Top-Rated Free Essay
Preview

Bismarck S Foreign Policy

Good Essays
1142 Words
Grammar
Grammar
Plagiarism
Plagiarism
Writing
Writing
Score
Score
Bismarck S Foreign Policy
Bismarck’s Foreign Policy

Otto von Bismarck (1815-1898) ruled Germany’s foreign policy from 1871 until 1890. He won over Prussia’s elected representatives by unifying Germany, first the north (1866) and then (in 1871) the whole of ‘Lesser Germany.’ In 1870, the French government blundered into a conflict with Prussia. By declaring war, the French fell into a trap that the Prussian king’s chief minister, Otto von Bismarck, had carefully laid for them. War against France, the ‘traditional enemy’, was Bismarck’s best chance of inflaming German national feeling and persuading the independent south German states to unite with the Prussian-dominated states of the north, thereby unifying Germany. The Franco-Prussian war was a disaster for France. She entered the war without allies and with a badly organized army, which was a huge disadvantage compared to the speedy Prussian forces. Prussia had well-trained, highly disciplined Prussians and their German allies.
Many believe his foreign policy was a success, meaning that all the goals that were set, were achieved. Others think of this in the exact opposite way. His success can be evaluated by looking at his three main goals.

Bismarck had three main objectives as Germany’s chancellor: To isolate France, to hold peace between Russia and Austria-Hungary and to avoid being encircled diplomatically, meaning to avoid war.
Otto von Bismarck wanted to isolate France for several reasons. First of all, Germany wanted to isolate them diplomatically. He wanted to do this, because Germany was sandwiched between two Great Powers, which were France and Russia. If Germany would not isolate one of them, there could have been a war coming from two fronts, leaving Germany hopeless. Bismarck decided to isolate France, because he was confident that if the time came, Germany would be able to beat France. he isolated France by distracting the other Great European Powers. Bismarck made them believe that they were dependent on Germany’s goodwill and sought to neutralize their antagonisms by a “balancing of discontents”. Furthermore, Bismarck wanted to manage France because he was scared of a war of revenge from France. This is because Germany took Alsace and Lorraine from France and by isolating them, they would manipulate France’s sense of revanchism. Isolating France was ver successful. Until 1890 France was completely isolated from the rest of Europe. All of Bismarck’s ideas to isolate them worked very effectively and without strong France in the European picture, Germany would be one of the strings European powers, which, until 1890, they were.

Another main objective of Otto von Bismarck was to stay friendly with Austria-Hungary and Russia. Bismarck did this by making the Dreikaiserbund in 1873. The Dreikaiserbund consisted of the German Kaiser, the Habsburg Emperor and the Tsar of Russia. In 1871, Bismarck wanted to show that he was a man of peace. He called himself the ‘Honest Broker’, implying that he would not take sides in the dispute. He showed this by the personal contacts between the German Kaiser, the Habsburg Emperor and the Tsar of Russia. Because of this, the Dreikaiserbund was created. It expressed the desire of the three emperors to stand together in the interests of monarchial solidarity against the threats of republicanism and socialism. This alliance also suited as an anti-revolution alliance, which was perfect for Germany, as they wanted to become Europe’s Greatest Power. Now that the three countries were at peace, Germany did not have the fear of being encircled by Austria-Hungary and Russia over the Balkans. This was very crucial and Germany had to create Balkan peace, because if they did not, Russia would probably ally with France (causing the isolation of France to collapse) and they would avoid any revolts or wars to break out. Because Otto von Bismarck did all of this, being friendly with Austria-Hungary and Russia was a great success. Until 1890, no wars or revolts broke out towards Germany and because of this, Germany kept on climbing up the European hierarchy to brome Europe’s Greatest Power.

In 1878 it seemed to Bismarck that Germany was presented a stark choice: either accept the continuing hostility of Russia or form an alliance with her. He was unwilling to choose the latter, since that would alienate Austria-Hungary and Russia. The proposal he put to Andrassy, the Austrian foreign secretary, in 1879 was a curious one. It worried a permanent relationship with Russia, creating a sort of Germanic bloc in Europe. Austria-Hungary’s Balkan ambitions would be kept in check, while the exclusive tie with Germany would dig a ditch between the Austrian and the Western Powers. Yet Andrassy rejected these proposals. He wanted a defensive pact directed solely against Russia, which he achieved. By the terms of the Dual Alliance of October 1879, Germany and Austria promised to give full support if either were attacked by Russia. This treaty has often been called a landmark, because it was not to be a prelude to some specific action, like earlier treaties; because it lasted so long; and because, with its precise terms kept secret, it bred suspicion among other Powers, who soon came up with similar treaties of their own.

