Preview

Benefits Of Donor Compensation

Good Essays
Open Document
Open Document
633 Words
Grammar
Grammar
Plagiarism
Plagiarism
Writing
Writing
Score
Score
Benefits Of Donor Compensation
In recent years, controversy has been arising over the idea of organ donors being given compensation to encourage donations. Critics state that it would be difficult and perplexing to regulate an organ market. Moreover, Americans today tend to believe that selling human organs is demeaning and can shape a world where the human body’s purpose is to make profit. Such publications have led officials to pass a law asserting that offering incentives to donors is a crime and illegal in the United States. However, there still are many benefits of donor compensation, such as rescuing lives and reducing the need for dialysis, which can be expensive. Although many may go against the idea of donor compensation, the idea is effective because it will save …show more content…
Stressful as it is, patients on the waiting list often use the black market as their source of hope. However, merchants often overprice their products which cause additional difficulties, such as the lack of currency, to the victim. Though, Dr. Satel suggests a system where, “a third party [such as the government or a charity] provides the reward, all patients, not just the financially secure, will benefit” (Humphreys 2014). In other words, Dr. Satel asserts that if the United States created a system in which the government or charities funded for these patients, those in need will be able to afford organs from donors outside the black market. Further evidence founded in his article, “Great Debate: Should Organ Donors Be Paid?” Rachel Rettner, Senior Writer of Live Science, states that “the government would pay for the incentive, regardless of its form…the set-up would mean that the rich and equal access to [the] kidneys” (Rettner 2009). Basically, the government would pay the incentive for the rich or poor, thus both classes will have the same convenience to various organs. Therefore, compensating donors will lead organ markets to become more

You May Also Find These Documents Helpful

  • Better Essays

    Organs For Sale Summary

    • 1135 Words
    • 5 Pages

    “Organs for Sale” is an argument written in response to the on-going ethical debate of a market-based incentive program to meet the rising demands of organ transplants. With many on the waiting list for new organs and few organs being offered, the author, Sally Satel, urges for legalization of payment to organ donors. Once in need of a new kidney herself, Sally writes of the anguish she encountered while facing three days a week on dialysis and the long wait on the UNOS list with no prospective willing donors in sight. She goes on to list several saddening researched facts on dialysis patients survival rates, length of time on the UNOS wait list, and registered as well as deceased donor numbers. While Sally is…

    • 1135 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Better Essays
  • Good Essays

    Many people are simply reluctant to donate their bodily parts. In response to the shortage, proposals have come forth advocating the sale of non-vital human organs.” (Andre, Claire, and Manuel Velasquez. " Organ Selling and Transplants." Organ Selling and Transplants.)…

    • 686 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    The first paper appoints the issue of not legalizing the payment of donating organs. The National Kidney Foundation does not believe that the payment for organ donating will increase donations. The foundation wants to remain committed to helping people with donations. They believe that if it is legalized then disadvantaged citizens would take advantage of this opportunity that should only be done for the great feeling of it, and not the money. Sally Satel believes that organ trafficking should be stopped by legalizing some type of donor rewards. Satel believes that if legalized then people would give more kidneys or any other organ to help people on the waiting list. She also believes that certain incentives should be given and not just straight cash. Some of those incentives are; income tax credit, tuition vouchers for ones children, and a contribution to a retirement fund that would not be able to be touched until a certain age.…

    • 522 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    However, readers’ response was mixed. Brad Tuttle of the Business Time was in line with Alexander. He said that legalization of the kidney marketplace could save money as well as people because monetary compensation was likely to encourage kidney donation (Tuttle). However, some readers opposed Alexander’s argument. Samir Chopra posed a blog entry to argue against Alexander. Although Samir thought that Alexander’s argument was interesting, he thought that the argument was problematic. Alexander made an analogy between soldiers and donators. Samir argued that most soldiers were young and poor people from minorities, so he worried that the donation with monetary compensation would be borne by those people. In addition, those poor donators would bring down the price of organs (Chopra).…

    • 919 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    In the “Yes, Let’s Pay Organs” the author Charles Krauthammer talks about organ rewards in Pennsylvania. In 1984 a federal law that declares organ a natural resources not subject to compensation. One of the objections in Pennsylvania ideas would affect the poor: slum housing street crime, small cars and hazardous jobs, while the rich, argued will not be moved by a $300 reward. The article also talks about the pricing of kidneys from the dead that cannot be sold at a market. The Pennsylvania program does cross the line but not all of them. Today people don’t sell organs from the living or the dead is a fence against the commoditization of human parts. There are 62,000 people desperately clinging to life, some of whom will die if we don’t have the courage…

    • 549 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Powerful Essays

    Satel begins her contemporary argument ‘organs for sale” by talking about her past experience when in need of a kidney, she talked about how frustrating it could be waiting for a kidney while decisions by potential donors are changed. The argument appeared in the journal of the American Enterprise Institution on October 14, 2006. She appeals to the…

