Preview

Bargain In The Film Plea Not Guilty

Good Essays
Open Document
Open Document
343 Words
Grammar
Grammar
Plagiarism
Plagiarism
Writing
Writing
Score
Score
Bargain In The Film Plea Not Guilty
When Kaffee says his defendants’ plea not guilty, this throws off the prosecutor’s initial plea bargain he had agreed on with Kaffee. This again relates to class because we discussed how lawyers sometimes meet to agree on a plea bargain in casual settings before they meet in court. This also relates to how we learned the roles of a prosecutor in class for giving a plea bargain.
Later in the movie, the case is in a district court. This had a lot of components of what we learned in class including, judges, bailiffs, the court reporter, and witnesses. As we learned in class, the judge is given the highest honor in the room. In the movie he was given the hammer, placed in the highest point of the room, and even said he should be addressed as “judge” or “your honor”. The bailiff on many occasions addresses the courtroom and says, “All rise” just as we learned as well. On another occasion, Kaffee asks the courtroom reporter to read back Colonel Jessup’s statement, because they must write down everything said at trial. This was all taught when we learned about the courtroom workers.
…show more content…
There can be lay, and expert witnesses. In the movie, they used the doctor as the expert witness. They were not allowed to question the expert to much extent because the “expert” opinion is not speculation. There were also other lay witnesses who were used in the trial to help confirm the flights that had gone in and out of Guantanamo Bay.
This movie was a very good representation of what we learned from the structure of the American courts because it made visualizing the process of the court systems easy for me to understand more clearly through watching the movie. I also think this assignment made me think more in depth, and research a little about the process of trial, so that gave me a better understanding as

You May Also Find These Documents Helpful

  • Good Essays

    When a justice system replaces jury trials with plea negotiations it contradicts the fair rules of evidence in front of a judge or a jury. Plea negotiations are very different from the formal process. Criminals end up of facing sentences that are lighter while victims are left unsatisfied. Plea Bargaining is very private which can affect the outcome and will not benefit the everybody. While the bargain might help that receive less severe penalties than a conviction at trial, the bargain may still leave you with a criminal record that can have a huge affect in the future. For example, in Erma Stewart’s case after she chose to plea guilty her entire life changed. As she explained she could not afford to pay her probation fines due to the fact…

    • 354 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    What caught my attention to this play was that the two authors were passionate about this theme for the play and obviously researched the history of the actual trial, in order to portray it as realistically as possible. This hard work and attention to detail created a very informative and memorable play. (Although some…

    • 1066 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    Cole, Plea-bargaining is negotiating a settlement between the prosecutor and the defense attorney, that would exchange a guilty plea for a lighter sentence.. Generally if the prosecutor is willing to lower the sentence, the defense will accept and plea guilty to the crime he or she was accused of. Roughly thirty-five years ago, plea-bargaining was not discussed outside of the courtroom. It was a “secret” of the court and done behind closed doors. Now, people know what plea-bargaining is, and is now a very controversial subject in society. There are positives and negative aspects of plea-bargaining in the case of Councilman…

    • 932 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Better Essays

    The concept of plea bargaining became a common means to resolve criminal cases in the early 1900s because not everyone that was accused of a crime had a lawyer to represent them in a trial. As the criminal justice system evolved, and there were more and more cases to prosecute, plea-bargaining was used more often so that all parties would have a faster resolution to the case, as opposed to going through a lengthy trial. The definition of plea bargaining is “the process whereby the accused and the prosecutor in a criminal case work out a mutually satisfactory disposition of the case subject to court approval [that] usually involves the defendant’s pleading guilty to a lesser offense or to only some of the counts of a multicounty indictment in return for a lighter sentence than the possible for the graver charge.” (Siegel, Schmalleger, & Worrall, 2011, Chapter 12, Plea Bargaining and Guilty Pleas).…