Bismarck did not want an alliance with Italy for its own sake. Italy was a second-rate, rather that a Great Power, and Bismarck was skeptical of Italy’s abilities, remarking privately that she wanted too much and had too much ideas, but could not bring everything to real life. In order to increase France’s isolation, Italy seemed a useful lay against France. By the terms of the Triple Alliance of May 1882, both Germany and Italy were entitled to support each other against an unprovoked attack by France. If Austria-Hungary were at war with Russia, Italy would be neutral-thus giving the Austrians security on their southern frontier. The years 1882 to 1887 marked the zenith of the Bismarckian system, when Bismarck could feel confident that Germany’s position in Europe was quite secure. So again, the Triple Alliance was successful for Germany’s security, so Bismarck managed to be successful again.

In conclusion, Otto von Bismarck’s foreign policy was a success. His overall aim was to avoid war from any fronts. Since the isolation of France and keeping peace with Austria-Hungary and Russia worked, it is clear that his foreign policy was a success. But, Otto von Bismarck’s foreign policy was only successful on the short run. All of his alliances and isolations collapsed once he resigned in 1890 and Count Leo von Caprivi took over the foreign policy. The Dreikaiserbund was broken and in 1892 the Franco-Russian alliance was made. This made France no longer isolated. It made Germany once again fear a war coming from two fronts and made Germany once again become inferior to the Great European Powers, which they were no longer part of.
(Fleur van den Broek)

You May Also Find These Documents Helpful

  • Satisfactory Essays

    Ccot Essay

    • 589 Words
    • 2 Pages

    In the 1800’s Germany was divided into a three thousand kingdoms and city states. These kingdoms all had different culture, religions, and traditions. As well as an attitude that they were the best, the effect lead to the division of Germany as broken nation and Napoleon took advantage of that and attacked. This influenced Germany to reduce its self-down to 39 kingdoms and unite as Napoleon organized them and put his family at throne. In the 1860’s a leader known as Otto Van Bismarck took leadership of Germany with intentions of making it a nation to be recognized. With his time in power he was obviously a militaristic leader with intentions that a strong military leads to a strong nation. Bismarck who had a “blood and iron” policy showed his military ways. This meant iron as in weapons and blood as in killing that as long as the job gets done you just need these two components. This seemed to be effective policy, because Bismarck initiated three wars and defeated and lead the way with this policy, and even the Austro-Prussia war only lasting seven weeks until Germany defeated Austria. As well defeating Denmark in 1866 and France in the France-Prussia war. Bismarck policies and way of leading with an iron fist was best for Germany as they became a strong nation and a force to be reckoned with.…

    • 589 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Satisfactory Essays
  • Good Essays

    Kaiser Wilhelm II’s foreign policy undid Bismarck’s policies, where he worked towards avoiding a war on two fronts for Germany. Apart from Austria-Hungary Alliance (1879), Three Emperor's Alliance (1881), treaties with Serbia in 1881 and Romania in 1883, Triple Alliance (1882) and eventually the Reinsurance Treaty with Russia (1887), which he considered essential to keep the Russians from reaching an alliance with the French and threaten Germany on two sides. The Schlieffen Plan, conceived by Count Alfred von Schlieffen in 1905 and further refined in the years was to cater for this eventuality. This occurred when the Russian Treaty was scheduled to expire in June 1890 and the Russians under The Tzar, Alexander III were aware of the fact that Bismarck was about to be replaced. Therefore, to secure relations with Germany they suggested renewing the Reinsurance Treaty for 6 years instead of 3 years. The new German Chancellor Caprivi and Wilhelm II decided not to renew it, this gave Russia a feeling of being isolated and vulnerable as her relations with Britain were not good at that time and it was just a natural development that France and Russia form an alliance. The French diplomats immediately began to work on this with the Tzar and an alliance was negotiated in 1894. This action was the one where…

    • 394 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    World War I: Study Guide

    • 1344 Words
    • 6 Pages

    -in order to glorify his army to its maximum potential, he began a program to make the german navy equal to the British fleet which alarmed Great Britian to make an alliance with france and russia (tripple entente)…

    • 1344 Words
    • 6 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    As nationalism and its ideas began the journey across Europe, it started to unite people into nation states. One of the prime examples of this unity is Germany. Before Germany was united as a whole in 1871, the nation was separated into Germanic states and Prussia. Determined to unite them into Germany because of their ethnicity, Wilhelm hired Otto Von Bismarck, who was just the guy to bring everyone together. Bismarck had used carefully thought out tactics to unite the Germanic states. They needed Prussia in order to become a powerful Germany. “Prussia….could no longer carry alone the power Germany required for its security” [Bismarck, Document 5]. Finally getting Prussia after the Franco-Prussian War, Germany was then united as a proud and powerful Germanic nation. The French were also united through Nationalism. After realizing their…

    • 1226 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    Bismark Attack Paper

    • 625 Words
    • 2 Pages

    The Prime Minister then decided to provoke France into a war. He wanted to make sure no one would try and intervene in German affairs and bring some of the smaller German states out of the nation as a whole. He then adds insult to injury by suggesting a…

