Preview

Beef Graft Case

Satisfactory Essays
Open Document
Open Document
916 Words
Grammar
Grammar
Plagiarism
Plagiarism
Writing
Writing
Score
Score
Beef Graft Case
Yaumil Akhyar
29113535
Lecture I:
Beef Graft Case

1. Create a short summary of the case and explain (a) who the suspects/convicts are and (b) what criminal charges are brought against them
2. Does the case involve gratification? If yes, towards who and provide explanation to justify your answers
3. Does the case involve “abuse of power/authority”? If yes, explain whose power is abused, how and in what capacity?
4. In what way has the case “cause losses to state budget”?
5. Beyond the legal charges, do you see any conflict of interest between the parties involved?

1. Summary of Beef Graft Case
The beginning of Beef Graft Case opened to public is when there was a caught of Ahmad Fathonah by Komisi Pemberantasan Korupsi (KPK). Fathonah was caught with cash in amount of Rp 100.000.000,00 thas was sealed in a plastic bag and some documents. Fathonah was caught by KPK based on information that said there was a bribe transaction about beef import in the PT Indoguna Utama office. Based on that information, KPK caught Ahmad Fathonah that has accepted money (bribe) from Juard Effendi and Arya Abdi Effendi, the directors of PT Indoguna Utama. After some investigation, KPK made a statement that Luthfi Hasan Ishaq, The President of Partai Keadilan Sejahtera (PKS) was with Ahmad Fathonah as recipients of the bribe from PT Indoguna Utama. KPK found four suspects of this case; Ahmad Fathonah, Luthfi Hasan Ishaq (LHI), Juard Effendi, and Arya Abdi Effendi. There is a conflict between PKS and KPK because of the appointment of LHI as the suspect. PKS said (by Refrizal, member of Commission VI of DPR RI from PKS) that the appointment to LHI as suspect was too premature and lack of evidences. This appointment was based of the money that caught with Ahmad Fathonah, and LHI never touch this money. But KPK replied that the evidence was sufficient. Evidence is not just like direct evidence (like LHI touch the money or transfer to his bank account) but also based on

You May Also Find These Documents Helpful

  • Good Essays

    Was Speelman’s substansive and procedural due process violated, as well as her right to a preliminary injunction?…

    • 505 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Satisfactory Essays

    This civil case was taken the supreme court. The supreme court dismissed a civil case taken by a murderer named Hazairin Iskandar. He sued, Zulfriki Mahbur and two acquaintances ,Aminah Theglory and Wahyu sasterawan. Hazairin Iskandar claims that his brother sold taxi while he was in prison. He sued the two acquaintances claimg that they deceptively sold both his taxi’s and taxi licence plates while he was in custody in May 2010. Iskander was jailed for about 17 years for killing of mohd shah seamin. Who had been having an affair with his wife, nita iskandar. He and his son committed that murder in februrary 2010.…

    • 572 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Satisfactory Essays
  • Satisfactory Essays

    bus 340

    • 460 Words
    • 2 Pages

    In order to answer the questions you will need to READ THE CASE, STUDY THE COURSE MATERIAL, SEARCH ADDITIONAL SECONDARY INFORMATION ABOUT THE CASE.…

    • 460 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Satisfactory Essays
  • Powerful Essays

    In Chapter 1 of your textbook, justice is analyzed from three perspectives, each with its own set of relevant concepts. The text includes three case studies for consideration from each perspective. Select one (only one) of these case studies as the focus of your initial post in this discussion. Then analyze the selected case study from the justice perspective which accompanies it and answer the following questions.…

    • 657 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Powerful Essays
  • Better Essays

    Esposito v. SFX

    • 1107 Words
    • 5 Pages

    3. Briefly – state the facts of this case, using the information found in the case in LexisNexis. (5 points)…

    • 1107 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Better Essays
  • Satisfactory Essays

