It isn’t arduous to see why some may question the efficiency of trial by jury and whether it should, and is able to, continue to discover innocence or guilt. Regarding the trial of Vicky Pryce, the failure of the jury within the hearing conjured ridicule and disdain from the judge and the media. The case deeply unsettled the trust of many in the system. The eight women and four men were dismissed after illustrating “fundamental deficits of understanding” (Jacobson, Hunter & Kirby, 2015, p. 55). Their profuse questions for the judge were deemed as unintelligent and unnecessary and so a costly re-trial was required. Consequently, this ordeal provoked a stronger desire for the abolition of trial by jury, to be replaced by a single judge as a more…
The tittle “The Death Penalty: Justice for None” the author provokes a feeling to the readers of compassion and empathy making it seem like the death penalty is completely ignorant and wrong no matter what the consequence of the criminal is. The authors opinion about the death penalty is that the death penalty in the united states shouldn’t even be considered an option because it is cruel and unjust.…
Yet, all these are reasons are unfair and can be bias towards an individual, especially the three one, because most of the times, a person is being forced to accepted the plea bargain either by threat (take the 3-5yr sentence, or get a 15-20yr sentence), or the defendant has to accept the plea because of financial hardships. This is way I feel we should get rid of plea bargains, because it is not doing what’s it is designed to do. Also, we are having more innocent individuals pleaded guilties, which the Innocent Project helped, proved that the plea bargains are bias and flawed. Plea bargains should only be accepted, if the defendant either caught red-hand, or after court cases, such as being find guilty, but decides to giving information to…
In Brandon L. Garrett's book, Convicting the Innocent: Where Criminal Prosecutions Go Wrong, he makes it very clear how wrongful convictions occur and how these people have spent many years in prison for crimes they never committed. Garrett presents 250 cases of innocent people who were convicted wrongfully because the prosecutors opposed testing the DNA of those convicted. Garrett provided simple statistics such as graphs, percentages, and charts to help the reader understand just how great of an impact this was.…
"Despite questioning the ultimate fairness and reliability of the jury system, Twelve Angry Men is, at heart, a tribute to this system. Discuss.…
to the persecutor and decides if the person on trial is guilty of committing a crime. Double…
I agree with you ethics in the criminal justice system is very important, the officer of law could affect the other people life over their decision. I think your friend was make the right decision. On the friend aspect yes she was betray her friend, but it is the right thing to do, friendship is show out the right and wrong things help each other go up not to cover up for the other. On the work aspect, she also right because tell the truth and help the other got what he/she is deserved it has.…
As Nataskie stated above, there is a place and a need for plea bargaining in our criminal justice system. Although it is true that plea bargaining gives a guilty person the opportunity to admit to their crime and accept the punishment for it, they are likely more motivated by the fact that plea bargaining involves the perpetrator receiving a reduced sentence of some sort. Another reason for continuing with plea bargaining, as a tool in the criminal justice system, is because often it affords the prosecutor the means necessary to get a lesser criminal to testify against a more significant criminal who otherwise might go free. Plea bargaining should maintain an active role in all justice systems regardless of whether they are local, state,…
To understand parole one needs to know what parole is and what it means. Parole is the status and early release of a convicted offender who has been conditionally releases from prison by a paroling authority before his or her sentence is expired. Parole and Probation have similar conditions. While an offender is on parole they have certain rules they need to follow. There is another form of parole which is Federal parole. Federal parole was determined by the Parole Board under the United Stated Parole Commission. Federal parole was changed after the Sentencing Reform Act. The Sentencing Reform Act was a part of the U.S. Federal statute that was intended to increase the consistency in the United States federal sentencing; this abolished federal parole all together. Parole was introduced by Brockway Zebulon in 1876 as a way to reduce jail overcrowding and as a way to rehabilitate offenders by encouraging them to win back their freedom with good behaviors. The role of parole was to reduce prison terms based on good behavior. Another role of probation was to supervise the convicted after being granted parole and grant freedom to those who had uncertain sentences. The reduction of jail terms after good and responsible behavior use to reduce indeterminate sentences. “There are 25 percent of inmates who are freed from prison are still paroled by the paroling authority, such as a parole board” (Schmalleger, F).…
When an inmate is released from prison on parole there are certain conditions that they have to follow such as not leaving the state and they have to obey extradition request from other jurisdictions. (Schmalleger, 2011). Once the inmate is placed on parole they are assigned a parole officer that they to visit on a regular basis and the parole officer will visit them and these visits will be at random. The parolees can be visited at home; work, and school, and they are also subjected to random drug and alcohol testing because as a condition of their parole they are not to use either. Even if a parolee is not using drugs and alcohol and is at home when the parole officer comes their parole can still be revocated if they have not found employment, which is a condition of parole within 30 days.…
High profile cases being spread through the media attracting massive attention. Cases such as the Sean Bell shooting, Amadou Diallo, and these trials were spread all throughout television which sometimes doesn’t fall in the favor of the defendant. There are two types of trials a bench trial also known as a court trail and a jury trial. NYS procedural law 260.10, states that every criminal depending on the crime must be trialed with 12 randomly selected jurors. The bench trial is another term for a judge trial without the jurors. The bench trial is conducted in this fashion; both parties present their evidence or make their opening statement. After the plaintiff finishes presenting his evidence, the defendant presents…
Professionals in the criminal justice field have the discretion to make many ethical choices throughout their careers. These choices are so significant that their outcomes can determine the futures of those involved. An ethical choice that prosecutors have to make daily, revolves around plea bargaining. Plea bargains are negotiations for contracts between the prosecution and the defense in an attempt to get them to plead guilty ("Plea Bargain.”). The prosecutor offers to reduce the severity or the length of the defendant’s punishment in exchange for the defense’s agreement to plead guilty ("Plea Bargain."). Sometimes plea deals even require the defendant to testify against someone else, so that they can be convicted of a crime ("Plea Bargain.").…
Creon’s actions and judgment in the play Antigone were questionable, but I don’t think he deserved the punishment he received at the conclusion of the play. My philosophy of life probably influenced my decision because I believe that everyone deserves a second chance. Creon was arrogant and did not listen to anyone’s advice, including Tiresias, a prophet who has never told him a lie. However, in the end he realized what had happened and accepted his fate.…
This paper is written in an attempt to comprehend the sentencing philosophy and purpose of criminal punishment through a review of the historical parameters concerning how sentencing and punishment serve society. Sentencing is the application of justice and the end result of a criminal conviction which is applied by the convening authority; followed by the sentence, or judgement of the court on a convicted offender. What makes punishment unique to our society is the application of our moral or ethical beliefs as a whole, and by the population at large. Throughout history, the sentencing and administration of punishments have been swift, brutal and often times ending with the death of the offender, but in our more civilized and modern society,…
The US Constitution grants citizens the right to trial by a jury of your peers. In other words, it grants citizens the right to be judged by average ordinary rather than by lawyers or judges.…