    • 625 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    Otto Van Bismarck began his reign when he was appointed as the prime minister of Prussia in 1862 by King William I. At this point in time, Prussia was in a mediocre state of power, considerably inferior in comparison to its other surrounding nations. As Bismarck steps into his role as ruler, he had distinctive and clear goals for the rise of power of Prussia over the unification of Germany. His reign consisted of strategies that were effective in the manipulation of domestic and international politics and political parties (Merriman 663). Most significantly, his ability to satisfy both parties of nationalism and liberalism become a key factor in his successful ruling. Specifically, the unexpected victory of the Austro-Prussian war landed Bismarck…

    • 328 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Better Essays

    How successful was Bismarck in maintaining his political control in Germany in the years 1878 to 1890?…

    • 1949 Words
    • 8 Pages
    Better Essays
  • Powerful Essays

    "Napoleon's tragedy was that his ambitions surpassed his capacities; Bismarck's tragedy was that his capacities exceeded his society's ability to absorb them. The legacy Napoleon left for France was strategic paralysis; the legacy the Bismarck left for Germany was unassimilable greatness"(statement made by Henry Kissinger) is in my opinion a correct statement. This statement can actually be separated into two parts. The first parts relates with the capacities, ambitions and successes of Bismarck and Napoleon. The second part is about the final result of their reign and how their reigns could be taken over after such changing of Europe.…

    • 2108 Words
    • 7 Pages
    Powerful Essays
  • Good Essays

    With, Otto von Bismarck, Germany grew from a fragile union of states to a dominant empire. For the 19th century, Bismarck's policies limited the destinies of most of the countries of Europe. Otto Eduard Leopold von Bismarck-Schonhausen was born on April 1, 1815, at Schonhausen. Otto decided to learn law at universities in Berlin, and then entered the Prussian civil service. He then left the service and went back to his family but then entered politics in 1847. At the time the German states were not well organized and could never form tight bonds. Bismarck was determined to free the states from Austrian domination and to unite them under Prussian rule. Otto served as a delegate at the congregation of the German union and as representative to Russia and France. In 1862 he was appointed minister-president of Prussia.…

    • 530 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Satisfactory Essays

    asdsa

    • 567 Words
    • 2 Pages

    European leaders believed creating a balance of power would prevent one country from being more powerful than another European country. The idea was if Germany, England, France, and Russia were all equal in power, than there would be no war. But the Chancellor of Prussia, Otto von Bismarck, thought differently. He didn’t like that Germany was being squished by Russia and France, so to solve this problem he created an alliance with Austria- Hungary.…

    • 567 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Satisfactory Essays
  • Satisfactory Essays

    The Franco-Prussian war (1870-1871) established Germany as a powerful empire. Some of the worst fighting in the war was between France and Germany. Leading up to the World the two countries had experienced decades of tension. France was not getting fooled and could see that over the course of the 19th century the Germanic…

    • 191 Words
    • 1 Page
    Satisfactory Essays
  • Satisfactory Essays

    Henry Kissinger Email

    • 448 Words
    • 2 Pages

    Bismarck was an astute and revered leader in the European community. His departure signaled a change in Germany’s foreign policy. Germany’s pursuit for its own security became the reason for its insecurity. Germany became the strongest military power in continental Europe and caused Great Britain, France and Russia to align against it. Ironically, for the greater part of Imperial Germany’s history, Russia was considered the main threat to peace in Europe. Russia always wanted more land and craved for territorial expansion.…

    • 448 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Satisfactory Essays
  • Satisfactory Essays

    <br>After Bismarck's dismissal the Kaiser and his advisers were convinced that the most likely wars in Europe were Germany against France of Austria-Hungary against Russia and in neither…

    • 1750 Words
    • 7 Pages
    Satisfactory Essays
  • Powerful Essays

    The historical interpretation of Otto von Bismarck and Bismarckian Germany has undergone extensive transformation, as historians have had access to a wider variety of sources and evidence, and have held differing social and political presuppositions influencing their portrayal of the German unifier. The changing historical interpretations can be seen over time, as differing contexts and sources influence the portrayal, as early interpretations of Bismarck from the 1870s to the 1920s portrayed Bismarck as a man in charge and as a necessity for Germany to move forward. The interpretation of Bismarck continued to change throughout the 1930s and 40s as a result of Nazism and the collapse of the Third Reich, the interpretations shifted, and throughout the 1960s, 70s and 80s the interpretation of Bismarck has become more balanced, not significantly influenced by political desires, whilst still influenced by social context. Through the study of historical debate focussing between the 1880s and 1980s, the changing interpretations of Bismarck can be illuminated and assessed.…

    • 4452 Words
    • 18 Pages
    Powerful Essays
  • Good Essays

    Bismarck and Metternich

    • 1023 Words
    • 5 Pages

    Bismarck sought to unite Germany by engaging into wars including the Danish War, the Austro-Prussian War, and finally the Franco-Prussian War. Many of Metternich’s and Bismarck’s goals resulted in their achievements. His most important legacy is the unification of Germany.…

    • 1023 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Good Essays