Preview

Benefits Of Breaking The Law

Good Essays
Open Document
Open Document
644 Words
Grammar
Grammar
Plagiarism
Plagiarism
Writing
Writing
Score
Score
Benefits Of Breaking The Law
In a free society, it is necessary for people to have an outlet to complain about laws. However, if a law is written in a way such that it would be illegal to protest it, in those times, breaking the law might be the only option. For example, during the 1960s, civil rights leaders had to break the law to get attention from the media and rally for change to show how wrong segregation was. Breaking the law peacefully positively affects a free society if the laws restrict the freedom of the country.
In the 1960s, many people such as Martin Luther King Jr. broke the law to show injustice in the system of government. If the protesters protested the law without breaking it, the general public would think that the blacks weren’t too invested in the

You May Also Find These Documents Helpful

  • Good Essays

    After reading "Letter from a Birmingham Jail" by Rev. Martin Luther King Jr. for the first time for this essay, I realized what true civil disobedience was. Rev. King understood that his…

    • 526 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    King’s leadership resulted in one of the the greatest non-violent mass protests in the history of the western world. King represented a sense of hope and promise to the followers of the Civil Rights Movement. The most important aspect to understand in this debate is King’s non-violence. With many other African-American leaders, such as Malcolm X, taking a more aggressive, violent approach to change, King saw the potential in Ghandi’s peaceful protests. As Fairclough writes, “Few blacks believed that the city’s businessmen would have accepted desegregation but for the double pressure of the demonstrations and the economic boycott of downtown stores” (209). The only effective events in the Civil Rights movements were those that followed King’s system of non-violence. While Carson argues that rather than King’s presence, “the success of the black movement required the mobilization of black communities…”(219), this assertion is made under the assumption that a non-violent leader would organize the masses. Without King’s leadership, there may have been an violent uprising that only led to more tensions between the…

    • 587 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    King makes notice of the fact that most of the laws being broken at that time were unjust laws. He mentions that people would break unjust laws on purpose as a protest. If you break a just law intentionally, you are just a bad person who wants to break the law. However, if you are breaking an unjust law intentionally, “you must do so openly, lovingly, and with a willingness to accept the penalty.”, from the words of Dr. King. People would break these laws in order to make a change for the better.…

    • 456 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    King states the ways the protests were handled emphasizing the unfairness of the monitoring. For example, he mentions the angry violent dogs that aggressively bite and attack six unarmed, nonviolent negroes. Secondly, the claim that the supposedly “break” such laws is emphasized by King claiming the reasons for this action. He declares that there are two types of laws. The ones that should be followed and the ones that are to morally wrong that they should not be followed; the just laws and the unjust laws. the segregation laws, for example, are unjust laws.…

    • 603 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    Even though President Kennedy wanted those issues to be resolved it was very hard to get certain people on board with black people’s rights. Instead many children and teenagers at the time, thought of a better way to get their message across. They would march 2“to jail to secure their freedom.” Birmingham’s young black people sought to follow Dr. Martin Luther King Jr.’s message which was to 3“fill the jails.” To bring the message to the rest of the world and draw national attention to it, many of the black youth would find ways…

    • 622 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    Objection of what is unjust has long been a part of human nature. Human beings have the tendency to oppose things that contradicts their morals or beliefs as it indirectly challenges who they are or what they stand for. In “Letter from Birmingham Jail” written in 1963, Martin Luther King Jr. responds to clergymen who criticized his actions and role in the battle against segregation. These actions that were carried out by King were done so because he believed it was his moral responsibility, he believed it was his obligation to fight for the rights of all people. In “Letter from Birmingham Jail,” Martin Luther King Jr. argues how the demonstrations he took part of are in fact justifiable as African American individuals were being overwhelmingly maltreated and degraded as human beings.…

    • 837 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    To begin with, in order to achieve true freedom one must peacefully protest. In the passage “Letter from Birmingham Jail” by Dr. Martin Luther King Jr. argues that it is acceptable to break a law if it an unjust law. According to the text “Letter from Birmingham Jail” in lines 242-246, Dr. Martin Luther King Jr., says, “ I submit that any individual who breaks a law that conscience tells him it is unjust and who willingly accepts the penalty of imprisonment in order to arouse the…

