Preview

Battle Of Thermopylae Research Paper

Good Essays
Open Document
Open Document
1358 Words
Grammar
Grammar
Plagiarism
Plagiarism
Writing
Writing
Score
Score
Battle Of Thermopylae Research Paper
Tareik Horne
Bossier Parish Community College
History 101 Western Civilization
5:00-7:50 P.M.
Dr. Roshunda Belton
9/21/14
Battle of Thermopylae
The Battle of Thermopylae started out in the late summer of 480 B.C, the Spartan King Leonidas 1 held out for three days with a mere 300 hoplites against thousands upon thousands of the best Great King’s troops. Under thirty-five Persian generals, were assembled for the invasion of Greece, five whom where sons of the royal house. On the arrival of Xerxes at Thermopylae, he saw the that place was defended by a large of number of Spartans, and about seven thousand hoplites from other states, commanded by the Spartan King Leonidas.
That night Xerxes sent a spy ahead, he learned that a
…show more content…
An Athenian hoplite carried a heavy 9 foot spear, wore a solid breastplate and carried an almost body-length shield. The Persian infantryman, contrast, wore little more than robes and carried a shorter sword and a wicker or cane shield. Therefore, close-quarter combat favored the Athenians. The Persian disadvantage was exacerbated by the Greek use of the Phalanx formation, an eight hoplite by eight-hoplite square.
The two armies fought together on the plain of Marathon for a length of time; and in the mid-battle the barbarians were victorious, and broke and pursed the Greeks into the inner county; but on the two wings the Athenians and the Plateaens defeated the enemy. Having so done, they suffered the routed barbarians to fly at their ease, and joining the two wings conquered them.
Therefore the Athenians secured in this way seven of the vessels; while with the reminder the barbicans pushed off, and taking aboard their Eretrian prisoners form the island where they had left them, doubled Cape Sunium, hoping to reach Athens before the return of the Athenians, and because of that The Athenians defeated a Persian army in the battle of Marathon.

You May Also Find These Documents Helpful

  • Good Essays

    The reasons for the Greek victory against the Persians in 490 to 480/479 BC was a mixture of exceptional leadership, skilful tactics and strategy, superior weapons and soldiers, and Greek unity. Strong leadership was the most important aspect of the Greek defence, as without the intelligence and bravery of the leaders, the Greeks would have been easily defeated. As a result of the excellent leadership; Greek tactics, strategy, and unity were greatly strengthened. Combined with their better weapons and soldiers, the Greeks held the advantage and seized opportunities at the perfect moment. Also, with each victory the Greeks grew more confident of success and defiant of the Persian attempts to invade. The poor organisation and disarray of their enemy led to an undermining of the Persian might and further improved Greece's chances of success.…

    • 2672 Words
    • 9 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Satisfactory Essays

    Which of the following was NOT true of the 490 B.C.E. Athenian victory over the Persians?…

    • 1565 Words
    • 7 Pages
    Satisfactory Essays
  • Good Essays

    The pass was about 330 feet in width. Leonities tactics helped him defend the large Persian fleet by creating a battle formation called Phalanx formation in which the men formed a wall of overlapping shields and protruded their spears out from the sides of the shields. This war tactic helped defend the persian attack because since the pass was only 330 feet wide Xerxes couldn't call his army to all attack at once they had to attack in waves so that made it easier for the spartans to hold off the massive persian army. Xerxes attacked greece because Darius originally attacked Greece because the Athenians gave support to the "Ionian Revolt" against Persian rule in Asia Minor. Darius's army was decisively defeated at the Battle of Marathon in the first attempt to invade Greece. After Darius died his son, Xerxes, vowed revenge for his father's defeat at the Battle of…

    • 597 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    Persian soldiers were career soldiers unlike most Greeks who were citizen soldiers, only performing their military duties when war was upon them. The notable exception to this was, of course,…