    • 1298 Words
    • 6 Pages
    Better Essays
  • Satisfactory Essays

    Plea Bargain

    • 857 Words
    • 3 Pages

    Brief: Respondent was arrested and charged with possession of methamphetamine with the intent to distribute, in violation of 84 Stat. 1260. On October 17, 1991, respondent and his attorney asked to meet with the prosecutor to discuss the possibility of cooperating with the Government. At the beginning of the meeting, the prosecutor informed respondent that he had no obligation to talk, but that if he wanted to cooperate, he would have to be completely truthful. As a condition of proceeding with the discussion, the prosecutor indicated that the respondent would have to agree that any statements he made could be used to impeach any contradictory testimony he might give at trial if it went that far. Respondent conversed with his counsel and agreed to proceed under the prosecutor’s conditions. The respondent admitted to knowing that the package he attempted to sell to the undercover cop did contain methamphetamine. Respondent claimed that he did not know Shuster was manufacturing methamphetamine at his residence and later confessed that he did know of Shuster manufacturing methamphetamine in his residence. Respondent minimized his role in Shuster’s methamphetamine operation by claiming that he had not visited Shuster’s residence for at least a week before his arrest. The government showed the respondent surveillance evidence showing that his car was at Shuster’s residence the day before the arrest. The meeting ended on the basis that the respondent failed to provide completely truthful information. Respondent was tried on the methamphetamine charges and took the stand at his own defense. He maintained that he was not involved in the methamphetamine trafficking and he had thought Shuster was using his home laboratory to make plastic explosives for the CIA. He denied knowing that the package he delivered to the…

    • 857 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Satisfactory Essays
  • Satisfactory Essays

    Plea bargaining is an essential tool used in the criminal justice system today.The process of plea bargaining usually begins before trial, and can involve a phone call between the prosecutor and the defense (Phelps & Cengage, 2006). Once the plea bargain is negotiated it would have to be approved by a judge in open court (Phelps & Cengage, 2006)With the amount of court proceedings that take place plea bargaining is a tool that can allow less cases on a judge’s…

    • 81 Words
    • 1 Page
    Satisfactory Essays
  • Satisfactory Essays

    Cjus 200 Ref. Paper 3

    • 304 Words
    • 2 Pages

    Plea bargaining, also known as plea negotiation, is the most commonly used practice in the criminal justice process in which defendants are allowed to plead guilty to a lesser charge or charges (Inciardi, 2010). Involved in this process are the prosecutor and the defense, along with the person accused of committing some sort of criminal activity. According to Inciardi (2010), “It is believed that more than 90 percent of criminal convictions result from negotiated pleas of guilty” (Pg. 302).…

    • 304 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Satisfactory Essays
  • Powerful Essays

    Courts Real vs Fiction

    • 1613 Words
    • 7 Pages

    This same belief extends to Americans’ knowledge about the law and the judicial system of the nation. There are many things that fictional accounts of lawyers, judges, and courts confuse or create simply to meet the needs of the fiction or make a specific point. Because the intricacies of the legal profession are not well known or explained in school or by the media, unfortunately, people often only have fictional accounts of the law to educate them. The result, unfortunately, is that the majority of Americans have incorrect beliefs of the law, judges, courts, and the persons that interact with them. One of the main differences between fictional portrayals of the court process and real court processes is how the trial is portrayed. In reality, trials are long, boring procedures where attorneys debate, present evidence, and ask questions that have legal value for the judge or jury to arrive at a decision (CA). Many things are said and many witnesses may be brought in to make statements (CA). Only rarely in that process will anything exciting happen. If one were to believe the portrayal of the trial sequence, however, seems as if every minute is interesting or exciting. Trials presented in movies such as My Cousin Vinny or To Kill a Mockingbird, although one is a comedy and one a drama, represent trials as a place where shocking facts are discovered and quick thinking attorneys make major differences in trial outcomes.…

