Preview

Bill Of Rights Synthesis

Good Essays
Open Document
Open Document
647 Words
Grammar
Grammar
Plagiarism
Plagiarism
Writing
Writing
Score
Score
Bill Of Rights Synthesis
This article is explaining the author Walter William’s opinion on why the Bill of Rights were written. He states that they were written because “Congress could not be trusted with our God-given rights.” The article also explained that the Amendments within the Bill of Rights were written because the “Government was the enemy of the people.” Even though the government was the “enemy” it was still needed to provided the State's protection.Others think that the Bill of Rights were “unnecessary and dangerous.” One of the individuals that felt it was unnecessary and dangerous was Alexander Hamilton, he felt that the government should have more power than the States.
The Constitution was written to protect the rights of “We the people,” which is
Continue Reading
View Writing Issues

You May Also Find These Documents Helpful

  • Satisfactory Essays

    How Did Thomas Jefferson Protect Individual Rights
    • 175 Words
    • 1 Page

    How Did Thomas Jefferson Protect Individual Rights

    Thomas Jefferson, American Founding Father and the principal author of The Declaration of independence, theorized that “the care of human life and happiness, and not their destruction, is the first and only object of good government.” Jefferson pointed to “unalienable rights,” and these rights were “giving to us by our creator and not by a government.” To protect the fundamental and individuals rights accordingly, James Madison was involved by including the Bill of Rights to The Constitution. The intention with these, was to remove the power from government reach only. Years after the Declaration of Independence and the Constitution was put in place, a remarkable Landmark decision by the United States Supreme Court was news and continues to…

    • 175 Words
    • 1 Page
    Satisfactory Essays
    Read More
  • Powerful Essays

    What did Alexander Hamilton mean by an “energetic” government? How does this kind of government protect individual liberty AND restrict it? Use examples from Hamilton and current examples.
    • 1387 Words
    • 4 Pages

    What did Alexander Hamilton mean by an “energetic” government? How does this kind of government protect individual liberty AND restrict it? Use examples from Hamilton and current examples.

    Hamilton is considered one of the most influential interpreters and advocates of the Constitution. He was one of the common writers of the Federalist papers, writing 51 out of the 85 papers. The Federalist papers were propaganda published in journals or newspapers, and their purpose was to educate citizens on why the Constitution should be ratified. They were always published under the pseudonym Publius to preserve their names from the public. In Federalist #23, Hamilton writes of how the Constitution must be energetic in order to have an energetic government. An energetic government would be one that is effective and powerful in their actions. In order to create and preserve an energetic government and protect and limit the citizens individual liberty, the fundamental purposes of the Union are the common defense of the members, the preservation of public peace and external attacks, and the regulation of commerce between the states and other nations.…

    • 1387 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Powerful Essays
    Read More
  • Satisfactory Essays

    How Did James Madison Wrote The Bill Of Rights In 1789?
    • 270 Words
    • 2 Pages

    How Did James Madison Wrote The Bill Of Rights In 1789?

    The author of the Bill of Rights is President James Madison,in despite of the fact that when he wrote the Bill of Rights in 1789 he wasn't president yet. James Madison wrote the Bill of Rights in 1789 because he wanted better constitutional protection for individual liberties. James Madison thought that the passing of the Bill of Rights in the House was entirely unnecessary and referred to it as the "nauseous project of amendments. "Also,when James Madison rose to his feet on June 8,1789 and put forward an idea adding the Bill of Rights to the Constitution through a series of amendments ,he was acting more politically more than philosophically. He was trying to crush the opposition to the new Constitution by taking away the issue that had the…

    • 270 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Satisfactory Essays
    Read More
  • Good Essays

    Preamble Promises Research Paper
    • 438 Words
    • 2 Pages

    Preamble Promises Research Paper

    The Bill of Rights were created so that the government power would have limits. The Bill of Rights Institute says, “Federalists argued that the Constitution did not need a bill of rights, because the people and the states kept any powers not given to the federal government. Anti-Federalists held that a bill of rights was necessary to safeguard individual liberty.” Two examples of the Bill of Right freedoms are that if a person is accused of a crime they have the right to a fair trial. Also people shall never be enslaved in the US.…

    • 438 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Good Essays
    Read More
  • Good Essays

    Separation Of Powers Dbq
    • 874 Words
    • 4 Pages

    Separation Of Powers Dbq

    At first, some of the first people in America didn’t want to have a federal government that had too much power. The Founding Fathers created the Constitution of the United States of America after the Articles of Confederation failed. There are numerous documents in the Constitution that limit the federal government in many ways. For example there is a system called Checks and Balances that gives certain powers to each branch. In the United States, there is something called the Separation of Powers which also limits the federal government. It keeps one branch of government from becoming too powerful against the other branches. Furthermore, the Bill of Rights also limits the federal government. Also known as the first ten additions or amendments to the Constitution, the Bill of Rights protect individual liberties. As you can…

    • 874 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Good Essays
    Read More
  • Good Essays

    Should The Framers Criticize The Government?
    • 855 Words
    • 4 Pages

    Should The Framers Criticize The Government?

