Preview

Battle Of Big Horn Analysis

Better Essays
Open Document
Open Document
1961 Words
Grammar
Grammar
Plagiarism
Plagiarism
Writing
Writing
Score
Score
Battle Of Big Horn Analysis
Two Sides to a Story Everyday history is being made, certain things more significant than others. In today’s day and age we are able to capture proof through photo, video, and etc. What about history made in times before all that? Word of mouth, all proof was based on a person’s story that was continually passed down until it was time to be inputted into a text book. Of course with this method, a lot can be left out or even added to the original story. Sometimes so much that it begins to turn into something completely different. Essentially, history was passed down like the childhood game “telephone.” The flaws become evident when talking about the Battle of Big Horn, one of the largest military defeats in U.S. history. Much controversy surrounds …show more content…
One of the most accurate sources about the Battle of Little Big Horn came from a letter written by Lieutenant Frederick Benteen known as Lieutenant Frederick Benteen Depicts the Battle of Little Bighorn,1876, soon after the battle occurred. Benteen in this case is a primary source, he was a live action witness that documented the outcome of the battle through a letter to his wife. His explanation was direct and was written days after the battle, making it impossible for opinions of the battle to be formulated. He begins the letter by explaining the various treks they are making in hopes of discovering Indian lands. They endure hardship for days at a time until they come close to one of the other divided regiments. At this point Benteen receives a message from a leader of another one of the regiments named Cooke, he said, “Benteen. Come on. Big village. Be quick, bring packs.” Here in this instance Benteen is displaying the hostility of the situation, he even hints it even more by saying that Cooke ended the last sentence with “pacs” instead of “packs”. Meaning he was killed before he could not even finish writing the last word of his message. After receiving word of this conflict, each regiment of the cavalry continue movement among the hills in hopes of finding the valley. The Trek continued until the valley was found and Custer and his 5 co’s crossed the ford with intentions of attacking the village from the rear, there he was able to see the immense population of Indians they were up against. At this point there was still another 4 miles left until they reached the ford. Upon arriving, the Indians were waiting on the other side. It is unknown whether all of the Co’s were able to enter the village, or if they were ran out immediately. As some regiments were able to make it out alive, Custer forcefully entered with his regiment again the next day. His over confidence and

You May Also Find These Documents Helpful

  • Good Essays

    Utley’s book, the reader learns about Custer was born on December 5, 1839 in Rumley, Ohio and liked to refer to himself as “Autie” and had a half sister to whom he was close to. The reader also starts to see Custer was more into studies, more into fun, and yet he barely graduates from West Point thirty-forty of thirty-four classmates. From this point the writer informs the reader about Custer’s military career and Libbie (Elizabeth Bacon). The romance between the two of them added and interesting twist throughout the book. Custer appeared to be a very difficult man, driven, harsh, conflicted, and his wife was his softer side. It is in chapter 2 Custer starts his military career as a staff officer (page 18), which the reader learns he ditches his staff role to plunge into battle. Here is where we learn of his ability to remain calm, cool, and collective in battle. Custer himself discovers his attributes of battle and the reader will see him take risks, when he does not necessarily agrees with his orders (page 52,page172, page 180), which Mr. Utley shares this could have been what caused General Custer’s own demise (page…

    • 1035 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Satisfactory Essays

    The Battle of Fallen Timbers started on Wednesday, August 20, 1794. The battle took place on the lower Maumee River Valley which is the present state of Ohio. Major General Anthony Wayne was encamped with a military force of 3,700 men, 2,000 of whom were part of the regular United States Army. The rest were Kentucky mounted militia. Fighting the Americans were some 2,000 hostile Indians. The Indians were allies of the British and the British had just recently built Fort Miamis. This fort was deep in American Territory, and stopped the Americans from further westward expansion. The tribes facing Wayne and his army were the Miamis, under Chief Little Turtle, the Shawnees under Blue Jacket and the Pottawawatomies, Ottawas, Chippewas, Saulk, Fox, and some Iroquios,…

    • 425 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Satisfactory Essays
  • Satisfactory Essays