    • 1613 Words
    • 7 Pages
    Powerful Essays
  • Good Essays

    Whether or not it is possible to entirely eliminate plea bargaining in all its forms and varieties, I am not persuaded that it is desirable to do so. But I am no friend of plea bargaining in the unrestrained forms of it that are evident in the United States. In a nutshell, the normative position I shall advance is this: individuals charged with crimes who are willing to confess or plead guilty should be granted modest and fixed sentence discounts in exchange for doing so. Charge bargaining, and that which often accompanies and enables it, strategic overcharging, should be strongly discouraged. Trial penalties, that is, additional increments of punishment assigned to individuals who exercise their right to trial, should be prohibited. However,…

    • 212 Words
    • 1 Page
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    As Nataskie stated above, there is a place and a need for plea bargaining in our criminal justice system. Although it is true that plea bargaining gives a guilty person the opportunity to admit to their crime and accept the punishment for it, they are likely more motivated by the fact that plea bargaining involves the perpetrator receiving a reduced sentence of some sort. Another reason for continuing with plea bargaining, as a tool in the criminal justice system, is because often it affords the prosecutor the means necessary to get a lesser criminal to testify against a more significant criminal who otherwise might go free. Plea bargaining should maintain an active role in all justice systems regardless of whether they are local, state,…

    • 127 Words
    • 1 Page
    Good Essays
  • Satisfactory Essays

    Courtroom Workgroups

    • 265 Words
    • 2 Pages

    In conclusion, I feel I have explained the basic elements and operations of a sociocultural system known as a courtroom workgroup. I have also learned why there is not very many trials, and when there is one, why it is such a big…

    • 265 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Satisfactory Essays
  • Better Essays

    Plea Bargaining Cases

    • 1514 Words
    • 7 Pages

    Plea bargaining is the process by which an agreement between the prosecutor and the defendant where the defendant pleads guilty to a lesser charge in the expectation of leniency. On February 7th, 1881 the first plea bargain was used in a trial by Albert McKenzie in the state of California (“Plea bargaining gains favor in American courts”). After the first use of a plea bargain in a 30 year span in Alameda County, “nearly 10 percent of defendants changed their “not guilty” pleas to “guilty of lesser charge” or plead guilty to reduced charges (“Plea bargaining gains favor in American courts”).” Soon plea bargaining spread throughout the entire United States becoming popular for most defendants. Alschuler (1979) found that over…

    • 1514 Words
    • 7 Pages
    Better Essays
  • Good Essays

    I agree with you. Some crimes can be handled differently depending how the offense is classified “Many states encourage diversion programs that remove less serious criminal matters from the full” (How Courts Work, n.d., para. 4) Plea bargaining can be accepted for reasons like, defendants avoiding the time in court. Also, the prosecutor can dedicate time to other cases. A valid approach is the agreement of both part on the case “obviously both sides have to agree before one comes to pass”. (How Courts Work, n.d., para. 2) As you mention, that should not be applied in the major…

    • 100 Words
    • 1 Page
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    Professionals in the criminal justice field have the discretion to make many ethical choices throughout their careers. These choices are so significant that their outcomes can determine the futures of those involved. An ethical choice that prosecutors have to make daily, revolves around plea bargaining. Plea bargains are negotiations for contracts between the prosecution and the defense in an attempt to get them to plead guilty ("Plea Bargain.”). The prosecutor offers to reduce the severity or the length of the defendant’s punishment in exchange for the defense’s agreement to plead guilty ("Plea Bargain."). Sometimes plea deals even require the defendant to testify against someone else, so that they can be convicted of a crime ("Plea Bargain.").…

    • 1813 Words
    • 8 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    Plea bargaining is being scrutinized and criticized for a variety of reasons. Many believe that plea bargaining is fair as it gives a possible offender the ability to negotiate a less severe sentence. If the offender is in fact innocent all he has to do is go trial and show it to the jury and he will be free to go. However many people are saying that plea bargaining has contributed to imprisoning of innocents and it is an unfair practice as a result. Though that may seem ludicrous because it would seem that innocent people would not willingly imprison themselves, data shows otherwise. These reasons are why plea bargaining has a negative impact and should be changed.…

    • 672 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays

Related Topics