Preview

Basic Concepts: Separation Of Powers In The Federal Government

Powerful Essays
Open Document
Open Document
1439 Words
Grammar
Grammar
Plagiarism
Plagiarism
Writing
Writing
Score
Score
Basic Concepts: Separation Of Powers In The Federal Government
Basic Concepts
1. Separation of Powers
Describe the two concepts that (a) balance power within the federal government and (b) provide distinctions in the role of the federal, state, and local governments.
Separation of powers and the supremacy clause. The separation of powers the Constitution provides a system of checks and balances between the Legislative, Executive, and judicial branches of government. The Constitution also divides power between the federal and state and local governments. Supremacy clause establishes that the Constitution, all federal statutes, and U.S. treaties are “the supreme law of the land.” The distinction of the separation of powers is also reflected in the fact that certain functions must not be exercised by
…show more content…
Relying on outside reports that because of nudity the production would not be in the best interests of the community, the board rejected the application. Why should the court allow the production to proceed?
Freedom of the press. The court should allow the production to proceed because the content is not illegal and it is not prohibited. There should, of course be liability on the part of the promoter to ensure that tickets are sold only to persons of age according to the law who are not restricted from viewing a performance that contains nudity.
(b) What are the distinctions in how the law treats public persons versus private persons with respect to defamation?
Defamation for public persons requires the proof of actual malice in order for the public person to gain damages for emotional distress. People in the public eye are expected to receive scrutiny both positive and negative related to their public activities. Private individuals are accorded more leeway in proving defamation because the expectation is different; proof of actual malice is not required.

8. Right to Possess

You May Also Find These Documents Helpful

  • Better Essays

    Esposito v. SFX

    • 1107 Words
    • 5 Pages

    “A statement is defamatory if it tends to expose the plaintiff to public hatred, contempt, ridicule or disgrace--that is, if it would tend to lead the average person in the community to form an evil or bad opinion of the plaintiff.” (Taken from LexisNexis, Esposito v SFX case)…

    • 1107 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Better Essays
  • Good Essays

    The Constitution of the United States defines a government with three branches: executive, legislative and judicial. Each branch has certain powers, but those powers are also bound by specific limits, exercised primarily in a system of checks and balances by the other branches. This concept is known as "separation of powers," according to an overview on the website of the National Conference of State Legislatures, a term coined by Charles-Louis de Secondat, an 18th-century French social and political philosopher. The legislative branch makes laws, but they must be signed by the executive to take effect, or they may be vetoed. The judicial branch rules on the laws' constitutionality. Legislators can respond by overriding a veto, changing a law or amending the Constitution.…

    • 877 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Satisfactory Essays

    MidTerm Essay The Constitution divided the powers between the Federal,State and Local governments in a very specific way. Which we now call Federalism,but before this we had the Articles of Confederation. The reason we did not keep the Articles of Confederation was because it was to weak and gave too much power to the states. But it did set up a foundation which helped bring us the division of powers between Federal,local and state governments.…

    • 309 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Satisfactory Essays
  • Good Essays

    Fairfax media published the newspaper articles outlining how Hockey had granted private access to select members of the community, in exchange for donations to his political campaign. White J found, with respect to the published articles, that, under Section 30(3)(i) , there was no consideration of “alternative meanings…for the choice of words…in the headline” , also finding that “there were inadequacies… to obtain a response by Hockey” , under Section 30(3)(h) . In terms of the poster, White J found that “there were readily available alternative formats of the poster” that were not explored by Fairfax, rather, there was no effort to find any defamatory meaning that could have been associated with the poster. The publication of the tweets by Fairfax was also found to not be reasonable. Similar to the poster, the tweets could have been reworded in a non-defamatory way, however, this was not cross checked with anyone at Fairfax, thus leading White J to believe that the conduct, in relation to the tweets was not reasonable.…

    • 804 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    Understanding Libel Quiz

    • 1364 Words
    • 6 Pages

    1. The BG News publishes an article that says the journalism department in the School of Communication Studies arbitrarily decides which professors will get merit raises and fails to keep good accounting records of department expenses. The department decides to sue the BG News for libel. An important element of the case will be:…

    • 1364 Words
    • 6 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Powerful Essays