    The Battle of the Lone Pine was intended to be a diversion. The Australian and New Zealand Army fought in the trenches. They stayed in the trenches for the pre-bomb, hiding themselves. This was where they tried to bomb the turkish trenches to eliminate as many of them as possible. Once they thought that enough of the turkish were killed, they would climb up and fight. This didn't work properly because the turkish were not in their trenches and therefore were not killed. As the Australian had to move forward with the British commands to fight, many people died due to the fact that Australian hand guns could not beat the turkish machine guns.…

    • 174 Words
    • 1 Page
    Satisfactory Essays
  • Good Essays

    The front scouts were quickly shot down by American militia. Then the battle began. Tarleton was known for unruly battle behavior and his men were usually very difficult to beat. Morgan however realized how predictable Tarleton was, working in the Americans favor. Tarleton sent his dragoon hoping to dismantle riflemen and wanting to disperse them on the battlefield. The militias with their accurate aiming were able to stop the dragoon, driving them back. Tarleton then had his soldiers march towards the Americans. Morgan had his men ready encouraging them to wipe out the officers first. After eliminating the “epaulettes” or British officers, soldiers were left frantic. The American soldiers proceeded to follow orders from their General and took off beyond the hill with guns loaded. With Americans “fleeing” the British thought they were victorious, oblivious to General Morgan’s innovative strategy. Washington’s Calvary then joined in driving back the British dragoon. Morgan met the soldiers where the horses were just like he said and turned them around with their loaded guns hoping for a victory. With the Calvary and all three lines of militia coming from every side, the British collapsed giving the colonists complete…

    • 477 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Satisfactory Essays

    Finally, the battle of Fort Necessity was almost finished when Fort Necessity was burned and the French moved back to Fort Duquesne on July 4. The battle of Fort Necessity helps the next generation understand deeply that Major George Washington got the value experiences and lessons from the failure of conducting the battle. Also, this battle has some negative effects such as the loss of military and the damage of nature. Therefore, it is considered as “the bloody battle” (Battle of Fort Necessity) which leads to the major result “French and Native American Victory” (Battle of Fort Necessity).…

    • 98 Words
    • 1 Page
    Satisfactory Essays
  • Good Essays

    Among the reading assignments, the chapter “Who Owns the Past?” in Dangerous Game by MacMillan piqued my interest to elaborate on. In this chapter, she emphasizes that history is written by many historians who have their own views, interpretations, and biases. In this regard, she implies that we should not simply believe in what historians claim, but dig into its sources and figure out from many perspectives. There are many ‘bad’ history produced by historians without offering a wide range of views and this can be used as an instrument that can largely influence on people by giving them prejudice on certain events. There are always reasons behind each event and it is important to find out what indeed happened as well as where the history is…

    • 307 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Better Essays

    The Battle of Little Bighorn was an intense, gory battle fought on June 25th, 1876. A group of federal troops led by George Custer were defeated by the Lakota tribe led by Crazy Horse and other Cheyenne warriors. George A. Custer was a United States Army officer and cavalry commander in the American Civil War and the American Indian Wars. Crazy Horse was an Oglala Sioux Indian chief who fought for the removal of Indian reservations. He was born in Rapid City, South Dakota in 1840. George A. Custer and Crazy Horse fought against each other in the Battle Of Little Bighorn. Though they are famous historical enemies, they have much more in common than first meets the eye.…

    • 1638 Words
    • 7 Pages
    Better Essays
  • Better Essays

    The Battle of Ia Drang Valley was a series of engagements between the U.S 1st Cavalry Division and the B-3 front, North Vietnamese Army. It was a battle between one US division and three NVA regiments. This was the first and last battle between NVA forces and U.S forces of similar size. This battle took place from 11-14-1965, thru 11-18-1965.…

    • 1569 Words
    • 7 Pages
    Better Essays
  • Good Essays

    Oral history is the collection and study of historical information with people having personal knowledge of past events. In the article “ Movement Without Aim,” Ronald J Grele discussed how the world views oral history and how it should not be taken seriously. Grele formed a strong argument due to the way he debated the irrelevance and how unsuccessful oral history is in the modern world.…

