Preview

Bargaining Power of Suppliers: Aggregation Of Supply

Good Essays
Open Document
Open Document
1975 Words
Grammar
Grammar
Plagiarism
Plagiarism
Writing
Writing
Score
Score
Bargaining Power of Suppliers: Aggregation Of Supply
BARGAINING POWER OF SUPPLIER
• Bargaining power is the ability to influence the setting of prices.
• The more concentrated and controlled the supply, the more power it wields against the market.
• Monopolistics or quasi-monopolistic suppliers will use their power to extract better terms (higher profit margins or ) at the expense of the market.
• In a truly competitive market, no one supplier can set the prices.
Aggregation of Supply
• Suppliers can group to wield more bargaining power.
• This aggregation can take different shapes.
• Cartels try to influence prices to their own advantage. In most developed countries cartels are illegal.
• Sometimes suppliers have secret collusion agreements that are difficult to prosecute.
• In most developed countries, a watchdog is responsible to protect well functioning markets from excessive supply aggregation.
• Cartels, like monopolists, will prefer higher prices (i.e. higher profit margins) at lower quantity, thus choosing a point on the supply curve that will not supply for all the buyers that would buy at the lower free market price.
Examples
Industries facing powerful suppliers:
• The PC making industry faces the almost monopolistic power of operating system supplier. Microsoft has abused its power a number of times and had to be reined in by competition watchdogs all over the world.
• Industries using diamonds, such as jewelry and electronics, face the huge power of DeBeers, that takes advantage of the supply concentration to achive dominant market share
Industries facing weak suppliers:
• Food processors can buy agricultural produce from many, weak small and medium farmers.
• Retail stores can fill their shelves with many competing products from different producers.
• Airlines face a duopoly of two equally powerful competitors (like Airbus and Boeing in the aviation industry). Although they are both big and powerful, the threat of substitution is enough to keep their power at bay.
BARGAINING POWER OF

You May Also Find These Documents Helpful

  • Good Essays

    * A monopolist faces a downward sloping demand curve and by lowering the quantity he sells, he can charge more…

    • 788 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    Egt1 Task 3 Essay Example

    • 1075 Words
    • 5 Pages

    Because there are few sellers, each oligopolist is likely to be aware of the actions of the others. The decisions of one firm influence and are influenced by the decisions of other firms. Strategic planning by oligopolists needs to take into…

    • 1075 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Satisfactory Essays

    1) Franchise agreements between bottlers (buyers) and concentrate producers locked bottlers into exclusive deals and made switching costs high, compelling bottlers to accept pricing and promotion schema.…

    • 990 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Satisfactory Essays
  • Powerful Essays

    Ap Euro Some Vocabulary

    • 2309 Words
    • 10 Pages

    11. Cartels – a combination of independent commercial enterprises that work together to control prices and limit competition.…

    • 2309 Words
    • 10 Pages
    Powerful Essays
  • Better Essays

    Visy Amcor Cartel

    • 1144 Words
    • 5 Pages

    In the first place, as is argued by (C. Bajada, J. Jackson, R. McIver & E. Wilson 2012), an oligopoly market is similar to monopoly in terms of product inefficiency and allocation inefficiency. If Amcor and Visy set a fixed high price and maintain their market share, there might be limited output. The price will exceed the marginal cost. Consequently, there would not be enough products to satisfy demand; therefore, buyers have to surrender to a high price and the market power is abused according to. As a result of collusion, clients in business with Amcor and Visy are over charged, causing loss to a large number of companies, and eventually, customers are charged at a higher price than they would have paid in a competitive market. Secondly, since the two major companies raise the price, other firms in the same industry may also choose to do so. Some of the new enters may expand market share, as…

    • 1144 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Better Essays
  • Good Essays

    Economics Study Guide

    • 389 Words
    • 2 Pages

    Members in Cartel want to restrict the quantity of output. But every individual firm wants to produce little more units of output to gain larger profits. Sooner or later, the fixed quantity of output will be breakup, the Cartel rules will be breakup.…

    • 389 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Powerful Essays

    These kind of firms require high resource investments, patents, regulations, have established distribution and supply networks, have adopted advanced technology and they enjoy economies of scale. A monopoly condition typically permits the firm to determine a monopoly price that is above what would be found in competitive situations. In these circumstances, the seller set a price to reap maximum profits under the assumption that there is no worry about competition (Stiglitz, 1973). Examples of monopolies include Google, Microsoft, and DeBeers. Oligopolies include health insurers, wireless carriers, and oil marketers. These elements can be used by the monopolies and oligopolies to bar entrants in the market. In addition, these market players are capable of agreeing to set similar prices since they are few in the market and their products mostly do not have near substitutes. Examples are in the oils markets and the airline industries where the few players control the larger market share and tend to have similar services with close prices. Oil marketers have been alleged to collude in fixing prices. OPEC members are also known to exhibit tendencies of oligopolistic…