    • 550 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Powerful Essays

    The Battle of Thermopylae is shrouded in fluctuating estimations and conflicting historic accounts. There is as much myth, legend and mystery surrounding the actual battle as we have historical records for it. Historians from ancient Greece were very biased and so we must find a middle ground between accounts to have an educated opinion of what really happened. The most speculation involves the actual numbers and count of each side; the Greek forces and the Persian forces. Greek accounts say the Persians numbered over a million. Herodotus even exclaims the Persian forces reached up to 2.6 million strong. We know today that this would hardly have been possible and that Herodotus had probably greatly exaggerated in his writings to glorify the Greeks.…

    • 1566 Words
    • 7 Pages
    Powerful Essays
  • Good Essays

    The Greeks had chosen to defend a narrow pass, or gap, between the mountains of central Greece and the sea, called Thermopylae. This pass was part of the route into Greece from the north. King Leonidas of Sparta rounded up 300 of Sparta’s most elite soldiers with the help of 7000 Greek soldiers from other states marched for an attempt to block the only road by which the massive Persian army could pass, while the small army knew they would face a large army which would end up to be over 100,000 Persians.…

    • 423 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    While strongest at the front, the phalanx's main weakness was on the right flank and to the rear. Once engaged in battle the heavy armor and close quarters did not allow the phalanx to easily address attacks from either of those directions. Although the battle of Thermopylae was a decisive Persian victory, the employment of the phalanx formation proved to be a useful and superior strategy there as roughly fourteen hundred Hoplite led by King Leonidas and three hundred Spartans held their ground for a week (three spent fighting) halting Persian advancement and causing numerous casualties. Were it not for a traitor exposing a path to the rear of the Greek positionallowing the Persian forces to surround the Greek position, there's no way of knowing how long this small force could have fought or whether or not they could have been victorious.…

    • 762 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    The Greeks during the Greco-Persian War manipulated terrain as a force multiplier in many battles; at the Battle of Marathon, Miltiades used the Vrana Valley to prevent a Persian march on Athens, at the Battle of Thermopylae, Leonidas used the narrow, Thermopylae pass to invalidate the Persian numbers, and at the Battle of Artemisium, Themistocles used the Artemisium Strait to aid in his battle against the Persian fleets.…

    • 491 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    The Greeks won the war against the Persians. In the war the Persians thought they could sneak attack Athens but the Greeks were waiting for them the whole time. The battle of Thermopylae was the second war. The Persians won the war against the Greeks. In the war the Greeks thought they could go in a tight spot so the Persians had to send a few soldiers in at a time.…

    • 298 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    How Did Sparta Decline

    • 872 Words
    • 4 Pages

    Sparta simply believed that the Lycurgus system did not need to be altered. Furthermore, they were against Spartans having too much wealth or personal power. As a result, the Lycurgus system's rigidity produced a closed society plagued by the effects of inbreeding. Some historians agree that "the Spartan hegemony 'perished through 'oliganthropia'' - a lack of men. This is not because of a population decrease in Laconia but just a lack of men of the Spartan citizen class who could serve as hoplites, called 'homoioi' or 'Spartiates.'" The number of men that Sparta could call upon to send into battle diminished appreciably during the 5th and early 4th centuries B.C. This was not solely due to reduced numbers of men but also partly because they were reluctant to leave Laconia unguarded and tended to send fewer men to battle than they could have. In the 5th century battle at Thermopylae against the Persians, only 300 Spartans and 1,000 allies held off the massive invasion of Persia's King Xerxes that is estimated to number over 120,000 men. According to Herodotus, however, there were probably 8,000 Spartiates available to be deployed (Scipio,…

    • 872 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    The Battle of Thermopylae of 480 BC, an alliance of Greek city-states fought the invading Persian Empire at the pass of Thermopylae in central Greece. Vastly outnumbered, the Greeks held back the Persians for three days in one of history's most famous last stands. A small force led by King Leonidas of Sparta blocked the only road through which the massive army of Xerxes I could pass. After three days of battle, a local resident named Ephialtes betrayed the Greeks by revealing a mountain path that led behind the Greek lines. Dismissing the rest of the army, King Leonidas stayed behind with 300 Spartans and 700 Thespian volunteers (Number vary). The Persians succeeded in taking the pass but sustained heavy losses, extremely disproportionate to…

