeed loaded topics, surrounded by a great deal of controversy; a fight waiting to happen, if you will. So, what is it about these issues that make us question peoples moral compasses? To make proper assessments about the people around us, we must first recognize flaws in our own thinking. We must question what we ourselves deem good or bad before we analyze someone else’s morality. For instance, since prostitution is generally looked down upon, people do not perceive them as honest, nor are they regarded as people with good intentions. People misguidedly use the label Prostitute as a way to judge an individual person. People are full and complex. We possess a wide variety of traits, and how you make your money may say a little about you, but it surely does not define your morality. Hastily judging someone’s morality is not an easy problem to fix; however, if everyone was more analytical, moral judgments would be a bit more reasonable. Once we are aware of this information, it is our duty to spread it. As a society, we have achieved amazing feats of innovation because we are able to deduce, and intelligently formulate what is proper and what is not. Perhaps if we conducted ourselves in the same manner regarding our moral judgments, humanity would achieve some remarkable things as well.…

    • 298 Words
    • 1 Page
    Satisfactory Essays
  • Powerful Essays

    Throughout this paper, I will contrast and compare two moral theories in attempt to uncover what one provides a better argument and can be applied as a universal moral code. The two moral theorists Immanuel Kant and J.S Mill have created two distinctly different theories on morality and how to develop a universal moral code. Both theories focus on intentions and consequences. Kant believes that the intentions and reasons of our actions can be measured and defined as morally correct, where as Mill believes that our intentions really play no role in morality, and that we should focus on the consequences and outcomes of our actions to evoke the most happiness for the most people. Even though both philosophers make incredibly different points, each encompasses strong arguments as well as issues with their approach. However, Kant will be successful in articulating a better universal moral theory through the use of his categorical imperative.…

    • 1481 Words
    • 6 Pages
    Powerful Essays
  • Good Essays

    People tend to believe that there is a clear line between good and evil – with them on one side, others always evil. Philip Zimbardo reveals that this line is far more permeable. Good can turn bad, and ‘evil’ people capable of redemption. He describes evil as “exercising power to intentionally harm people (psychologically), to hurt people (physically), to destroy people (mortally), or ideas, and to commit crimes against humanity”. The question offered is, what is it that makes people turn evil? It will be shown that the power to turn people evil lies in the system – the legal, political, economical, and cultural background that creates the situation that corrupts individuals.…

    • 1031 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    The Vikings came from what is known as Sweden, Norway, and Denmark. During the time from the 8th to the 11th centuries the Vikings traveled in their longboats to the British Isles and the coast of Europe raiding the settlements.…

    • 606 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Satisfactory Essays

    Have you ever wondered why your parents teach you manners? Or why they punish your for hitting your sister or biting your brother? Humans must be taught to be good because we are born inherently evil. The definition of evil is being somewhat wicked and immoral. The definition of good is being morally right and having integrity. Now, some people may say that this is a horrible thing to say, but if you think about it, how do all these bad things happen if people aren’t truly bad? Why do we have crime, rape, domestic violence, war, and murder? Not all people do these things and most people believe these are wrong, but there are people who still do it anyway. Humans can be good, if they try; however, humans are born inherently evil.…

    • 391 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Satisfactory Essays
  • Powerful Essays

    As human beings it is in our nature to be driven by self-interest. This is where the view of psychological egoism derives from. Even though it may seem like we are taking part in an unselfish act, in different ways it can also be considered selfish. It is because of this view that morality is needed in society in order for us to live in harmony with one another. In this essay I will discuss how it is possible to reconcile egoism with morality and why we should be moral due to our psychological egoism. These discussion points include; the social contract, importance of morals not governed and the prisoner’s dilemma theory. Throughout my argument I will refer to Thomas Hobbes’ idea of social contract theory explained in depth in James Rachels’ book The Elements of Moral Philosophy as it is an important concept in understanding the view of psychological egoism. Additionally, I will also discuss Peter Singer’s view point on acting morally from his book Practical Ethics.…

    • 1630 Words
    • 7 Pages
    Powerful Essays
  • Better Essays

    Descartes 4th Meditation

    • 788 Words
    • 4 Pages

    Cited: 1. Feinberg, Joel, and Shafer-Laundau, Russ. Reason and Responsibility. 12th. Belmont, CA, USA: Thomson and Wadsworth, 2005.…

    • 788 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Better Essays
  • Better Essays

    The following essay will discuss psychologist Stanley Milgram’s study of obedience to authority, and will outline the ethical issues it raised for social psychologists. Milgram was inspired by the Nuremburg trials and the defense of many ex-nazis being that they were coerced into assisting the genocide by simply following orders from higher authority figures. Milgram set out to see if ordinary volunteers could be coerced into taking actions which went against their own moral judgement if they were ordeed to do so by an authority figure and assured that they would not be held responsible for any negative consequences. The participant’s willingness was also measured in the experiment. The experiment was controversial, received much criticisism and raised several ethical issues, including post traumatic stress and skewed self image of participants, the right to withdraw from the experiment not being made clear to participants and, particularly, deception of participants. The experiment and these issues will be discussed further in the following paragraphs.…

    • 1361 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Better Essays
  • Powerful Essays

    It is human nature for us to think about other people’s actions and intentions and then process what they mean. In this way, we form attributions, which help us understand others’ purposes and objectives. There are two main types of attributions. The first is dispositional attribution, which are assumptions that are made based on someone’s behaviour where a person assumes the behaviour is caused by someone’s personality or character. The second type is a situational attribution, which is an assumption that takes into the account a situation the other person was in at the time.…

    • 5027 Words
    • 21 Pages
    Powerful Essays