    When the Framers wrote “securing the blessings of liberty,” it was referring to the freedom to criticize the government or petition it when they disagreed with its policies, in other words it meant our government will make good decisions so that we have the good things about freedom and the future generations have freedom and right as well. Once the constitution was ratified the Bill of Rights were the ten amendments to the constitution that offered numerous limitations on the national government's ability to interfere with personal liberties, now there are 27 amendments.…

    • 855 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Good Essays
    Read More
  • Good Essays

    Federalist Papers 51
    • 695 Words
    • 3 Pages

    Federalist Papers 51

    The Federalist Papers are a collection of 85 essays written by Alexander Hamilton, James Madison and John Jay advocating the validation of the United States constitution. The series of articles were first published in 1787 - 1788 in the Independent Journal, the New-York Packet and the Daily Advertiser. At the time of publication, it was unclear who the author’s were, since Hamilton, Madison and Jay used the pseudonym “Publius”, in respect to Roman diplomat Publius Valeria Publicola. It wasn’t until Hamilton’s death in 1804 that it was clear as to who were the creator’s of the “incomparable exposition of the Constitution, a classic in political science unsurpassed in both breadth and depth by the product of any later American writer” (Federalist Papers). The Federalist Papers drafted a basic form of American federalism, meaning the papers served as a justification of the document that would soon become the constitution. The federalist’s promoted a divided federal government, a system of checks and balances where there was “division of power across the local, state and national levels of government” and a system for judicial review (William Bianco). At first, the Federalist Papers were received as unfinished and exaggerated, as many Americans were cynical of a contradiction of the bill of rights. Despite first impressions, the Federalist Papers have survived well into the 21st century, and are still used today by lawyers, judges, and jurors as a tool to interpret the Constitutional laws.…

    • 695 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays
    Read More
  • Good Essays

    Constitution Of America Pros And Cons
    • 523 Words
    • 3 Pages

    Constitution Of America Pros And Cons

    The Constitution of the United States of America has become one of the most essential documents of legislation in history. The modern government of America that exists today is built upon the Constitution. Found within the document is another important piece of legislation that is called The Bill of Rights which is composed of the first ten amendments. The purpose of this bill was to protect the rights of the citizens, granting the people certain freedoms and preventing the government from becoming powerful. One of the most heated debates on civil liberties is freedom of speech.…

    • 523 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays
    Read More
  • Good Essays

    In The Federalist No. 51 Analysis
    • 493 Words
    • 2 Pages

    In The Federalist No. 51 Analysis

    After the Constitution was developed, America split into two groups: those who wanted to ratify the constitution and those who did not. This quote is written by a federalist who wanted to ratify the constitution in order to protect the rights of man. Government was created to alleviate the issues caused by the faults of man. No person is truly perfect because everyone is born unique. Everyone’s unique thoughts will always clash with someone else’s.…

    • 493 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Good Essays
    Read More
  • Good Essays

    The Pros And Cons Of Federalism
    • 565 Words
    • 3 Pages

    The Pros And Cons Of Federalism

    “It has been several times truly remarked, that bills of rights are in their origin, stipulations between kings and their subjects, ... It is evident, therefore, that according to their primitive signification, they have no application to constitutions professedly founded upon the power of the people, and executed by their immediate representatives and servants...”…

    • 565 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays
    Read More
  • Good Essays

    Micheal Kammens
    • 687 Words
    • 3 Pages

    Micheal Kammens

    James Madison believed that the people were the source of authority for the state. The Bill of Rights was seen as somewhat of an attack on the government. It was simply to protect the individual rights and freedom of the people. The rights were freedom of speech, freedom of press, no established religion, no double jeopardy, and requirement of trial by jury. Kammen agrees that the Bill of Rights was the needed push for those who did not truly understand that the constitution was to protect the people of the state.…

    • 687 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays
    Read More
  • Good Essays

    Compare And Contrast Federalist And Anti Federalists
    • 591 Words
    • 3 Pages

    Compare And Contrast Federalist And Anti Federalists

    One of the greatest fears of the Anti-Federalists was that the Constitution had no Bill of Rights. The Anti-Federalist believed that the Constitution needed to have something in place to prevent the government from encroaching on the people’s rights and liberties. They felt by having a Bill of Rights the power could remain with the states and the…

    • 591 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays
    Read More
  • Good Essays

    Eighth Amendment Research Paper
    • 770 Words
    • 4 Pages

    Eighth Amendment Research Paper

    Hornberger, Jacob. G. The bill of rights (2005). Retrieved on January 30, 2010 from http://www.fff.org/freedom/fd0503a.asp…

    • 770 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Good Essays
    Read More
  • Good Essays

    Essay On The Articles Of Confederation
    • 670 Words
    • 3 Pages

    Essay On The Articles Of Confederation

    The shift from the Articles of Confederation of the United States Constitution was not a consistent one, and altering the issues of the Articles of Confederation required a progression of extensive civil arguments both in the midst of and after the tradition. Be that as it may, one thing was sure, something must be changed. The Federalists trusted that the Constitution as it stood. On the other hand, the Anti-Federalists asserted the Constitution without a Bill of Rights the people would be oppressed. From the laws we have now I trust that the Anti-Federalists fulfilled their objective with the constitution; be that as it may, the national government still keeps up its power on the grounds that the Federalists were supporting a more grounded focal…

    • 670 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays
    Read More
  • Good Essays

    The Federalist, No. 15 Alexander Hamilton
    • 499 Words
    • 2 Pages

    The Federalist, No. 15 Alexander Hamilton

    Hamilton’s statement “we must extend the author of the Union to person of the citizens” meant that the power of the government must be held by the people as the only right objects of government. I agree with Hamilton, because I believe that the citizens have the right to be heard. According to Hamilton, the idea of a government is to make laws, and for those laws to have real power, they must contain a consequence or penalty. He believed that the enforcement of the law was either done by courts, or by military force. He meant that…

    • 499 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Good Essays
    Read More

Related Topics