I changed my tune
I changed my tune
In my opinion I don’t agree with Mrs.Jonstone and Mrs. Lyons. I think Mrs. Johnston shouldn’t separate her sons that are twin even though she doesn’t have enough money to take care of her sons. She should work harder for get a lot of money to take care of her sons. For Mrs. Lyons I think she doesn’t do that even though she grows jealous and suspicious because I think it’s not good for everyone and the result it’s not beautiful. For this drama I think it’s funny and it can teach many things to me such as about the class in social, and Superstition and…
In the middle of chapter eight, when the house fire is under control, several villagers take advantage of the situation to go into the house and destroy it. Many of the villagers wanted the house to completely burn down. Jackson writes that they wanted them dead, one villager yelled “put them back in the house and start the fire all over again” (108). This all proves that the residents of the village hated the Blackwood family.…
From the very beginning of this story I’ve had a strong opinion on how this topic is so meaningless and drawn out almost to the brink of insanity. Although the writer does display a good level of sincerity and commitment to this argument, but even with that being said my opinions of the writer and how his views are kind of one sided still remain.…
Every month Movie Night is held in the Fireside Room. This month Carriage Glen will be showing Driving Miss Daisy starring Morgan Freeman and Jessica Tandy, and Big starring Tom Hanks and Robert Loggia. Driving Miss Daisy came out in 1989. It is about an elderly Jewish woman wanting to maintain her independence, but after crashing her car her son hires her to have an African-American chauffeur. Daisy and Hoke's relationship gets off to a rocky start, but they gradually form a close friendship over the years, You can enjoy this movie in the Fireside Room on Monday, February 1st at 7:00 p.m. The second movie that will be shown in February is Big. A Tom Hanks classic from 1988. After a wish turns 12-year-old Josh Baskin into a 30-year-old…
If you are the leader of a group discussion, there are a number of challenges you will have to face. Being able to successfully overcome these challenges will mean the difference between the success and failure of your group.…
Discussion phrases Asking for opinion What do you think about this problem? Do you have any ideas/thoughts about this? How do you see this problem? Is this a serious problem? What are your thoughts on this? Giving opinion I think ../ feel In my opinion, this is … To me, As far as I’m concerned,.. In my point of view.. I strongly…
A Group Discussion at a B-School can be defined as a formal discussion involving 10 to 12 participants in a group. They are given a topic. After some time, during which they collect their thoughts, the group is asked to discuss the topic for 20 to 25 minutes. B-Schools use the Group Discussion process to assess a candidate's personality traits.…
In our economic matters, there is an excessive tendency towards the thinking rather than doing.…
Group DISCUSSION Definition of Group Discussion v Group Discussion is a modern method of assessing students personality. v It is both a technique and an art and a comprehensive tool to judge the worthiness of the student and his appropriateness for the job. Group Discussion The term suggests a discussion among a group of persons. v The group will have 8…
If the opening speaker talks sense, he will get credit because he opened the discussion and took the group in the right direction. If, on the other hand, the first speaker's start lacks substance, he will attract the undivided attention of the evaluators to his shortcomings. So speak first only if you have enough sensible things to say. Otherwise, keep yourself silent and let someone else start.…
What else can Doctor K. do to meet his obligation to report a communicable disease?…
World War Two, was an age of strife and change and was one of the largest conflicts the world would ever endure. Moreover, the conclusion of this war would see to the fall of great dictatorships and imperialism to the rise of the democratic republic. However, in 1941, a quick and simple conclusion to the war appeared bleak. From: the fall of Poland in 1939, the temporary ceasefire between Germany and the Soviet Union, and the fall of France in 1940, the allied powers were in a state of retreat. Now, with the constant bombing of Great Britain and the threat of Nazi invasion, the allies looked for a superpower to turn the tides of the war (World War II in Europe). The remaining allied power’s eyes fell onto the superpower to the west, the…
The section that had the most impact on me was chapter 3 “The Savage Inequalities of Public Education in New York”. The reason it impacted me the most was for several reasons, but there was a few that stood out the most. The first reason is the comments that were made by the wealthier students with better educations, and from the principles who ran the schools. An example was the principle from Riverdale Elementary school P.S. 24; he stated “I have to ask myself why there should be an elementary school in District 10 with fifteen hundred children. Why should there be an elementary school within a skating rink? Why should the Board of Ed allow this? This is not the way things should be.” I agree, it shouldn’t be like that, every child should have an equal opportunity to learn with the best education no matter what their race or ethnicity is. The fact that we are living in a nation where civil rights were established, and our schools are still segregated is truly upsetting and disturbing. However, the main reasons to why it is segregated are because of money and stereotypes. A comment from a student named Jennifer who attended a wealthy school in Rye, New York really ticked me off when Johnathan Kozol asked “Have we any obligations to poor people?” and she responded by saying “I don’t think the burden is on us, taxing the rich to help the poor we’d be getting…
First, in William Faulkner's "Barn Burning," the main character in the story is a little boy named Colonel Sartoris. In this story, Sarty is faced with the decision of either going along with the views and actions of his morally challenged father or by running away and leaving his family and his pain behind. Sarty gains his freedom when he decides to warn the de Spains because his father's violation of his own sort of morality frees him from what he calls the "pull of blood," or duty to his family (Faulkner 356). Sarty believes he is prepared to defend his father at the trial: "He aims for me to lie, he thought, and I will have to do it," and he fights the boy twice his size who calls out, "Barn burner!"(Faulkner 349). He hopes that the fires will end, thinking, "Maybe he's done satisfied now," but when Abner begins to set ablaze his next barn, Sarty extinguishes the family ties (Faulkner 358). This violation liberates Sarty from the "the old blood which he [has] not been permitted to choose for himself" (Faulkner 356). The "pull of blood" is not strong enough to corrupt Sarty, to make him into what he seems destined to become. His father's offense and his own thoughtfulness lead Sarty to his decision to warn the de Spain's. Sartoris is an example of social anxiety because of the fear that…
When debating on a topic or pacific subject I prefer to debate one on one, but that is not the only way debating is done it is also done in groups and this can be a benefit in some situations and can also be a problem in some cases. When having a group debate it gives you a broad approach with having more than two people opinion, it’s going to be a harder fight, but you will get more than one standpoint on the argument. A group debate also provides diversity amongst the topic, the argument should still be based on facts and proven research but will also be debated different due to different peoples approach. Another benefit that I can see with a group debate may be strength in numbers if the group is one sided on the debate they can outnumber the opponent and win the argument they can also help brain storm and recognize different weaknesses in the opposing argument. This strength in numbers can be both a benefit and a drawback it just depends on what side of the argument you are on. I have never been in a group debate but I have seen a few on T.V. and from what I have seen it is hard to get your thoughts completed before someone is trying to respond to what you just said and when trying to wait for someone to finish their thought you may forget what you wanted to rebuttal or someone else may jump in front of you and now you have more than one comment that you want to respond to. When dealing with groups it’s a lot to process at one time and you have to be on your toes because you have more than one opponent coming at you. There seem to be an equal number of benefits as drawbacks in group debates I also think that the topic is a factor if it is a broad topic then it should be for a group debate and if it is for a narrow topic then it should be one on one.…