Preview

Beneficence: The Greatest Ethical Ideal

Satisfactory Essays
Open Document
Open Document
358 Words
Grammar
Grammar
Plagiarism
Plagiarism
Writing
Writing
Score
Score
Beneficence: The Greatest Ethical Ideal
Beneficence
By xiayimaru, december 2012 | 5 Pages (1020 Words) | 114 Views |
4.51 12345
| Report | This is a Premium essay for upgraded members
Upgrade to access full essay
SIMON SAYS, "CLICK BELOW."
Send

There are so many ethical ideal that I have learned from this subject, got honesty, forgiveness, justice, etc. However, I think that the greatest ethical ideal that I have learned is beneficence. In normal word, beneficence is meaning the action to do benefit and promote the good to other people. While in the language of a principle or rule of beneficence refers to a normative statement of a moral obligation to act for the benefit of other, helping them to further their important and legitimate interests, often by preventing or removing possible harms. I will choose beneficence is because there are many people in this world they need the help from other, although it is only a small thing but when we help them this is also can count as beneficence. If we help the people that need help, I believe that if one day when we need the help they will help us back. The example beneficence that we can act that is generous gift-giving, uncompensated public service, forgiving another’s costly error, and etc.
In Utilitarianism, John Stuart Mill argues that “moral philosophers have left a train of unconvincing and incompatible theories that can be coherently unified by a single standard of beneficence that allows us to decide objectively what is right and wrong.” The principle of utility, or the ‘greatest happiness’ principle, he declares “the basic foundation of morals: Actions are right in the proportion to their promotion of happiness, and wrong as they produce the reverse.” This truth can be very simple, but the potential demand is very harsh, which this is the principle of beneficence. That principle of beneficence: The greatest possible balance of beneficial can lead to the action of right or bad. However Kant notoriously rejects the utilitarian
Continue Reading
View Writing Issues

You May Also Find These Documents Helpful

  • Satisfactory Essays

    HCM 420 Mastery Exercises
    • 2182 Words
    • 8 Pages

    HCM 420 Mastery Exercises

    6. True or false? Beneficence is a principle of ethics that assumes that the healthcare professional is there for the benefit of the patient and will act with kindness.…

    • 2182 Words
    • 8 Pages
    Satisfactory Essays
    Read More
  • Good Essays

    U of P / Eth 316 / Ethics Essay Example
    • 761 Words
    • 3 Pages

    U of P / Eth 316 / Ethics Essay Example

    Utilitarianism ethics emphasize that action should be morally beneficial to a group. This course of ethics is often known as “the greatest good for the greatest number” or simply put, “the greater good” (Boylan, 2009). In other words, the consequence of any ethical action should be beneficial for all by mass appeal. This is a common underlying theme for ethics in capitalist economies and business as well as in democratic governments (Boylan, 2009).…

    • 761 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays
    Read More
  • Good Essays

    Mill's Utilitarianism Chapter Summary
    • 387 Words
    • 2 Pages

    Mill's Utilitarianism Chapter Summary

    To summarize this Mill’s chapter two about what utilitarianism is, basically meaning that individuals would find some kind of pleasure that are more desirable and more valuable to themselves are inherently good. Utilitarianism is pleasurable when the actions are good; when the actions are bad the pleasure decreases. To Mill he compares human pleasures are as equal as animalistic pleasures. It depends on what kind of pleasure people are seeking. For this purpose, Mill mentioned that people would have to look within quality of the pleasure people are seeking as well as quantity.…

    • 387 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Good Essays
    Read More
  • Good Essays

    Analysis Of The Theory Of Utilitarianism By John Stuart Mill
    • 430 Words
    • 2 Pages

    Analysis Of The Theory Of Utilitarianism By John Stuart Mill

    “The creed which accepts as the foundation of morals, Utility, or the Greatest Happiness Principle, holds that actions are right in proportion as they tend to promote happiness” (11). That quote is from “Utilitarianism” written by John Stuart Mill. Mill is noted in history as a man who pushed for radical change of social and legal principles using Utilitarianism as his guide. That quote sums up his belief in that theory. In this essay I will be discussing Mill, the theory of Utilitarianism and how that theory relates to contemporary ethical issues.…

    • 430 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Good Essays
    Read More
  • Better Essays

    Ethics Case Study: The Plight Of Dr. Ethos
    • 1741 Words
    • 7 Pages

    Ethics Case Study: The Plight Of Dr. Ethos

    “ The ‘greatest happiness principle’ holds that actions are right in proportion as they tend to promote happiness, wrong as they tend to produce the reverse of happiness” (Mill p. 7). Actions only hold moral worth if the consequences are favorable on a grand scale. In utilitarianism actions are evaluated, not people which brings about the “agent neutral” concept. Mill stated ‘the utilitarian standard of what is right in conduct is not the agent’s own happiness but that of all concerned…as between his own happiness and that of others, utilitarianism requires him to be as strictly impartial as a disinterested benevolent spectator.’…

    • 1741 Words
    • 7 Pages
    Better Essays
    Read More
  • Powerful Essays

    Why Is Net Neutrality Morally Impermissible?
    • 1730 Words
    • 7 Pages

    Why Is Net Neutrality Morally Impermissible?

    This theory is a consequentialist based ethical theory which states you must choose the action that increases the total utility. John Stuart Mill was a key proponent of Utilitarianism. Utility is defined as the total happiness or pleasure, minus the total unhappiness or pain involved in the action. Another name for utility is the Greatest Happiness principle. From the definition of utility, pleasure and the absence of pain are the only things desirable as ends in themselves and are the only things that are good.…

    • 1730 Words
    • 7 Pages
    Powerful Essays
    Read More
  • Satisfactory Essays

    Main strengths of a Utilitarian ethical system
    • 824 Words
    • 4 Pages

    Main strengths of a Utilitarian ethical system

    Utilitarianism, the theory that actions are right if they useful for the majority, the greatest happiness and pleasure for the greatest and majority of people. Jeremy Bentham (1748-1832) was an English moral philosopher concerned with social reform, Bentham wanted people to seek pleasure and avoid pain. On the other hand John Stuart Mill (1806-1873) who was a great admirer of Bentham; however, he believed in the principle of utility and the idea that please should be ranked according to quality not quantity. For example: eating a mars bar is a poorer pleasure compared to listening to poetry. Mill believing in pleasures of the mind is greater than pleasures of the body (eating). Within this essay I shall be discussing the different views of Bentham and Mill and how their theories are strengths for the utilitarian system.…

    • 824 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Satisfactory Essays
    Read More
  • Powerful Essays

    John Stuart Mill
    • 1736 Words
    • 7 Pages

    John Stuart Mill

    1. John Stuart Mill – On Virtue and Happiness (1863)The utilitarian doctrine is, that happiness is desirable, and the only thing desirable, as an end; all other things being only desirable as means to that end. What ought to be required of this doctrine, what conditions is it requisite that the doctrine should fulfill, to make good its claim to be believed? The only proof capable of being given that an object is visible is that people actually see it. The only proof that a sound is audible, is that people hear it; and so of the other sources of our experience. In like manner, I apprehend, the sole evidence it is possible to produce that anything is desirable, is that people do actually desire it. If the end which the utilitarian doctrine proposes to itself were not, in theory and in practice, acknowledged to be an end, nothing could ever convince any person that it was so. No reason can be given why the general happiness is desirable, except that each person, so far as he believes it to be attainable, desires his own happiness. This, however, being a fact, we have not only all the proof which the case admits of, but all which it is possible to require, that happiness is a good, that each persons happiness is a good to that person, and the general happiness, therefore, a good to the aggregate of all persons. Happiness has made out its title as one of the ends of conduct, and consequently one of the criteria of morality. But it has not, by this alone, proved itself to be the sole criterion. To do that, it would seem, by the same rule, necessary to show; not only that people desire happiness, but those they never desire anything else. Now it is palpable that they do desire things which, in common language, are decidedly distinguished from happiness. They desire, for example, virtue, and the absence of vice, no less really than pleasure and the absence of pain. The desire of virtue is not as universal, but it is as authentic…

    • 1736 Words
    • 7 Pages
    Powerful Essays
    Read More
  • Satisfactory Essays

    John Stuart Mill’s Maximization of Happiness
    • 255 Words
    • 2 Pages

    John Stuart Mill’s Maximization of Happiness

    Mill’s study of ethical action holding that the proper course of action is the one that maximizes overall "happiness" seems to be more logical, although we all will have our own opinions on morality. Morality can be just a matter of consequences and the act will be “right” or “wrong” according to its penalties or values. Morality is not just a matter of what a person says is right, or because the culture or people of the universe agree with you. As stated in the text, Mill’s criticism of Kant is “the rightness of an act must not be divorced from its consequences”, with right meaning maximizing the happiness of mankind. For every action we do there is a consequence and it is up to ourselves to make the consequence result in happiness. Naturally people will do what feels right or what we may think has the least consequences, which is ultimately our pursuit of pleasure and the avoidance of pain. Each person's happiness counts as much as anyone else's; hence, Utilitarianism is not a form of ethical or moral egoism in that it does not require us to pursue our own happiness. When deciding to so what is “right” or moral we will determine alternative courses of action; weigh out the consequences of each action and then value to the consequences of each action based on how much happiness is destroyed or produced. We will choose which action provides most benefits and least consequences; therefore we chose actions that result in overall…

    • 255 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Satisfactory Essays
    Read More
  • Good Essays

    Marx and Mills
    • 1200 Words
    • 5 Pages

    Marx and Mills

    John Stuart Mill suggests that a person's ethical decision-making process should be based solely upon the amount of happiness that the person can receive. Although Mill fully justifies himself, his approach lacks certain criteria for which happiness can be considered. Happiness should be judged, not only by pleasure, but by pain as well. This paper will examine Mill's position on happiness, and the reasoning behind it. Showing where there are agreements and where there are disagreements will critique the theory of Utilitarianism. By showing the problems that the theory have will reveal what should make up ethical decision-making. John Stuart Mill supports and explains his reasoning in his book, Utilitarianism. Mill illustrates the guidelines of his theory. Mill defines utilitarianism as the quest for happiness. His main point is that one should guide his or her judgements by what will give pleasure. Mill believes that a person should always seek to gain pleasure and reject pain. Utilitarianism also states that the actions of a person should be based upon the "greatest happiness principle". This principle states that ethical actions command the greatest amount of happiness for the greatest number of people. Mill further explores the need for pleasure by noting "a being of higher faculties requires more to make him happy." . He acknowledges that some pleasures are more alluring than others are. He adds to this by making known that when placing value in things to calculate pleasure, not only quantity important but quality as well. Mill's criteria for happiness is easily understood, some statements that he gives are questionable. John Stuart Mill plainly laid out what he believes that the basis for ethical decision-making. First, the pursuit of pleasure is directly related to happiness. This idea can be easily accepted. It is natural for a person to focus his goals on things that will bring him pleasure. It would be absurd if someone's goal in life was to be poor and…

    • 1200 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Good Essays
    Read More
  • Good Essays

    Kant Vs Utilitarianism
    • 318 Words
    • 2 Pages

    Kant Vs Utilitarianism

    Utilitarianism and Kant’s respective have different ways for demonstrating whether an act we do is right or wrong. Corresponding to Kant, we should look at our maxims, intentions, of a particular action. Kantians believe “If we are rational, we will each agree to curb our self-interest and cooperate with one another” (Shafer-Landau, Russ 194). In other words, humans are rational beings capable of rational behavior and should not be used purely for self-interest. On the other hand, Utilitarian’s believe that we should do actions that produce the greatest amount of happiness. However, this could associate using people as mere means and lead to the sacrifice of lives for the greater good.…

    • 318 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Good Essays
    Read More
  • Good Essays

    Kant Vs Mill
    • 1231 Words
    • 5 Pages

    Kant Vs Mill

    This view forms the basis of the contrasting argument between him and Kant .Mill principle of `utility also known as the greatest happiness is that, when people act out of duty it justifies the utilitarian principle as a foundation of morals.It explains that actions are right in proportions and promote overall human happiness of everything or anything that can ;possibly tolerate pain.it focus on the consequence of actions.Not on rights or ethical sentiments.it is best to be cultivated and noble…

    • 1231 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Good Essays
    Read More
  • Good Essays

    Personal Ethics Paper
    • 6307 Words
    • 26 Pages

    Personal Ethics Paper

    As history progressed, several ethical theories developed. These ethical theories include the Golden Rule, egoism, teleology (Utilitarianism, Consequentialism), deontology (Rights Principles, Kant’s Categorical Imperative), virtue ethics, and the Six Pillars of Character. I believe the ethical theory Utilitarianism fits me best. Utilitarianism’s ethical doctrine states, “Actions should be performed with the greatest happiness of the greatest number of people in mind.” Utilitarians consider the interests of all stakeholders affected by a decision and choose the decision that produces the “greatest good to the greatest number” of people. I consider myself a Utilitarian because I do exactly this: every decision I make that affects other people besides myself, I try to maximize the benefits while minimizing the harm. For example, if I had dinner plans with my friends, and we had trouble choosing a restaurant, instead of just…

    • 6307 Words
    • 26 Pages
    Good Essays
    Read More
  • Good Essays

    Ethics Essay
    • 647 Words
    • 3 Pages

    Ethics Essay

    To begin one must look at virtue ethics. Virtue ethics comes with characteristics that include honesty and generosity. According to Boylan, M. Basic Ethics (2009), “Virtue ethics is also sometimes called agent-based or character ethics. It takes the viewpoint that in living your life you should try to cultivate excellence in all that you do and all that others do.”…

    • 647 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays
    Read More
  • Good Essays

    Summary Of John Stuart Mill's Utilitarianism
    • 249 Words
    • 1 Page

    Summary Of John Stuart Mill's Utilitarianism

    In John Stuart Mill’s Utilitarianism, Mill discusses the concept of utilitarianism, defined as, “The doctrine that actions are right if they are useful of for the benefit of a majority.” Mill elaborates on this idea and within the second chapter of his essay, addresses many misconceptions towards this view. Addressing the given quote, one misconception made is that utilitarianism degrades the meaning of life. Some people oppose this view because they think that it is wrong to say that there is no better end than pleasure and freedom from pain. Mill replies to this by saying that there are different qualities of pleasure. He professes about a higher quality pleasure being one which you would choose above another pleasure even if it meant pain…

    • 249 Words
    • 1 Page
    Good Essays
    Read More

Related Topics