    • 728 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    Although events in history occurred over a long span of time and development, history first became an academic subject a little more than 100 years ago (McNeill 12). Since then, a plethora of controversies appeared regarding how historians, scholars, and intellectuals should examine and analyze history. Among the initial methods of studying history was the scientific research method, or scientific source criticism, which fundamentally extracts valid, legitimate facts from a diverse range of historical sources. Throughout time, however, the facts derived from this method of historical study gradually altered, leading to a new method of historical study: using facts and combining them with opinions and goals to constitute personal interpretations. As Oscar Handlin zealously asserts, historians and scholars should provide a strict examination of history based on a chronological study of known and verifiable facts as opposed to using verifiable facts as the basis for their own interpretation, influenced by their own group, experiences, beliefs, and personal motives. Through implementing a strict examination of history, historians can successfully detect and eradicate bias in their writings, allow the government as well as individuals to gain an insight into the past in order to secure and progress the future, and grasp the magnitude of truth.…

    • 645 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    After my reading of Robert Ferrell’s America’s Deadliest Battle, I was capable of grasping an understanding of the American Expeditionary Force’s preparation for their battle against Germany in 1918, in addition to assessing the quality of some of the officers and men within the AEF, and some of the actions that displayed the weaknesses and strengths of the AEF as well. Additionally, I will be touching basis on other measures that gave the battle at the Meuse-Argonne its name as “America’s deadliest battle,” and discussing my overall opinion on America’s fighting ability in World War I.…

    • 807 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    The Artillery of the Potomac Army at Gettysburg, achieved victory through the “King of Battle” and integration of the Union maneuver commanders (Steve, 2014). Combat experience demonstrated seasoned leadership. The superiority of the Union artillery over their confederate counterparts was not only the number of guns employed, but also, it was the manner of how the Union commanders employed the artillery under their command (Steve, 2014). Proper integration of assets can determine the battlefield in moments. Hence, the concept of today’s utilization of artillery supporting the maneuver elements, has not drastically changed. (Steve, 2014)…

    • 1381 Words
    • 6 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    Essentially, when thinking about oral History stories such as Troy and how they were passed down the generations to come up with the story we now know. As it has been passed down for such a long time without being written down, or even if it has being written from certain people ( which means we would only get their side of the argument ) would mean that we can’t look at something and say it is true. With no real account of information actually documented in archives, which is made by historians we can’t come out and say that it is feasible and can’t can be trusted. By this is it meant that information found about the time is only found in the form of letters and/or diaries. If this is the case it is known that people do tend to over-exaggerate the event, this could either be because they are wanting to gain revenge over an old or current rival ( as Peter Oliver states “The fact is that oral testimony . . . is frequently used as means of paying off old scores” (1) . In Oliver’s mind, someone would manipulate a source so that they could make someone they dislike look bad ), or to make others feel sorry for them because of what they have been through. It can also be said that “tricks that the memory can play, to efforts at rationalization & self-justification that all of us make, even if only subconsciously, or to the terrible telescoping of time which an interview often encourages and which runs counter to the very essence of history”2 This can also happen with age, it is…

    • 1444 Words
    • 6 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    When we learn stories, and when we learn history, we try to make sense of the information we’re given by piecing it together to form a whole. Sometimes the process is so fine-tuned that it goes unnoticed. The information comes from disparate sources; it develops over time; we learn parts here and there, and we construct and make sense of the collective story using the model of what we thought was the truth as given to us, before each subsequent piece of information invaded the narrative that has been constructed or is being constructed, or that is always in the process of being constructed or remembered and carried forward. If there is a rupture in the narrative, we question not only its validity but the validity of the entire story, as we’ve presented it to ourselves or as it was presented to us as something cohesive and true. The process in some ways makes us have expectations that we are not aware of and that sometimes violate our reasoning skills. We are often not aware that we are accepting or reasoning through the elements as…

    • 863 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Satisfactory Essays

    English Speaking Countries Capital cities 100 200 300 400 500 600 700 History 100 200 300 400 500 600 700 What is it? 100 200 300 400 500 600 700 Where is it?…

    • 978 Words
    • 15 Pages
    Satisfactory Essays

Related Topics