    • 1169 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Powerful Essays
  • Good Essays

    In the article, “Buying and Selling Organs Would Create an Economic Class War” (Bramstedt, 2014), the author Katrina claims that people in need of a kidney transplant should not be allowed to pay someone to donate one of theirs. She argues that firstly, health care should not be based on economic structures as she believes that it is unfair that a person gets the organ based on their personal wealth. Secondly, she suggests that it should be equal for all to receive an organ based on the “waiting list” that one has registered for. Lastly, she claims that if the priority list/wait list for organ transplant is overlooked, it could create a “back-door” option where donors will incorporate the idea to sell organs illegally, i.e black market sales…

    • 1086 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    Compensating donors for organ donations is one of the most controversial debates we have today. The shortage of organ donations in America is the one of the main reason there is a sudden drive to supplement the possible sources of organs. It first began with the move from donations of organs from cadaver to donations from living donors, and no the debate is rerisen, to the possibility of building a market for organ donations with a financial incentive.…

    • 949 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Better Essays

    resume

    • 1378 Words
    • 6 Pages

    3.Quotation from the essay w/Parenthetical Reference- Satel says, "If we really want to increase the supply of organs, we need to try incentives- financial and otherwise." (129. Par. 6) Here in this statement Satel uses logic to prove that if people are given something they would enjoy, In return they will become an organ donor. "Many transplant experts recognize this, proposing initiatives that would allow people to give their organs in exchange for tax breaks , guaranteed health insurance, college scholarships for their children, deposits in their retirement accounts, and so on... the Presidents Council on Bloethics and others, have begun discussing the virtues of such incentives." (129. Par.7) This evidence proves that the Auther is not the only person who thinks incentives should be given and if enough people think there should be initiatives, then it may happen.…

    • 1378 Words
    • 6 Pages
    Better Essays
  • Good Essays

    Yes, Let's Pay For Organs

    • 564 Words
    • 3 Pages

    As everyone knows, there are millions of people waiting desperately for an organ to save their life's. Now a days there are countries like Singapore that allows the commercialization of organs for a really high amount. Even though; United States prohibited the option to sell organs for money, I believe that having the option to save other people by selling an organ is a very smart idea. In "Yes, let's Pay for Organs" by Charles Krauthammer; a political columnist, writes an essay to demonstrate that maybe selling organs for a low price would and may help to our society in general.…

    • 564 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    The final argument against allowing for monetary compensation for organ donation is that many maintain desperate people do desperate things. This means that people may choose to donate even though it is against their better judgement, thus making the action less voluntary. However, medical experts say that there must be a level of consent and understanding for the danger that the donor will undergo during this process. Consent means that they must understand the risks, as well as, the reward and be willing to undergo the process. Any hesitation would undermine consent and would void the process (Wilkinson,…

    • 1469 Words
    • 6 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    Organs Trading

    • 1683 Words
    • 7 Pages

    In recent years, the US has taken several steps to improve the allocation of available organs among those needing them, such as giving greater priority to those who could benefit the most. These steps have helped, but they have not stopped the queues from growing, nor have they prevented large numbers of persons from dying while waiting for transplants.…

    • 1683 Words
    • 7 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    Organs are constantly needed around the world by dying patients and anxious doctors. Sadly, there isn’t enough donors so patients stuck in the waiting list are being left untreated because of the lack of organs. I believe donating should be forced to be mandatory everywhere because people don’t believe they need to. In reality it is our moral duty to help whoever is in need. I plan to present the benefits, problems, and solutions towards this controversial topic.…

    • 806 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    Imagine you are in the hospital and that you have been placed on life support because you are in need of a new kidney, heart, or liver. Would you be put on the national transplant list, hoping to get the life sustaining organ you need, or would you go look for someone willing the sell the organ you are in need of? People donate their bodies to science every day so that students can dissect them and hopefully learn something. There is also approximately 18 people who die every single day while waiting for an organ transplant (www.inpublicsafety.com, 2014). In 2014 there were over 100,000 names on the national transplant list. Each month another 2,000 names are added to this list (www.inpublicsafety.com, 2014). It would be very difficult to watch someone you love die because a match for organ donation could not be found. It would be even harder to watch that same loved one die because they purchased an organ off the black-market. Organ sales are dangerous and unethical due to the selling of diseased organs, high cost of the organ, and unsanitary conditions.…

    • 1043 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    Richard A. Epstein puts forth a very convincing argument on selling organs; he brings up many factors which could persuade you to think the way he does on the issue of selling organs. Epstein argues that we should legalize selling organs. He presents both sides of the argument as well as a rebuttal to the opposite side of the issue.…

    • 509 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays