Preview

Belief in God

Good Essays
Open Document
Open Document
375 Words
Grammar
Grammar
Plagiarism
Plagiarism
Writing
Writing
Score
Score
Belief in God
Belief in God
Jennifer Bennett

1-28-2013

Belief in God

William James believes that, Belief in God does not and should not depend on dispassionate reason. Instead it must depend on the practical difference it makes in our lives. According to James we are justified in believing on insufficient evidence when options are genuine. If we don’t rick being wrong, we may lose the chance of ever being right. James had made the argument that is better to believe in God even if there is no God, and therefore no afterlife if there is no life after death and no God then you have lost nothing by believing, however believing you have gain moral and social attributes. “A new zest which adds itself like a gift to life, and takes the form either of lyrical enchantment or of appeal to earnestness and heroism.

Blaise Pascal’s believes if we do a cost-benefit analysis of the matter, we find that it is eminently reasonable to get ourselves to believe that God does exists regardless of whether we have good evidence for that belief. According to Pascal’s of “God exists” the reason is neutral. It can neither prove nor disprove it. However we must make a choice on this matter, for not to choose for God is in effect to choose against him and lose the benefits that belief would bring. Pascal’s says God does exist, if God exists, then there is an infinite gain with minimal finite loss. If God does not exist, then there is only an overall finite loss in term of sacrifice of earthly goods.

W.K Clifford says it is “Wrong always, everywhere, and for everyone, to believe anything on insufficient evidence, forming beliefs on insufficient evidence makes us credulous cognitive powers. James essay on “the will to Believe”

Reference:
Philosophy of Religion: An Anthology, ed. Louis P. Pojman (Belmont, CA.: Wadsworth, 2003), 363].
Jordan, Jeff, "Pragmatic Arguments and Belief in God", The Stanford Encyclopedia of Philosophy (Spring 2011 Edition), Edward N. Zalta (ed.), URL =
Continue Reading
View Writing Issues

You May Also Find These Documents Helpful

  • Good Essays

    Clifford Insufficient Evidence
    • 850 Words
    • 4 Pages

    Clifford Insufficient Evidence

    I do believe that in most cases it is wrong to believe on something without gathering enough information and evidence on the subject matter. For example, if someone was murdered and the police arrested someone who was at the scene of the crime, it would be wrong to accuse him and believing this person committed the crime without investigating and looking for evidence that indicates he was the culprit. So, I agree with Clifford based on this example. However, it's not always the case where it is wrong to believe on insufficient evidence because sometimes you can't find evidence to support either side. We can't always use sufficient logic and evidence to decide an issue even though we may still believe in one thing or the other.…

    • 850 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Good Essays
    Read More
  • Powerful Essays

    Does Clifford Offer a Convincing View of Religious Faith
    • 1810 Words
    • 8 Pages

    Does Clifford Offer a Convincing View of Religious Faith

    In his article “The Ethics of Belief (Clifford, 1877) W.K. Clifford sought to argue that “it is wrong always, everywhere, and for anyone, to believe anything upon insufficient evidence” (as cited on p190). The aim of this essay is to establish whether indeed this view offered by Clifford, when considering religious faith, is convincing. In order to do this I will consider the arguments that Clifford put forward, including that which to believe anything based upon insufficient evidence always does harm and so is wrong. Such a statement is in direct opposition to those religious believers who regard their blind faith as a virtue and for whom evidence is something that is unnecessary in order to believe. Along with discussing Clifford I will detail the responses given by James who disagreed with Clifford and in response attacked his views within his own paper “The Will to Believe”. James believed instead that it is more important to achieve truth than to avoid error. Both men, in my opinion, offer strong and persuasive arguments however I do not believe that either stands without criticism, therefore throughout I will offer my own views on the foundations of their arguments, which I hope will establish, that although many of Clifford’s points are valid in particular and specific circumstances they do not offer, as proposed, a convincing view of religious faith.…

    • 1810 Words
    • 8 Pages
    Powerful Essays
    Read More
  • Good Essays

    Pascal's Wager: Epistemic Argument For God
    • 1959 Words
    • 8 Pages

    Pascal's Wager: Epistemic Argument For God

    Although Linda’s argument, especially the latter half, may seem similar to my argument, Linda’s argument is not sound, but rather a weak counterargument to the objection made, because Linda makes Pascal’s Wager more of a religious recruiting tool than an actual legitimate argument by itself. The distinction between our arguments is that I argued Pascal’s Wager causes an individual to follow the religion for its benefits, temporarily becoming a selfish person before becoming a selfless individual, whereas Linda argues that the Wager itself does not create a low view of God and of religious people because the Wager is not faith in and of itself but rather the Wager is just the beginning of the path to sincere faith. Meaning, similar to the “greater good” argument about evil discussed above, I argue that Pascal’s Wager is a “greater good” argument for a necessity to temporarily be selfish until one becomes selfless, whereas Linda views the Wager more as a path for atheists or christians who are having second thoughts about believing in…

    • 1959 Words
    • 8 Pages
    Good Essays
    Read More
  • Good Essays

    Mccloskey Argument Analysis
    • 1490 Words
    • 6 Pages

    Mccloskey Argument Analysis

    William Lane Craig argues in Reasonable Faith that, if life ends in a grave, that it does not matter whether someone has been a good or bad person because one’s “destiny” is not related to how a person behaves, thus someone has no motivation to live life as a good person. McCloskey argues that not believing in a God is more comforting when someone you love or yourself is going through a hard time or is suffering from a terrible disease. Rather than believing in a God who is purposely allowing the person to suffer through whatever they are going…

    • 1490 Words
    • 6 Pages
    Good Essays
    Read More
  • Good Essays

    William Clifford The Ethics Of Belief
    • 779 Words
    • 4 Pages

    William Clifford The Ethics Of Belief

    William K. Clifford sets out to show in “The Ethics of Belief” that “it is wrong always, everywhere, and for anyone, to believe anything upon insufficient evidence…” In this paper, I will show that his argument lacks key definitions needed in order to found his inference upon and that it begs the question as to what qualifies as “insufficient” evidence. Furthermore, I will show that the primary issue is not the belief but the results of the belief that is important and that all judgment and interpretation should be based upon said results.…

    • 779 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Good Essays
    Read More
  • Better Essays

    Pascal's Wager Rhetorical Analysis
    • 1565 Words
    • 7 Pages

    Pascal's Wager Rhetorical Analysis

    This essay is mostly defending the rationality of religious faith with evidence of religious truth lacking. In section X William James says, “In truths dependent on our personal action, then, faith based on desire is certainly a lawful and possibly an indispensable thing.” William James defends that religious beliefs depend on ones personal actions and can also be justified through ones faith based on desire. He states that the evidence of religion ultimately depends on our belief. James concludes that whether we choose to believe or not we decide our own…

    • 1565 Words
    • 7 Pages
    Better Essays
    Read More
  • Satisfactory Essays

    Cosmological Argument From Evil Essay
    • 450 Words
    • 2 Pages

    Cosmological Argument From Evil Essay

    Outline the Ontological argument for the existence of God and consider the view that, while it may strengthen a believer’s faith, it has no value for the non ....…

    • 450 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Satisfactory Essays
    Read More
  • Better Essays

    W. K. Clifford The Ethics Of Belief Analysis
    • 1524 Words
    • 7 Pages

    W. K. Clifford The Ethics Of Belief Analysis

    Does Clifford present a persuasive viewpoint of religious faith? In his article “The Ethics of Belief (Clifford, 1877) W.K. Clifford sought to claim that it is inappropriate always, in all places, and for anyone, to believe anything upon unsatisfactory evidence. The goal of this paper is to determine whether indeed this opinion offered by Clifford, when considering religious faith, is persuasive. To successfully do this, I will weigh up the arguments that Clifford put forward, including that of disbelieving anything based upon scarce evidence, it always does damage and therefore is wrong. Such an assertion is in direct conflict to those pious believers who consider their blind faith as a goodness and for whom proof is something that is needless…

    • 1524 Words
    • 7 Pages
    Better Essays
    Read More
  • Good Essays

    Mark Howard's Argument Analysis
    • 580 Words
    • 3 Pages

    Mark Howard's Argument Analysis

    When I now claim to believe in the rationality of God, I mean that the question is settled to my satisfaction. I do not have any doubts—after pondering the arguments, the balance of evidence and argument has a definite tilt. Although I do not claim that the Mark Howard view of the rationality of God would make a compelling case for why someone else ought to believe, I now am better able to articulate an argument that provides something for them to think about. I have moved beyond the realm of automatic, unchallenged acceptance of an inherited belief and am now better able to communicate the faith that Peter admonishes us to be able to give an account of. Admittedly, this is not the end of my inquiry.…

    • 580 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays
    Read More
  • Good Essays

    Clifford's Beliefs On Insufficient Evidence
    • 661 Words
    • 3 Pages

    Clifford's Beliefs On Insufficient Evidence

    In short, Clifford proposes that it is morally wrong to believe anything upon insufficient evidence. He supports his argument by claiming that beliefs upon insufficient evidence are always harmful, and that holding unjust beliefs could make one, and even society, credulous. There are several appealing reasons as to why someone would accept Clifford’s position. Clifford’s argument suggests his support for evidentialism, which is the view that one’s beliefs need to be guided and constrained by evidence. Examples of people who could be evidentialists are scientists, skeptics, lawyers, or critical thinkers.…

    • 661 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays
    Read More
  • Good Essays

    Dembski's Argumentative Analysis
    • 727 Words
    • 3 Pages

    Dembski's Argumentative Analysis

    The belief in God is not rational because it requires faith. When there is a lack of evidence, faith suggests that the individual should commit to a belief by using their emotions or intuitions. Theologians use faith to form the ontological, cosmological, and design…

    • 727 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays
    Read More
  • Powerful Essays

    Response Paper
    • 1586 Words
    • 5 Pages

    Response Paper

    In 1968, a article was published by a man named H.J. McCloskey called “On Being an Atheist”, in which an attempt to present arguments against the existence of God is made. In his work, McCloskey attempts to provide readers with the argument that atheism is more “reasonable and comfortable (McCloskey,1968)” compared to the alternative theistic view. In his article, McCloskey attempts to make arguments against the three typical theistic proofs of God which includes the cosmological and teleological arguments, along with the argument from design. McCloskey uses the existence of evil and the irrationalness off faith against the theistic view of God. At the beginning of the article it seems that an intriguing argument will be made regarding the theistic view point of God, yet as McCloskey continues the argument becomes more biased in attacking spiritual beliefs which questions his validity.…

    • 1586 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Powerful Essays
    Read More
  • Powerful Essays

    response to Being an Atheist
    • 2161 Words
    • 9 Pages

    response to Being an Atheist

    In fact McCloskey places the bar even lower by referring to the “proofs of” rather than “arguments for” God’s existence, thereby overstating the Theist’s claim. With respect to the “proofs” for God’s existence that McCloskey attempts to deal with, namely the Cosmological and Teleological Arguments, McCloskey offers trivial objections that are easily answered. With respect to arguments for God’s non-existence, McCloskey offers the logical form of the problem of evil which, while rich in rhetoric, does not contain enough logic to necessitate its title. McCloskey ends his article with a pragmatic justification of Atheist, stating that Atheism is more comforting that Theism; a point that is stark in its irrelevance.…

    • 2161 Words
    • 9 Pages
    Powerful Essays
    Read More
  • Powerful Essays

    Kierkegaard's Conception Of Belief In God
    • 1429 Words
    • 6 Pages

    Kierkegaard's Conception Of Belief In God

    Belief in God exists in every culture and has throughout history (www.iep.utm.edu/relig-ep/). If we can conceive one of the greatest possible beings, then it must exist. Pragmatic arguments have often been active in the support of theistic belief. Theistic pragmatic arguments are not arguments for the suggestion that God exists; they are arguments that believing God exists is rational. Pragmatic arguments are relevant to belief-formation, since teaching a belief is an action.…

    • 1429 Words
    • 6 Pages
    Powerful Essays
    Read More
  • Better Essays

    Cosmological Argument
    • 1060 Words
    • 5 Pages

    Cosmological Argument

    For instance, David Hume was an agnostic philosopher who approved the skeptical observation that we do not know enough to proclaim or reject the existence of God (as cited in Soccio, 2013, p. 296). Another theory, Thomas Aquinas is a philosopher that has a theory of five ways to demonstrate God’s existence for natural reasons; these are the argument from motion, the cosmological argument, argument from necessity, the argument from gradation, and the teleological argument (Soccio, 2013, p. 230). “The argument from motion explains that motion must be given to each object by some other object that is already moving. The cosmological argument clarifies that there is a cause for everything created in this world. The argument from necessity is based on the idea that nothing had ever occurred, nothing will continually occur, hence to some degree the existence of supernatural being is necessary. The argument from gradation creates the idea that the existence of god grows from having more being than a nonliving thing. Teleological argument believes that the universe displays order and resolution that can only be the outcome of a God” (as cited in Soccio, 2013, p. 232-236). Thomas Aquinas is an example to show that with his multiple ways of proving God existence can increase many people wanting answers. The way that no theories has completely demonstrated the presence of God indicates the proposal of this paper that people do not need evidence for the existence of…

    • 1060 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Better Essays
    Read More

Related Topics