    • 1295 Words
    • 6 Pages
    Powerful Essays
  • Good Essays

    They are considered price takers and it has a downward sloping demand curve, the market demand cure and is free to choose its price and quantity according to market demand. In a perfectly competitive market, there is a market price. Market revenue is equal to price in the market, every additional unit that is sold brings the market price. Monopolies are still profit maximizing firms and are going to satisfy profit maximizing condition that marginal cost + marginal revenue. Antitrust laws are put into place to promote competition and benefits consumers with lower prices, higher quality products and services, as well as more of a choice.…

    • 592 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    Antitrust behaviors tend to create a barrier to market entry and hence creating a natural monopoly or oligopoly. The firms in the oligopoly are then able to undertake price fixing whenever they want and increase their economic profits (Macgregor, 2012). Monopoly pricing is quite significant in antitrust activities, where the price curve is slopped upwards while trying to maintain or increase the demand curve. The firms were investigated for antitrust behaviors under the Sherman Act which is aimed at preserving unfettered and free competition in any trade activity. The antitrust laws under the Sherman Act proscribes any unlawful business and mergers practices in any industry where the act leave it upon the court to make the decision on which mergers or businesses are legal or illegal all based on the current facts (Macgregor,…

    • 691 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    In a competitive market there are many firms that supply the same product, such as local gas stations. Mankiw (2007) stated, “You may recall that a market is competitive if each buyer and seller is small compared to the size of the market and, therefore, has little ability to influence market prices” (p. 289). A firm has market power when it is capable of influencing the market price. In a competitive market, the market determines the price the sellers will charge. Mankiw (2007) stated, “In particular, if firms are competitive and profit maximizing, the price of a good equals the marginal cost of making that good” (p. 306). If the seller charges less than the market price, they may sell more. If they raise the cost, they risk losing customers. The output in a competitive market is determined by what will make them have the largest profit. Firms figure this out be comparing the marginal revenue and marginal cost of each unit they produce. When marginal revenue is greater than the marginal cost, the output should be increased so the firm can make a larger profit. They should produce less when the marginal revenue is less than the marginal cost because they will not be making a profit at all. In a competitive market, there is a free entry and exit in the market. The only thing that would keep a firm from entering the market in a competitive firm is if the decision is not profitable to them. The firm will know the decision to enter is profitable if the average total cost of producing the good is less than the price of the good. Mankiw (2007) stated, “In this long-run equilibrium, all firms produce at the efficient scale, price equals the minimum of average total cost, and the number of firms…

    • 1081 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Satisfactory Essays

    Paper

    • 343 Words
    • 2 Pages

    Oligopolists sometimes engage in price competition when other attempts to gain market share fail. The result is lower prices, increased output, and smaller profits. Since price competition is typically self-defeating in an oligopoly, rival firms usually attempt to differentiate their product to gain market share.…

    • 343 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Satisfactory Essays
  • Satisfactory Essays

    Buyer Power: In the metal can industry there are many producers of metal cans, however, they suffer from low product differentiation. There are few product options available to the multiple buyers, which increases buyer power. In addition, the producers provide cans to only a few large-sized buyers, which have a total market power of $12.2 billion. The 10 largest buyers represent approximately 30% of the market, making the large scale buyers highly coveted by the producers. Further, buyers can purchase cans from any producer with low producer switching cost and can have relationships with multiple producers. This enables the buyers to control prices very efficiently and respond to poor producer customer service quickly. Additionally, buyers are not the end users and, therefore, have the incentive to control prices more. Finally, buyers have the ability to backwards integrate and produce their own cans, which puts additional pressure on the producers to push costs below the industry entry costs for the buyers. Overall, buyer power is very high.…

    • 668 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Satisfactory Essays
  • Satisfactory Essays

    * Bargaining Power of Buyers: Because of monopoly business and limited resources there is little bargaining power of buyers and the cost of substitute products is very high. There is little…

    • 373 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Satisfactory Essays
  • Good Essays

    The increasing powers of the distributors and retailers, who can choose to sell only products that gives them maximum profit.…

    • 368 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    Cartel is sustainable if prices are widely known, so no one firm is willing to step over the boundary. A cartel can inspect each other by agreeing to see each other's books, and exchange information. But sometimes, books can be faked by government help in some cases.…

    • 780 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Good Essays