    The Hillsborough Disaster

    • 3606 Words
    • 15 Pages

    Defamation law safeguards an individual’s rights against a defamatory statement that cause public contempt, hatred, or ridicule[1]. In Britain, the law of defamation is divided into two distinct sections; slander and libel. Slander is defamation in the transient form while libel is found in permanent from such as newspaper articles, online articles, or pictures. The law does not recognise the deceased as claimant even when represented by their relatives[2].…

    • 3606 Words
    • 15 Pages
    Powerful Essays
  • Good Essays

    Qualified Privilege Essay

    • 1004 Words
    • 5 Pages

    There are four major defenses which can be relied upon defamation, justification, fair comment, absolute privilege; and qualified privilege. (Discuss) Qualified privilege, this exists for the same fundamental purpose as absolute privilege which is to protect those who say defamatory statements in circumstances where the common convenience and welfare of society demand such protection. If we compare absolute privilege and qualified privilege we can see that absolute privilege is limited to some defined occasions. On the other hand, qualified privilege applies to the protection of a wider variety of situations whereby it is in the public interest that individuals are able to comment freely on what they honestly believe to be true in their…

    • 1004 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    Separation of Powers is very intrinsic, for the different types of government. In Document 4, the Legislative Branch makes the laws. The Executive Branch carries out and enforces the laws. The Judicial Branch interprets laws and punishes those who break the laws that are enforced. The Separation of Powers is very vital to this country, in ways such the Executive Branch has all of the power, and no one else had any form of control for this country; then this country would be in shambles due to one branch having all of the power. For example,…

    • 621 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    The framers of the Constitution created a political system based on limited government. The main point of this separation of powers was to limit any one branch from exercising the main functions of another; this starts in the division of government responsibilities into distinct branches. There are three distinctive branches, the legislative branch, the executive branch, and the judicial branch. Checks and balances came to play when the divisions of the branches were determined. With checks and balances, each of the three branches of government can limit the powers of the other. This was design, so that no one branch became too powerful.…

    • 720 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Better Essays

    for the act of defamation, of which two of these, Justification and Fair comment, we…

    • 1644 Words
    • 7 Pages
    Better Essays
  • Good Essays

    Separation Of Power

    • 747 Words
    • 3 Pages

    Separation of powers is one of the major functions of the United States Constitution. The Founders aspired to create a new system of government complete with separation of power in order to implement a strategic system of checks and balances. Our current separation of power stems from concepts of federalism, where division is placed between national and state governments. The Founders wished to be centered on the powers of state over national government, so the concept of federalism allows for checks and balances between state and national government (Lenz, 2013). Separation of power delegates authority to different branches of government and provides a system of checks and balances. There are three branches of government: the judicial…

    • 747 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Powerful Essays

    LIBEL TERM PAPER

    • 3456 Words
    • 11 Pages

    "Libel is committed when defamatory matter is published in permanent form or in a form which is deemed to be permanent. Defamation published by spoken word or in some other transitory form is slander."…

    • 3456 Words
    • 11 Pages
    Powerful Essays
  • Powerful Essays

    The rules of the tort represent an attempt to strike a balance between two important and often competing interests, the public interest in freedom of speech and the private interest in marinating one’s reputation. The difficulty of achieving this balance is perhaps indicated by the fact that, though liability for a defamatory statement is strict and substantial damages might be recovered from the one making the defamatory statement, a large variety of defenses exist for the one who makes such a statement.…

    • 2908 Words
    • 12 Pages
    Powerful Essays
  • Satisfactory Essays

    Law Notes on Slander

    • 253 Words
    • 2 Pages

    Defamation of Character and its Defences Defamation of Character is an unjustified or untrue attack on a person’s reputation. The attack may be intentional or unintentional Must lower the person’s reputation, cause people to avoid him/her, or expose the person to hatred – may result in difficulty finding or keeping jobs, friendships etc. A person’s reputation who has been damaged due to defamation can sue for damages. Section 2b of the CORAF guarantees freedom of speech and expression yey people are not allowed to make false or ungrounded accusations.…

    • 253 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Satisfactory Essays
  • Powerful Essays

    Seperation of Powers

    • 2689 Words
    • 11 Pages

    * The separation of powers is a doctrine which is fundamental to the organization of a state – and to the concept of constitutionalism – in so far as it prescribes the appropriate allocation of powers, and the limits of those powers, to differing institutions…

    • 2689 Words
    • 11 Pages
    Powerful Essays