    • 964 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    Peaceful resistance to law positively impacts society. Humans have a lengthy, detailed history of not always being able to see what is right or moral in certain circumstances, and unfortunately, humans are who create laws. One infamous example of unjust laws would be the Jim Crow laws of the south. Today, it is clear as day that discrimination and racism is unconstitutional, but why was it so hard to see that during that time period.…

    • 529 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    Howard Zinn, American historian, playwright, and social activist, once said, “Protest beyond the law is not a departure from democracy; it is absolutely essential to it.” He was talking about civil disobedience. Civil disobedience is the refusal to obey certain laws or government demands for the purpose of influencing legislation or government policy, characterized by the employment of such nonviolent techniques as boycotting, picketing, and nonpayment of taxes according to dictionary.com. Two authors write about civil disobedience in their pieces. Martin Luther King Jr., who was a civil rights activist and minister, according to biography.com, wrote Letter to Birmingham Jail. He writes this letter to fellow clergymen while he is in jail about why he is sent to the jail. Henry David Thoreau, who was a philosopher, journalist, and poet, wrote his essay, Civil Disobedience. Thoreau writes this while in jail because he refuses to pay taxes and accepts that he will go to jail for it. At times, civil disobedience is indeed appropriate and justified, given the right circumstances based on morality.…

    • 973 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    Civil disobedience, or refusing to obey the law to protest peacefully, has been one of the most effective ways of changing government policies. In many cases throughout history, fairer societies have been created after laws were challenged. For example, American colonists protested against British taxes by refusing to pay them. This eventually led to the founding of the United States. Colonists went against the law to improve their way of living and end an unfair tax. They were able to initiate change and spark…

    • 387 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    It took years for rights to be expanded to others. One of the greatest examples of civil disobedience to allow for the expansion of civil rights is through Martin Luther King Jr.'s history of protesting segregation against black people. In my early education, I was aware of King's importance to civil rights but never understood what he had to go through in order to create a change. By being introduced to Letter from a Birmingham Jail in high school, I finally recognized that before he had a dream of equality King had to have the action of protest. Throughout his letter, he emphasizes the distinction between just and unjust laws. As King states, "An unjust law is a code that is out of harmony with the moral law" (King, 1963). Americans must understand that civil disobedience should only be exemplified when there is a moral purpose behind the desire for…

    • 581 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    Civil Disobedience Unjust

    • 559 Words
    • 3 Pages

    Martin Luther King Jr. once stated “One has a moral responsibility to disobey unjust laws.” It was this disobedience that drew attention to the cause, in his case racial equality, that was being fought for. Peaceful organized…

    • 559 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    In his “Letters from a Birmingham jail,” MLK pinpoints one of the biggest flaws in the anti-civil disobedience arguments. He states that many people more scrutinze the protest more closely than the “conditions that brought about the demonstrations.”(King, Jr) He calls this argument a “superficial kind of social analysis that deals merely with effects and does not grapple with underlying causes.”(King, Jr.) MLK understood that he and the people who stood with him were breaking the law. Instead of denying that fact, he simply argues that the laws in place are unjust,and that he is unable to follow laws that target and marginalize people. Neither MLK nor Ali were saying that it’s inherently ok for citizens to disobey laws or that the government's laws should not by respected. They stood against laws that unfairly targeted a certain group of people. In Birmingham the peaceful protests were met with violence, high-pressure fire hoses and police dogs were used on men, women, and children. The public was confronted by these images and things finally began to change, voting and segregation laws…

    • 709 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    Do you think that is okay for a political leader to bend or break the law for the good of the country? No it may not be right to harm someone or allow something bad or harmful to happen just because you are following the law. If you break the law with any type of good intentions of not hurting anything or anybody, it should be okay. Breaking this law Julius was helping the huge population of their people. At the same time breaking a law isn't okay! If you expect someone to follow the rules, everybody needs to. Although, I do not think these decisions are very black and white, it would probably be a much bigger debate when an actual situation arises. But in the same case if the law isn't implied all the time, it really couldn't be considered…

    • 394 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    There were times in history when breaking the law was justified: great leaders like Gandhi and Martin Luther King broke the law and changed the world for the better.…

    • 893 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Good Essays