    EEOC v Target

    • 744 Words
    • 2 Pages

    1) What were the legal issues in this case? What did the appeals court decide?…

    • 744 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Satisfactory Essays
  • Satisfactory Essays

    Retard

    • 969 Words
    • 4 Pages

    (d) The case: (12 marks) • What happened in this case? (1 mark) Summarise the facts. PLEASE BE CAREFUL NOT TO SIMPLY RE-WRITE OR RE-STATE THE FACTS. What is required is a BRIEF summary, in your own words. What was the decision in the case? (1 mark) Identify and explain the main legal issue or issues of the case in your own words. (10 marks) NOTE: this part of the question will require students to do some reading and to conduct some independent research beyond the case and beyond the prescribed textbook. Please see the attached Guidelines for this Assignment, as well as the Research Guidance Notes for Assignment 1 on Blackboard to help you with your research.) 3. Please include footnotes AND a bibliography (list of references at the end of your assignment). Please note footnotes and the bibliography will NOT be included in the word limit. NOTE: You should also refer to the Course Outline (section 4) regarding Assessment Format (paragraph 4.3), Assignment Submission Procedure (paragraph 4.4) and penalty for late submission (paragraph 4.5).…

    • 969 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Satisfactory Essays
  • Satisfactory Essays

    For this unit's assignment, write a 3-page paper that answers the following questions, based on the case provided.…

    • 289 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Satisfactory Essays
  • Good Essays

    Issue: The issue of this case is whether petitioner’s actions constituted misconduct so as to…

    • 508 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Powerful Essays

    AMRE

    • 2960 Words
    • 12 Pages

    2. Do you believe that the individuals who behaved unethically in this case were appropriately punished? Defend your answer.…

    • 2960 Words
    • 12 Pages
    Powerful Essays
  • Good Essays

    2. From what you know of this case, do you think the jury arrived at the correct decision? If not, why not? If so, why?…

    • 531 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Satisfactory Essays

    Surat, Aug 22: Following specific clues during postmortem, police has registered a case of murder in the death of two persons, who fell off the 12th floor of an under-construction building in Punagam on August 10.Police have booked Jaswant Savani, the third partner of the deceased Ashok Lathiya and Kishore Mangukiya, after postmortem revealed that the duo had sustained injuries on head and neck before they died. Simultaneously, during forensic examination of the spot, police got specific clues that it cannot be an accident as claimed by Savani. Police questioned Savani, who is under treatment at a hospital, to collect information about the incident and after leads the offence was registered.Sources claim that Rs. 5 crore insurance money was the motive behind the crime but it is clear that Savani mislead…

    • 412 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Satisfactory Essays
  • Satisfactory Essays

    Pml-N

    • 955 Words
    • 4 Pages

    • The purpose of these objections were just to COLLECT their BLACK MONEY from the concerned Chinese companies and on not being paid the bribe the files of both these projects were withheld as a conspiracy against Punjab…

    • 955 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Satisfactory Essays
  • Good Essays

    pinaki

    • 4557 Words
    • 19 Pages

    1. We are in this case concerned with the question as to whether the relationship between A-1 and A-2 was extra-marital leading to cruelty within the meaning of Section 498A IPC and also amounted to abetment leading to the act of suicide within the meaning of Section 306 IPC.…

    • 4557 Words
    • 19 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Powerful Essays

    This is to certify that the Project Paper titled: Mistake of Fact vis-à-vis Mistake of Law, submitted to Rajiv Gandhi National University of Law, Punjab, in partial fulfillment of the requirements for Paper-V of the B.A.LL.B (Hons.), fifth semester, is an original and bonafide research work carried out by Aanchal Singh, Siddhant Gupta, Zubin Ahmad, Satish Fenin, Abhilash Kalla, under my supervision and guidance. It is further certified that no part of this study has been submitted to any University for the award of any Degree or Diploma whatsoever.…

    • 10889 Words
    • 44 Pages
    Powerful Essays