    • 716 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    Sparta then prepared for war against Athens. As war broke out Athens began to fall and lose the war. Mainly because they were better fighters on water and not on land. Unlike the Spartans who were the best at fighting on the land.…

    • 813 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    P.51), by the year of 457 had encircled the city center with a massive stone wall and fortified a broad corridor with a wall on both sides leading all the way to the main harbor at Piraeus (1.107.1. P.57-58). “… Athens was now fortified sufficiently to protect its inhabitants …” (1.91.4. P. 50). Athenian fleet, built against “the prospect of the barbarian invasion” (1.14.3. P.12), and the city fortifications – made it unconquerable to direct attack. This concept laid the basis for the Athenian strategy – defense at land and offense at sea. In the light of the preparation to the war the Athenian general Pericles “gave the citizens some advice on their present affairs… They were not to go out to battle, but to come into the city and guard it, and get ready their fleet, in which their real strength lay.” (2.13.2. P.98). Protected from the land attacks by long walls down to Piraeus, Athens would behave like an island. It would avoid any direct land confrontations with Spartans at any price while its fast and mobile navy would attack Spartans at sea. To protect the population of Attica, Pericles commanded to move more than one hundred thousand people from Attica to Athens and bring them inside the city walls. As long as Athenian navy would stay supreme, Athenians could survive any siege, by resupplying from the allies of the empire. The technology of military siege machines in this period was not developed enough to break such walls easily. Consequently, regardless of what harm was done to the agricultural lands of Attica during the war, the Athenians could rely on sea power and import food by ship through their fortified port. They had huge financial resources collected from their silver mines and from the dues of the Delian League (1.99. P.53). The…

    • 814 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Satisfactory Essays

    Essay 1

    • 277 Words
    • 2 Pages

    According to the essay Herodotus: Xerxes Invades Greece, from The Histories, Herodotus was a very famous historian, who gave his account of the battle of Thermopylae. It is significant though to recognize that Herodotus was Greek and giving an account of what happened when the Persians defeated them. In the text Xerxes has many incidents that portray him as superstitious and tyrannical. Some examples of Xerxes’ tyranny is his plans to “march an army through Europe against Greece,” his want to not rest until he has taken and burnt Athens, wants to extend the Persian territory throughout all of Europe, his beheading of his master- builders, and his lack of mercy towards his slave and his five sons. Xerxes shows his superstitions when he sends for the Magians to tell him why the sun has disappeared, and the day has so quickly tuned to night. Turning to the actions in battle, those of the Spartans tell me that they are a strong willed people who do not give up easily, if at all, even when faced with a great challenge and are outnumbered. Besides this essay showing the Greeks strong will, this essay seems to promote their use of wit and skill in tricking the Persians into thinking there were less of them than there actually was. The account was written by a Greek, so the information in the story would cast them in a more positive light. Lastly, in our text, Western Civilization, there is a thurough evaluation of the significance of the Persian invasions on the Greek political and intellectual…

    • 277 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Satisfactory Essays
  • Good Essays

    Odyssey Literary Analysis

    • 1127 Words
    • 5 Pages

    The orthodox current claims that the transformations triggered by the Hoplite Reform took place in an abrupt and sudden manner, and, thus, can be categorized as an intense revolution. Kagan and Viggiano claim for a precipitated change in the archaic Greek structure and perception of warfare beginning with Homer’s epics. Such evolution of the fighting style, from the individual combat between hero-aristocrats to the massive engagement of entire hoplite armies, was driven in great part by the innovations in weapons, armor and tactics. Nonetheless, the invention of the double-griped hoplon and the rearrangement of heavy infantry into a cohesive phalanx formation had various political, socioeconomic and psychological implications outside the battlefield, especially concerning the creation of a hoplite middle class. This model is most similar to George Grote’s thesis, as both claim that the Hoplite Reform marked the turning point between Homeric aristocratic fighting style and values into the later broader sociopolitical structure and mindset. Thus, this changes forced the narrow, highborn aristocracy to secede a substantial portion of their power. Yet, it only enabled the creation of a broader oligarchy and never reached the extent of a full democracy in the short run –…

    • 1127 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Good Essays

Related Topics